Booker Middle School in Sarasota, Florida (FL) - Test Results, Rating, Ranking, Grades, Scores, Classes, Enrollment, Teachers, Students, and Report Card

City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 13.

2250 MYRTLE ST
Sarasota, FL 34234

Show street view No street view available for this location

Other nearby schools ratings:

Coastal Behavioral Healthcare Residential Treatment Center School (2.3 miles):	92
Phoenix Academy School (2.9 miles):	72
Braden River Middle School (6.9 miles):	57
Mcintosh Middle School (3.6 miles):	47
Manatee For The Arts School (10.5 miles):	36
Cyesis School (5.4 miles):	27
Booker Middle School:	13
Buffalo Creek Middle School (14.5 miles):	2
Oak Park School (8.8 miles):	0

Booker Middle School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:

Florida:	45
Sarasota County:	48
Sarasota:	43
Booker Middle School:	13

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum

Phone: (941) 359-5824 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 58
School number: 84
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: SARASOTA
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 8
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (941) 359-5898
Magnet Program.
Principal: Joseph Bazenas
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 13
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 55
Senate District: 21
School Web Address: www.sarasota.k12.fl.us/bms

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	61%
State average from 613 schools:	71%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	61%
State average from 612 schools:	73%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	82%
State average from 613 schools:	88%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	31%
State average from 612 schools:	51%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	60%
State average from 613 schools:	64%

Making Math Gains

Here:	67%
State average from 612 schools:	70%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

BOOKER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	53%
State average from 613 schools:	62%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	65%
State average from 613 schools:	68%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	480
State average from 613 schools:	545

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 613 schools:	100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: C

Grade in 2009: C

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 119999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	82%
State average from 614 schools:	56%

Minority Rate

Here:	75%
State average from 614 schools:	49%

Region: 4

Title I: YES

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 858 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 858 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	94%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 248
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	54%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 802
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 775

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	53%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 800
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 772
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 213 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 213 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 60
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	75%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 202
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 186

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	75%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 202
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 186
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 290 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 290 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	91%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 85
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	38%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 273
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 268

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	34%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 272
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 266
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 274 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 274 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 83
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	50%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 251
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 246

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	53%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 250
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 245
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 703 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 703 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	94%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 206
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	47%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 655
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 632

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	47%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 654
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 630
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 118 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 118 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	37%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 103
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 101

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	45%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 103
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 101
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 178 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 178 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	86%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 59
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	28%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 171
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 166

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	26%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 170
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 164
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	58%
State average from 613 schools:	70%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	54%
State average from 613 schools:	71%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	82%
State average from 613 schools:	92%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	26%
State average from 613 schools:	49%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	62%
State average from 613 schools:	66%

Making Math Gains

Here:	61%
State average from 613 schools:	69%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

BOOKER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	69%
State average from 613 schools:	68%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	62%
State average from 613 schools:	67%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	474
State average from 613 schools:	553

Percent Tested

Here:	99%
State average from 613 schools:	100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: C

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	79%
State average from 613 schools:	52%

Minority Rate

Here:	75%
State average from 613 schools:	48%

Region: 4

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 846 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 846 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	91%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 216
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	51%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 789
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 764

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	46%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 791
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 767
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 215 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 215 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 58
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	79%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 202
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 193

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	72%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 202
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 194
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 304 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 304 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 82
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	36%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 287
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 279

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	31%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 288
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 281
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 258 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 258 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	85%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 60
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	46%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 239
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 233

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	41%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 240
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 234
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 665 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 665 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	89%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 171
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	45%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 622
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 604

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	40%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 623
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 606
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 99 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 99 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 85
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 83
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 86
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 84
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 183 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 183 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	85%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 46
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	29%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 171
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 169

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	22%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 172
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 170
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	60%
State average from 603 schools:	69%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	52%
State average from 603 schools:	70%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	94%
State average from 603 schools:	88%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	33%
State average from 602 schools:	46%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	60%
State average from 602 schools:	65%

Making Math Gains

Here:	61%
State average from 602 schools:	71%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	65%
State average from 602 schools:	64%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

BOOKER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	57%
State average from 602 schools:	69%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	482
State average from 602 schools:	543

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 604 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	73%
State average from 605 schools:	49%

Minority Rate

Here:	74%
State average from 605 schools:	48%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 855 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 858 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 224
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	50%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 804
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 768

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

BOOKER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	43%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 806
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 771
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 225 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 225 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 69
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	69%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 216
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 204

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	60%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 217
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 205
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 319 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 322 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 84
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	40%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 295
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 288

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	33%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 297
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 288
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 256 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 256 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	87%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 60
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	48%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 242
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 231

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	40%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 241
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 230
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 621 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 624 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 149
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	42%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 578
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 551

