Charles T. Kranz Intermediate School in El Monte, CA
(07-08 • Public • Regular School)
City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in California) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 27
- Address
- 12460 Fineview St.
EL MONTE, CA 91732
- Telephone
- (626) 652-4200
(make sure to verify first before calling)
- Website
- http://kranz.mtviewschools.com
- City-data.com school rating
- 27
- Students
- 758
- Classroom Teachers (FTE)
- 36.0
- National School Lunch
Program (NSLP) Status - Yes, under Provision 2
- Free lunch eligible students
- 639
- Reduced-price lunch
eligible students - 61
- School district
- Mountain View Elementary
- Charter school
- No
- Title I status
- Title I schoolwide school
- Magnet School Indicator
- No
- Shared Time Indicator
- Missing
- Adult education offered
- No
No street view available for this location
Ratings
This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
Charles T. Kranz Intermediate School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:California: | 46 |
Los Angeles County: | 44 |
El Monte: | 35 |
Charles T. Kranz Intermediate: | 27 |
Students & Teachers
Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 758
Enrollment in 2015: 759
Enrollment in 2014: 771
Enrollment in 2013: 766
Enrollment in 2012: 864
Enrollment in 2011: 996
Enrollment in 2010: 1,101
Enrollment in 2009: 1,102
Enrollment in 2008: 1,088
Enrollment in 2007: 1,167
Enrollment in 2006: 1,200
Enrollment in 2005: 1,295
Enrollment in 2004: 1,278
Enrollment in 2003: 1,262
Enrollment in 2002: 1,212
Enrollment in 2001: 1,136
Enrollment in 2000: 1,093
Enrollment in 1999: 1,071
Charles T. Kranz Intermediate School - Historical enrollment
Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)
Grade | G07 | G08 | Total |
---|
All students | 365 | 393 | 758 |
Female students | 173 | 180 | 353 |
Male students | 192 | 213 | 405 |
Asian students | 19 | 11 | 30 |
Hispanic students | 342 | 381 | 723 |
Two or More Races students | 4 | 1 | 5 |
Enrollment by grade:
7th grade enrollment: 365
8th grade enrollment: 393
Charles T. Kranz Intermediate School - Historical enrollment by grade
Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 12,430 schools)
Female enrollment: 353 (46.6%)Here: | 46.6% |
California: | 49.4% |
Male enrollment: 405 (53.4%)School: | 53.4% |
California: | 49.6% |
Charles T. Kranz Intermediate School - Historical enrollment by gender
Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 12,430 schools)
Asian enrollment: 30 (4.0%)
Hispanic enrollment: 723 (95.4%)
Two or More Races enrollment: 5 (0.7%)
Charles T. Kranz Intermediate School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity
Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 10,111 schools)
Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 700 (92.3%)
Free lunch eligible students: 639 (84.3%)
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 61 (8.0%)
Charles T. Kranz Intermediate School - Lunch Program Eligibility
Teachers and support:
(State average from 12,394 schools)
Classroom Teachers (FTE): 36
Number of FTE teachers in their first year of teaching: 1
Number of FTE teachers in their second year of teaching: 1
Number of FTE school counselors: 1
Number of FTE teachers who were absent more than 10 school days during the school years: 5
Number of FTE security guards: 2.5
Number of FTE nurses: 0.4
Number of FTE psychologists: 0.4
Student/Teacher RatioCharles T. Kranz Intermediate School: | 21.0 |
State: | 22.8 |
Charles T. Kranz Intermediate School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio
School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds:
$3,593,375- Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 36 (Salary Expenditures: $2,841,018)
- Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 2 (Salary Expenditures: $29,273)
- Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 5.7 (Salary Expenditures: $358,493)
- Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 4.8 (Salary Expenditures: $369,474)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds:
$222,127Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,:
$4,213,955- Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $3,314,214
- Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 8.4 (Salary Expenditures: $145,241)
- Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 7.2 (Salary Expenditures: $389,947)
- Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 4.8 (Salary Expenditures: $369,474)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds:
$309,223 Limited English Proficiency:
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 299 (male: 175, female: 124)
- Hispanic: 292 (male: 170, female: 122)
- Asian: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 64 (male: 50, female: 14)
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 329 (male: 172, female: 157)
- Hispanic: 322 (male: 167, female: 155)
- Asian: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 76 (male: 44, female: 32)
Students with disabilities:
Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.
Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 87 (male: 62, female: 25)
- Hispanic: 83 (male: 58, female: 25)
- Asian: 4 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 65 (male: 49, female: 16)
Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 2 (all male)
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 100 (male: 59, female: 41)
- Hispanic: 92 (male: 55, female: 37)
- Asian: 8 (male: 4, female: 4)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 74 (male: 43, female: 31)
Gifted and Talented:
(State average from 5,551 schools)
This school has students enrolled in one or more gifted/talented programs
Gifted/talented programs are programs during regular school hours that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an enriched curriculum for students who are endowed with a high degree of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, creativity, interest, or talent.
