Frank E. Brigham Academy School in Winter Haven, Florida (FL) - Test Results, Rating, Ranking, Grades, Scores, Classes, Enrollment, Teachers, Students, and Report Card

City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 67.

601 AVE C SE
Winter Haven, FL 33880

Show street view No street view available for this location

Other nearby schools ratings:

Bartow Elementary Academy School (11.5 miles):	93
Frank E. Brigham Academy School:	67
Valleyview Elementary School (3.8 miles):	62
Gibbons Street Elementary School (11.2 miles):	53
Auburndale Central Elementary School (5.2 miles):	45
Doris A. Sanders Learning Center School (11.5 miles):	37
Combee Elementary School (11.7 miles):	29
Poinciana Elementary School (15.8 miles):	20

Frank E. Brigham Academy School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:

Florida:	45
Polk County:	41
Winter Haven:	38
Frank E. Brigham Academy School:	67

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum

Phone: (863) 291-5300 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 53
School number: 531
School type: Elementary
District Name: POLK
Grade range: KINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 5
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (863) 298-7913
Magnet School.
Principal: Bill Londeree
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 12
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 66
Senate District: 17

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

FRANK E. BRIGHAM ACADEMY:	84%
State average from 734 schools:	73%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	82%
State average from 734 schools:	77%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	85%
State average from 734 schools:	85%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	72%
State average from 733 schools:	53%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	62%
State average from 734 schools:	64%

Making Math Gains

Here:	60%
State average from 733 schools:	67%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	53%
State average from 734 schools:	58%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	55%
State average from 734 schools:	66%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	553
State average from 734 schools:	543

Percent Tested

FRANK E. BRIGHAM ACADEMY:	100%
State average from 733 schools:	100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 119999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	52%
State average from 734 schools:	57%

Minority Rate

Here:	44%
State average from 735 schools:	46%

Region: 2

Title I: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 390 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 390 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	90%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 145
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	76%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 368
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 362

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	75%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 368
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 362
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 225 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 225 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	87%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 82
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

FRANK E. BRIGHAM ACADEMY:	79%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 217
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 213

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	77%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 218
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 214
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 89 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 89 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 37
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	67%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 82
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 82

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	72%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 81
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 81
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 200 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 200 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	86%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 77
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	70%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 188
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 185

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	66%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 187
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 184
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 23
Number of Students Tested in Math: 23
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 70 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 70 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	39%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 69
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 67

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	41%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 68
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 66
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	88%
State average from 735 schools:	74%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	81%
State average from 734 schools:	76%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	96%
State average from 734 schools:	88%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	64%
State average from 734 schools:	51%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	72%
State average from 734 schools:	67%

Making Math Gains

Here:	65%
State average from 735 schools:	68%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	74%
State average from 735 schools:	65%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	60%
State average from 734 schools:	67%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	600
State average from 734 schools:	557

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 734 schools:	100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	42%
State average from 734 schools:	53%

Minority Rate

Here:	39%
State average from 734 schools:	45%

Region: 3

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 377 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 377 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 98
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	81%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 352
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 338

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	72%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 352
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 338
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 226 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 226 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 67
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	84%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 217
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 208

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	76%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 217
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 208
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27
Number of Students Tested in Math: 27
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 90 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 90 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	80%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 83
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 81

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	71%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 83
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 81
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 170 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 170 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 45
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	74%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 156
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 151

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	62%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 156
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 151
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 71 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 71 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	52%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 67
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 66

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	37%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 67
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 66
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	87%
State average from 711 schools:	73%

Meeting High Standards in Math

FRANK E. BRIGHAM ACADEMY:	81%
State average from 711 schools:	75%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	97%
State average from 711 schools:	82%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	53%
State average from 711 schools:	47%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	65%
State average from 711 schools:	65%

Making Math Gains

Here:	64%
State average from 711 schools:	70%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

FRANK E. BRIGHAM ACADEMY:	52%
State average from 711 schools:	62%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	56%
State average from 711 schools:	69%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	555
State average from 711 schools:	544

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 711 schools:	100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	38%
State average from 711 schools:	50%

Minority Rate

FRANK E. BRIGHAM ACADEMY:	41%
State average from 711 schools:	44%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 351 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 351 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 114
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	80%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 334
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 318

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	75%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 334
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 318
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 212 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 212 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 72
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	87%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 205
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 198

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	83%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 205
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 198
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 78 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 78 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 28

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	68%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 74
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 69

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	58%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 74
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 69
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 137 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 137 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 43
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	69%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 128
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 122

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	64%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 128
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 122
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 22
Number of Students Tested in Math: 22
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 57 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 57 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	49%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 51
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 45

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

FRANK E. BRIGHAM ACADEMY:	47%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 51
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 45
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

FRANK E. BRIGHAM ACADEMY:	88%
State average from 652 schools:	75%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	86%
State average from 652 schools:	73%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	95%
State average from 652 schools:	83%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	51%
State average from 650 schools:	46%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	79%
State average from 652 schools:	72%

Making Reading Gains - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded

Making Math Gains

Here:	70%
State average from 652 schools:	68%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	74%
State average from 652 schools:	67%

% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	62%
State average from 652 schools:	69%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns

Here:	605
State average from 652 schools:	553

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 652 schools:	100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	32%
State average from 655 schools:	53%

Minority Rate

Here:	42%
State average from 655 schools:	55%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 297 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 296 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	100%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 92
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	87%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 296
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	84%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 295
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 177 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 176 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

FRANK E. BRIGHAM ACADEMY:	100%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 52
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 176
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	90%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 175
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 88 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 88 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 29

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

FRANK E. BRIGHAM ACADEMY:	74%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 88
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	69%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 88
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 91 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 91 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	100%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 35
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	80%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 90
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	74%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 90
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	90%
State average from 643 schools:	75%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	85%
State average from 643 schools:	71%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	97%
State average from 643 schools:	81%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	58%
State average from 643 schools:	63%

Making Math Gains

Here:	69%
State average from 643 schools:	69%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	64%
State average from 643 schools:	61%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns

Here:	463
State average from 643 schools:	420

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 643 schools:	100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	32%
State average from 644 schools:	54%

Minority Rate

FRANK E. BRIGHAM ACADEMY:	42%
State average from 644 schools:	54%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 277 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 277 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	100%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 88
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	90%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 271
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	84%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 271
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 162 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 162 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	100%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 55

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	92%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 159
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	90%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 159
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 82 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 82 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 22

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	84%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 79
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	72%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 79
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 83 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 83 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 20

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	86%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 81
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	77%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 81
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

FRANK E. BRIGHAM ACADEMY:	84%
State average from 631 schools:	74%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	82%
State average from 631 schools:	69%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	98%
State average from 631 schools:	80%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	73%
State average from 631 schools:	66%

Making Math Gains

Here:	74%
State average from 631 schools:	69%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	67%
State average from 631 schools:	60%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns

Here:	478
State average from 631 schools:	417

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 631 schools:	100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	33%
State average from 631 schools:	54%

Minority Rate

Here:	39%
State average from 631 schools:	52%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1432
State average:	1402

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	322
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	14%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	5%
State average:	11%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	38%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	30%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	13%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	80%
State average:	74%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	18
State average:	17

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1595
State average:	1604

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	322
State average:	324

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	17%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	14%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	28%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	31%
State average:	29%

% in each Achievement Level 5

FRANK E. BRIGHAM ACADEMY:	10%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

FRANK E. BRIGHAM ACADEMY:	69%
State average:	72%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	19
State average:	19

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	8
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	2
State average:	2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1681
State average:	1659

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	316
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

FRANK E. BRIGHAM ACADEMY:	12%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	8%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	38%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	36%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	6%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	80%
State average:	70%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	4
State average:	3

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	16
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	10
State average:	10

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	2
State average:	2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1860
State average:	1716

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	338
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	7%
State average:	19%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	12%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	33%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

FRANK E. BRIGHAM ACADEMY:	35%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	14%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	82%
State average:	65%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	16
State average:	14

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1961
State average:	1810

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	346
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	5%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	11%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 3

FRANK E. BRIGHAM ACADEMY:	32%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

FRANK E. BRIGHAM ACADEMY:	33%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	18%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	84%
State average:	65%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	19
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2024
State average:	1876

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	339
State average:	308

% in each Achievement Level 1

FRANK E. BRIGHAM ACADEMY:	8%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	18%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	34%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	28%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	12%
State average:	3%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	74%
State average:	52%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	18
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	8
State average:	6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1941
State average:	1922

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	315
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	20%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	32%
State average:	30%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	32%
State average:	26%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	11%
State average:	12%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	5%
State average:	7%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

FRANK E. BRIGHAM ACADEMY:	48%
State average:	45%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	11
State average:	11

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	7
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2013
State average:	1938

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	316
State average:	302

Percent Passing

Here:	64%
State average:	56%

% in each Achievement Level 1

FRANK E. BRIGHAM ACADEMY:	27%
State average:	35%

% in each Achievement Level 2

FRANK E. BRIGHAM ACADEMY:	27%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	21%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	9%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	16%
State average:	12%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	46%
State average:	37%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	15
State average:	15

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	7
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	333
State average:	321

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	7%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 2

FRANK E. BRIGHAM ACADEMY:	28%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	52%
State average:	36%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	9%
State average:	11%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	3%
State average:	4%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	64%
State average:	51%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	10
State average:	9

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	9
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	9
State average:	9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	341
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1

FRANK E. BRIGHAM ACADEMY:	12%
State average:	27%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	26%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 3

FRANK E. BRIGHAM ACADEMY:	39%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	15%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	8%
State average:	2%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	62%
State average:	41%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	10
State average:	9

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	10
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	8
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	301
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	28%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	40%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 3

FRANK E. BRIGHAM ACADEMY:	28%
State average:	30%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	3%
State average:	5%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

FRANK E. BRIGHAM ACADEMY:	32%
State average:	36%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	8
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

FRANK E. BRIGHAM ACADEMY:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	6
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1532
State average:	1481

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	350
State average:	339

% in each Achievement Level 1

FRANK E. BRIGHAM ACADEMY:	9%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	8%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	27%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	34%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 5

FRANK E. BRIGHAM ACADEMY:	23%
State average:	16%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	84%
State average:	79%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	9
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	5
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	6
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1585
State average:	1585

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	330
State average:	330

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	10%
State average:	10%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	14%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	36%
State average:	36%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	28%
State average:	26%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	12%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	76%
State average:	74%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1700
State average:	1674

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	340
State average:	334

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	12%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	23%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	25%
State average:	27%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	31%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	8%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	65%
State average:	63%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	8
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	7
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1843
State average:	1696

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	349
State average:	315

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	11%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 2

FRANK E. BRIGHAM ACADEMY:	12%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 3

FRANK E. BRIGHAM ACADEMY:	27%
State average:	29%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	29%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	21%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	77%
State average:	55%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	5
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	7
State average:	6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1927
State average:	1786

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	340
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	9%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	14%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	29%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	32%
State average:	19%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	18%
State average:	7%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	78%
State average:	57%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	5
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	7
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	7
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1996
State average:	1892

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	346
State average:	320

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	5%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	10%
State average:	21%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	34%
State average:	38%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	25%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	26%
State average:	10%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	85%
State average:	64%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	8
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	8
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	9
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	7
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1932
State average:	1925

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	304
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	14%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	22%
State average:	22%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	36%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	22%
State average:	21%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	6%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	64%
State average:	61%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	4
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1998
State average:	1995

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	327
State average:	326

Percent Passing

Here:	82%
State average:	80%

% in each Achievement Level 1

FRANK E. BRIGHAM ACADEMY:	11%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	20%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	26%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	39%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 5

FRANK E. BRIGHAM ACADEMY:	3%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	69%
State average:	69%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

FRANK E. BRIGHAM ACADEMY:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	8
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	5
State average:	5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1458
State average:	1402

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	326
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1639
State average:	1605

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	330
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 09%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 09%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1708
State average:	1656

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	320
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1872
State average:	1707

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	340
State average:	310

% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1956
State average:	1800

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	345
State average:	315

% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2051
State average:	1864

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	345
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1977
State average:	1907

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	322
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2002
State average:	1921

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	314
State average:	299

Percent Passing: 70%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	327
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	345
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 10

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	303
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1505
State average:	1476

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	344
State average:	338

% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1581
State average:	1578

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	329
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1673
State average:	1675

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	334
State average:	334

% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1863
State average:	1679

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	354
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1953
State average:	1799

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	347
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2033
State average:	1876

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	355
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 9

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1975
State average:	1925

Mean Scale Score 100-500

FRANK E. BRIGHAM ACADEMY:	317
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2016
State average:	1972

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	331
State average:	321

Percent Passing: 88%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 103

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	4
State average from 27 schools:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 47%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 92%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 401

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	5
State average from 27 schools:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 12%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 7%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 97%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 330

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	4
State average from 27 schools:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 32%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 75%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1432
State average:	1396

Mean Scale Score 100-500

FRANK E. BRIGHAM ACADEMY:	322
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1610
State average:	1582

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	325
State average:	320

% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1667
State average:	1627

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	313
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

FRANK E. BRIGHAM ACADEMY:	1900
State average:	1696

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	345
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 8
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2005
State average:	1775

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	355
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 8
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2030
State average:	1857

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	340
State average:	304

% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 9

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1973
State average:	1894

Mean Scale Score 100-500

FRANK E. BRIGHAM ACADEMY:	321
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

FRANK E. BRIGHAM ACADEMY:	2047
State average:	1935

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	322
State average:	302

Percent Passing: 71%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 9

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	316
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	338
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

FRANK E. BRIGHAM ACADEMY:	300
State average:	302

% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 34%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1481
State average:	1461

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	339
State average:	335

% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1618
State average:	1563

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	337
State average:	325

% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1692
State average:	1668

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	338
State average:	333

% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

FRANK E. BRIGHAM ACADEMY:	1877
State average:	1670

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	357
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 24%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1984
State average:	1801

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	354
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 27%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2009
State average:	1882

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	349
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 26%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1968
State average:	1915

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	315
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2042
State average:	1984

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	337
State average:	323

Percent Passing: 90%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Number of Students

FRANK E. BRIGHAM ACADEMY:	110
State average:	103

Mean Scale Score

Here:	640
State average from 3241 schools:	633

Median NPR

Here:	67
State average:	61

Literary (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

FRANK E. BRIGHAM ACADEMY:	10
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

FRANK E. BRIGHAM ACADEMY:	15
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

FRANK E. BRIGHAM ACADEMY:	7
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Number of Students

FRANK E. BRIGHAM ACADEMY:	116
State average:	97

Mean Scale Score

FRANK E. BRIGHAM ACADEMY:	657
State average from 3233 schools:	653

Median NPR

FRANK E. BRIGHAM ACADEMY:	73
State average:	69

Literary (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	10

Interpretation (max 20)

FRANK E. BRIGHAM ACADEMY:	15
State average:	15

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	8

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Number of Students

FRANK E. BRIGHAM ACADEMY:	124
State average:	101

Mean Scale Score

FRANK E. BRIGHAM ACADEMY:	671
State average from 3309 schools:	667

Median NPR

Here:	75
State average:	71

Literary (max 18)

FRANK E. BRIGHAM ACADEMY:	13
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

FRANK E. BRIGHAM ACADEMY:	13
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	15
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	6
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	429
State average:	190

Mean Scale Score

Here:	698
State average from 2604 schools:	671

Median NPR

Here:	84
State average:	63

Literary (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	8

Interpretation (max 20)

FRANK E. BRIGHAM ACADEMY:	17
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

FRANK E. BRIGHAM ACADEMY:	8
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	412
State average:	201

Mean Scale Score

Here:	714
State average from 2487 schools:	682

Median NPR

Here:	88
State average:	66

Literary (max 18)

Here:	16
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

FRANK E. BRIGHAM ACADEMY:	15
State average:	12

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	11
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	16
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

FRANK E. BRIGHAM ACADEMY:	11
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	8
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	412
State average:	192

Mean Scale Score

Here:	712
State average from 2497 schools:	687

Median NPR

Here:	84
State average:	63

Literary (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	12

Informational (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	7

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	16
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	11
State average:	10

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	8
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	328
State average:	273

Mean Scale Score

Here:	704
State average from 2275 schools:	694

Median NPR

Here:	71
State average:	61

Literary (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	11

Functional (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	11

Initial Understanding (max 12)

FRANK E. BRIGHAM ACADEMY:	8
State average:	7

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	15
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

FRANK E. BRIGHAM ACADEMY:	10
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	6
State average:	5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	319
State average:	237

Mean Scale Score

Here:	718
State average from 2096 schools:	709

Median NPR

Here:	75
State average:	65

Literary (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	14

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	8

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	16
State average:	15

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	11
State average:	10

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	8
State average:	8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 117

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	341
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 80%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

FRANK E. BRIGHAM ACADEMY:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 7%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 95%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 415

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	336
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 13%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 70%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	5
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 10%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 10%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 96%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 330

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	310
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 62%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

FRANK E. BRIGHAM ACADEMY:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 37%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 83%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1572
State average:	1342

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	345
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 22%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1714
State average from 1875 schools:	1542

Mean Scale Score 100-500

FRANK E. BRIGHAM ACADEMY:	342
State average:	313

% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 99%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1715
State average:	1546

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1559
State average:	1397

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 156

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1768
State average from 1873 schools:	1629

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	331
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 100%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1768
State average:	1632

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1683
State average:	1532

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 85

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	319
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1575
State average:	1413

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	359
State average:	324

% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 27%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1579
State average from 1874 schools:	1525

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	328
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 99%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1581
State average:	1528

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1560
State average:	1414

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 21

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1781
State average from 1872 schools:	1647

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	357
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 99%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1778
State average:	1649

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1554
State average:	1519

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 225

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 113

Mean Scale Score

FRANK E. BRIGHAM ACADEMY:	658
State average from 1891 schools:	633

Median NPR: 80
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 15
Functional (max 18): 15
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 12): 10
Strategies (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 91

Mean Scale Score

FRANK E. BRIGHAM ACADEMY:	659
State average from 1874 schools:	642

Median NPR: 75
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 92

Mean Scale Score

Here:	690
State average from 1870 schools:	667

Median NPR: 87
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 15
Functional (max 18): 15
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 17
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 113

Mean Scale Score

Here:	659
State average from 1891 schools:	632

Median NPR: 84
Number Sense (max 14): 12
Operations (max 11): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 91

Mean Scale Score

FRANK E. BRIGHAM ACADEMY:	666
State average from 1874 schools:	652

Median NPR: 84
Number Sense (max 12): 10
Operations (max 12): 10
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 92

Mean Scale Score

FRANK E. BRIGHAM ACADEMY:	685
State average from 1870 schools:	663

Median NPR: 87
Number Sense (max 12): 10
Operations (max 12): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 92

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	342
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 84%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 15
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

FRANK E. BRIGHAM ACADEMY:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 42%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 96%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 88%

City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DC	DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID
IL	IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	MD
ME	MI	MN	MO	MS	MT	NC
ND	NE	NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY
OH	OK	OR	PA	RI	SC	SD
TN	TX	UT	VA	VT	WA	WI
WV	WY

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID	IL
IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	ME	MI
MN	MO	MS	MT	NC	ND	NE
NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	SD	TN	TX
VA	VT	WA	WI	WV	WY

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID	IL
IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	ME	MI
MN	MO	MS	MT	NC	ND	NE
NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	SD	TN	TX
VA	VT	WA	WI	WV	WY

AL	AZ	CA	CO	CT	DE	FL
GA	HI	IA	ID	IL	IN	KS
LA	MA	MD	MI	MN	MO	NC
NE	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	TN	TX	UT
VA	WA	WI	WV

AL	CA	CO	DC	DE	FL	GA
IA	ID	IL	IN	KS	KY	LA
MD	ME	MI	MN	NC	NE	NH
NJ	NV	NY	OH	OK	OR	PA
SC	TN	TX	UT	VA	WA	WI