Bozeman School in Panama City, Florida (FL) - Test Results, Rating, Ranking, Grades, Scores, Classes, Enrollment, Teachers, Students, and Report Card

City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 60.

13410 HWY 77
Panama City, FL 32409

Show street view No street view available for this location

Other nearby schools ratings:

Bay Haven Charter Academy School (2.0 miles):	88
Mowat Middle School (0.6 miles):	66
Bozeman School:	60
Hutchison Beach Elementary School (11.6 miles):	55
Merriam Cherry Street Elementary School (6.3 miles):	47
Everitt Middle School (5.7 miles):	38
Cedar Grove Elementary School (4.6 miles):	26
Hope School (2.4 miles):	3

Bozeman School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:

Florida:	45
Bay County:	42
Panama City:	39
Bozeman School:	60

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum

Phone: (850) 265-9887 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 3
School number: 541
School type: Combination Elementary and Secondary
District Name: BAY
Grade range: PREKINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 12
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (850) 265-5377
Principal: Sandy Harrison
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 2
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 7
Senate District: 2

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	79%
State average from 59 schools:	76%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	72%
State average from 59 schools:	78%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	93%
State average from 59 schools:	85%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	53%
State average from 59 schools:	54%

Making Reading Gains

BOZEMAN SCHOOL:	69%
State average from 59 schools:	66%

Making Math Gains

Here:	71%
State average from 59 schools:	69%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	68%
State average from 59 schools:	62%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	72%
State average from 59 schools:	69%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	577
State average from 59 schools:	560

Percent Tested

BOZEMAN SCHOOL:	100%
State average from 59 schools:	100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: B

Grade in 119999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	43%
State average from 59 schools:	54%

Minority Rate

Here:	48%
State average from 59 schools:	46%

Region: 2

Title I: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1092 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1092 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 362
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	73%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1048
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 990

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	66%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1047
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 987
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 574 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 574 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 210
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	80%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 560
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 534

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	76%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 559
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 532
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 83 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 83 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 76
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 72
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 76
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 72
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 303 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 303 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	90%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 90
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	61%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 286
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 264

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	52%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 286
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 264
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 43 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 43 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 37
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 37
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 469 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 469 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	91%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 150
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	63%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 442
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 417

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	55%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 441
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 414
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 59 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 59 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 145 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 145 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	77%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 47
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	42%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 137
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 126

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	35%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 136
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 123
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

BOZEMAN SCHOOL:	77%
State average from 58 schools:	76%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	74%
State average from 58 schools:	77%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	95%
State average from 58 schools:	88%

Meeting High Standards in Science

BOZEMAN SCHOOL:	57%
State average from 58 schools:	50%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	70%
State average from 58 schools:	69%

Making Math Gains

Here:	73%
State average from 58 schools:	69%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	76%
State average from 58 schools:	66%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	68%
State average from 58 schools:	68%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	590
State average from 58 schools:	564

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 59 schools:	100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: B

Grade in 1999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	39%
State average from 59 schools:	51%

Minority Rate

Here:	47%
State average from 59 schools:	46%

Region: 3

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1169 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1170 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 391
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	71%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1093
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1031

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	69%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1092
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1031
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 621 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 622 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 196
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	77%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 593
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 564

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	77%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 593
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 564
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 83 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 83 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 28
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 76
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 70
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 76
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 70
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 323 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 323 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	92%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 119
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	61%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 284
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 265

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

BOZEMAN SCHOOL:	56%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 284
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 266
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 49 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 49 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 46
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 46
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 458 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 458 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 155
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	60%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 409
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 386

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	56%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 407
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 385
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 77 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 77 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 58
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 56
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 58
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 56
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 156 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 157 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	85%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 54
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	36%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 145
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 136

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	32%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 144
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 136
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	74%
State average from 59 schools:	73%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	74%
State average from 59 schools:	75%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	91%
State average from 59 schools:	83%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	58%
State average from 59 schools:	47%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	66%
State average from 59 schools:	65%

Making Math Gains

BOZEMAN SCHOOL:	75%
State average from 59 schools:	70%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	68%
State average from 59 schools:	60%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	65%
State average from 59 schools:	68%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	571
State average from 59 schools:	541

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 59 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: B

Grade in 1999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	36%
State average from 59 schools:	47%

