Canoe Creek Charter Academy School in St Cloud, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 23.

3600 CANOE CREEK RD
St Cloud, FL 34772

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
West Creek Elementary School (15.5 miles):

91
Endeavor Elementary School (14.2 miles):

61
Pleasant Hill Elementary School (10.7 miles):

52
Highlands Elementary School (11.9 miles):

45
Sunrise Elementary School (11.4 miles):

35
Reedy Creek Elementary School (12.5 miles):

24
Canoe Creek Charter Academy School:

23
Walker Middle School (19.7 miles):

16
Canoe Creek Charter Academy School rating compared to average state and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
St Cloud:

34
Canoe Creek Charter Academy:

23

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (407) 891-7320 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 49
School number: 916
School type: Combination Elementary and Secondary
District Name: OSCEOLA
Grade range: PREKINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 8
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (407) 891-7730
Principal: April Williams
Regular charter school.
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 15
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 79
Senate District: 15
School Web Address: www.osceola.k12.fl.us

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

71%
State average from 54 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Math
CANOE CREEK CHARTER ACADEMY:

62%
State average from 54 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

80%
State average from 54 schools:

86%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

44%
State average from 54 schools:

53%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

67%
State average from 54 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

77%
State average from 53 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

63%
State average from 54 schools:

61%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

86%
State average from 54 schools:

65%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
CANOE CREEK CHARTER ACADEMY:

550
State average from 54 schools:

539
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 53 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: B

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: D

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: D

Grade in 2003: N

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

57%
State average from 54 schools:

60%
Minority Rate
CANOE CREEK CHARTER ACADEMY:

62%
State average from 54 schools:

57%
Region: 3

Title I: NO


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 245 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 245 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 71
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
CANOE CREEK CHARTER ACADEMY:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 229
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 217

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 229
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 217
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 91 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 91 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 31
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 86
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 83

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 86
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 83
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 107 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 107 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 30
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 96
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 88

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

54%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 96
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 88
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 140 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 140 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 36
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

67%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 132
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 124

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 132
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 124
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 35 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

71%
State average from 53 schools:

78%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

53%
State average from 52 schools:

76%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

86%
State average from 53 schools:

89%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

32%
State average from 53 schools:

52%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

64%
State average from 52 schools:

69%
Making Math Gains
CANOE CREEK CHARTER ACADEMY:

62%
State average from 53 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

76%
State average from 52 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

62%
State average from 52 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

506
State average from 52 schools:

566
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 52 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: B

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: D

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: D

Grade in 2003: N

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

56%
State average from 52 schools:

55%
Minority Rate
Here:

57%
State average from 53 schools:

52%
Region: 3


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 273 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 273 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 84
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 249
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 245

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

48%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 249
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 245
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 116 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 116 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 40
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 112
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 111

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 112
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 111
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 114 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 114 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 32
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 95
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 93

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

35%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 95
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 93
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 153 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 153 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 41
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 134
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 133

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 134
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 133
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 54 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 54 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

37%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 37

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

13%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 37
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 25
Number of Students Tested in Math: 25
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
CANOE CREEK CHARTER ACADEMY:

69%
State average from 52 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

52%
State average from 52 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
CANOE CREEK CHARTER ACADEMY:

88%
State average from 52 schools:

84%
Meeting High Standards in Science
CANOE CREEK CHARTER ACADEMY:

28%
State average from 51 schools:

48%
Making Reading Gains
CANOE CREEK CHARTER ACADEMY:

67%
State average from 51 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

66%
State average from 51 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

51%
State average from 51 schools:

61%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

63%
State average from 51 schools:

69%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

484
State average from 51 schools:

545
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 51 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: D

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: D

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

51%
State average from 52 schools:

53%
Minority Rate
Here:

56%
State average from 52 schools:

52%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 309 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 302 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 92
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 287
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 256

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 286
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 256
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 129 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 128 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 35
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 120
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 107

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 120
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 108
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 135 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 131 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 43
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 126
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 110

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 126
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 110
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 166 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 162 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 51
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

48%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 155
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 136

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

38%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 154
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 136
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 65 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 61 (96%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

24%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 58
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 46

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

24%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 58
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 46
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 34 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1342
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

307
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
CANOE CREEK CHARTER ACADEMY:

18%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

13%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

42%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

16%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

11%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

69%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

16
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1505
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

307
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

30%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

11%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

30%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

22%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

8%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

59%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

17
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1619
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

305
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

18%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
CANOE CREEK CHARTER ACADEMY:

10%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

36%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

30%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

6%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

72%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
CANOE CREEK CHARTER ACADEMY:

3
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

15
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

10
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1687
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

307
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

14%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
CANOE CREEK CHARTER ACADEMY:

22%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

25%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

6%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

65%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

14
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1878
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

330
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

4%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

14%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
CANOE CREEK CHARTER ACADEMY:

50%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
CANOE CREEK CHARTER ACADEMY:

25%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 5
CANOE CREEK CHARTER ACADEMY:

7%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

82%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

18
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1829
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

298
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

14%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
CANOE CREEK CHARTER ACADEMY:

43%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

31%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

9%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

43%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

15
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

6
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
CANOE CREEK CHARTER ACADEMY:

320
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

18%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

36%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

28%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

16%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

2%
State average:

4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

46%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
CANOE CREEK CHARTER ACADEMY:

9
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

9
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

314
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

18%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
CANOE CREEK CHARTER ACADEMY:

35%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

44%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

3%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

47%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

9
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
CANOE CREEK CHARTER ACADEMY:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1481
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

339
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

2%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

16%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

42%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

22%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

18%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

82%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
CANOE CREEK CHARTER ACADEMY:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
CANOE CREEK CHARTER ACADEMY:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1467
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

303
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

24%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

30%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

22%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
CANOE CREEK CHARTER ACADEMY:

16%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

8%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

46%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
CANOE CREEK CHARTER ACADEMY:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1614
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

321
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

16%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

30%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

32%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

20%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

2%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

54%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1661
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

307
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

22%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

41%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

24%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

12%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

2%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

37%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1792
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

307
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

14%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

21%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

39%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

25%
State average:

19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

64%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
CANOE CREEK CHARTER ACADEMY:

5
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1885
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

318
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

9%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

14%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

60%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
CANOE CREEK CHARTER ACADEMY:

17%
State average:

17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

77%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
CANOE CREEK CHARTER ACADEMY:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1299
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
CANOE CREEK CHARTER ACADEMY:

300
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1510
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

307
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 06%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1567
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

295
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1717
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

312
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1825
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

320
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 57%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
CANOE CREEK CHARTER ACADEMY:

1886
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

310
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

283
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 23%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

292
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1300
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

300
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
CANOE CREEK CHARTER ACADEMY:

1338
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

273
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1517
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

301
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1545
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

280
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1754
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

297
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1852
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

309
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 53
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

3
State average from 27 schools:

59
Unscore - Combined: 2
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 40%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 74%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 39
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
CANOE CREEK CHARTER ACADEMY:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 54%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 90%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1326
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

304
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1470
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

301
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1526
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

288
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1672
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

304
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1700
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

296
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1868
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

306
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

292
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 21%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

289
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 25%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
CANOE CREEK CHARTER ACADEMY:

1257
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

291
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1350
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

276
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1549
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

308
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1582
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

289
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1751
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

297
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1857
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

311
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

59
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
CANOE CREEK CHARTER ACADEMY:

623
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
Here:

52
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
CANOE CREEK CHARTER ACADEMY:

11
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
CANOE CREEK CHARTER ACADEMY:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

58
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
Here:

637
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
CANOE CREEK CHARTER ACADEMY:

56
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

57
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
CANOE CREEK CHARTER ACADEMY:

662
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
Here:

68
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
CANOE CREEK CHARTER ACADEMY:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
CANOE CREEK CHARTER ACADEMY:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

50
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
Here:

666
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
Here:

59
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

49
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
CANOE CREEK CHARTER ACADEMY:

675
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
Here:

62
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
CANOE CREEK CHARTER ACADEMY:

12
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
CANOE CREEK CHARTER ACADEMY:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

40
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
Here:

683
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
Here:

60
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
CANOE CREEK CHARTER ACADEMY:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
CANOE CREEK CHARTER ACADEMY:

10
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 57
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

285
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 53%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 44%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 75%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 40
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

301
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 50%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 45%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 98%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. St Cloud, FL
  5. Canoe Creek Charter Academy School in St Cloud, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.