Foundation School in Lakeland, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 2.

1325 GEORGE JENKINS BLVD
Lakeland, FL 33802

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
International Baccalaureate School (13.7 miles):

100
Armwood High School (19.8 miles):

63
Berkley Accelerated Middle School (11.7 miles):

50
Bill Duncan Excel Center School (6.0 miles):

41
Lake Gibson Senior High School (6.1 miles):

36
Lake Gibson Senior High School (6.1 miles):

26
Mulberry Senior High School (10.1 miles):

17
Foundation School:

2
Foundation School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Polk County:

41
Lakeland:

44
Foundation School:

2

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (863) 682-8111 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 53
School number: 8051
School type: Senior High
District Name: POLK
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 12
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (863) 687-8205
Principal: Emory Welch
Regular charter school.
The main educational program offered at the school: Alternative Education
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 12
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 64
Senate District: 15

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 52 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 52 (95%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 23
Number of Students Tested in Math: 23
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 49 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 49 (96%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 31
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 70 (78%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 73 (80%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

13%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

6%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 23
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 32 (78%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 34 (82%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 64 (79%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 67 (83%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

13%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

6%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 20
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

22%
State average from 63 schools:

49%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

14%
State average from 63 schools:

55%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

85%
State average from 63 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

35%
State average from 63 schools:

37%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

30%
State average from 63 schools:

53%
Making Math Gains
Here:

36%
State average from 63 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

23%
State average from 63 schools:

55%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

40%
State average from 63 schools:

63%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
Here:

285
State average from 63 schools:

461
Percent Tested
Here:

93%
State average from 63 schools:

97%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: NO

Grade in 2007: P

Grade in 2006: P

Grade in 2005: F

Grade in 2004: P

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

86%
State average from 63 schools:

55%
Minority Rate
Here:

63%
State average from 63 schools:

55%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 62 (84%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 62 (84%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

18%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

11%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 44
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 22
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 30 (89%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 31 (89%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 54 (84%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 54 (84%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

18%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

11%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

18%
State average from 62 schools:

49%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

20%
State average from 62 schools:

55%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

84%
State average from 62 schools:

82%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

49%
State average from 62 schools:

57%
Making Math Gains
Here:

48%
State average from 62 schools:

66%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

47%
State average from 62 schools:

62%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

266
State average from 62 schools:

371
Percent Tested
Here:

91%
State average from 62 schools:

97%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: NO

Grade in 2006: P

Grade in 2005: F

Grade in 2004: P

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

94%
State average from 63 schools:

54%
Minority Rate
Here:

62%
State average from 63 schools:

53%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 77 (91%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 77 (91%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

67%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 18
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

15%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 60
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

19%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 59
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 25 (84%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26 (85%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 45 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 44 (95%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 11

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

11%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 37
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

14%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 36
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 73 (92%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 73 (92%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 16

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

14%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 56
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

18%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 55
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

15%
State average from 52 schools:

48%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

17%
State average from 52 schools:

56%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

36%
State average from 53 schools:

79%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

41%
State average from 53 schools:

54%
Making Math Gains
Here:

49%
State average from 53 schools:

67%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

50%
State average from 53 schools:

59%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

208
State average from 53 schools:

362
Percent Tested
Here:

91%
State average from 53 schools:

97%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: F

Grade in 2004: P

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

84%
State average from 53 schools:

54%
Minority Rate
Here:

58%
State average from 52 schools:

51%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Results


2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1507
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

274
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1289
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

218
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 79%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 7%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1625
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

255
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 62%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 5%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
FOUNDATION SCHOOL:

212
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 74%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1478
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

265
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 50%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1499
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

234
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 92%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1719
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

276
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 5%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 26
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 42%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 73%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1395
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

254
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 60%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1663
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

289
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1668
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
FOUNDATION SCHOOL:

264
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 59%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 5%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1595
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

252
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 60%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

237
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 70%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
FOUNDATION SCHOOL:

1321
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

228
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 70%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1636
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

268
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 4%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1703
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

272
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 13%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
FOUNDATION SCHOOL:

1730
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

245
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 70%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 20%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

10
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
Here:

624
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
Here:

22
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

7
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

5
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
FOUNDATION SCHOOL:

10
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
FOUNDATION SCHOOL:

6
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
FOUNDATION SCHOOL:

5
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

17
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
Here:

666
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
Here:

53
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
FOUNDATION SCHOOL:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

19
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
FOUNDATION SCHOOL:

656
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
Here:

34
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
FOUNDATION SCHOOL:

10
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
FOUNDATION SCHOOL:

11
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

7
State average:

273

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
FOUNDATION SCHOOL:

5
State average:

237

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 23
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

225
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 70%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 4%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 7
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 30%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 61%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 5

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1621
State average from 878 schools:

1661
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

295
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 33%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1752
State average:

1663
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1460
State average:

1592
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 292

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1493
State average from 808 schools:

1746
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

257
State average:

305
% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 12%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 12%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 50%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1477
State average:

1743
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1513
State average:

1668
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: -36

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1359
State average from 819 schools:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

199
State average:

294
% in each Achievement Level 1: 85%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 54%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1313
State average:

1807
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1508
State average:

1738
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: -196

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1664
State average from 612 schools:

1849
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

264
State average:

298
% in each Achievement Level 1: 56%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 9: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 78%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1640
State average:

1837
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1732
State average:

1779
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: -92

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

211
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 86%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 3
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 3
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1499
State average from 873 schools:

1641
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

269
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 33%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
FOUNDATION SCHOOL:

1457
State average:

1645
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1518
State average:

1620
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: -61

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1560
State average from 804 schools:

1777
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

249
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 69%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 50%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1533
State average:

1774
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1522
State average:

1645
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 10

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1560
State average from 815 schools:

1851
Mean Scale Score 100-500
FOUNDATION SCHOOL:

235
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 77%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 54%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1569
State average:

1845
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
FOUNDATION SCHOOL:

1618
State average:

1755
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: -49

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1803
State average from 613 schools:

1884
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

267
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 10: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 8: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 76%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1810
State average:

1869
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1826
State average:

1821
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: -16

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 11
Mean Scale Score
Here:

664
State average from 874 schools:

671
Median NPR: 57
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 25
Mean Scale Score
Here:

645
State average from 796 schools:

675
Median NPR: 34
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 8
Functional (max 18): 9
Initial Understanding (max 12): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 11
Critical Analysis (max 12): 5
Strategies (max 10): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 13
Mean Scale Score
Here:

636
State average from 810 schools:

685
Median NPR: 18
Literary (max 18): 10
Informational (max 18): 6
Functional (max 18): 8
Initial Understanding (max 10): 5
Interpretation (max 20): 9
Critical Analysis (max 14): 7
Strategies (max 10): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 17
Mean Scale Score
FOUNDATION SCHOOL:

674
State average from 597 schools:

696
Median NPR: 43
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 10): 6
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 14): 8
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 2

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 11
Mean Scale Score
Here:

648
State average from 874 schools:

669
Median NPR: 45
Number Sense (max 10): 4
Operations (max 12): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 25
Mean Scale Score
Here:

649
State average from 796 schools:

685
Median NPR: 38
Number Sense (max 9): 3
Operations (max 9): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 3
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 13
Mean Scale Score
Here:

662
State average from 810 schools:

698
Median NPR: 34
Number Sense (max 9): 3
Operations (max 9): 3
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 3
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 17
Mean Scale Score
Here:

687
State average from 597 schools:

708
Median NPR: 49
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 7
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 2

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 13
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
FOUNDATION SCHOOL:

196
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 85%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 15%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 7
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 23%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 38%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 23%

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 2
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Lakeland, FL
  5. Foundation School in Lakeland, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.