City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Vermont) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is
66.
10 HOOVER STREET
Springfield, VT 5156
County: WINDSOR
Grade span: Kindergarten - 5th Grade
Phone: (802) 885-5154 (make sure to verify first before calling)
Other nearby schools ratings:
Elm Hill School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:| Vermont: | 51 |
| Windsor County: | 59 |
| Springfield: | 48 |
| Elm Hill School: | 66 |
Discuss this school with others on our active
Vermont forum
Enrollment in Elm Hill School
2005 Student Enrollment: 122
Kindergarten Enrollment: 18
1st Grade Enrollment: 19
2nd Grade Enrollment: 22
3rd Grade Enrollment: 20
4th Grade Enrollment: 21
5th Grade Enrollment: 19
Ungraded Enrollment: 3
Female Enrollment: 67
Male Enrollment: 54
White Enrollment: 117
Black Enrollment: 2
Hispanic Enrollment: 2
Free Lunch Eligible Students: 32
Reduced Price Lunch Eligible Students: 7
Free And Reduced Price Lunch Eligible Students: 39
Pupil / Teacher Ratio: 13
Full Time Equivalent (FTE) Teachers: 9.4
Genders in Elm Hill School
Grades in Elm Hill School
2004 Student Enrollment: 114
Kindergarten Enrollment: 16
1st Grade Enrollment: 19
2nd Grade Enrollment: 19
3rd Grade Enrollment: 19
4th Grade Enrollment: 19
5th Grade Enrollment: 20
Ungraded Enrollment: 2
Female Enrollment: 56
Male Enrollment: 56
White Enrollment: 109
Black Enrollment: 2
Hispanic Enrollment: 1
Migrant Students Enrollment: 1
Free Lunch Eligible Students: 26
Reduced Price Lunch Eligible Students: 20
Free And Reduced Price Lunch Eligible Students: 46
Pupil / Teacher Ratio: 12.7
Full Time Equivalent (FTE) Teachers: 9
2003 Student Enrollment: 115
Kindergarten Enrollment: 18
1st Grade Enrollment: 17
2nd Grade Enrollment: 20
3rd Grade Enrollment: 19
4th Grade Enrollment: 16
5th Grade Enrollment: 25
Female Enrollment: 50
Male Enrollment: 63
White Enrollment: 110
Black Enrollment: 2
Hispanic Enrollment: 1
Migrant Students Enrollment: 2
Free Lunch Eligible Students: 26
Reduced Price Lunch Eligible Students: 19
Free And Reduced Price Lunch Eligible Students: 45
Pupil / Teacher Ratio: 12.8
Full Time Equivalent (FTE) Teachers: 9
2002 Student Enrollment: 124
Kindergarten Enrollment: 18
1st Grade Enrollment: 20
2nd Grade Enrollment: 16
3rd Grade Enrollment: 18
4th Grade Enrollment: 24
5th Grade Enrollment: 28
Female Enrollment: 57
Male Enrollment: 67
White Enrollment: 122
Black Enrollment: 2
Free Lunch Eligible Students: 35
Reduced Price Lunch Eligible Students: 13
Free And Reduced Price Lunch Eligible Students: 48
Pupil / Teacher Ratio: 13.9
Full Time Equivalent (FTE) Teachers: 8.9
2001 Student Enrollment: 123
Kindergarten Enrollment: 18
1st Grade Enrollment: 16
2nd Grade Enrollment: 20
3rd Grade Enrollment: 25
4th Grade Enrollment: 27
5th Grade Enrollment: 17
Female Enrollment: 59
Male Enrollment: 64
White Enrollment: 121
Black Enrollment: 2
Free Lunch Eligible Students: 32
Reduced Price Lunch Eligible Students: 13
Free And Reduced Price Lunch Eligible Students: 45
Pupil / Teacher Ratio: 14
Full Time Equivalent (FTE) Teachers: 8.8
Attendance Rate in Elm Hill School
Retention Rate in Elm Hill School
2006 Student Statistics:
Attendance rate: 96.4%
| Here: | 96.4% |
| State average from 232 schools: | 95.4% |
Retention rate: 2.5%
| This school: | 2.5% |
| State average from 169 schools: | 3.3% |
Special education (%): 13.1%
| Here: | 13.1% |
| State average from 231 schools: | 12.4% |
Home study students: 1
2005 Student Statistics:
Attendance rate: 96.7%
| This school: | 96.7% |
| State average from 233 schools: | 95.2% |
Retention rate: 2.7%
| Here: | 2.7% |
| State average from 180 schools: | 3.3% |
Special education (%): 13.2%
| Elm Hill School: | 13.2% |
| State average from 232 schools: | 12.3% |
2004 Student Statistics:
Attendance rate: 96.5%
| Here: | 96.5% |
| State average from 232 schools: | 95.5% |
Retention rate: 3.4%
| Here: | 3.4% |
| State average from 141 schools: | 2.4% |
Special education (%): 13.0%
| Here: | 13.0% |
| State average from 231 schools: | 12.3% |
2006 Staff Statistics:
Classroom teachers: 6.90
Other teachers: 3.50
Instructional aides: 5.69
Licensed administrators: .50
Administrative support: 1
Other staff: 2.75
Average teacher salary ($): 46,411$
| Here: | 46,411$ |