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	35%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 580
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 554
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 110 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 110 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 98
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 87
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 97
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 86
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 197 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 198 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	88%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 40
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	24%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 191
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 188

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	16%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 191
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 187
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	50%
State average from 539 schools:	64%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	50%
State average from 539 schools:	64%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	88%
State average from 539 schools:	91%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	27%
State average from 538 schools:	44%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	56%
State average from 539 schools:	61%

Making Math Gains

Here:	59%
State average from 539 schools:	69%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	70%
State average from 539 schools:	64%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	64%
State average from 539 schools:	67%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns

Here:	464
State average from 539 schools:	523

Percent Tested

Here:	99%
State average from 539 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

BOOKER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	70%
State average from 541 schools:	49%

Minority Rate

BOOKER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	71%
State average from 542 schools:	53%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 906 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 907 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	92%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 319
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	42%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 845
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	41%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 845
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 259 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 259 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

BOOKER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	96%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 84
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	60%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 242
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	59%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 242
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 324 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 324 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	89%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 108
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	31%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 303
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	30%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 303
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 272 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 273 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

BOOKER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	88%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 103
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	33%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 251
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

BOOKER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	33%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 251
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 638 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 639 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	91%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 218
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	33%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 594
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	33%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 594
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 116 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 116 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	79%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 42
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	17%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 108
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	17%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 108
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 202 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 203 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	77%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 69
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	19%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 191
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	17%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 192
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	52%
State average from 526 schools:	64%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	50%
State average from 526 schools:	63%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	79%
State average from 526 schools:	89%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	72%
State average from 526 schools:	66%

Making Math Gains

Here:	71%
State average from 526 schools:	71%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	82%
State average from 526 schools:	72%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns

Here:	406
State average from 526 schools:	425

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 526 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	61%
State average from 525 schools:	50%

Minority Rate

Here:	71%
State average from 526 schools:	52%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 998 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 998 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	88%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 334
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	45%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 942
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	43%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 942
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 293 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 293 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	94%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 116

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	67%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 275
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	67%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 275
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 357 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 357 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	86%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 114

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	33%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 337
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	28%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 337
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 291 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 291 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	83%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 92

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	34%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 277
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

BOOKER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	36%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 277
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 604 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 604 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	84%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 187

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	36%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 568
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	33%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 568
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 127 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 127 (98%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	81%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 31

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	18%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 115
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	25%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 115
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 191 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 191 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

BOOKER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	63%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 63

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

BOOKER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	20%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 181
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	17%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 181
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	45%
State average from 505 schools:	59%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	42%
State average from 505 schools:	60%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	78%
State average from 506 schools:	83%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	60%
State average from 505 schools:	61%

Making Math Gains

Here:	59%
State average from 505 schools:	69%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	74%
State average from 505 schools:	66%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns

Here:	358
State average from 506 schools:	397

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 506 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	70%
State average from 506 schools:	51%

Minority Rate

Here:	66%
State average from 506 schools:	50%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1455
State average:	1402

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	326
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	11%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	8%
State average:	11%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	37%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	34%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	11%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	82%
State average:	74%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

BOOKER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	18
State average:	17

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1650
State average:	1604

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	331
State average:	324

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	11%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	13%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	28%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	39%
State average:	29%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	9%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	76%
State average:	72%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	20
State average:	19

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	9
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

BOOKER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	2
State average:	2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1706
State average:	1659

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	320
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	11%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	10%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	34%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

BOOKER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	37%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 5

BOOKER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	8%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	79%
State average:	70%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	4
State average:	3

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	16
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	11
State average:	10

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	2
State average:	2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1663
State average:	1716

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	303
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

BOOKER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	24%
State average:	19%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	19%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	28%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	22%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	7%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	57%
State average:	65%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	13
State average:	14

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	3
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1761
State average:	1810

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	308
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	21%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	22%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	31%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	20%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	7%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	57%
State average:	65%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	16
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	3
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1824
State average:	1876

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	297
State average:	308

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	24%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	35%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 3

BOOKER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	28%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	11%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	1%
State average:	3%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	40%
State average:	52%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	4
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	15
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	6
State average:	6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1677
State average:	1922

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	267
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	62%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	22%
State average:	30%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	10%
State average:	26%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	5%
State average:	12%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	2%
State average:	7%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	17%
State average:	45%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

BOOKER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	4
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	8
State average:	11

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	4
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	5
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1617
State average:	1938

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	243
State average:	302

Percent Passing

BOOKER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	12%
State average:	56%

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	81%
State average:	35%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	13%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	4%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	1%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	1%
State average:	12%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	6%
State average:	37%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

BOOKER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	11
State average:	15

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

BOOKER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	5
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	5
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	327
State average:	321

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	12%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	38%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	33%
State average:	36%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	13%
State average:	11%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	4%
State average:	4%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	50%
State average:	51%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	10
State average:	9

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	9
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	9
State average:	9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

BOOKER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	287
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	41%
State average:	27%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	34%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	21%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	4%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	1%
State average:	2%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	26%
State average:	41%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

BOOKER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	8
State average:	9

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	6
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	7
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	6
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	267
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	56%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	33%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	10%
State average:	30%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	1%
State average:	5%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	11%
State average:	36%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

BOOKER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	6
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	5
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	5
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

BOOKER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	1461
State average:	1481

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	335
State average:	339

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	8%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	16%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	30%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	37%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	10%
State average:	16%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	77%
State average:	79%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	8
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	4
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	5
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1586
State average:	1585

Mean Scale Score 100-500

BOOKER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	330
State average:	330

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	9%
State average:	10%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	17%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	36%
State average:	36%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	28%
State average:	26%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	9%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	73%
State average:	74%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

BOOKER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1673
State average:	1674

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	334
State average:	334

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	14%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	28%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	24%
State average:	27%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	22%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	12%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	58%
State average:	63%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	8
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	6
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

BOOKER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	1685
State average:	1696

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	313
State average:	315

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	27%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	18%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	33%
State average:	29%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	14%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	8%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	55%
State average:	55%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	4
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

BOOKER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	6
State average:	6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1756
State average:	1786

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	298
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1

BOOKER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	27%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	24%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 3

BOOKER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	31%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	15%
State average:	19%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	3%
State average:	7%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	50%
State average:	57%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

BOOKER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	4
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	5
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1821
State average:	1892

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	302
State average:	320

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	24%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	26%
State average:	21%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	37%
State average:	38%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	11%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	2%
State average:	10%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	50%
State average:	64%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

BOOKER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	6
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	4
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1777
State average:	1925

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	259
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1

BOOKER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	40%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	35%
State average:	22%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	21%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	3%
State average:	21%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	24%
State average:	61%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	3
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	3
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	4
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	4
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	3
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1820
State average:	1995

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	283
State average:	326

Percent Passing

Here:	38%
State average:	80%

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	35%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	47%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	14%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	4%
State average:	33%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	18%
State average:	69%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	4
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	2
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	3
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	4
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	3
State average:	5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1421
State average:	1402

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	320
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1683
State average:	1605

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	337
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 06%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1682
State average:	1656

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	316
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

BOOKER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	1659
State average:	1707

Mean Scale Score 100-500

BOOKER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	302
State average:	310

% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1720
State average:	1800

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	300
State average:	315

% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1810
State average:	1864

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	294
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1632
State average:	1907

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	259
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 73%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 4%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1571
State average:	1921

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	234
State average:	299

Percent Passing: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 84%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 3%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	319
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	275
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 22%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	258
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 64%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1487
State average:	1476

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	340
State average:	338

% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1604
State average:	1578

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	334
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1637
State average:	1675

Mean Scale Score 100-500

BOOKER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	326
State average:	334

% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1657
State average:	1679

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	306
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

BOOKER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	1704
State average:	1799

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	285
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 37%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1826
State average:	1876

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	303
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1731
State average:	1925

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	245
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1781
State average:	1972

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	274
State average:	321

Percent Passing: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 23%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 131

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	4
State average from 27 schools:	59

Unscore - Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 43%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 78%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 229

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	4
State average from 27 schools:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 34%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 74%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 46

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	3
State average from 27 schools:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 35%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 33%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1487
State average:	1396

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	331
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1632
State average:	1582

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	328
State average:	320

% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

BOOKER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	1664
State average:	1627

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	313
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1609
State average:	1696

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	293
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1686
State average:	1775

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	294
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1833
State average:	1857

Mean Scale Score 100-500

BOOKER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	299
State average:	304

% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1736
State average:	1894

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	278
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 15%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1646
State average:	1935

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	248
State average:	302

Percent Passing: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 81%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 4%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	308
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	280
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 27%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	256
State average:	302

% in each Achievement Level 1: 69%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 5%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1484
State average:	1461

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	340
State average:	335

% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1492
State average:	1563

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	308
State average:	325

% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1649
State average:	1668

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	329
State average:	333

% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

BOOKER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	1595
State average:	1670

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	292
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 37%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1691
State average:	1801

Mean Scale Score 100-500

BOOKER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	282
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1856
State average:	1882

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	310
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1784
State average:	1915

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	261
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 25%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1834
State average:	1984

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	287
State average:	323

Percent Passing: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 25%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Number of Students

BOOKER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	128
State average:	103

Mean Scale Score

BOOKER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	645
State average from 3241 schools:	633

Median NPR

Here:	71
State average:	61

Literary (max 18)

BOOKER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	13
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	16
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	100
State average:	97

Mean Scale Score

Here:	654
State average from 3233 schools:	653

Median NPR

Here:	71
State average:	69

Literary (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

BOOKER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	13
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	10

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	15
State average:	15

Critical Analysis (max 12)

BOOKER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	9
State average:	8

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	95
State average:	101

Mean Scale Score

BOOKER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	673
State average from 3309 schools:	667

Median NPR

BOOKER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	77
State average:	71

Literary (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

BOOKER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	13
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

BOOKER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	10
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	15
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

BOOKER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	6
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	336
State average:	190

Mean Scale Score

Here:	660
State average from 2604 schools:	671

Median NPR

Here:	52
State average:	63

Literary (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	11
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	7
State average:	8

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	13
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

BOOKER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	7
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	269
State average:	201

Mean Scale Score

BOOKER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	670
State average from 2487 schools:	682

Median NPR

Here:	57
State average:	66

Literary (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

BOOKER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	11
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	11
State average:	12

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	13
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

BOOKER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	6
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	236
State average:	192

Mean Scale Score

Here:	686
State average from 2497 schools:	687

Median NPR

Here:	63
State average:	63

Literary (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	12

Informational (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	7
State average:	7

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	13
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	10

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	87
State average:	273

Mean Scale Score

BOOKER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	670
State average from 2275 schools:	694

Median NPR

Here:	38
State average:	61

Literary (max 18)

Here:	11
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	9
State average:	11

Functional (max 18)

Here:	10
State average:	11

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	6
State average:	7

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	12
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

BOOKER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	7
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	4
State average:	5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	52
State average:	237

Mean Scale Score

Here:	687
State average from 2096 schools:	709

Median NPR

Here:	45
State average:	65

Literary (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	14

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	8

Interpretation (max 20)

BOOKER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	13
State average:	15

Critical Analysis (max 12)

BOOKER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	9
State average:	10

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 102

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	303
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 60%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 43%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 76%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 236

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	285
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 45%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 40%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 87%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 60

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	226
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 72%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 2%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 7

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	3
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 40%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 33%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1556
State average from 878 schools:	1661

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	283
State average:	302

% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 83%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1561
State average:	1663

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1514
State average:	1592

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 47

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1741
State average from 808 schools:	1746

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	304
State average:	305

% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1753
State average:	1743

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1671
State average:	1668

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 82

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1760
State average from 819 schools:	1810

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	283
State average:	294

% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1764
State average:	1807

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1676
State average:	1738

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 88

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	262
State average:	290

% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 21%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1545
State average from 873 schools:	1641

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	280
State average:	302

% in each Achievement Level 1: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 81%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1557
State average:	1645

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1587
State average:	1620

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: -29

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1744
State average from 804 schools:	1777

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	295
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1747
State average:	1774

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1640
State average:	1645

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 107

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1800
State average from 815 schools:	1851

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	296
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1802
State average:	1845

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1712
State average:	1755

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 90

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 285

Mean Scale Score

Here:	657
State average from 874 schools:	671

Median NPR: 51
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 250

Mean Scale Score

Here:	673
State average from 796 schools:	675

Median NPR: 60
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 322

Mean Scale Score

BOOKER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	680
State average from 810 schools:	685

Median NPR: 58
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 14): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 277

Mean Scale Score

Here:	658
State average from 874 schools:	669

Median NPR: 53
Number Sense (max 10): 5
Operations (max 12): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 252

Mean Scale Score

BOOKER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	680
State average from 796 schools:	685

Median NPR: 65
Number Sense (max 9): 4
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 6
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 325

Mean Scale Score

Here:	692
State average from 810 schools:	698

Median NPR: 63
Number Sense (max 9): 6
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 336

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	273
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 36%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 9
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 79%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 66%

City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DC	DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID
IL	IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	MD
ME	MI	MN	MO	MS	MT	NC
ND	NE	NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY
OH	OK	OR	PA	RI	SC	SD
TN	TX	UT	VA	VT	WA	WI
WV	WY

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID	IL
IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	ME	MI
MN	MO	MS	MT	NC	ND	NE
NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	SD	TN	TX
VA	VT	WA	WI	WV	WY

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID	IL
IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	ME	MI
MN	MO	MS	MT	NC	ND	NE
NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	SD	TN	TX
VA	VT	WA	WI	WV	WY

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DC	DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID
IL	IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	MD
ME	MI	MN	MO	MS	MT	NC
ND	NE	NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY
OH	OK	OR	PA	RI	SC	SD
TN	TX	UT	VA	VT	WA	WI
WV	WY

AB	BC	MB	NB	NL	NS	NT
NU	ON	PE	QC	SK	YT