Ae Projcomp School in Orlando, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 35.

7510 LAUREL HILL OAKS CIR
Orlando, FL 32818

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Oviedo High School (17.4 miles):

83
Lake Brantley High School (8.3 miles):

67
Lyman High School (11.5 miles):

56
Rosenwald Center School (10.3 miles):

46
Ae Projcomp School:

35
Ocoee High School (4.9 miles):

32
Orlando Marine Institute #1 School (5.8 miles):

16
Excel High School (4.2 miles):

6
Ae Projcomp School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Orange County:

44
Orlando:

42
Ae Projcomp School:

35

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (407) 235-1500 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 48
School number: 113
School type: Senior High
District Name: ORANGE
Grade range: GRADES 9 TO 12
School's status regarding neglected and delinquent criteria: Delinquent, Non-residential
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (407) 851-8190
Principal: Jack Green

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

56%
State average from 451 schools:

62%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

55%
State average from 451 schools:

77%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

90%
State average from 452 schools:

86%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

37%
State average from 451 schools:

48%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

57%
State average from 452 schools:

58%
Making Math Gains
Here:

62%
State average from 449 schools:

72%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

65%
State average from 452 schools:

52%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
AE PROJCOMP:

61%
State average from 452 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
AE PROJCOMP:

483
State average from 452 schools:

522
Percent Tested
Here:

98%
State average from 450 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: C

Grade in 2009: B

Grade in 2008: B

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 119999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

75%
State average from 454 schools:

50%
Minority Rate
Here:

29%
State average from 454 schools:

47%
Region: 2

Title I: YES


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 517 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 517 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 156
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
AE PROJCOMP:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 484
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 471

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 484
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 471
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 364 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 364 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 114
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 346
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 335

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 346
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 335
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 57 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 57 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 55
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 54
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 55
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 54
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 73 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 73 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 65
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 64
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 65
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 64
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 386 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 386 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 115
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 356
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 348

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 356
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 348
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 97 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 97 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 29

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

32%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 93
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 89

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

27%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 93
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 89
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

63%
State average from 443 schools:

60%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

62%
State average from 440 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

96%
State average from 443 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

38%
State average from 443 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

62%
State average from 441 schools:

59%
Making Math Gains
AE PROJCOMP:

64%
State average from 442 schools:

72%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

59%
State average from 442 schools:

56%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

60%
State average from 441 schools:

66%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

504
State average from 441 schools:

522
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 448 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: B

Grade in 2008: B

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

73%
State average from 446 schools:

46%
Minority Rate
Here:

29%
State average from 451 schools:

45%
Region: 2


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 519 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 518 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 159
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 488
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 470

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 485
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 467
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 368 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 368 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 119
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
AE PROJCOMP:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 353
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 340

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 351
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 336
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 69 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 68 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 66
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 65
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 65
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 65
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 65 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 65 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 56
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 52
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 56
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 53
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 376 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 376 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 113
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 348
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 332

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
AE PROJCOMP:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 346
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 331
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 97 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 95 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 25

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

27%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 90
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 84

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

23%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 88
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 84
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
AE PROJCOMP:

57%
State average from 425 schools:

61%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

57%
State average from 425 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
AE PROJCOMP:

94%
State average from 425 schools:

82%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

40%
State average from 425 schools:

45%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

59%
State average from 425 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
Here:

68%
State average from 425 schools:

74%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

58%
State average from 425 schools:

55%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

67%
State average from 425 schools:

71%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

500
State average from 425 schools:

526
Percent Tested
Here:

98%
State average from 425 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: B

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

71%
State average from 425 schools:

42%
Minority Rate
Here:

26%
State average from 425 schools:

44%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 521 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 522 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 166
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
AE PROJCOMP:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 492
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 468

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 492
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 470
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 387 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 389 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 127
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 365
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 347

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 363
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 346
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 46 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 46 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 44
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 43
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 44
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 70 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 70 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 66
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 61
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 67
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 63
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 366 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 366 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 117
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

41%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 343
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 324

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
AE PROJCOMP:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 344
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 327
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 84 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 86 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 31
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

16%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 82
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 75

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

15%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 82
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 77
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1352
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

281
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

41%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

35%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

18%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
AE PROJCOMP:

6%
State average:

29%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

24%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

15
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1394
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

264
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

39%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

17%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

44%
State average:

33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

44%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

11
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

9
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
AE PROJCOMP:

1
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1613
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

294
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
AE PROJCOMP:

27%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
AE PROJCOMP:

23%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

27%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

18%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

5%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

49%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

12
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
AE PROJCOMP:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1789
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

16%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

19%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

41%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

20%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

65%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
AE PROJCOMP:

16
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1805
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

293
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

25%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

39%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

28%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

8%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

36%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

14
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

5
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1894
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
AE PROJCOMP:

307
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

26%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
AE PROJCOMP:

35%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

26%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

10%
State average:

12%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

40%
State average:

45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

11
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1876
State average:

1938
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

291
State average:

302
Percent Passing
AE PROJCOMP:

47%
State average:

56%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

41%
State average:

35%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

37%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
AE PROJCOMP:

12%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

4%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

5%
State average:

12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

21%
State average:

37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
AE PROJCOMP:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
AE PROJCOMP:

14
State average:

15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
AE PROJCOMP:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

293
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

33%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

50%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

17%
State average:

36%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

17%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

8
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

6
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

294
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

29%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

41%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

24%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

5%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
AE PROJCOMP:

1%
State average:

2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

30%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

8
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
AE PROJCOMP:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

292
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

31%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

45%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

22%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

1%
State average:

5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
AE PROJCOMP:

24%
State average:

36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1374
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

281
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

25%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

40%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

35%
State average:

36%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

35%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

2
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1561
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

310
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
AE PROJCOMP:

22%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

50%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

11%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
AE PROJCOMP:

17%
State average:

28%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

28%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1626
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

299
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

32%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

25%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

28%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

13%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

2%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

43%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
AE PROJCOMP:

6
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1769
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

301
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

23%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

28%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

31%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
AE PROJCOMP:

15%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

49%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1854
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
AE PROJCOMP:

310
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

16%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

28%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

40%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

12%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

55%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1895
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

294
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

20%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

27%
State average:

22%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

16%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

53%
State average:

61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1978
State average:

1995
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

322
State average:

326
Percent Passing
AE PROJCOMP:

79%
State average:

80%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

12%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

23%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

34%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

27%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 5
AE PROJCOMP:

4%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

65%
State average:

69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
AE PROJCOMP:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
AE PROJCOMP:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1402
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

289
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 06%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 04
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 08
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 02

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1378
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

262
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1608
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

293
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1748
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

306
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1853
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
AE PROJCOMP:

303
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

276
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 11%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

291
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1303
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

265
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 22%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1504
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

298
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 63%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 21%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1614
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

296
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1774
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

302
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1853
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

310
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 18
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

3
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 22%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 39%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 174
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Unscore - Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 30%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 9%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 89%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1187
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

252
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 59%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1208
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

231
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 71%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 14%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1595
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

290
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1777
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

311
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1809
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

294
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1746
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

280
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

256
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 64%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 7%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

296
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1300
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

264
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 19%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1451
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
AE PROJCOMP:

287
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 14%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1612
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

296
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1767
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
AE PROJCOMP:

301
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1857
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

311
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1796
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

265
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
AE PROJCOMP:

4
State average:

103

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

16
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
Here:

616
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
Here:

37
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
AE PROJCOMP:

11
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
AE PROJCOMP:

11
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
AE PROJCOMP:

14
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
Here:

636
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
Here:

43
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

11
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

5
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
AE PROJCOMP:

171
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
Here:

657
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
Here:

50
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
AE PROJCOMP:

12
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
AE PROJCOMP:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

163
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
AE PROJCOMP:

679
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
AE PROJCOMP:

65
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
AE PROJCOMP:

12
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
AE PROJCOMP:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

170
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
Here:

675
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
Here:

52
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

14
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
AE PROJCOMP:

672
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
Here:

40
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
AE PROJCOMP:

9
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
AE PROJCOMP:

4
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
AE PROJCOMP:

7
State average:

237

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 17
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

217
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 71%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 12%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 8
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 6%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 29%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 177
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

280
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 37%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 30%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 7%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 86%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 11
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

216
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 64%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 36%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 7
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 45%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 27%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 27%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1704
State average from 612 schools:

1849
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

272
State average:

298
% in each Achievement Level 1: 73%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 9%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 9: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 73%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1671
State average:

1837
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1605
State average:

1779
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 66

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1717
State average from 613 schools:

1884
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

241
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 9%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 11: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 10: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 8: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 73%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1675
State average:

1869
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1754
State average:

1821
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: -79

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 1

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 1

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 4
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 8
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Orlando, FL
  5. Ae Projcomp School in Orlando, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.