Excel School in Orlando, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 9.

1200 W COLONIAL DR
Orlando, FL 32804

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Lake Eola Charter School (1.3 miles):

98
Lake Howell High School (9.6 miles):

68
Olympia High School (7.9 miles):

59
Professional & Technical High School (18.0 miles):

49
Apopka High School (12.3 miles):

37
Ae Fmec School (4.6 miles):

23
Community Education Partners-Se School (5.7 miles):

10
Excel School:

9
Excel School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Orange County:

44
Orlando:

42
Excel School:

9

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (407) 317-3636 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 48
School number: 764
School type: Senior High
District Name: ORANGE
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 12
Principal: Margaret Christmas
The function/setting of the school: Alternative to Expulsion
The main educational program offered at the school: Alternative Education
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 3
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 39
Senate District: 19

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 181 (91%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 179 (90%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 40
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

20%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 76
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 71

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

32%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 69
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 63
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 89 (86%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 89 (87%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

19%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 36

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

24%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 31
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 66 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 64 (94%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 149 (91%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 148 (91%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 29
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

19%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 62
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 59

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

27%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 56
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 53
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 46 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 44 (92%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 256 (91%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 248 (90%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 35
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

26%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 74
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 68

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

32%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 74
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 68
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 51 (90%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 47 (87%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 128 (89%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 126 (88%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

18%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 33

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

27%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 31
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 72 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 70 (96%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 202 (92%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 194 (89%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 31
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

24%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 62
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 56

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

28%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 56
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 57 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 53 (90%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 220 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 220 (94%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

34%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 68
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 66

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 70
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 67
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 39 (91%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 40 (93%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 112 (93%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 112 (93%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

26%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
EXCEL:

20%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 33
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 66 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 66 (96%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 123 (92%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 123 (92%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 31
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

20%
State average from 63 schools:

49%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

39%
State average from 63 schools:

55%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

79%
State average from 63 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

14%
State average from 63 schools:

37%
Making Reading Gains
EXCEL:

37%
State average from 63 schools:

53%
Making Math Gains
EXCEL:

61%
State average from 63 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

57%
State average from 63 schools:

55%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

57%
State average from 63 schools:

63%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
Here:

364
State average from 63 schools:

461
Percent Tested
Here:

91%
State average from 63 schools:

97%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: P

Grade in 2006: P

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

65%
State average from 63 schools:

55%
Minority Rate
Here:

81%
State average from 63 schools:

55%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 214 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 209 (91%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 54
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

19%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 84
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 82
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 41 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 42 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 117 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 114 (90%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 30
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

10%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

31%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 48 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 45 (88%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 149 (93%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 145 (90%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 36
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

18%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 56
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

35%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 54
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 29 (92%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28 (89%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

18%
State average from 62 schools:

49%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

42%
State average from 62 schools:

55%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

71%
State average from 62 schools:

82%
Making Reading Gains
EXCEL:

40%
State average from 62 schools:

57%
Making Math Gains
Here:

59%
State average from 62 schools:

66%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

45%
State average from 62 schools:

62%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

275
State average from 62 schools:

371
Percent Tested
Here:

97%
State average from 62 schools:

97%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: NO

Grade in 2006: P

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

48%
State average from 63 schools:

54%
Minority Rate
Here:

79%
State average from 63 schools:

53%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 212 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 204 (94%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 32
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

19%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 72
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

40%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 70
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 44 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 44 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 90 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 86 (95%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 23
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 72 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 68 (89%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 11

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

17%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 30
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 28
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 110 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 105 (92%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 10

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
EXCEL:

23%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 30
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

40%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 30
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 30 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 29 (94%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1476
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

269
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

41%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

22%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

4%
State average:

25%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
EXCEL:

37%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

10
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
EXCEL:

1567
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

271
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

40%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

21%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

28%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
EXCEL:

9%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

2%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

40%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

13
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1715
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

274
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

41%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

38%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
EXCEL:

19%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

2%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

21%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

12
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

5
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1819
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

293
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

37%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
EXCEL:

49%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

11%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

3%
State average:

12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
EXCEL:

14%
State average:

45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

9
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1722
State average:

1938
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

262
State average:

302
Percent Passing
EXCEL:

27%
State average:

56%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

65%
State average:

35%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

22%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
EXCEL:

6%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

2%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

12%
State average:

37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

11
State average:

15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

246
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

65%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

32%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

4%
State average:

31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

4%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

6
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

5
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

5
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

270
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

53%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 2
EXCEL:

43%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

5%
State average:

30%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

5%
State average:

36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
EXCEL:

6
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

5
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1478
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

265
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

48%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

40%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

8%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

4%
State average:

18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

12%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
EXCEL:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1611
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

262
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

58%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

16%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

23%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

2%
State average:

19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

26%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
EXCEL:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1751
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

284
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

34%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
EXCEL:

40%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

23%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

3%
State average:

17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

26%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1849
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
EXCEL:

280
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

26%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

38%
State average:

22%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

24%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
EXCEL:

10%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

35%
State average:

61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
EXCEL:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1874
State average:

1995
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

296
State average:

326
Percent Passing
Here:

54%
State average:

80%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

22%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

44%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

22%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

10%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

2%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

34%
State average:

69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
EXCEL:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1528
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

278
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1593
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

276
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1701
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

271
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1746
State average:

1907
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

279
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 17%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1747
State average:

1921
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

267
State average:

299
Percent Passing: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 17%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

247
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 61%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 6%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

263
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 71%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 17%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1361
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

237
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 77%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 12%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1600
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

259
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 68%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 7%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1724
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

277
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 25%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1820
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

272
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 34%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1860
State average:

1972
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

293
State average:

321
Percent Passing: 57%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 65
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

3
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 57%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 49
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

3
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 51%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1816
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

292
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 23%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1721
State average:

1935
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

262
State average:

302
Percent Passing: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 72%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 17%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
EXCEL:

277
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 24%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1878
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

288
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1963
State average:

1984
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

318
State average:

323
Percent Passing: 75%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
EXCEL:

84
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
Here:

686
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
Here:

54
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
EXCEL:

12
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
EXCEL:

5
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

49
State average:

237
Mean Scale Score
Here:

702
State average from 2096 schools:

709
Median NPR
Here:

61
State average:

65
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Initial Understanding (max 12)
EXCEL:

8
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
EXCEL:

15
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 48
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

245
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 13%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 13%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 8
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
EXCEL:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 35%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 73%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 47
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

267
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 21%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 21%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 8
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 32%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 64%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1775
State average from 612 schools:

1849
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

285
State average:

298
% in each Achievement Level 1: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 14%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 9: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 81%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
EXCEL:

1806
State average:

1837
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1740
State average:

1779
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 66

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1720
State average from 573 schools:

1879
Mean Scale Score 100-500
EXCEL:

262
State average:

291
Percent Passing: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 70%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 9%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 18: 10
Percent Matched to 2006: 76%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1732
State average:

1873
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1806
State average:

1876
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: -74

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

247
State average:

295
% in each Achievement Level 1: 73%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 13: 3
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 14: 5

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1857
State average from 613 schools:

1884
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

282
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 10: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 8: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 81%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1870
State average:

1869
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1842
State average:

1821
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 28

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1909
State average from 581 schools:

1950
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

305
State average:

315
Percent Passing: 60%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 10: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 14: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 11: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 71%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1922
State average:

1939
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1880
State average:

1901
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 42

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 65
Mean Scale Score
EXCEL:

685
State average from 597 schools:

696
Median NPR: 53
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 14): 9
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 64
Mean Scale Score
Here:

680
State average from 575 schools:

695
Median NPR: 38
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 9
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 14): 8
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 65
Mean Scale Score
Here:

698
State average from 597 schools:

708
Median NPR: 61
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 8
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 64
Mean Scale Score
Here:

694
State average from 575 schools:

710
Median NPR: 42
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 6
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 63
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

259
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 17%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 9 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 35%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 71%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 37%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Orlando, FL
  5. Excel School in Orlando, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.