Minority Rate

Here:	45%
State average from 59 schools:	46%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1131 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1131 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	92%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 350
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	67%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1068
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 996

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	68%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1071
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 997
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 625 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 625 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 187
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	76%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 604
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 569

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	74%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 606
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 571
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 103 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 103 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 41
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 91
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 82
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 91
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 81
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 271 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 271 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

BOZEMAN SCHOOL:	78%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 73
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	53%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 249
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 228

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	54%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 250
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 228
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 49 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 49 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 42
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 42
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 406 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 406 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	85%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 121
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	49%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 366
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 337

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	51%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 367
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 336
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 76 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 76 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 26
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 69
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 59
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 69
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 59
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 157 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 157 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	67%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 42
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	34%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 145
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 131

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

BOZEMAN SCHOOL:	31%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 148
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 134
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	65%
State average from 25 schools:	61%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	76%
State average from 25 schools:	61%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

BOZEMAN SCHOOL:	85%
State average from 25 schools:	81%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	39%
State average from 25 schools:	42%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	52%
State average from 25 schools:	59%

Making Reading Gains - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Included

Making Math Gains

Here:	74%
State average from 25 schools:	65%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	50%
State average from 25 schools:	57%

% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Included

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	73%
State average from 25 schools:	66%

11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10

Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns

BOZEMAN SCHOOL:	524
State average from 25 schools:	493

Percent Tested

BOZEMAN SCHOOL:	100%
State average from 25 schools:	97%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	44%
State average from 25 schools:	55%

Minority Rate

Here:	3%
State average from 25 schools:	44%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 823 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 821 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	94%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 318
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

BOZEMAN SCHOOL:	57%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 783
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	66%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 781
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 801 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 799 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	94%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 313
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	57%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 762
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	66%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 760
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 372 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 370 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

BOZEMAN SCHOOL:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 137
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	54%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 347
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	56%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 346
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 158 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 157 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	79%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 61
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	27%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 150
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	26%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 148
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	63%
State average from 23 schools:	61%

Meeting High Standards in Math

BOZEMAN SCHOOL:	72%
State average from 23 schools:	61%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	90%
State average from 23 schools:	83%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	60%
State average from 23 schools:	59%

Making Math Gains

Here:	75%
State average from 23 schools:	67%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

BOZEMAN SCHOOL:	60%
State average from 23 schools:	59%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns

BOZEMAN SCHOOL:	420
State average from 23 schools:	391

Percent Tested

BOZEMAN SCHOOL:	100%
State average from 23 schools:	97%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: N

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	49%
State average from 24 schools:	53%

Minority Rate

Here:	4%
State average from 24 schools:	44%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 795 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 794 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	92%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 306
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	56%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 744
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	63%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 745
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 770 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 769 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	92%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 295

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	56%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 723
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	63%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 724
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 375 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 375 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	89%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 131

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	50%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 345
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	51%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 346
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 147 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 147 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	75%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 52
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	25%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 136
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	22%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 137
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	60%
State average from 24 schools:	55%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	65%
State average from 24 schools:	56%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	91%
State average from 24 schools:	79%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	54%
State average from 24 schools:	56%

Making Math Gains

Here:	67%
State average from 24 schools:	63%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	61%
State average from 24 schools:	54%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns

Here:	398
State average from 24 schools:	363

Percent Tested

Here:	99%
State average from 24 schools:	95%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: N

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	57%
State average from 24 schools:	54%

Minority Rate

Here:	2%
State average from 24 schools:	41%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1363
State average:	1402

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	310
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	17%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

BOZEMAN SCHOOL:	14%
State average:	11%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	29%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

BOZEMAN SCHOOL:	32%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	8%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	68%
State average:	74%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	17
State average:	17

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1580
State average:	1604

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	319
State average:	324

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	15%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	15%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	34%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	31%
State average:	29%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	6%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	71%
State average:	72%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	19
State average:	19

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	8
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	2
State average:	2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1642
State average:	1659

Mean Scale Score 100-500

BOZEMAN SCHOOL:	309
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	13%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

BOZEMAN SCHOOL:	15%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	39%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

BOZEMAN SCHOOL:	26%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	7%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	72%
State average:	70%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	3
State average:	3

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	15
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	10
State average:	10

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	2
State average:	2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1757
State average:	1716

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	320
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	13%
State average:	19%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	15%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	36%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

BOZEMAN SCHOOL:	28%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	7%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	72%
State average:	65%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	14
State average:	14

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1911
State average:	1810

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	337
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	7%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	12%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	38%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	31%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	12%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	81%
State average:	65%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	18
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1932
State average:	1876

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	320
State average:	308

% in each Achievement Level 1

BOZEMAN SCHOOL:	13%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	25%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	35%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	22%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	5%
State average:	3%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	62%
State average:	52%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	4
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	17
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	7
State average:	6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1968
State average:	1922

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	320
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	15%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	28%
State average:	30%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	43%
State average:	26%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	11%
State average:	12%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	3%
State average:	7%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	57%
State average:	45%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	11
State average:	11

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

BOZEMAN SCHOOL:	7
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

BOZEMAN SCHOOL:	1941
State average:	1938

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	303
State average:	302

Percent Passing

Here:	48%
State average:	56%

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	39%
State average:	35%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	35%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	11%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	6%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	9%
State average:	12%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	25%
State average:	37%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	15
State average:	15

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	6
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	317
State average:	321

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	15%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	39%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	31%
State average:	36%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	11%
State average:	11%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	3%
State average:	4%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	46%
State average:	51%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	9
State average:	9

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

BOZEMAN SCHOOL:	8
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	9
State average:	9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	316
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	21%
State average:	27%

% in each Achievement Level 2

BOZEMAN SCHOOL:	32%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	35%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	10%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	2%
State average:	2%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	47%
State average:	41%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	9
State average:	9

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	9
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	7
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1332
State average:	1481

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	307
State average:	339

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	16%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	20%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 3

BOZEMAN SCHOOL:	36%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	24%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 5

BOZEMAN SCHOOL:	5%
State average:	16%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	65%
State average:	79%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	7
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

BOZEMAN SCHOOL:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	4
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	4
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1555
State average:	1585

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	323
State average:	330

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	13%
State average:	10%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	16%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 3

BOZEMAN SCHOOL:	38%
State average:	36%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	26%
State average:	26%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	6%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	71%
State average:	74%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1657
State average:	1674

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	331
State average:	334

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	11%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	28%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	30%
State average:	27%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	21%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	10%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	61%
State average:	63%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	8
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

BOZEMAN SCHOOL:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	7
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1666
State average:	1696

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	308
State average:	315

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	26%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	21%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	31%
State average:	29%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	19%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	3%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

BOZEMAN SCHOOL:	53%
State average:	55%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	4
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	6
State average:	6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1845
State average:	1786

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	320
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	14%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	19%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	35%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	25%
State average:	19%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	8%
State average:	7%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	68%
State average:	57%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

BOZEMAN SCHOOL:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	4
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	6
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1932
State average:	1892

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	330
State average:	320

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	12%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

BOZEMAN SCHOOL:	15%
State average:	21%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	34%
State average:	38%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	21%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	17%
State average:	10%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

BOZEMAN SCHOOL:	73%
State average:	64%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	6
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1933
State average:	1925

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	305
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	7%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	29%
State average:	22%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	47%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	14%
State average:	21%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	3%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	64%
State average:	61%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	4
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1987
State average:	1995

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	324
State average:	326

Percent Passing

Here:	85%
State average:	80%

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	8%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	21%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	41%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 4

BOZEMAN SCHOOL:	29%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	1%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	70%
State average:	69%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	8
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	5
State average:	5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1379
State average:	1402

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	313
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1605
State average:	1605

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	324
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1694
State average:	1656

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	318
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1789
State average:	1707

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	325
State average:	310

% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1840
State average:	1800

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	323
State average:	315

% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1916
State average:	1864

Mean Scale Score 100-500

BOZEMAN SCHOOL:	316
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1946
State average:	1907

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	316
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	316
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	315
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	236
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 78%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 3
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1342
State average:	1476

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	309
State average:	338

% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1588
State average:	1578

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	330
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1695
State average:	1675

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	339
State average:	334

% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1740
State average:	1679

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	325
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1842
State average:	1799

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	319
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1920
State average:	1876

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	327
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1927
State average:	1925

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	303
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 124

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	4
State average from 27 schools:	59

Unscore - Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 47%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 86%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 410

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

BOZEMAN SCHOOL:	4
State average from 27 schools:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 9%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 89%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1364
State average:	1396

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	311
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1583
State average:	1582

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	320
State average:	320

% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1646
State average:	1627

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	309
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1742
State average:	1696

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	317
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1829
State average:	1775

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	321
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1909
State average:	1857

Mean Scale Score 100-500

BOZEMAN SCHOOL:	315
State average:	304

% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1965
State average:	1894

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	320
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	316
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	319
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	274
State average:	302

% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 62%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1347
State average:	1461

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	310
State average:	335

% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1590
State average:	1563

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	331
State average:	325

% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1682
State average:	1668

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	336
State average:	333

% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1717
State average:	1670

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	320
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1821
State average:	1801

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	314
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1931
State average:	1882

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	329
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1954
State average:	1915

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	311
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	125
State average:	103

Mean Scale Score

BOZEMAN SCHOOL:	630
State average from 3241 schools:	633

Median NPR

Here:	59
State average:	61

Literary (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	14
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

BOZEMAN SCHOOL:	8
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	6
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	116
State average:	97

Mean Scale Score

Here:	656
State average from 3233 schools:	653

Median NPR

Here:	72
State average:	69

Literary (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	10

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	15
State average:	15

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	8

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	130
State average:	101

Mean Scale Score

Here:	672
State average from 3309 schools:	667

Median NPR

Here:	76
State average:	71

Literary (max 18)

BOZEMAN SCHOOL:	13
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	15
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

BOZEMAN SCHOOL:	9
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	6
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	363
State average:	190

Mean Scale Score

Here:	677
State average from 2604 schools:	671

Median NPR

Here:	69
State average:	63

Literary (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	8

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	15
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Number of Students

BOZEMAN SCHOOL:	392
State average:	201

Mean Scale Score

BOZEMAN SCHOOL:	687
State average from 2487 schools:	682

Median NPR

Here:	71
State average:	66

Literary (max 18)

BOZEMAN SCHOOL:	14
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

BOZEMAN SCHOOL:	13
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	12

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

BOZEMAN SCHOOL:	14
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	368
State average:	192

Mean Scale Score

Here:	693
State average from 2497 schools:	687

Median NPR

Here:	69
State average:	63

Literary (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	12

Informational (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	7

Interpretation (max 20)

BOZEMAN SCHOOL:	14
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	10

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	146
State average:	273

Mean Scale Score

Here:	698
State average from 2275 schools:	694

Median NPR

Here:	66
State average:	61

Literary (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	11

Functional (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	11

Initial Understanding (max 12)

BOZEMAN SCHOOL:	7
State average:	7

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	14
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

BOZEMAN SCHOOL:	10
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	6
State average:	5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	5
State average:	237

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 113

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	299
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 11%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 59%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 38%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 72%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 372

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	302
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 56%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 7%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 86%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 5

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

BOZEMAN SCHOOL:	1462
State average:	1342

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	327
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1601
State average from 1875 schools:	1542

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	323
State average:	313

% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 80%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1600
State average:	1546

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1479
State average:	1397

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 121

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1689
State average from 1873 schools:	1629

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	317
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 54%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 99%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1684
State average:	1632

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1607
State average:	1532

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 78

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1732
State average from 878 schools:	1661

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	315
State average:	302

% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1748
State average:	1663

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1693
State average:	1592

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 55

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

BOZEMAN SCHOOL:	1768
State average from 808 schools:	1746

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	309
State average:	305

% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

BOZEMAN SCHOOL:	1771
State average:	1743

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1794
State average:	1668

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: -23

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1872
State average from 819 schools:	1810

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	307
State average:	294

% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 95%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1874
State average:	1807

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1807
State average:	1738

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 67

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1917
State average from 612 schools:	1849

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	311
State average:	298

% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1933
State average:	1837

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

BOZEMAN SCHOOL:	1889
State average:	1779

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 44

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1924
State average from 573 schools:	1879

Mean Scale Score 100-500

BOZEMAN SCHOOL:	300
State average:	291

Percent Passing: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 28%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 18: 12
Percent Matched to 2006: 95%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1939
State average:	1873

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1935
State average:	1876

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 5

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	308
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	299
State average:	290

% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	302
State average:	295

% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 28%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 14: 7

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1548
State average:	1413

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	354
State average:	324

% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1582
State average from 1874 schools:	1525

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	329
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 82%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1582
State average:	1528

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1399
State average:	1414

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 183

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1689
State average from 1872 schools:	1647

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	337
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 99%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

BOZEMAN SCHOOL:	1688
State average:	1649

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1551
State average:	1519

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 137

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1750
State average from 873 schools:	1641

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	328
State average:	302

% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

BOZEMAN SCHOOL:	1764
State average:	1645

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1700
State average:	1620

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 64

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1795
State average from 804 schools:	1777

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	307
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

BOZEMAN SCHOOL:	1809
State average:	1774

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1737
State average:	1645

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 72

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

BOZEMAN SCHOOL:	1888
State average from 815 schools:	1851

Mean Scale Score 100-500

BOZEMAN SCHOOL:	318
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1891
State average:	1845

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1808
State average:	1755

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 83

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1916
State average from 613 schools:	1884

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	300
State average:	290

% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 10: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 8: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1924
State average:	1869

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

BOZEMAN SCHOOL:	1869
State average:	1821

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 55

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1985
State average from 581 schools:	1950

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	323
State average:	315

Percent Passing: 85%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 10: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 11: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 95%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1994
State average:	1939

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1920
State average:	1901

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 74

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 48

Mean Scale Score

BOZEMAN SCHOOL:	650
State average from 1891 schools:	633

Median NPR: 74
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 56

Mean Scale Score

Here:	648
State average from 1874 schools:	642

Median NPR: 66
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 72

Mean Scale Score

Here:	680
State average from 1870 schools:	667

Median NPR: 81
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 118

Mean Scale Score

Here:	683
State average from 874 schools:	671

Median NPR: 74
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 109

Mean Scale Score

Here:	679
State average from 796 schools:	675

Median NPR: 65
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 128

Mean Scale Score

Here:	690
State average from 810 schools:	685

Median NPR: 67
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 14): 10
Strategies (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 141

Mean Scale Score

BOZEMAN SCHOOL:	708
State average from 597 schools:	696

Median NPR: 74
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 15
Initial Understanding (max 10): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 14): 10
Strategies (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 153

Mean Scale Score

Here:	697
State average from 575 schools:	695

Median NPR: 55
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 14): 10
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 48

Mean Scale Score

Here:	651
State average from 1891 schools:	632

Median NPR: 81
Number Sense (max 14): 11
Operations (max 11): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 56

Mean Scale Score

Here:	657
State average from 1874 schools:	652

Median NPR: 79
Number Sense (max 12): 10
Operations (max 12): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 72

Mean Scale Score

Here:	670
State average from 1870 schools:	663

Median NPR: 79
Number Sense (max 12): 10
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 117

Mean Scale Score

BOZEMAN SCHOOL:	685
State average from 874 schools:	669

Median NPR: 77
Number Sense (max 10): 6
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 109

Mean Scale Score

Here:	685
State average from 796 schools:	685

Median NPR: 69
Number Sense (max 9): 5
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 128

Mean Scale Score

Here:	699
State average from 810 schools:	698

Median NPR: 71
Number Sense (max 9): 6
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 141

Mean Scale Score

Here:	712
State average from 597 schools:	708

Median NPR: 73
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 9
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 153

Mean Scale Score

Here:	712
State average from 575 schools:	710

Median NPR: 64
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 7
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 56

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

BOZEMAN SCHOOL:	289
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 11%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 54%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 13
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	3
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 45%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 70%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 55%

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 127

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	308
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 54%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 10
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

BOZEMAN SCHOOL:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 87%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 75%

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 153

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	295
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 45%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 9 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	3
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 78%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 63%

City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DC	DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID
IL	IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	MD
ME	MI	MN	MO	MS	MT	NC
ND	NE	NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY
OH	OK	OR	PA	RI	SC	SD
TN	TX	UT	VA	VT	WA	WI
WV	WY

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DC	DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID
IL	IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	MD
ME	MI	MN	MO	MS	MT	NC
ND	NE	NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY
OH	OK	OR	PA	RI	SC	SD
TN	TX	UT	VA	VT	WA	WI
WV	WY

AB	BC	MB	NB	NL	NS	NT
NU	ON	PE	QC	SK	YT