Frank W. Springstead High/Adul School in Brooksville, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 2.

3300 MARINER BLVD
Brooksville, FL 34609

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Dayspring Academy School (14.6 miles):

76
Cotee River Elementary School (19.9 miles):

67
Oakstead Elementary School (19.6 miles):

58
Mary Giella Elementary School (8.3 miles):

54
Moton Elementary School (10.2 miles):

45
Chasco Elementary School (17.1 miles):

33
Fox Hollow Elementary School (15.7 miles):

23
Frank W. Springstead High/Adul School:

2
Frank W. Springstead High/Adul School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Hernando County:

39
Brooksville:

32
Frank W. Springstead High/Adul:

2

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:



Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (352) 797-7027 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 27
School number: 8181
School type: Adult
District Name: HERNANDO
Grade range: ADULT
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (352) 797-7127
Principal: Harry Wilson
The function/setting of the school: Adult Education
The main educational program offered at the school: Adult
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 5
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 44
Senate District: 15

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 119 (92%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 119 (92%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
FRANK W. SPRINGSTEAD HIGH/ADUL:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 44
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
FRANK W. SPRINGSTEAD HIGH/ADUL:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 96
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 83

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 95
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 83
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 36 (92%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 36 (92%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 68 (92%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 68 (93%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 25

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 56
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 49

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 55
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 47
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 103 (92%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 103 (92%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 37
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
FRANK W. SPRINGSTEAD HIGH/ADUL:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 84
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 72

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 83
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 72
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 119 (92%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 119 (92%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 44
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 96
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 83

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 95
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 83
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 135 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 135 (94%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 52
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 107
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 94

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

41%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 108
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 94
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20
Number of Students Tested in Math: 20
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 42 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 41 (92%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 31

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 72 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 73 (96%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 31

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
FRANK W. SPRINGSTEAD HIGH/ADUL:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 60
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 50

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

40%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 60
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 53
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 103 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 103 (94%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

69%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 39
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 85
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 75

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

38%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 86
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 76
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 135 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 135 (94%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 52
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 107
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 94

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

41%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 108
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 94
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 137 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 137 (95%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 46
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 121
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 108

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 122
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 107
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 25
Number of Students Tested in Math: 25
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 45 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 45 (96%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

41%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 38

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
FRANK W. SPRINGSTEAD HIGH/ADUL:

41%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 36
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 63 (93%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 63 (93%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 55
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 47

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 56
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 48
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 107 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 107 (96%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 36
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 95
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 88

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

41%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 96
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 87
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 137 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 137 (95%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 46
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 121
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 108

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 122
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 107
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
FRANK W. SPRINGSTEAD HIGH/ADUL:

1172
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

225
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

57%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

14%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

29%
State average:

33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

29%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

10
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

1
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1394
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

238
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

64%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

7%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

21%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

7%
State average:

23%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

29%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

2
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

11
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1707
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

272
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

43%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
FRANK W. SPRINGSTEAD HIGH/ADUL:

29%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

29%
State average:

33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

29%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

12
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
FRANK W. SPRINGSTEAD HIGH/ADUL:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

5
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1596
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

252
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

73%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

27%
State average:

30%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

7
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

245
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

64%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

36%
State average:

31%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

6
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

6
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
FRANK W. SPRINGSTEAD HIGH/ADUL:

6
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

253
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

68%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
FRANK W. SPRINGSTEAD HIGH/ADUL:

11%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

21%
State average:

31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

21%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

6
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
FRANK W. SPRINGSTEAD HIGH/ADUL:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

6
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

5
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

260
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

47%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

35%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 3
FRANK W. SPRINGSTEAD HIGH/ADUL:

18%
State average:

30%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

18%
State average:

36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

6
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

5
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1237
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

242
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

71%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

21%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

7%
State average:

27%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

7%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

3
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

2
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1534
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

243
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

64%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

21%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

7%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

7%
State average:

19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

14%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

2
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1709
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

273
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

48%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

33%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

19%
State average:

38%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

19%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
FRANK W. SPRINGSTEAD HIGH/ADUL:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

2
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1669
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

227
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

64%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

36%
State average:

22%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

2
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
FRANK W. SPRINGSTEAD HIGH/ADUL:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

2
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1273
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

232
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 70%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1587
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

275
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1599
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

250
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 62%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1688
State average:

1921
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

256
State average:

299
Percent Passing: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 71%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 21%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

203
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 75%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 5%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1342
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

233
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 80%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 20%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1582
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

255
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 57%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 13%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1645
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

257
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 19%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1863
State average:

1972
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

294
State average:

321
Percent Passing: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 21
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

3
State average from 27 schools:

59
Unscore - Combined: 5
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 43%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 14
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

3
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 43%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 50%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1413
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

258
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1522
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

262
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 57%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1618
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

254
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 59%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 6%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1618
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

256
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 69%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

215
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 88%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1320
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

228
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 86%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1529
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

242
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 67%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 7%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1597
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

245
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 65%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 6%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1764
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

255
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 54%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

7
State average:

103

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

4
State average:

97

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

4
State average:

101

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

14
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
Here:

629
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
Here:

25
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

8
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

5
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

11
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

5
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

15
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
Here:

631
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
Here:

22
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

6
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

10
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

4
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

18
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
Here:

642
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
Here:

23
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

8
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
FRANK W. SPRINGSTEAD HIGH/ADUL:

8
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

5
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

9
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

5
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

14
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
FRANK W. SPRINGSTEAD HIGH/ADUL:

670
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
Here:

38
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

5
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
FRANK W. SPRINGSTEAD HIGH/ADUL:

8
State average:

237

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 4

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 16
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

224
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 69%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 19%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 7
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
FRANK W. SPRINGSTEAD HIGH/ADUL:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 6%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 50%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 7


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.