| State average from 234 schools: | 44,460$ |
2005 Staff Statistics:
Classroom teachers: 7
Other teachers: 3
Instructional aides: 7.50
Licensed administrators: .50
Administrative support: 1
Other staff: 2.30
Average teacher salary ($): 46,598$
| This school: | 46,598$ |
| State average from 233 schools: | 42,814$ |
2004 Staff Statistics:
Classroom teachers: 7
Other teachers: 2.90
Instructional aides: 6.80
Licensed administrators: .50
Administrative support: 1
Other staff: 2.28
Average teacher salary ($): 45,121$
| Here: | 45,121$ |
| State average from 233 schools: | 41,394$ |
Risk Factor Statistics:
Poverty rate (%), July 2006: 17.9%
| Here: | 17.9% |
| State average from 231 schools: | 10.6% |
Poverty rate (%), Dec. 2005: 16.5%
| This school: | 16.5% |
| State average from 230 schools: | 10.0% |
Poverty rate town rank, July 2006: 55.0%
| Here: | 55.0% |
| State average from 232 schools: | 1.6% |
Poverty rate town rank, Dec. 2005: 54.0%
| Here: | 54.0% |
| State average from 231 schools: | 1.6% |
2007 Financial Resources Statistics:
Adjusted gross income per exemption ($): 19,304$
| Here: | 19,304$ |
| State average from 233 schools: | 21,550$ |
Adjusted gross income per exemption (rank): 225.0
| Here: | 225.0 |
| State average from 233 schools: | 156.1 |
Median Income for Joint & Head of Household ($): 43,334$
| Here: | 43,334$ |
| State average from 233 schools: | 51,309$ |
Median Income for Joint & Head of Household (town rank): 234.0
| Here: | 234.0 |
| State average from 233 schools: | 156.3 |
Percent of Joint & Head of Household returns less than $75,000: 80.8%
| This school: | 80.8% |
| State average from 233 schools: | 72.7% |
2006 Financial Resources Statistics:
Adjusted gross income per exemption ($): 18,717$
| Here: | 18,717$ |
| State average from 233 schools: | 20,888$ |
Adjusted gross income per exemption (rank): 208.0
| Here: | 208.0 |
| State average from 233 schools: | 141.6 |
Median Income for Joint & Head of Household ($): 42,250$
| Elm Hill School: | 42,250$ |
| State average from 233 schools: | 49,082$ |
Median Income for Joint & Head of Household (town rank): 220.0
| Here: | 220.0 |
| State average from 233 schools: | 155.9 |
Percent of Joint & Head of Household returns less than $75,000: 82.5%
| Here: | 82.5% |
| State average from 233 schools: | 75.1% |
2005 Financial Resources Statistics:
Adjusted gross income per exemption ($): 17,952$
| Here: | 17,952$ |
| State average from 233 schools: | 19,835$ |
Adjusted gross income per exemption (rank): 182.0
| Here: | 182.0 |
| State average from 233 schools: | 136.1 |
Median Income for Joint & Head of Household ($): 39,962$
| Here: | 39,962$ |
| State average from 233 schools: | 46,686$ |
Median Income for Joint & Head of Household (town rank): 202.0
| Elm Hill School: | 202.0 |
| State average from 233 schools: | 139.1 |
Percent of Joint & Head of Household returns less than $75,000: 80.8%
| Elm Hill School: | 80.8% |
| State average from 233 schools: | 72.7% |
2007 Financial Expenditures Statistics:
Percent direct instruction: 59.0%
| Elm Hill School: | 59.0% |
| State average from 233 schools: | 63.3% |
Percent student services: 10.0%
| Here: | 10.0% |
| State average from 230 schools: | 6.1% |
Percent staff services: 4.1%
| Here: | 4.1% |
| State average from 230 schools: | 3.3% |
Percent leadership services: 9.1%
| Here: | 9.1% |
| State average from 233 schools: | 8.8% |
Percent operation: 17.8%
| Here: | 17.8% |
| State average from 233 schools: | 19.5% |
Financial Expenditures - Elm Hill School
Financial Expenditures - Vermont
Total PK-12 current expense ($): 18,740,843$
| Elm Hill School: | 18,740,843$ |
| State average from 233 schools: | 6,286,407$ |
Total PK-12 current expense per site FTE student ($): 14,079$
| Here: | 14,079$ |
| State average from 233 schools: | 11,797$ |
Total unduplicated expenditures ($): 20,559,870$
| This school: | 20,559,870$ |
| State average from 233 schools: | 7,256,725$ |
Tuition and fees to other Vermont districts ($): 1,434,077$
| This school: | 1,434,077$ |
| State average from 233 schools: | 1,769,547$ |
K-12 Town Special education costs ($): 3,470,334$
| Here: | 3,470,334$ |
| State average from 203 schools: | 1,421,788$ |
2006 Financial Expenditures Statistics:
Percent direct instruction: 58.9%
| Here: | 58.9% |
| State average from 233 schools: | 63.4% |
Percent student services: 11.5%
| Here: | 11.5% |
| State average from 232 schools: | 6.0% |
Percent staff services: 3.9%
| Here: | 3.9% |
| State average from 230 schools: | 3.3% |
Percent leadership services: 8.4%
| Here: | 8.4% |
| State average from 233 schools: | 9.0% |
Percent operation: 17.4%
| Here: | 17.4% |
| State average from 233 schools: | 18.3% |
Financial Expenditures - Elm Hill School
Financial Expenditures - Vermont
Total PK-12 current expense ($): 17,772,657$
| Here: | 17,772,657$ |
| State average from 233 schools: | 6,034,752$ |
Total PK-12 current expense per site FTE student ($): 12,895$
| Here: | 12,895$ |
| State average from 233 schools: | 11,289$ |
Total unduplicated expenditures ($): 19,902,108$
| Elm Hill School: | 19,902,108$ |
| State average from 233 schools: | 6,992,659$ |
Tuition and fees to other Vermont districts ($): 1,355,523$
| Here: | 1,355,523$ |
| State average from 232 schools: | 1,629,679$ |
K-12 Town Special education costs ($): 3,368,574$
| This school: | 3,368,574$ |
| State average from 203 schools: | 1,339,712$ |
2005 Financial Expenditures Statistics:
Percent direct instruction: 59.5%
| Here: | 59.5% |
| State average from 232 schools: | 63.3% |
Percent student services: 11.2%
| Here: | 11.2% |
| State average from 230 schools: | 6.2% |
Percent staff services: 3.6%
| Here: | 3.6% |
| State average from 231 schools: | 3.4% |
Percent leadership services: 8.5%
| Here: | 8.5% |
| State average from 232 schools: | 9.1% |
Percent operation: 17.2%
| Here: | 17.2% |
| State average from 232 schools: | 18.1% |
Financial Expenditures - Elm Hill School
Financial Expenditures - Vermont
Total PK-12 current expense ($): 16,800,290$
| Here: | 16,800,290$ |
| State average from 232 schools: | 5,698,600$ |
Total PK-12 current expense per site FTE student ($): 12,473$
| Here: | 12,473$ |
| State average from 232 schools: | 10,333$ |
Total unduplicated expenditures ($): 18,489,265$
| Here: | 18,489,265$ |
| State average from 232 schools: | 6,690,749$ |
Tuition and fees to other Vermont districts ($): 1,327,435$
| This school: | 1,327,435$ |
| State average from 231 schools: | 1,491,304$ |
K-12 Town Special education costs ($): 3,063,892$
| Here: | 3,063,892$ |
| State average from 203 schools: | 1,228,117$ |
NECAP Results in Elm Hill School
2007 Math New England Common Assessment (NECAP) Statistics - Grades 03 - 08:
NECAP Math Results - Elm Hill School
NECAP Math Results - Vermont
82
Proportion of Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.18
| Here: | 0.18 |
| State average from 234 schools: | 0.18 |
Proportion of Students Proficient: 0.49
| Here: | 0.49 |
| State average from 234 schools: | 0.44 |
Proportion of Students Partially Proficient: 0.21
| This school: | 0.21 |
| State average from 234 schools: | 0.20 |
Proportion of Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.12
| Here: | 0.12 |
| State average from 234 schools: | 0.18 |
NECAP Math Results (Female) - Elm Hill School
NECAP Math Results (Female) - Vermont
45
Proportion of Female Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.20
| Elm Hill School: | 0.20 |
| State average from 225 schools: | 0.18 |
Proportion of Female Students Proficient: 0.44
| Here: | 0.44 |
| State average from 225 schools: | 0.45 |
Proportion of Female Students Partially Proficient: 0.24
| Here: | 0.24 |
| State average from 225 schools: | 0.20 |
Proportion of Female Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.11
| This school: | 0.11 |
| State average from 225 schools: | 0.18 |
NECAP Math Results (Male) - Elm Hill School
NECAP Math Results (Male) - Vermont
37
Proportion of Male Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.16
| This school: | 0.16 |
| State average from 225 schools: | 0.19 |
Proportion of Male Students Proficient: 0.54
| Here: | 0.54 |
| State average from 225 schools: | 0.43 |
Proportion of Male Students Partially Proficient: 0.16
| Elm Hill School: | 0.16 |
| State average from 225 schools: | 0.20 |
Proportion of Male Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.14
| Here: | 0.14 |
| State average from 225 schools: | 0.18 |
NECAP Math Results (FRL) - Elm Hill School
NECAP Math Results (FRL) - Vermont
32
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.06
| This school: | 0.06 |
| State average from 202 schools: | 0.09 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient: 0.47
| Here: | 0.47 |
| State average from 202 schools: | 0.38 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Partially Proficient: 0.28
| This school: | 0.28 |
| State average from 202 schools: | 0.24 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.19
| Here: | 0.19 |
| State average from 202 schools: | 0.28 |
NECAP Math Results (Not FRL) - Elm Hill School
NECAP Math Results (Not FRL) - Vermont
50
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.26
| Here: | 0.26 |
| State average from 202 schools: | 0.21 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient: 0.50
| This school: | 0.50 |
| State average from 202 schools: | 0.47 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Partially Proficient: 0.16
| Here: | 0.16 |
| State average from 202 schools: | 0.18 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.08
| This school: | 0.08 |
| State average from 202 schools: | 0.13 |
2007 Reading New England Common Assessment (NECAP) Statistics - Grades 03 - 08:
NECAP Reading Results - Elm Hill School
NECAP Reading Results - Vermont
82
Proportion of Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.18
| Here: | 0.18 |
| State average from 234 schools: | 0.17 |
Proportion of Students Proficient: 0.55
| This school: | 0.55 |
| State average from 234 schools: | 0.52 |
Proportion of Students Partially Proficient: 0.18
| Elm Hill School: | 0.18 |
| State average from 234 schools: | 0.20 |
Proportion of Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.09
| Elm Hill School: | 0.09 |
| State average from 234 schools: | 0.11 |
NECAP Reading Results (Female) - Elm Hill School
NECAP Reading Results (Female) - Vermont
45
Proportion of Female Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.20
| Elm Hill School: | 0.20 |
| State average from 225 schools: | 0.22 |
Proportion of Female Students Proficient: 0.60
| Here: | 0.60 |
| State average from 225 schools: | 0.52 |
Proportion of Female Students Partially Proficient: 0.16
| Here: | 0.16 |
| State average from 225 schools: | 0.17 |
Proportion of Female Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.04
| This school: | 0.04 |
| State average from 225 schools: | 0.08 |
NECAP Reading Results (Male) - Elm Hill School
NECAP Reading Results (Male) - Vermont
37
Proportion of Male Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.16
| Elm Hill School: | 0.16 |
| State average from 225 schools: | 0.12 |
Proportion of Male Students Proficient: 0.49
| Here: | 0.49 |
| State average from 225 schools: | 0.52 |
Proportion of Male Students Partially Proficient: 0.22
| Here: | 0.22 |
| State average from 225 schools: | 0.22 |
Proportion of Male Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.14
| Here: | 0.14 |
| State average from 225 schools: | 0.14 |
NECAP Reading Results (FRL) - Elm Hill School
NECAP Reading Results (FRL) - Vermont
32
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.09
| Here: | 0.09 |
| State average from 202 schools: | 0.09 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient: 0.56
| This school: | 0.56 |
| State average from 202 schools: | 0.46 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Partially Proficient: 0.16
| Here: | 0.16 |
| State average from 202 schools: | 0.26 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.19
| Here: | 0.19 |
| State average from 202 schools: | 0.18 |
NECAP Reading Results (Not FRL) - Elm Hill School
NECAP Reading Results (Not FRL) - Vermont
50
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.24
| Here: | 0.24 |
| State average from 202 schools: | 0.20 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient: 0.54
| This school: | 0.54 |
| State average from 202 schools: | 0.56 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Partially Proficient: 0.20
| Here: | 0.20 |
| State average from 202 schools: | 0.17 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.02
| Elm Hill School: | 0.02 |
| State average from 202 schools: | 0.08 |
2007 Writing New England Common Assessment (NECAP) Statistics - Grades 03 - 08:
NECAP writing Results - Elm Hill School
NECAP writing Results - Vermont
19
Proportion of Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.26
| This school: | 0.26 |
| State average from 194 schools: | 0.14 |
Proportion of Students Proficient: 0.32
| Here: | 0.32 |
| State average from 194 schools: | 0.33 |
Proportion of Students Partially Proficient: 0.32
| Here: | 0.32 |
| State average from 194 schools: | 0.32 |
Proportion of Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.11
| Here: | 0.11 |
| State average from 194 schools: | 0.21 |
2006 Math New England Common Assessment (NECAP) Statistics - Grades 03 - 08:
Students tested: 78
Proportion of Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.26
| Here: | 0.26 |
| State average from 232 schools: | 0.19 |
Proportion of Students Proficient: 0.47
| This school: | 0.47 |
| State average from 232 schools: | 0.44 |
Proportion of Students Partially Proficient: 0.20
| This school: | 0.20 |
| State average from 232 schools: | 0.19 |
Proportion of Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.06
| Elm Hill School: | 0.06 |
| State average from 232 schools: | 0.18 |
Female Students tested: 40
Proportion of Female Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.23
| Elm Hill School: | 0.23 |
| State average from 224 schools: | 0.18 |
Proportion of Female Students Proficient: 0.45
| Here: | 0.45 |
| State average from 224 schools: | 0.46 |
Proportion of Female Students Partially Proficient: 0.23
| Here: | 0.23 |
| State average from 224 schools: | 0.19 |
Proportion of Female Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.10
| This school: | 0.10 |
| State average from 224 schools: | 0.18 |
Male Students tested: 38
Proportion of Male Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.29
| Here: | 0.29 |
| State average from 224 schools: | 0.19 |
Proportion of Male Students Proficient: 0.50
| This school: | 0.50 |
| State average from 224 schools: | 0.44 |
Proportion of Male Students Partially Proficient: 0.18
| This school: | 0.18 |
| State average from 224 schools: | 0.18 |
Proportion of Male Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.03
| Here: | 0.03 |
| State average from 224 schools: | 0.19 |
Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students tested: 28
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.25
| Here: | 0.25 |
| State average from 198 schools: | 0.09 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient: 0.36
| Here: | 0.36 |
| State average from 198 schools: | 0.40 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Partially Proficient: 0.32
| Elm Hill School: | 0.32 |
| State average from 198 schools: | 0.23 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.07
| Here: | 0.07 |
| State average from 198 schools: | 0.28 |
Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students tested: 50
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.26
| Elm Hill School: | 0.26 |
| State average from 198 schools: | 0.22 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient: 0.54
| Elm Hill School: | 0.54 |
| State average from 198 schools: | 0.48 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Partially Proficient: 0.14
| Elm Hill School: | 0.14 |
| State average from 198 schools: | 0.17 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.06
| Here: | 0.06 |
| State average from 198 schools: | 0.13 |
2006 Reading New England Common Assessment (NECAP) Statistics - Grades 03 - 08:
Students tested: 78
Proportion of Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.23
| Elm Hill School: | 0.23 |
| State average from 232 schools: | 0.15 |
Proportion of Students Proficient: 0.49
| Here: | 0.49 |
| State average from 232 schools: | 0.53 |
Proportion of Students Partially Proficient: 0.19
| This school: | 0.19 |
| State average from 232 schools: | 0.21 |
Proportion of Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.09
| Here: | 0.09 |
| State average from 232 schools: | 0.11 |
Female Students tested: 40
Proportion of Female Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.23
| Elm Hill School: | 0.23 |
| State average from 224 schools: | 0.19 |
Proportion of Female Students Proficient: 0.53
| Here: | 0.53 |
| State average from 224 schools: | 0.53 |
Proportion of Female Students Partially Proficient: 0.15
| Here: | 0.15 |
| State average from 224 schools: | 0.19 |
Proportion of Female Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.10
