Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I have a property for lease listed for $1825/month. In my requirements, I indicate that minimum verifiable annual household income to qualify is $70K.
Utilities are not included, so the tenant must pay for water and electricity. In addition, most of my tenants over the past 15 years have had car payments.
A few people have messaged me to question the income requirement, stating the “norm” income requirement is 2.5x rent.
Do you think my requirement of $70K household income is unreasonable?
If you find a tenant who qualifies under your criteria, then it is not unreasonable. It shouldn't matter what other people have for criteria or what the "norm" is. By having tighter requirements you are simply protecting yourself more than most people are. I would do the same.
I require that the monthly TAKE HOME be three times the rent.
I know landlords who require 2 1/2 times the rent and I know landlords who require 4 times the rent. It is up to the individual landlord to decide what to charge.
The same for deposits. Sometimes it is one month, sometimes it is two months, sometimes there are extra deposits for pets, or for bad credit, or lack of time on the job. Each landlord sets his own criteria (with some state law restrictions).
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.