Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I think you're worried about the wrong free speech threat.
Yes, he wanted to.
From your link:
Quote:
President Trump promised Wednesday to "take a strong look" at the country's libel laws, saying they are a "sham and a disgrace and do not represent American values and American fairness."
Trump made his comments at the beginning of a Cabinet meeting.
"You can't say things that are false, knowingly false, and be able to smile as money pours into your bank account," said Trump
The quote above was followed by another example of the press saying something they knew was false, so that more money would pour into their bank account.
In other words, the article is a prime example of why the libel laws need to be changed.
We need more solid media sources like Breitbart, not 3rd rate sources like NYT.
Despite my knowing that you are not being forthright, I will agree with your statement.
(Although I would prefer more like Newsmax, NY Post, and Heritage.)
Quote:
Originally Posted by BobNJ1960
Don't get mad at liberal media. Enjoy their demise. Daily News staff do not even have an office.
...
Real newsmen do not need an office. They need something like a Jeep (Wrangler), so their "office" can go to where the news is.
Always has been. The difference is, until the 60's, they were rich people who put America first, from then until around Y2K, they became rich "Globalists," who had a disdain for everything that made America great. (BTW, it isn't the corporations that are the problem, it is the executives that run them, and the fact that we don't realize "corporation" is just another word for a government of-by-and-for the shareholders.)
Despite my knowing that you are not being forthright, I will agree with your statement.
(Although I would prefer more like Newsmax, NY Post, and Heritage.)
Real newsmen do not need an office. They need something like a Jeep (Wrangler), so their "office" can go to where the news is.
Always has been. The difference is, until the 60's, they were rich people who put America first, from then until around Y2K, they became rich "Globalists," who had a disdain for everything that made America great. (BTW, it isn't the corporations that are the problem, it is the executives that run them, and the fact that we don't realize "corporation" is just another word for a government of-by-and-for the shareholders.)
They put themselves first. Always did.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
