Ewes-Eckerd Intensive Halfway School in Clearwater, Florida (FL)



100 N STARCREST DR
Clearwater, FL 33765

Show street view No street view available for this location

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (727) 461-2990 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 52
School number: 8017
School type: Senior High
District Name: PINELLAS
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 12
School's status regarding neglected and delinquent criteria: Neglected, Residential
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (727) 442-5911
Principal: Keith Phillipson
The function/setting of the school: Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ)
The main educational program offered at the school: Alternative Education
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 9
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 50
Senate District: 13
School Web Address: http://www.eckerd.org

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

13%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 25 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

38%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 25 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 25 (96%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 8

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

8%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 13
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

14%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 14
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 209 Results


2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1300
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

237
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 76%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1415
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

242
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 71%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1488
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
EWES-ECKERD INTENSIVE HALFWAY:

227
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 88%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 4%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1533
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

240
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 81%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 5%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1512
State average:

1935
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

223
State average:

302
Percent Passing: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 88%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 1%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

199
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 90%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 1%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

222
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 87%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 4%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 3
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1278
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

218
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 85%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 9%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1510
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

237
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 74%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 14%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1597
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

245
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 71%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1671
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

228
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 66%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 9%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1738
State average:

1984
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

263
State average:

323
Percent Passing: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 59%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 14%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
EWES-ECKERD INTENSIVE HALFWAY:

1
State average:

103

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

1
State average:

101

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

47
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
EWES-ECKERD INTENSIVE HALFWAY:

608
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
Here:

12
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

8
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

6
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

7
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
EWES-ECKERD INTENSIVE HALFWAY:

4
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

8
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

5
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
EWES-ECKERD INTENSIVE HALFWAY:

4
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
EWES-ECKERD INTENSIVE HALFWAY:

79
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
Here:

623
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
Here:

17
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

7
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

7
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
EWES-ECKERD INTENSIVE HALFWAY:

5
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

9
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
EWES-ECKERD INTENSIVE HALFWAY:

5
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

4
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

104
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
Here:

627
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
Here:

13
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

7
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
EWES-ECKERD INTENSIVE HALFWAY:

7
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

8
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

4
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
EWES-ECKERD INTENSIVE HALFWAY:

8
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
EWES-ECKERD INTENSIVE HALFWAY:

6
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

4
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

254
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
Here:

652
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
Here:

23
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

7
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
EWES-ECKERD INTENSIVE HALFWAY:

7
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
EWES-ECKERD INTENSIVE HALFWAY:

5
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

10
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

3
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

193
State average:

237
Mean Scale Score
Here:

652
State average from 2096 schools:

709
Median NPR
Here:

16
State average:

65
Literary (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

8
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

14
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

10
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

5
State average:

8

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Writing Results



2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 88
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

201
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 82%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 7%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 6
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 51%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 173
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

216
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 69%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 8%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 7
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 45%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Clearwater, FL
  5. Ewes-Eckerd Intensive Halfway School in Clearwater, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.