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 26 (male: 16, female: 10)
- Hispanic: 22 (male: 14, female: 8)
- Asian: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 studentsCharles T. Kranz Intermediate School: | 34.3 |
California: | 84.3 |
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 38 (male: 22, female: 16)
- Hispanic: 34 (male: 20, female: 14)
- Asian: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 students
Statewide Student Assessments
Smarter Balanced Summative Assessments:
(State average from 10,463 schools)
Smarter Balanced Summative Assessments (SB) is one of the online summative assessments - part of California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) System.
The summative assessments are comprehensive, end-of-year assessments of grade-level learning that measure progress toward college and career readiness. Each test in English language arts/literacy (ELA) and mathematics is comprised of two parts: (1) a computer-adaptive test and (2) a performance task, administered within a selected testing window available at 66 percent of the instructional year for grades three through eight, and grade eleven.
The summative assessments are aligned with the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) for ELA and mathematics. The tests capitalize on the strengths of computer adaptive testing efficient and precise measurement across the full range of achievement and timely turnaround of results.
ELA Standard Met and Above
- All40%
- Males34%
- Females46%
- Asian73%
- Hispanic38%
ELA students tested: 678
ELA students with scores: 678
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 40% |
California: | 49% |
Standard Not Met:
32.3%Standard Nearly Met:
27.9%Standard Met:
31.9%Standard Exceeded:
8.0%All Grades:
7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2527.3, Students tested: 341, Standard Not Met: 27.9%, Nearly Met: 27.9%, Met: 34.0%, Exceeded: 10.3%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2525.1, Students tested: 337, Standard Not Met: 36.8%, Nearly Met: 27.9%, Met: 29.7%, Exceeded: 5.6%)Charles T. Kranz Intermediate School - ELA Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
Math Standard Met and Above
- All16%
- Males12%
- Females20%
- Asian62%
- Hispanic13%
Math students tested: 678
Math students with scores: 677
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 16% |
California: | 38% |
Standard Not Met:
54.5%Standard Nearly Met:
29.4%Standard Met:
10.9%Standard Exceeded:
5.2%All Grades:
7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2478.9, Students tested: 341, Standard Not Met: 49.6%, Nearly Met: 32.3%, Met: 12.6%, Exceeded: 5.6%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2470.2, Students tested: 337, Standard Not Met: 59.5%, Nearly Met: 26.5%, Met: 9.2%, Exceeded: 4.8%)Charles T. Kranz Intermediate School - Math Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
ELA Standard Met and Above
- All32%
- Males29%
- Females36%
- Asian72%
- Hispanic30%
ELA students tested: 744
ELA students with scores: 744
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 32% |
State: | 48% |
Standard Not Met:
42.0%Standard Nearly Met:
26.0%Standard Met:
26.0%Standard Exceeded:
6.0%All Grades:
7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2503.8, Students tested: 357, Standard Not Met: 42.0%, Nearly Met: 25.0%, Met: 26.0%, Exceeded: 7.0%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2517.0, Students tested: 387, Standard Not Met: 41.0%, Nearly Met: 27.0%, Met: 26.0%, Exceeded: 5.0%)Charles T. Kranz Intermediate School - ELA Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
Math Standard Met and Above
- All15%
- Males15%
- Females14%
- Asian60%
- Hispanic13%
Math students tested: 744
Math students with scores: 744
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 15% |
State: | 37% |
Standard Not Met:
60.0%Standard Nearly Met:
26.0%Standard Met:
11.0%Standard Exceeded:
3.0%All Grades:
7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2469.7, Students tested: 357, Standard Not Met: 54.0%, Nearly Met: 29.0%, Met: 13.0%, Exceeded: 3.0%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2467.3, Students tested: 387, Standard Not Met: 65.0%, Nearly Met: 22.0%, Met: 9.0%, Exceeded: 4.0%)Charles T. Kranz Intermediate School - Math Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
ELA Standard Met and Above
- All28%
- Males27%
- Females29%
- Asian71%
- Hispanic26%
ELA students tested: 767
ELA students with scores: 766
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 28% |
State: | 44% |
Standard Not Met:
42.0%Standard Nearly Met:
31.0%Standard Met:
24.0%Standard Exceeded:
4.0%All Grades:
7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2486.6, Students tested: 386, Standard Not Met: 50.0%, Nearly Met: 28.0%, Met: 19.0%, Exceeded: 3.0%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2527.7, Students tested: 381, Standard Not Met: 33.0%, Nearly Met: 33.0%, Met: 28.0%, Exceeded: 5.0%)Charles T. Kranz Intermediate School - ELA Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
Math Standard Met and Above
- All14%
- Males18%
- Females11%
- Asian63%
- Hispanic12%
Math students tested: 767
Math students with scores: 763
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 14% |
California: | 34% |
Standard Not Met:
60.0%Standard Nearly Met:
26.0%Standard Met:
11.0%Standard Exceeded:
3.0%All Grades:
7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2453.5, Students tested: 386, Standard Not Met: 62.0%, Nearly Met: 25.0%, Met: 12.0%, Exceeded: 1.0%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2485.5, Students tested: 381, Standard Not Met: 57.0%, Nearly Met: 28.0%, Met: 10.0%, Exceeded: 5.0%)Charles T. Kranz Intermediate School - Math Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
California Alternate Assessments:
(State average from 1,579 schools)
The new California Alternate Assessments (CAAs) are based on alternate achievement standards-called the Core Content Connectors-and linked to the Common Core State Standards. The CAAs are online tests for students with an individualized education program (IEP) that designates the use of an alternate assessment to measure student progress on alternate achievement standards. This alternate assessment is part of the California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) System and replaces the California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA) for English language arts and mathematics.
ELA students tested: 13
ELA students with scores: 13
Percentage Level 3: | 0% |
State: | 15% |
Level 1:
92.3% The student showed limited understanding of core concepts.Level 2:
7.7% The student showed foundational understanding of core concepts. Level 3:
0.0% The student showed understanding of core concepts.All Grades:
Math students tested: 13
Math students with scores: 13
Percentage Level 3: | 0% |
California: | 6% |
Level 1:
100.0% The student showed limited understanding of core concepts.Level 2:
0.0% The student showed foundational understanding of core concepts. Level 3:
0.0% The student showed understanding of core concepts.All Grades:
Math students tested: 11
Math students with scores: 11
Percentage Level 3: | 0% |
California: | 5% |
Level 1:
100.0% The student showed limited understanding of core concepts.Level 2:
0.0% The student showed foundational understanding of core concepts. Level 3:
0.0% The student showed understanding of core concepts.All Grades:
Paper-based CAASPP:
(State average from 9,784 schools)
California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) System includes paper-based tests:
California Standards Tests (CSTs) - The CSTs for science in grades five, eight, and ten are administered only to students in California public schools. All questions are multiple-choice. These tests were developed specifically to assess students' knowledge of the California content standards in science.
California Modified Assessment (CMA) - The CMA for science was administered to eligible students in grades five, eight, and ten. The CMA is a standards-based test for students with an individualized education program who meet the eligibility criteria adopted by the State Board of Education. The Elementary and Secondary Education Act called for a range of assessments appropriate to students' abilities. The CMA provides an appropriate assessment for a small percentage of students allowing them to demonstrate their knowledge of skills in the California academic content standards for science.
CST Science students tested: 357
CST Science students with scores: 353
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 37% |
California: | 54% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
20.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
18.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
25.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
20.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
18.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 326.0, Students tested: 357, Far Below Basic: 20.0%, Below Basic: 18.0%, Basic: 25.0%, Proficient: 20.0%, Advanced: 18.0%)20.0%
18.0%
25.0%
20.0%
18.0%
CMA Science students tested: 29
CMA Science students with scores: 28
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 11% |
State: | 38% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
28.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
29.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
32.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
7.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
4.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 286.5, Students tested: 29, Far Below Basic: 28.0%, Below Basic: 29.0%, Basic: 32.0%, Proficient: 7.0%, Advanced: 4.0%) CST Science students tested: 363
CST Science students with scores: 362
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 41% |
State: | 56% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
14.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
18.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
27.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
23.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
17.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 333.3, Students tested: 363, Far Below Basic: 14.0%, Below Basic: 18.0%, Basic: 27.0%, Proficient: 23.0%, Advanced: 17.0%)14.0%
18.0%
27.0%
23.0%
17.0%
CMA Science students tested: 17
CMA Science students with scores: 17
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 12% |
California: | 38% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
12.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
41.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
35.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
6.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
6.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 299.5, Students tested: 17, Far Below Basic: 12.0%, Below Basic: 41.0%, Basic: 35.0%, Proficient: 6.0%, Advanced: 6.0%) CST Science students tested: 347
CST Science students with scores: 343
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 39% |
State: | 60% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
15.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
17.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
29.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
23.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
17.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 332.7, Students tested: 347, Far Below Basic: 15.0%, Below Basic: 17.0%, Basic: 29.0%, Proficient: 23.0%, Advanced: 17.0%)15.0%
17.0%
29.0%
23.0%
17.0%
CMA Science students tested: 30
CMA Science students with scores: 30
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 7% |
California: | 39% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
43.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
27.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
23.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
7.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
0.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 277.0, Students tested: 30, Far Below Basic: 43.0%, Below Basic: 27.0%, Basic: 23.0%, Proficient: 7.0%, Advanced: 0.0%) The Physical Fitness Test:
The Physical Fitness Test (PFT) for students in California schools is the FITNESSGRAM. The main goal of the test is to help students in starting life-long habits of regular physical activity.
Aerobic Capacity:7th grade:
(Students tested: 347, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 74.9%, Needs Improvement: 15.9%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 9.2%)
Body Composition:7th grade:
(Students tested: 347, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 44.1%, Needs Improvement: 19.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 36.9%)
Abdominal Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 347, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 80.7%, Needs Improvement: 19.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 347, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 86.7%, Needs Improvement: 13.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 347, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 51.3%, Needs Improvement: 48.7%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:7th grade:
(Students tested: 347, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 83.6%, Needs Improvement: 16.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:7th grade:
(Students tested: 361, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 74.0%, Needs Improvement: 17.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 8.8%)
Body Composition:7th grade:
(Students tested: 361, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 47.4%, Needs Improvement: 20.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 31.8%)
Abdominal Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 361, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 84.2%, Needs Improvement: 15.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 361, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 89.2%, Needs Improvement: 10.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 361, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 69.5%, Needs Improvement: 30.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:7th grade:
(Students tested: 361, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 87.8%, Needs Improvement: 12.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:7th grade:
(Students tested: 384, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 66.9%, Needs Improvement: 19.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 13.3%)
Body Composition:7th grade:
(Students tested: 384, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 49.2%, Needs Improvement: 20.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 30.2%)
Abdominal Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 384, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 88.3%, Needs Improvement: 11.7%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 384, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 91.1%, Needs Improvement: 8.9%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 384, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 64.3%, Needs Improvement: 35.7%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:7th grade:
(Students tested: 384, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 92.2%, Needs Improvement: 7.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:7th grade:
(Students tested: 374, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 65.2%, Needs Improvement: 22.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 12.6%)
Body Composition:7th grade:
(Students tested: 374, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 47.3%, Needs Improvement: 19.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 33.4%)
Abdominal Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 374, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 61.5%, Needs Improvement: 38.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 374, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 73.3%, Needs Improvement: 26.7%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 374, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 52.9%, Needs Improvement: 47.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:7th grade:
(Students tested: 374, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 93.9%, Needs Improvement: 6.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:7th grade:
(Students tested: 377, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 59.7%, Needs Improvement: 17.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 23.3%)
Body Composition:7th grade:
(Students tested: 377, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 43.5%, Needs Improvement: 14.9%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 41.6%)
Abdominal Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 377, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 66.3%, Needs Improvement: 33.7%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 377, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 82.5%, Needs Improvement: 17.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 377, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 62.3%, Needs Improvement: 37.7%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:7th grade:
(Students tested: 377, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 93.6%, Needs Improvement: 6.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:7th grade:
(Students tested: 391, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 50.1%, Needs Improvement: 20.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 29.7%)
Body Composition:7th grade:
(Students tested: 391, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 34.0%, Needs Improvement: 14.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 51.7%)
Abdominal Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 391, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 77.2%, Needs Improvement: 22.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 391, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 89.5%, Needs Improvement: 10.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 391, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 63.7%, Needs Improvement: 36.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:7th grade:
(Students tested: 391, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 93.4%, Needs Improvement: 6.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
California English Language Development Test:
(State average from 9,932 schools)
Students in kindergarten through grade twelve whose home language is not English are required by law to take an English skills test. In California, the test is called the California English Language Development Test (CELDT).
Charles T. Kranz Intermediate School - students who met CELDT criterion (all grades)
All Grades:Student Count: 278
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 148
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 53.0% |
State: | 34.0% |
Grade 7:Student Count: 150
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 74
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 49.0% |
State: | 48.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 554.5 |
California: | 547.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 529.5 |
State: | 534.4 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 541.7 |
California: | 529.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 533.7 |
California: | 530.2 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 128
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 74
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 58.0% |
California: | 47.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 583.4 |
State: | 556.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 548.2 |
State: | 547.2 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 550.1 |
California: | 536.1 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 559.2 |
California: | 537.0 |
All Grades:Student Count: 308
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 180
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 58.0% |
State: | 34.0% |
Grade 7:Student Count: 142
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 83
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 58.0% |
California: | 48.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 572.2 |
State: | 550.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 540.5 |
California: | 536.7 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 546.1 |
California: | 530.6 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 549.4 |
State: | 532.1 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 166
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 97
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 58.0% |
State: | 49.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 603.3 |
California: | 562.4 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 566.7 |
State: | 552.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 557.5 |
California: | 539.5 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 564.8 |
California: | 541.2 |
All Grades:Student Count: 304
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 175
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 58.0% |
State: | 34.0% |
Grade 7:Student Count: 157
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 78
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 50.0% |
California: | 47.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 578.2 |
California: | 551.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 537.2 |
California: | 538.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 556.1 |
State: | 532.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 550.1 |
State: | 532.1 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 147
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 97
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 66.0% |
California: | 48.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 617.0 |
State: | 562.8 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 566.6 |
California: | 552.6 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 555.2 |
State: | 543.1 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 567.4 |
California: | 541.5 |
All Grades:Student Count: 351
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 204
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 58.0% |
State: | 34.0% |
Grade 7:Student Count: 159
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 87
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 55.0% |
State: | 47.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 569.7 |
State: | 549.7 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 541.5 |
California: | 538.6 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 552.1 |
State: | 533.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 558.1 |
California: | 535.2 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 192
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 117
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 61.0% |
California: | 49.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 579.1 |
State: | 564.3 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 558.3 |
California: | 554.9 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 555.7 |
California: | 545.4 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 561.7 |
California: | 545.9 |
All Grades:Student Count: 353
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 203
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 58.0% |
State: | 34.0% |
Grade 7:Student Count: 180
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 101
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 56.0% |
State: | 47.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 582.3 |
State: | 557.3 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 537.1 |
California: | 539.4 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 551.4 |
State: | 543.2 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 560.0 |
California: | 540.4 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 173
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 102
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 59.0% |
State: | 47.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 612.0 |
State: | 570.1 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 567.5 |
State: | 552.2 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 554.6 |
California: | 551.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 569.7 |
State: | 548.6 |
All Grades:Student Count: 349
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 195
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 56.0% |
State: | 35.0% |
Grade 7:Student Count: 159
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 87
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 55.0% |
California: | 50.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 580.3 |
California: | 566.1 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 536.4 |
California: | 544.7 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 560.3 |
California: | 543.8 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 572.2 |
California: | 545.1 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 190
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 108
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 57.0% |
California: | 50.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 590.6 |
California: | 579.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 564.9 |
California: | 558.4 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 553.8 |
State: | 553.4 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 583.6 |
California: | 555.6 |
All Grades:Student Count: 420
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 196
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 47.0% |
California: | 31.0% |
Grade 7:Student Count: 218
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 109
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 50.0% |
California: | 48.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 574.6 |
State: | 559.8 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 547.9 |
State: | 542.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 539.3 |
State: | 548.8 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 561.4 |
California: | 534.4 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 202
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 87
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 43.0% |
State: | 48.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 583.5 |
California: | 570.7 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 549.1 |
State: | 557.2 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 541.5 |
State: | 562.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 557.7 |
California: | 544.1 |
Accountability
Adequate Yearly Progress:
(State average from 9,846 schools)
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) - Accountability system mandated by federal No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Statistics are based on test results of the Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) Program, the California High School Exit Examination (CAHSEE), and the California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA).
Charles T. Kranz Intermediate School - Adequate Yearly Progress status
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 716 out of 719 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 27 out of 27 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 705 out of 708 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 478 out of 478 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 100 out of 100 enrolled)
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic99
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- SED99
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 99% (tested 715 out of 719 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 28 out of 28 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 99% (tested 705 out of 709 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 477 out of 478 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 100 out of 100 enrolled)
Met all AYP Criteria: Yes
Number of AYP criteria met: 9
Number of AYP criteria possible: 9
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)Attendance rate (calculated by using number of days attended and enrolled) : 96
Met Attendance rate Target: Yes
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
ELA Participation RateCharles T. Kranz Intermediate School: | 99.0% |
State: | 95.2% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic99
- Asian97
- Filipino100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP99
- With Disabilities96
- Hispanic: 99% (tested 735 out of 739 enrolled)
- Asian: 97% (tested 27 out of 28 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 5 out of 5 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 751 out of 753 enrolled)
- English Learners: 99% (tested 425 out of 428 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 96% (tested 99 out of 103 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveCharles T. Kranz Intermediate School: | 28.7% |
California: | 42.6% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic27
- Asian68
- SED29
- LEP10
- With Disabilities10
- Hispanic: 27% (189 out of 698 valid scores)
- Asian: 68% (17 out of 25 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 29% (206 out of 719 valid scores)
- English Learners: 10% (41 out of 403 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 10% (9 out of 90 valid scores)
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Math Participation RateCharles T. Kranz Intermediate School: | 99.0% |
California: | 94.9% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic99
- Asian97
- Filipino100
- White100
- SED99
- LEP99
- With Disabilities96
- Hispanic: 99% (tested 733 out of 740 enrolled)
- Asian: 97% (tested 27 out of 28 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 5 out of 5 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 99% (tested 749 out of 754 enrolled)
- English Learners: 99% (tested 424 out of 428 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 96% (tested 99 out of 103 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveCharles T. Kranz Intermediate School: | 14.6% |
State: | 33.3% |
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic13
- Asian60
- SED14
- LEP5
- With Disabilities7
- Hispanic: 13% (90 out of 695 valid scores)
- Asian: 60% (15 out of 25 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 14% (103 out of 716 valid scores)
- English Learners: 5% (19 out of 402 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 7% (6 out of 90 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 11
Number of AYP criteria possible: 19
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: No
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 89.2%
ELA Participation RateCharles T. Kranz Intermediate School: | 100.0% |
State: | 98.2% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 751 out of 751 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 21 out of 21 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 364 out of 364 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 464 out of 464 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 107 out of 107 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or Above
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic44
- Asian76
- SED38
- LEP32
- With Disabilities26
- Hispanic: 44% (313 out of 711 valid scores)
- Asian: 76% (16 out of 21 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 38% (127 out of 338 valid scores)
- English Learners: 32% (142 out of 443 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 26% (25 out of 95 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: No
Math Percent Proficient Target: 89.5%
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 750 out of 751 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 21 out of 21 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 363 out of 364 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 464 out of 464 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 106 out of 107 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveSchool: | 41.2% |
California: | 59.6% |
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic40
- Asian76
- SED34
- LEP31
- With Disabilities19
- Hispanic: 40% (286 out of 710 valid scores)
- Asian: 76% (16 out of 21 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 34% (116 out of 337 valid scores)
- English Learners: 31% (138 out of 443 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 19% (18 out of 94 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 13
Number of AYP criteria possible: 17
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: Yes
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 78.4%
ELA Participation RateSchool: | 100.0% |
California: | 98.3% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 836 out of 838 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 19 out of 19 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 6 out of 6 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 866 out of 868 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 532 out of 533 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 92 out of 93 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveSchool: | 47.7% |
California: | 57.4% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic47
- Asian79
- SED48
- LEP35
- With Disabilities31
- Hispanic: 47% (371 out of 791 valid scores)
- Asian: 79% (15 out of 19 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 48% (392 out of 821 valid scores)
- English Learners: 35% (174 out of 505 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 31% (27 out of 86 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: No
Math Percent Proficient Target: 79%
Math Participation RateHere: | 100.0% |
California: | 98.1% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 834 out of 837 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 19 out of 19 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 6 out of 6 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 864 out of 867 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 530 out of 532 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 92 out of 93 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or Above
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic38
- Asian90
- SED39
- LEP31
- With Disabilities23
- Hispanic: 38% (303 out of 791 valid scores)
- Asian: 90% (17 out of 19 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 39% (323 out of 821 valid scores)
- English Learners: 31% (155 out of 505 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 23% (20 out of 86 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 9
Number of AYP criteria possible: 17
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: No
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 67.6%
ELA Participation RateSchool: | 100.0% |
California: | 98.2% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 957 out of 959 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 36 out of 36 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 6 out of 6 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,004 out of 1,006 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 621 out of 621 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 121 out of 121 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveCharles T. Kranz Intermediate School: | 41.0% |
State: | 55.9% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic39
- Asian81
- SED41
- LEP26
- With Disabilities27
- Hispanic: 39% (343 out of 871 valid scores)
- Asian: 81% (26 out of 32 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 41% (374 out of 914 valid scores)
- English Learners: 26% (150 out of 572 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 27% (30 out of 113 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: No
Math Percent Proficient Target: 68.5%
Math Participation RateSchool: | 100.0% |
California: | 98.0% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 956 out of 959 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 36 out of 36 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 6 out of 6 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,003 out of 1,006 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 620 out of 621 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 120 out of 121 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveSchool: | 38.0% |
California: | 59.3% |
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic37
- Asian81
- SED38
- LEP27
- With Disabilities16
- Hispanic: 37% (321 out of 871 valid scores)
- Asian: 81% (26 out of 32 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 38% (348 out of 914 valid scores)
- English Learners: 27% (153 out of 572 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 16% (18 out of 112 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 13
Number of AYP criteria possible: 19
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: No
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 56.8%
ELA Participation RateSchool: | 100.0% |
California: | 98.2% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Black100
- White100
- Multirace100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,034 out of 1,036 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 53 out of 53 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 5 out of 5 enrolled)
- Two or More Races: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,097 out of 1,099 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 635 out of 636 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 140 out of 142 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or Above
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic36
- Asian69
- SED38
- LEP23
- With Disabilities17
- Hispanic: 36% (349 out of 966 valid scores)
- Asian: 69% (35 out of 51 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 38% (390 out of 1,027 valid scores)
- English Learners: 23% (136 out of 604 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 17% (23 out of 133 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
Math Percent Proficient Target: 58%
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic99
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Black100
- White100
- Multirace100
- SED99
- LEP100
- With Disabilities98
- Hispanic: 99% (tested 1,029 out of 1,036 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 53 out of 53 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 5 out of 5 enrolled)
- Two or More Races: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 99% (tested 1,092 out of 1,099 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 633 out of 636 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 98% (tested 139 out of 142 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveCharles T. Kranz Intermediate School: | 36.5% |
California: | 57.1% |
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic34
- Asian80
- SED37
- LEP26
- With Disabilities17
- Hispanic: 34% (326 out of 962 valid scores)
- Asian: 80% (41 out of 51 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 37% (373 out of 1,023 valid scores)
- English Learners: 26% (157 out of 603 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 17% (22 out of 133 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 9
Number of AYP criteria possible: 17
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: No
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 46%
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,006 out of 1,009 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 61 out of 61 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 9 out of 9 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,079 out of 1,082 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 681 out of 683 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 123 out of 123 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or Above
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic32
- Asian67
- SED34
- LEP20
- With Disabilities10
- Hispanic: 32% (303 out of 946 valid scores)
- Asian: 67% (38 out of 57 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 34% (348 out of 1,015 valid scores)
- English Learners: 20% (132 out of 651 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 10% (12 out of 117 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: No
Math Percent Proficient Target: 47.5%
Math Participation RateCharles T. Kranz Intermediate School: | 100.0% |
California: | 98.2% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,006 out of 1,009 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 61 out of 61 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 9 out of 9 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,079 out of 1,082 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 681 out of 683 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 123 out of 123 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveCharles T. Kranz Intermediate School: | 30.7% |
State: | 55.6% |
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic28
- Asian68
- SED31
- LEP22
- With Disabilities13
- Hispanic: 28% (267 out of 946 valid scores)
- Asian: 68% (39 out of 57 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 31% (312 out of 1,015 valid scores)
- English Learners: 22% (140 out of 651 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 13% (15 out of 117 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 11
Number of AYP criteria possible: 19
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: No
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 35.2%
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,019 out of 1,019 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 54 out of 54 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 12 out of 12 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,089 out of 1,089 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 690 out of 690 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 107 out of 107 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveSchool: | 29.6% |
California: | 48.6% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic27
- Asian66
- White55
- SED30
- LEP16
- With Disabilities6
- Hispanic: 27% (259 out of 948 valid scores)
- Asian: 66% (35 out of 53 valid scores)
- White: 55% (6 out of 11 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 30% (301 out of 1,016 valid scores)
- English Learners: 16% (106 out of 667 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 6% (6 out of 102 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: No
Math Percent Proficient Target: 37%
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,014 out of 1,019 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 54 out of 54 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 12 out of 12 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,084 out of 1,089 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 688 out of 690 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 106 out of 107 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or Above
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic23
- Asian66
- White18
- SED25
- LEP16
- With Disabilities8
- Hispanic: 23% (217 out of 944 valid scores)
- Asian: 66% (35 out of 53 valid scores)
- White: 18% (2 out of 11 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 25% (255 out of 1,012 valid scores)
- English Learners: 16% (104 out of 665 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 8% (8 out of 101 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 16
Number of AYP criteria possible: 21
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 24.4%
ELA Participation RateCharles T. Kranz Intermediate School: | 99.0% |
State: | 97.8% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic99
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED99
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 99% (tested 1,104 out of 1,110 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 51 out of 51 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 12 out of 12 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 99% (tested 1,174 out of 1,180 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 750 out of 752 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 107 out of 107 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveSchool: | 28.0% |
California: | 46.4% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic26
- Asian69
- White46
- SED28
- LEP16
- With Disabilities4
- Hispanic: 26% (261 out of 1,009 valid scores)
- Asian: 69% (35 out of 51 valid scores)
- White: 46% (5 out of 11 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 28% (302 out of 1,077 valid scores)
- English Learners: 16% (112 out of 710 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 4% (4 out of 101 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
Math Percent Proficient Target: 26.5%
Math Participation RateCharles T. Kranz Intermediate School: | 99.0% |
State: | 97.9% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic99
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED99
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 99% (tested 1,103 out of 1,110 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 51 out of 51 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 12 out of 12 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 99% (tested 1,173 out of 1,180 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 751 out of 752 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 107 out of 107 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or Above
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic26
- Asian73
- White27
- SED28
- LEP20
- With Disabilities7
- Hispanic: 26% (259 out of 1,007 valid scores)
- Asian: 73% (37 out of 51 valid scores)
- White: 27% (3 out of 11 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 28% (300 out of 1,075 valid scores)
- English Learners: 20% (139 out of 710 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 7% (7 out of 101 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 16
Number of AYP criteria possible: 19
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 24.4%
ELA Participation RateCharles T. Kranz Intermediate School: | 100.0% |
State: | 97.3% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP99
- With Disabilities95
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,093 out of 1,098 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 65 out of 65 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 17 out of 17 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,179 out of 1,184 enrolled)
- English Learners: 99% (tested 745 out of 750 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 95% (tested 95 out of 100 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or Above
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic25
- Asian57
- White35
- SED27
- LEP17
- With Disabilities2
- Hispanic: 25% (269 out of 1,075 valid scores)
- Asian: 57% (37 out of 65 valid scores)
- White: 35% (6 out of 17 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 27% (314 out of 1,161 valid scores)
- English Learners: 17% (127 out of 742 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 2% (2 out of 94 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
Math Percent Proficient Target: 26.5%
Math Participation RateCharles T. Kranz Intermediate School: | 100.0% |
California: | 97.5% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,096 out of 1,097 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 65 out of 65 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 17 out of 17 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,182 out of 1,183 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 749 out of 750 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 100 out of 100 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveCharles T. Kranz Intermediate School: | 28.9% |
California: | 49.9% |
Math Proficient or Above
- Asian71
- White41
- SED29
- LEP22
- With Disabilities4
- Asian: 71% (46 out of 65 valid scores)
- White: 41% (7 out of 17 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 29% (337 out of 1,164 valid scores)
- English Learners: 22% (166 out of 746 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 4% (4 out of 99 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 14
Number of AYP criteria possible: 17
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 24.4%
ELA Participation RateSchool: | 100.0% |
California: | 99.3% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,108 out of 1,110 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 58 out of 58 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 14 out of 14 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,186 out of 1,188 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 771 out of 772 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 71 out of 71 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveCharles T. Kranz Intermediate School: | 26.1% |
California: | 44.5% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic25
- Asian48
- White29
- SED26
- LEP19
- With Disabilities6
- Hispanic: 25% (255 out of 1,022 valid scores)
- Asian: 48% (27 out of 56 valid scores)
- White: 29% (4 out of 14 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 26% (287 out of 1,098 valid scores)
- English Learners: 19% (136 out of 736 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 6% (4 out of 68 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
Math Percent Proficient Target: 26.5%
Math Participation RateCharles T. Kranz Intermediate School: | 100.0% |
State: | 99.2% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,108 out of 1,110 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 58 out of 58 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 14 out of 14 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,186 out of 1,188 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 771 out of 772 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 71 out of 71 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveCharles T. Kranz Intermediate School: | 26.9% |
State: | 49.3% |
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic25
- Asian59
- White29
- SED27
- LEP22
- With Disabilities4
- Hispanic: 25% (256 out of 1,022 valid scores)
- Asian: 59% (33 out of 56 valid scores)
- White: 29% (4 out of 14 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 27% (295 out of 1,098 valid scores)
- English Learners: 22% (158 out of 736 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 4% (3 out of 68 valid scores)
Health & Safety
Offenses:
(State average from 5,445 schools)
An incident refers to a specific criminal act involving one or more victims and offenders. For example, if two students are robbed without a weapon, at the same time and place, this is classified as two robbery victimizations but only one robbery without a weapon incident
A weapon is any instrument or object used with the intent to threaten, injure, or kill. This includes look-alikes if they are used to threaten others.
Physical attack or fight refers to an actual and intentional touching or striking of another person against his/her will, or the intentional causing of bodily harm to an individual. Physical attack or fight does not include rape.
A threat refers to an act where there was no physical contact between the offender and victim but the victim felt that physical harm could have occurred based on verbal or nonverbal communication by the offender. This includes nonverbal threats (e.g., brandishing a weapon), and verbal threats of physical harm which are made in person. Threats made over the telephone or threatening letters are excluded.
At least one incident at this school that involved a shooting: No
Any of this school's students, faculty, or staff died as a result of a homicide committed at this school: No
Incidents of physical attack or fight without a weapon: 7
Incidents of threats of physical attack without a weapon: 45
Total incidents per 1,000 studentsCharles T. Kranz Intermediate School: | 68.6 |
State: | 60.8 |
Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
(State average from 8,737 schools)
A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 73 (male: 38, female: 35)
- Hispanic: 73 (male: 38, female: 35)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 37 (male: 20, female: 17)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 16 (male: 11, female: 5)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 studentsHere: | 96.3 |
California: | 172.7 |
Chronic Student Absenteeism
- Hispanic73
- Asian2
- White2
- LEP34
- IDEA10
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 77 (male: 29, female: 48)
- Hispanic: 73 (male: 29, female: 44)
- Asian: 2 (all female)
- White: 2 (all female)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 34 (male: 17, female: 17)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 studentsSchool: | 101.6 |
California: | 178.2 |
Suspensions:
(State average from 1,406 schools)
Out-of-school suspension - For students with disabilities served under IDEA : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his/her regular school for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes to another setting (e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include both removals in which no individualized family service plan(IFSP) or individualized education plan(IEP) services are provided because the removal is 10 days or less as well as removals in which the child continues to receive services according to his/her IFSP or IEP.
- For students without disabilities and students with disabilities served solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his / her regular school for at least half a day(but less than the remainder of the school year) for disciplinary purposes to another setting(e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include removals in which no educational services are provided, and removals in which educational services are provided(e.g., school-provided at home instruction or tutoring).
In-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his or her regular classroom(s) for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes, but remains under the direct supervision of school personnel. Direct supervision means school personnel are physically in the same location as students under their supervision. School days missed due to out-of-school suspension
- Hispanic126
- Asian1
- LEP67
- IDEA22
School days missed due to out-of-school suspension: 127 (male: 82, female: 45)
- Hispanic: 126 (male: 81, female: 45)
- Asian: 1 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 67 (male: 43, female: 24)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 22 (male: 15, female: 7)
Instances of out-of-school suspension (Students without disabilities): 64
Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Students without disabilities)Charles T. Kranz Intermediate School: | 84.4 |
State: | 84.8 |
Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 2 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2
Students without disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 24 (male: 10, female: 14)
- Hispanic: 22 (male: 8, female: 14)
- Asian: 2 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 13 (male: 5, female: 8)
Students without disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension: 10 (male: 8, female: 2)
- Hispanic: 10 (male: 8, female: 2)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
Instances of out-of-school suspension (Students with disabilities): 12
Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Students with disabilities)Charles T. Kranz Intermediate School: | 15.8 |
State: | 28.1 |
Students with disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 10 (male: 8, female: 2)
- Hispanic: 10 (male: 8, female: 2)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 5 (all male)
Students with disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all female)
Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 10 (male: 8, female: 2)
- Hispanic: 10 (male: 8, female: 2)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
Students without disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 46 (male: 32, female: 14)
- Hispanic: 46 (male: 32, female: 14)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 25 (male: 14, female: 11)
Students without disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension: 19 (male: 14, female: 5)
- Hispanic: 19 (male: 14, female: 5)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 10 (male: 8, female: 2)
Students with disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
Students with disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 13 (male: 8, female: 5)
- Hispanic: 13 (male: 8, female: 5)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
Students with disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension: 2 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2
Comments
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: