George C. Miller, Junior Intermediate School in Crescent City, Florida (FL) - Test Results, Rating, Ranking, Grades, Scores, Classes, Enrollment, Teachers, Students, and Report Card

City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 18.

101 S PROSPECT ST
Crescent City, FL 32112

Show street view No street view available for this location

Other nearby schools ratings:

Buddy Taylor Middle School (16.6 miles):	65
Summit Academy School (15.2 miles):	46
Fort Mccoy School (19.0 miles):	43
Robert H. Jenkins, Junior Middle School (18.1 miles):	32
Putnam County Exceptional Education School (18.3 miles):	24
Cornerstone Elementary School (15.2 miles):	21
George C. Miller, Junior Intermediate School:	18
T. Dewitt Taylor Middle-High School (12.8 miles):	12
Pathways Academy School (16.9 miles):	0

George C. Miller, Junior Intermediate School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:

Florida:	45
Putnam County:	31
Crescent City:	36
This School:	18

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum

Phone: (386) 698-1360 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 54
School number: 231
School type: Elementary
District Name: PUTNAM
Grade range: GRADES 4 TO 6
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (386) 698-1973
Principal: Dean Ellis
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 7
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 21
Senate District: 7
School Web Address: http://mis.putnamschools.org/

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading: 92%

Meeting High Standards in Math: 92%

Meeting High Standards in Writing: 87%

Meeting High Standards in Science: 81%

Making Reading Gains : 71%

Making Math Gains: 76%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading : 66%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math: 75%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns): 640

Percent Tested: 100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 119999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate: 32%

Minority Rate: 42%

Region: 2

Title I: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 453 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 453 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 147
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	87%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 427
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 413

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	89%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 427
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 414
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 263 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 263 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 84
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	94%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 252
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 241
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 252
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 242
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 80 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 80 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 29

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	71%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 75
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 74

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

GEORGE C. MILLER, JUNIOR INTERMEDIATE:	68%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 75
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 74
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 58 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 58 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 50
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 50
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 141 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 141 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	94%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 50
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	70%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 125
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 119

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	70%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 125
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 120
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 23
Number of Students Tested in Math: 23
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 66 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 66 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 64
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 63
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 64
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 63
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading: 91%

Meeting High Standards in Math: 87%

Meeting High Standards in Writing: 83%

Meeting High Standards in Science: 66%

Making Reading Gains : 77%

Making Math Gains: 64%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading : 72%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math: 54%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns): 594

Percent Tested: 100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate: 28%

Minority Rate: 44%

Region: 3

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 427 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 428 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 138
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	87%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 420
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 413

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	82%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 421
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 414
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 240 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 241 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 91
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	91%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 239
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 235

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	90%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 240
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 236
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 75 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 75 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	68%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 73
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 72

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	62%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 73
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 72
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 55 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 55 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 53
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 53
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 53
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 53
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 30 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 30 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 116 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 117 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 29

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	70%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 115
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 113

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	65%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 116
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 114
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 69 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 69 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	64%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 69
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 67

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	59%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 69
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 67
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading: 87%

Meeting High Standards in Math: 87%

Meeting High Standards in Writing: 79%

Meeting High Standards in Science: 72%

Making Reading Gains : 65%

Making Math Gains: 62%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading : 61%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math: 52%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns): 565

Percent Tested: 100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate: 30%

Minority Rate: 46%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 439 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 439 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	92%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 124
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

GEORGE C. MILLER, JUNIOR INTERMEDIATE:	82%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 433
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 419

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	82%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 434
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 420
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 243 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 243 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

GEORGE C. MILLER, JUNIOR INTERMEDIATE:	91%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 58
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

GEORGE C. MILLER, JUNIOR INTERMEDIATE:	90%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 240
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 237

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	89%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 240
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 237
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 87 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 87 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 24

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	64%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 86
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 84

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	62%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 87
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 85
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 59 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 59 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 58
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 55
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 58
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 55
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 22
Number of Students Tested in Math: 22
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 122 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 122 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	88%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 33
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	60%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 120
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 112

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

GEORGE C. MILLER, JUNIOR INTERMEDIATE:	60%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 121
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 113
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 77 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 77 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	61%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 76
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 72

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	57%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 77
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 73
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading: 60%

Meeting High Standards in Math: 46%

Meeting High Standards in Writing: 75%

Meeting High Standards in Science: 23%

Making Reading Gains: 68%

Making Reading Gains - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
Making Math Gains: 60%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading: 71%

% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math: 70%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns: 473

Percent Tested: 100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: F

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate: 84%

Minority Rate: 63%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 502 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 501 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	91%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 163
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	55%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 487
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	43%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 487
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 185 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 185 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	95%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 58
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	68%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 174
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	49%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 174
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 86 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 86 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 29

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	39%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 85
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

GEORGE C. MILLER, JUNIOR INTERMEDIATE:	32%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 85
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 208 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 207 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	90%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 72
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	48%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 205
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	43%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 205
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 426 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 425 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	90%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 143
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	51%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 414
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	42%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 414
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 114 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 113 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	89%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 62
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	37%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 111
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	34%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 111
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 76 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 75 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 24

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

GEORGE C. MILLER, JUNIOR INTERMEDIATE:	28%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 74
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 73
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading: 55%

Meeting High Standards in Math: 45%

Meeting High Standards in Writing: 79%

Making Reading Gains: 52%

Making Math Gains: 53%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading: 50%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns: 334

Percent Tested: 99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: F

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate: 87%

Minority Rate: 64%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 449 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 449 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	87%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 137
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	50%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 431
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	42%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 431
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 157 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 157 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	92%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 48

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	68%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 149
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	47%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 149
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 69 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 69 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 25

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	30%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 64

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	34%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 64
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 190 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 190 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	92%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 53

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	41%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 188
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	39%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 188
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 389 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 389 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	86%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 119

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	46%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 375
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

GEORGE C. MILLER, JUNIOR INTERMEDIATE:	39%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 375
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 113 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 113 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 45

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	33%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 112
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	33%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 112
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 63 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 63 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 18

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	30%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 60

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	30%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 60
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading: 65%

Meeting High Standards in Math: 56%

Meeting High Standards in Writing: 80%

Making Reading Gains: 65%

Making Math Gains: 66%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading: 60%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns: 392

Percent Tested: 99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: F

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate: 88%

Minority Rate: 62%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1516
State average:	1402

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	336
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	8%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	4%
State average:	11%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	32%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	42%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	14%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	88%
State average:	74%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	19
State average:	17

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

GEORGE C. MILLER, JUNIOR INTERMEDIATE:	1678
State average:	1604

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	336
State average:	324

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	8%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	8%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	36%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	40%
State average:	29%

% in each Achievement Level 5

GEORGE C. MILLER, JUNIOR INTERMEDIATE:	8%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

GEORGE C. MILLER, JUNIOR INTERMEDIATE:	84%
State average:	72%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	20
State average:	19

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	9
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	2
State average:	2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1801
State average:	1659

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	337
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	7%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

GEORGE C. MILLER, JUNIOR INTERMEDIATE:	7%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	27%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	41%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	18%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

GEORGE C. MILLER, JUNIOR INTERMEDIATE:	86%
State average:	70%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	4
State average:	3

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	17
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	11
State average:	10

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	2
State average:	2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1854
State average:	1716

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	337
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

GEORGE C. MILLER, JUNIOR INTERMEDIATE:	7%
State average:	19%

% in each Achievement Level 2

GEORGE C. MILLER, JUNIOR INTERMEDIATE:	10%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	38%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	33%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 5

GEORGE C. MILLER, JUNIOR INTERMEDIATE:	12%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	83%
State average:	65%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	16
State average:	14

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

GEORGE C. MILLER, JUNIOR INTERMEDIATE:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1917
State average:	1810

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	338
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	6%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	12%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	40%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	29%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	13%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	82%
State average:	65%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	18
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1962
State average:	1876

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	326
State average:	308

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	10%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	24%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	34%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	24%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	8%
State average:	3%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	66%
State average:	52%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	17
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	7
State average:	6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2002
State average:	1922

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	327
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	15%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 2

GEORGE C. MILLER, JUNIOR INTERMEDIATE:	26%
State average:	30%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	32%
State average:	26%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	18%
State average:	12%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	9%
State average:	7%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

GEORGE C. MILLER, JUNIOR INTERMEDIATE:	59%
State average:	45%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	12
State average:	11

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	7
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	350
State average:	321

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	8%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	20%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 3

GEORGE C. MILLER, JUNIOR INTERMEDIATE:	41%
State average:	36%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	19%
State average:	11%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	12%
State average:	4%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	71%
State average:	51%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	11
State average:	9

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	10
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	10
State average:	9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	338
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	11%
State average:	27%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	26%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	44%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	16%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	3%
State average:	2%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

GEORGE C. MILLER, JUNIOR INTERMEDIATE:	63%
State average:	41%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	10
State average:	9

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	10
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	8
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	310
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	20%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	45%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	31%
State average:	30%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	5%
State average:	5%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	36%
State average:	36%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	9
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	7
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1603
State average:	1481

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	366
State average:	339

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	3%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	6%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	25%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	40%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	25%
State average:	16%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	91%
State average:	79%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

GEORGE C. MILLER, JUNIOR INTERMEDIATE:	10
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	5
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	6
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

GEORGE C. MILLER, JUNIOR INTERMEDIATE:	1680
State average:	1585

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	351
State average:	330

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	5%
State average:	10%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	6%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	33%
State average:	36%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	37%
State average:	26%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	18%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	89%
State average:	74%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	5
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1812
State average:	1674

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	363
State average:	334

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	6%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	12%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	19%
State average:	27%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	39%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	23%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	81%
State average:	63%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	9
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	8
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	9
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	8
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1761
State average:	1696

Mean Scale Score 100-500

GEORGE C. MILLER, JUNIOR INTERMEDIATE:	330
State average:	315

% in each Achievement Level 1

GEORGE C. MILLER, JUNIOR INTERMEDIATE:	12%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	18%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	40%
State average:	29%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	24%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	7%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	70%
State average:	55%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	5
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	7
State average:	6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1858
State average:	1786

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	323
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	11%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	15%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	41%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	27%
State average:	19%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	7%
State average:	7%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	74%
State average:	57%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	4
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	6
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1947
State average:	1892

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	334
State average:	320

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	8%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	14%
State average:	21%

% in each Achievement Level 3

GEORGE C. MILLER, JUNIOR INTERMEDIATE:	41%
State average:	38%

% in each Achievement Level 4

GEORGE C. MILLER, JUNIOR INTERMEDIATE:	23%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	14%
State average:	10%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	78%
State average:	64%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	6
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1988
State average:	1925

Mean Scale Score 100-500

GEORGE C. MILLER, JUNIOR INTERMEDIATE:	321
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	7%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	20%
State average:	22%

% in each Achievement Level 3

GEORGE C. MILLER, JUNIOR INTERMEDIATE:	34%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

GEORGE C. MILLER, JUNIOR INTERMEDIATE:	24%
State average:	21%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	14%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	73%
State average:	61%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	4
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	5
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1547
State average:	1402

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	341
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1709
State average:	1605

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	341
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 04%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 08%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1760
State average:	1656

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	330
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1811
State average:	1707

Mean Scale Score 100-500

GEORGE C. MILLER, JUNIOR INTERMEDIATE:	329
State average:	310

% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1905
State average:	1800

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	336
State average:	315

% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1932
State average:	1864

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	320
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1998
State average:	1907

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	326
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2016
State average:	1921

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	317
State average:	299

Percent Passing: 67%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	329
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	316
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	313
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1611
State average:	1476

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	367
State average:	338

% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 26%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 92%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1676
State average:	1578

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	350
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1743
State average:	1675

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	349
State average:	334

% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1752
State average:	1679

Mean Scale Score 100-500

GEORGE C. MILLER, JUNIOR INTERMEDIATE:	328
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1855
State average:	1799

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	322
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1899
State average:	1876

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	321
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1992
State average:	1925

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	322
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2031
State average:	1972

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	335
State average:	321

Percent Passing: 90%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 141

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	4
State average from 27 schools:	59

Unscore - Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 48%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 79%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 220

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

GEORGE C. MILLER, JUNIOR INTERMEDIATE:	5
State average from 27 schools:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 30%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 12%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 95%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 244

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	4
State average from 27 schools:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 80%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1522
State average:	1396

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	337
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1645
State average:	1582

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	330
State average:	320

% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 20
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1727
State average:	1627

Mean Scale Score 100-500

GEORGE C. MILLER, JUNIOR INTERMEDIATE:	324
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1798
State average:	1696

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	327
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 8
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1842
State average:	1775

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	324
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1944
State average:	1857

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	322
State average:	304

% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1947
State average:	1894

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	316
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2015
State average:	1935

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	316
State average:	302

Percent Passing: 64%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	336
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	322
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	302
State average:	302

% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1622
State average:	1461

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	370
State average:	335

% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 30%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 91%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1639
State average:	1563

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	342
State average:	325

% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1763
State average:	1668

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	353
State average:	333

% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1674
State average:	1670

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	310
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1830
State average:	1801

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	316
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1922
State average:	1882

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	327
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1932
State average:	1915

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	304
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2003
State average:	1984

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	328
State average:	323

Percent Passing: 84%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Number of Students

GEORGE C. MILLER, JUNIOR INTERMEDIATE:	164
State average:	103

Mean Scale Score

Here:	649
State average from 3241 schools:	633

Median NPR

GEORGE C. MILLER, JUNIOR INTERMEDIATE:	74
State average:	61

Literary (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	16
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

GEORGE C. MILLER, JUNIOR INTERMEDIATE:	10
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

GEORGE C. MILLER, JUNIOR INTERMEDIATE:	7
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Number of Students

GEORGE C. MILLER, JUNIOR INTERMEDIATE:	119
State average:	97

Mean Scale Score

Here:	662
State average from 3233 schools:	653

Median NPR

Here:	77
State average:	69

Literary (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

GEORGE C. MILLER, JUNIOR INTERMEDIATE:	13
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	10

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	16
State average:	15

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	8

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	8
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	146
State average:	101

Mean Scale Score

Here:	682
State average from 3309 schools:	667

Median NPR

Here:	83
State average:	71

Literary (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	16
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	248
State average:	190

Mean Scale Score

GEORGE C. MILLER, JUNIOR INTERMEDIATE:	686
State average from 2604 schools:	671

Median NPR

Here:	75
State average:	63

Literary (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

GEORGE C. MILLER, JUNIOR INTERMEDIATE:	9
State average:	8

Interpretation (max 20)

GEORGE C. MILLER, JUNIOR INTERMEDIATE:	16
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

GEORGE C. MILLER, JUNIOR INTERMEDIATE:	10
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	8
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	226
State average:	201

Mean Scale Score

GEORGE C. MILLER, JUNIOR INTERMEDIATE:	697
State average from 2487 schools:	682

Median NPR

GEORGE C. MILLER, JUNIOR INTERMEDIATE:	79
State average:	66

Literary (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	12

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	15
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

GEORGE C. MILLER, JUNIOR INTERMEDIATE:	10
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	217
State average:	192

Mean Scale Score

Here:	704
State average from 2497 schools:	687

Median NPR

Here:	78
State average:	63

Literary (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	12

Informational (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	7

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	15
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	11
State average:	10

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	8
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	256
State average:	273

Mean Scale Score

Here:	699
State average from 2275 schools:	694

Median NPR

Here:	66
State average:	61

Literary (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	11

Functional (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	11

Initial Understanding (max 12)

GEORGE C. MILLER, JUNIOR INTERMEDIATE:	7
State average:	7

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	15
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	6
State average:	5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	185
State average:	237

Mean Scale Score

Here:	719
State average from 2096 schools:	709

Median NPR

Here:	76
State average:	65

Literary (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	14

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	8

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	16
State average:	15

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	11
State average:	10

Strategies (max 10)

GEORGE C. MILLER, JUNIOR INTERMEDIATE:	8
State average:	8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 123

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	309
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 61%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 73%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 214

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	317
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 65%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

GEORGE C. MILLER, JUNIOR INTERMEDIATE:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 6%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 91%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 232

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

GEORGE C. MILLER, JUNIOR INTERMEDIATE:	291
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 41%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

GEORGE C. MILLER, JUNIOR INTERMEDIATE:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 69%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1419
State average from 1875 schools:	1542

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	292
State average:	313

% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 95%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1433
State average:	1546

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1312
State average:	1397

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 121

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

GEORGE C. MILLER, JUNIOR INTERMEDIATE:	1553
State average from 1873 schools:	1629

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	293
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1570
State average:	1632

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1430
State average:	1532

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 140

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1619
State average from 878 schools:	1661

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	295
State average:	302

% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

GEORGE C. MILLER, JUNIOR INTERMEDIATE:	1624
State average:	1663

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1528
State average:	1592

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 96

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	289
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 23%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1434
State average from 1874 schools:	1525

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	295
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 96%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

GEORGE C. MILLER, JUNIOR INTERMEDIATE:	1443
State average:	1528

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1285
State average:	1414

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 158

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1579
State average from 1872 schools:	1647

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	314
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1583
State average:	1649

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1436
State average:	1519

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 147

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1638
State average from 873 schools:	1641

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	302
State average:	302

% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1639
State average:	1645

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1598
State average:	1620

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 41

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 163

Mean Scale Score

Here:	629
State average from 1874 schools:	642

Median NPR: 49
Literary (max 18): 10
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 147

Mean Scale Score

Here:	657
State average from 1870 schools:	667

Median NPR: 64
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 176

Mean Scale Score

GEORGE C. MILLER, JUNIOR INTERMEDIATE:	665
State average from 874 schools:	671

Median NPR: 58
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 163

Mean Scale Score

Here:	639
State average from 1874 schools:	652

Median NPR: 66
Number Sense (max 12): 9
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 148

Mean Scale Score

Here:	650
State average from 1870 schools:	663

Median NPR: 64
Number Sense (max 12): 8
Operations (max 12): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 176

Mean Scale Score

Here:	670
State average from 874 schools:	669

Median NPR: 65
Number Sense (max 10): 6
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 161

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

GEORGE C. MILLER, JUNIOR INTERMEDIATE:	278
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 44%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	3
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 34%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 73%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 53%

City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DC	DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID
IL	IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	MD
ME	MI	MN	MO	MS	MT	NC
ND	NE	NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY
OH	OK	OR	PA	RI	SC	SD
TN	TX	UT	VA	VT	WA	WI
WV	WY

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID	IL
IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	ME	MI
MN	MO	MS	MT	NC	ND	NE
NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	SD	TN	TX
VA	VT	WA	WI	WV	WY

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID	IL
IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	ME	MI
MN	MO	MS	MT	NC	ND	NE
NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	SD	TN	TX
VA	VT	WA	WI	WV	WY

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DC	DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID
IL	IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	MD
ME	MI	MN	MO	MS	MT	NC
ND	NE	NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY
OH	OK	OR	PA	RI	SC	SD
TN	TX	UT	VA	VT	WA	WI
WV	WY

AB	BC	MB	NB	NL	NS	NT
NU	ON	PE	QC	SK	YT