| Here: | 0.10 |
| State average from 224 schools: | 0.08 |
Male Students tested: 38
Proportion of Male Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.24
| Here: | 0.24 |
| State average from 224 schools: | 0.11 |
Proportion of Male Students Proficient: 0.45
| This school: | 0.45 |
| State average from 224 schools: | 0.52 |
Proportion of Male Students Partially Proficient: 0.24
| Here: | 0.24 |
| State average from 224 schools: | 0.23 |
Proportion of Male Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.08
| Here: | 0.08 |
| State average from 224 schools: | 0.14 |
Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students tested: 28
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.14
| Elm Hill School: | 0.14 |
| State average from 198 schools: | 0.07 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient: 0.57
| This school: | 0.57 |
| State average from 198 schools: | 0.46 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Partially Proficient: 0.21
| This school: | 0.21 |
| State average from 198 schools: | 0.27 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.07
| Here: | 0.07 |
| State average from 198 schools: | 0.19 |
Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students tested: 50
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.28
| Here: | 0.28 |
| State average from 198 schools: | 0.18 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient: 0.44
| Here: | 0.44 |
| State average from 198 schools: | 0.56 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Partially Proficient: 0.18
| Here: | 0.18 |
| State average from 198 schools: | 0.18 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.10
| Here: | 0.10 |
| State average from 198 schools: | 0.07 |
2006 Writing New England Common Assessment (NECAP) Statistics - Grades 03 - 08:
Students tested: 21
Proportion of Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.05
| Here: | 0.05 |
| State average from 195 schools: | 0.13 |
Proportion of Students Proficient: 0.57
| This school: | 0.57 |
| State average from 195 schools: | 0.35 |
Proportion of Students Partially Proficient: 0.19
| Here: | 0.19 |
| State average from 195 schools: | 0.28 |
Proportion of Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.19
| Here: | 0.19 |
| State average from 195 schools: | 0.23 |
2005 Math New England Common Assessment (NECAP) Statistics - Grades 03 - 08:
Students tested: 70
Proportion of Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.11
| Here: | 0.11 |
| State average from 280 schools: | 0.17 |
Proportion of Students Proficient: 0.46
| Here: | 0.46 |
| State average from 280 schools: | 0.46 |
Proportion of Students Partially Proficient: 0.29
| This school: | 0.29 |
| State average from 280 schools: | 0.21 |
Proportion of Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.14
| Here: | 0.14 |
| State average from 280 schools: | 0.17 |
Female Students tested: 31
Proportion of Female Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.13
| Here: | 0.13 |
| State average from 271 schools: | 0.16 |
Proportion of Female Students Proficient: 0.42
| This school: | 0.42 |
| State average from 271 schools: | 0.46 |
Proportion of Female Students Partially Proficient: 0.29
| Here: | 0.29 |
| State average from 271 schools: | 0.21 |
Proportion of Female Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.16
| Elm Hill School: | 0.16 |
| State average from 271 schools: | 0.17 |
Male Students tested: 39
Proportion of Male Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.10
| Here: | 0.10 |
| State average from 271 schools: | 0.17 |
Proportion of Male Students Proficient: 0.49
| Here: | 0.49 |
| State average from 271 schools: | 0.45 |
Proportion of Male Students Partially Proficient: 0.28
| Here: | 0.28 |
| State average from 271 schools: | 0.21 |
Proportion of Male Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.13
| This school: | 0.13 |
| State average from 271 schools: | 0.17 |
Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students tested: 25
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient: 0.40
| This school: | 0.40 |
| State average from 230 schools: | 0.40 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Partially Proficient: 0.40
| This school: | 0.40 |
| State average from 230 schools: | 0.26 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.20
| Elm Hill School: | 0.20 |
| State average from 230 schools: | 0.26 |
Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students tested: 45
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.18
| Here: | 0.18 |
| State average from 230 schools: | 0.19 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient: 0.49
| Here: | 0.49 |
| State average from 230 schools: | 0.48 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Partially Proficient: 0.22
| This school: | 0.22 |
| State average from 230 schools: | 0.19 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.11
| Here: | 0.11 |
| State average from 230 schools: | 0.14 |
2005 Reading New England Common Assessment (NECAP) Statistics - Grades 03 - 08:
Students tested: 70
Proportion of Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.14
| Here: | 0.14 |
| State average from 280 schools: | 0.13 |
Proportion of Students Proficient: 0.47
| Elm Hill School: | 0.47 |
| State average from 280 schools: | 0.53 |
Proportion of Students Partially Proficient: 0.30
| Here: | 0.30 |
| State average from 280 schools: | 0.24 |
Proportion of Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.09
| Here: | 0.09 |
| State average from 280 schools: | 0.10 |
Female Students tested: 31
Proportion of Female Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.19
| Here: | 0.19 |
| State average from 271 schools: | 0.17 |
Proportion of Female Students Proficient: 0.48
| Here: | 0.48 |
| State average from 271 schools: | 0.53 |
Proportion of Female Students Partially Proficient: 0.23
| This school: | 0.23 |
| State average from 271 schools: | 0.21 |
Proportion of Female Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.10
| This school: | 0.10 |
| State average from 271 schools: | 0.08 |
Male Students tested: 39
Proportion of Male Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.10
| This school: | 0.10 |
| State average from 271 schools: | 0.10 |
Proportion of Male Students Proficient: 0.46
| Here: | 0.46 |
| State average from 271 schools: | 0.51 |
Proportion of Male Students Partially Proficient: 0.36
| This school: | 0.36 |
| State average from 271 schools: | 0.26 |
Proportion of Male Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.08
| Here: | 0.08 |
| State average from 271 schools: | 0.13 |
Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students tested: 25
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.08
| This school: | 0.08 |
| State average from 230 schools: | 0.06 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient: 0.48
| Here: | 0.48 |
| State average from 230 schools: | 0.45 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Partially Proficient: 0.36
| This school: | 0.36 |
| State average from 230 schools: | 0.32 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.08
| This school: | 0.08 |
| State average from 230 schools: | 0.17 |
Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students tested: 45
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.18
| Here: | 0.18 |
| State average from 230 schools: | 0.16 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient: 0.47
| Elm Hill School: | 0.47 |
| State average from 230 schools: | 0.56 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Partially Proficient: 0.27
| Here: | 0.27 |
| State average from 230 schools: | 0.21 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.09
| Elm Hill School: | 0.09 |
| State average from 230 schools: | 0.08 |
2005 Writing New England Common Assessment (NECAP) Statistics - Grades 03 - 08:
Students tested: 15
Proportion of Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.13
| This school: | 0.13 |
| State average from 238 schools: | 0.09 |
Proportion of Students Proficient: 0.53
| Here: | 0.53 |
| State average from 238 schools: | 0.43 |
Proportion of Students Partially Proficient: 0.27
| Here: | 0.27 |
| State average from 238 schools: | 0.34 |
Proportion of Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.07
| Here: | 0.07 |
| State average from 238 schools: | 0.14 |
- All Cities
- Vermont forum
- Vermont
- Springfield, VT
- Elm Hill School in Springfield, Vermont (VT)
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: