Endeavor Elementary School in Orlando, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 51.

13501 BALCOMBE RD
Orlando, FL 32837

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Lake Eola Charter School (12.2 miles):

98
Palm Lake Elementary School (9.9 miles):

64
Waterford Elementary School (17.2 miles):

56
Endeavor Elementary School:

51
Lakeville Elementary School (19.9 miles):

47
Millennia Elementary School (8.6 miles):

39
Neptune Elementary School (10.5 miles):

29
Ridgewood Park Elementary School (15.5 miles):

20
Endeavor Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Orange County:

44
Orlando:

42
Endeavor Elementary School:

51

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (407) 251-2560 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 48
School number: 214
School type: Elementary
District Name: ORANGE
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (407) 251-2561
Principal: Myrlene Kimble
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 8
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 49
Senate District: 19

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

88%
State average from 963 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

92%
State average from 963 schools:

77%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

86%
State average from 963 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

70%
State average from 962 schools:

53%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

70%
State average from 963 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

68%
State average from 963 schools:

66%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
ENDEAVOR ELEMENTARY:

62%
State average from 963 schools:

58%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

73%
State average from 963 schools:

66%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

609
State average from 963 schools:

543
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 963 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: B

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: N

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

51%
State average from 963 schools:

58%
Minority Rate
Here:

70%
State average from 963 schools:

47%
Region: 3

Title I: NO


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 389 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 389 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 116
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
ENDEAVOR ELEMENTARY:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 360
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 351

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 361
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 351
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 112 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 112 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 33
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
ENDEAVOR ELEMENTARY:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 106
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 100

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
ENDEAVOR ELEMENTARY:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 107
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 101
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 32 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 32 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 192 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 192 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 56
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 172
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 169

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 172
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 168
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 40 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 40 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 39
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 39
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 199 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 199 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
ENDEAVOR ELEMENTARY:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 61
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

82%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 179
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 176

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 180
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 176
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 145 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 145 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 41
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 130
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 126

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
ENDEAVOR ELEMENTARY:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 130
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 125
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 42 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 42 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

89%
State average from 959 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

86%
State average from 959 schools:

77%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
ENDEAVOR ELEMENTARY:

91%
State average from 959 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

65%
State average from 959 schools:

52%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

79%
State average from 959 schools:

67%
Making Math Gains
Here:

67%
State average from 959 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
ENDEAVOR ELEMENTARY:

67%
State average from 959 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

62%
State average from 959 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

606
State average from 959 schools:

560
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 959 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: B

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: N

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

46%
State average from 959 schools:

54%
Minority Rate
Here:

65%
State average from 959 schools:

46%
Region: 3


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 387 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 386 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 129
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 365
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 359

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
ENDEAVOR ELEMENTARY:

82%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 363
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 357
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 129 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 129 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 47
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 126
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 124

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 126
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 124
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 35 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 31
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 157 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 156 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 50
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 142
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 139

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

82%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 141
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 138
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 40 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 40 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 39
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 39
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 190 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 189 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 59
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 173
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 169

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
ENDEAVOR ELEMENTARY:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 171
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 167
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 149 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 148 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 52
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

79%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 136
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 136

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 134
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 134
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 38 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 38 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

80%
State average from 954 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

82%
State average from 954 schools:

76%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

69%
State average from 954 schools:

82%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

63%
State average from 954 schools:

48%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

65%
State average from 954 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
Here:

67%
State average from 954 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
ENDEAVOR ELEMENTARY:

46%
State average from 954 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

69%
State average from 954 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

541
State average from 954 schools:

544
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 954 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: NO

Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Reading: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: B

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

46%
State average from 954 schools:

51%
Minority Rate
Here:

66%
State average from 954 schools:

45%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 422 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 422 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 140
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 407
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 394

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 407
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 392
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 143 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 143 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 49
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

81%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 139
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 131

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

82%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 139
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 131
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 38 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 38 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 36
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 36
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 172 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 172 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 56
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

70%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 164
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 159

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 164
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 157
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 45 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 45 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 45
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 45
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 205 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 205 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 76
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

67%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 196
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 191

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 196
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 190
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 166 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 166 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 60
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

69%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 159
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 153

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 159
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 152
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 39 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 39 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1512
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

335
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

9%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

10%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

23%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

43%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 5
ENDEAVOR ELEMENTARY:

15%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

81%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

19
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1682
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
ENDEAVOR ELEMENTARY:

337
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

8%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

6%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
ENDEAVOR ELEMENTARY:

30%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

43%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 5
ENDEAVOR ELEMENTARY:

13%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

86%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

21
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1720
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

323
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

11%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

9%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

38%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

9%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

80%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

17
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

11
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

332
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

11%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

26%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

50%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

11%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 5
ENDEAVOR ELEMENTARY:

3%
State average:

4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
ENDEAVOR ELEMENTARY:

64%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

10
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

9
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
ENDEAVOR ELEMENTARY:

1665
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

379
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

3%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

6%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
ENDEAVOR ELEMENTARY:

18%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

38%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

35%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

91%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

10
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1696
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
ENDEAVOR ELEMENTARY:

355
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

4%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

6%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
ENDEAVOR ELEMENTARY:

34%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

35%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

20%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

90%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
ENDEAVOR ELEMENTARY:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
ENDEAVOR ELEMENTARY:

1759
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

352
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

10%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
ENDEAVOR ELEMENTARY:

12%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

26%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

37%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

15%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

78%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

8
State average:

7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1491
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

331
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1706
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

341
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 05%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 08%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1729
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

324
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

333
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1646
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

375
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 28%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 93%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1700
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

356
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 22%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1726
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

345
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 131
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 50%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 89%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1485
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

330
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1601
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

323
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1686
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

317
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

332
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1605
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

366
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 32%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1609
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

335
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1724
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

345
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

133
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
Here:

648
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
Here:

74
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
ENDEAVOR ELEMENTARY:

16
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
ENDEAVOR ELEMENTARY:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

143
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
Here:

655
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
Here:

71
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
ENDEAVOR ELEMENTARY:

13
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
ENDEAVOR ELEMENTARY:

10
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
ENDEAVOR ELEMENTARY:

9
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

140
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
Here:

677
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
Here:

80
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 141
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

283
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 45%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 35%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 65%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Orlando, FL
  5. Endeavor Elementary School in Orlando, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.