Phone: (850) 453-1910 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 17
School number: 2019
School type: Senior High
District Name: ESCAMBIA
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 12
School's status regarding neglected and delinquent criteria: Delinquent, Non-residential
Principal: Bernard Williams
The function/setting of the school: Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ)
The main educational program offered at the school: Alternative Education
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 1
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 2
Senate District: 2
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 44 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 44 (95%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 9% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 8% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 31 (93%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 32 (93%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 31 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 31 (95%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 55 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 53 (96%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 17% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 39 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 38 (95%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 41 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 40 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 42 (93%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 41 (93%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 19% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 31% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 29 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28 (93%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 34 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 33 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 52 (89%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 48 (85%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 15
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 14% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 14
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 20
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 30 (83%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 27 (75%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 29 (90%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28 (88%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
- All Cities
- Florida forum
- Florida
- Pensacola, FL
- Amikids School in Pensacola, Florida (FL)
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: