Hobbs Middle School in Milton, Florida (FL) - Test Results, Rating, Ranking, Grades, Scores, Classes, Enrollment, Teachers, Students, and Report Card

City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 55.

5317 GLOVER LANE
Milton, FL 32570

Show street view No street view available for this location

Other nearby schools ratings:

Thomas L Sims Middle School (6.7 miles):	91
Avalon Middle School (3.6 miles):	72
Hobbs Middle School:	55
O.A.S.I.S High Preparatory Academy School (16.8 miles):	49
A. V. Clubbs Center School (15.7 miles):	47
Bellview Middle School (17.8 miles):	39
Central High School (10.5 miles):	26
Learning Academy Of Santa Rosa School (2.6 miles):	8

Hobbs Middle School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:

Florida:	45
Santa Rosa County:	54
Milton:	48
Hobbs Middle School:	55

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum

Phone: (850) 983-5630 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 57
School number: 231
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: SANTA ROSA
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 8
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (850) 983-5635
Principal: Buddy Powell
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 1
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 1
Senate District: 2
School Web Address: http://www.santarosa.k12.fl.us/schools/hms/

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	92%
State average from 613 schools:	71%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	92%
State average from 612 schools:	73%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	87%
State average from 613 schools:	88%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	81%
State average from 612 schools:	51%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	71%
State average from 613 schools:	64%

Making Math Gains

HOBBS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	76%
State average from 612 schools:	70%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	66%
State average from 613 schools:	62%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	75%
State average from 613 schools:	68%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	640
State average from 613 schools:	545

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 613 schools:	100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 119999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	32%
State average from 614 schools:	56%

Minority Rate

Here:	42%
State average from 614 schools:	49%

Region: 2

Title I: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 453 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 453 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 147
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	87%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 427
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 413

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	89%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 427
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 414
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 263 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 263 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 84
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

HOBBS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	94%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 252
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 241
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 252
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 242
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 80 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 80 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 29

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	71%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 75
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 74

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	68%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 75
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 74
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 58 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 58 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 50
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 50
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 141 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 141 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	94%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 50
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	70%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 125
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 119

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	70%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 125
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 120
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 23
Number of Students Tested in Math: 23
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 66 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 66 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 64
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 63
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 64
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 63
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	91%
State average from 613 schools:	70%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	87%
State average from 613 schools:	71%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	83%
State average from 613 schools:	92%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	66%
State average from 613 schools:	49%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	77%
State average from 613 schools:	66%

Making Math Gains

Here:	64%
State average from 613 schools:	69%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	72%
State average from 613 schools:	68%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	54%
State average from 613 schools:	67%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	594
State average from 613 schools:	553

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 613 schools:	100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	28%
State average from 613 schools:	52%

Minority Rate

HOBBS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	44%
State average from 613 schools:	48%

Region: 3

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 427 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 428 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 138
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	87%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 420
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 413

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	82%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 421
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 414
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 240 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 241 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 91
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

HOBBS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	91%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 239
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 235

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	90%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 240
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 236
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 75 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 75 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	68%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 73
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 72

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	62%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 73
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 72
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 55 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 55 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 53
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 53
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 53
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 53
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 30 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 30 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 116 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 117 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 29

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	70%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 115
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 113

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	65%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 116
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 114
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 69 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 69 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	64%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 69
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 67

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	59%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 69
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 67
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	87%
State average from 603 schools:	69%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	87%
State average from 603 schools:	70%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	79%
State average from 603 schools:	88%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	72%
State average from 602 schools:	46%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	65%
State average from 602 schools:	65%

Making Math Gains

Here:	62%
State average from 602 schools:	71%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	61%
State average from 602 schools:	64%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	52%
State average from 602 schools:	69%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	565
State average from 602 schools:	543

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 604 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	30%
State average from 605 schools:	49%

Minority Rate

Here:	46%
State average from 605 schools:	48%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 439 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 439 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

HOBBS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	92%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 124
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	82%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 433
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 419

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	82%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 434
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 420
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 243 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 243 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	91%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 58
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	90%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 240
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 237

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	89%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 240
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 237
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 87 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 87 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 24

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	64%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 86
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 84

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	62%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 87
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 85
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 59 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 59 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 58
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 55
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 58
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 55
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 22
Number of Students Tested in Math: 22
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 122 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 122 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	88%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 33
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	60%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 120
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 112

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	60%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 121
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 113
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 77 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 77 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	61%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 76
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 72

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	57%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 77
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 73
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	70%
State average from 539 schools:	64%

Meeting High Standards in Math

HOBBS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	70%
State average from 539 schools:	64%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	91%
State average from 539 schools:	91%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	54%
State average from 538 schools:	44%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	62%
State average from 539 schools:	61%

Making Math Gains

HOBBS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	68%
State average from 539 schools:	69%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	67%
State average from 539 schools:	64%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	56%
State average from 539 schools:	67%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns

Here:	538
State average from 539 schools:	523

Percent Tested

Here:	99%
State average from 539 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	47%
State average from 541 schools:	49%

Minority Rate

Here:	20%
State average from 542 schools:	53%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 698 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 696 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	97%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 220
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	65%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 650
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

HOBBS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	65%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 646
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 554 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 554 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	98%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 166
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	67%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 518
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	67%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 516
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 87 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 87 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	97%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 30
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 78
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 78
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 327 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 325 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	95%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 101
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	54%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 297
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	52%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 293
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 103 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 102 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 30
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 87
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 84
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	72%
State average from 526 schools:	64%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	69%
State average from 526 schools:	63%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	89%
State average from 526 schools:	89%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	65%
State average from 526 schools:	66%

Making Math Gains

HOBBS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	74%
State average from 526 schools:	71%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	72%
State average from 526 schools:	72%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns

Here:	441
State average from 526 schools:	425

Percent Tested

Here:	99%
State average from 526 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	49%
State average from 525 schools:	50%

Minority Rate

Here:	18%
State average from 526 schools:	52%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 680 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 681 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	91%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 200
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	66%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 626
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	63%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 627
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 560 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 560 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	92%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 166

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

HOBBS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	68%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 513
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	67%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 513
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 71 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 71 (99%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 21

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	46%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 68

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	40%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 68
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 335 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 335 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	87%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 89

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

HOBBS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	59%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 299
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

HOBBS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	53%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 299
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 107 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 107 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	56%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 32
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

HOBBS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	36%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 98
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

HOBBS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	32%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 98
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	69%
State average from 505 schools:	59%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	67%
State average from 505 schools:	60%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

HOBBS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	83%
State average from 506 schools:	83%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	56%
State average from 505 schools:	61%

Making Math Gains

Here:	70%
State average from 505 schools:	69%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	57%
State average from 505 schools:	66%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns

HOBBS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	402
State average from 506 schools:	397

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 506 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	47%
State average from 506 schools:	51%

Minority Rate

Here:	18%
State average from 506 schools:	50%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1516
State average:	1402

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	336
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	8%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	4%
State average:	11%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	32%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	42%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	14%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	88%
State average:	74%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

HOBBS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	19
State average:	17

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

HOBBS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	1678
State average:	1604

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	336
State average:	324

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	8%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	8%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	36%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	40%
State average:	29%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	8%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	84%
State average:	72%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	20
State average:	19

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	9
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	2
State average:	2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1801
State average:	1659

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	337
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

HOBBS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	7%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	7%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	27%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	41%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	18%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	86%
State average:	70%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

HOBBS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	4
State average:	3

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	17
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	11
State average:	10

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	2
State average:	2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1854
State average:	1716

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	337
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	7%
State average:	19%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	10%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	38%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

HOBBS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	33%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	12%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

HOBBS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	83%
State average:	65%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	16
State average:	14

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1917
State average:	1810

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	338
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	6%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	12%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	40%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	29%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	13%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

HOBBS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	82%
State average:	65%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	18
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1962
State average:	1876

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	326
State average:	308

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	10%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	24%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	34%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	24%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	8%
State average:	3%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	66%
State average:	52%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	17
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	7
State average:	6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2002
State average:	1922

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	327
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	15%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	26%
State average:	30%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	32%
State average:	26%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	18%
State average:	12%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	9%
State average:	7%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	59%
State average:	45%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	12
State average:	11

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

HOBBS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	7
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	350
State average:	321

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	8%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	20%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	41%
State average:	36%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	19%
State average:	11%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	12%
State average:	4%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	71%
State average:	51%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	11
State average:	9

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	10
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

HOBBS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	10
State average:	9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	338
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	11%
State average:	27%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	26%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	44%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	16%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 5

HOBBS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	3%
State average:	2%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	63%
State average:	41%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	10
State average:	9

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	10
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	8
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	310
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	20%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	45%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	31%
State average:	30%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	5%
State average:	5%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	36%
State average:	36%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	9
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	7
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1603
State average:	1481

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	366
State average:	339

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	3%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	6%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	25%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	40%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	25%
State average:	16%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	91%
State average:	79%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	10
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	5
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

HOBBS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	6
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1680
State average:	1585

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	351
State average:	330

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	5%
State average:	10%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	6%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	33%
State average:	36%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	37%
State average:	26%

% in each Achievement Level 5

HOBBS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	18%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	89%
State average:	74%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	5
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

HOBBS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	1812
State average:	1674

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	363
State average:	334

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	6%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	12%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	19%
State average:	27%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	39%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	23%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	81%
State average:	63%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	9
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

HOBBS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	8
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	9
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	8
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1761
State average:	1696

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	330
State average:	315

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	12%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	18%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 3

HOBBS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	40%
State average:	29%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	24%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 5

HOBBS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	7%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	70%
State average:	55%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	5
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	7
State average:	6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1858
State average:	1786

Mean Scale Score 100-500

HOBBS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	323
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	11%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	15%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	41%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	27%
State average:	19%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	7%
State average:	7%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	74%
State average:	57%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	4
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	6
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1947
State average:	1892

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	334
State average:	320

% in each Achievement Level 1

HOBBS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	8%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	14%
State average:	21%

% in each Achievement Level 3

HOBBS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	41%
State average:	38%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	23%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	14%
State average:	10%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	78%
State average:	64%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

HOBBS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	6
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1988
State average:	1925

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	321
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	7%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	20%
State average:	22%

% in each Achievement Level 3

HOBBS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	34%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	24%
State average:	21%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	14%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	73%
State average:	61%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	4
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

HOBBS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	5
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

HOBBS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	1547
State average:	1402

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	341
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1709
State average:	1605

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	341
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 04%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 08%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1760
State average:	1656

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	330
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1811
State average:	1707

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	329
State average:	310

% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1905
State average:	1800

Mean Scale Score 100-500

HOBBS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	336
State average:	315

% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1932
State average:	1864

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	320
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1998
State average:	1907

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	326
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2016
State average:	1921

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	317
State average:	299

Percent Passing: 67%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

HOBBS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	329
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	316
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

HOBBS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	313
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1611
State average:	1476

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	367
State average:	338

% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 26%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 92%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1676
State average:	1578

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	350
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1743
State average:	1675

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	349
State average:	334

% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1752
State average:	1679

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	328
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1855
State average:	1799

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	322
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1899
State average:	1876

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	321
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1992
State average:	1925

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	322
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2031
State average:	1972

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	335
State average:	321

Percent Passing: 90%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 141

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

HOBBS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	4
State average from 27 schools:	59

Unscore - Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 48%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 79%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 220

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	5
State average from 27 schools:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 30%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 12%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 95%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 244

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	4
State average from 27 schools:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 80%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

HOBBS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	1522
State average:	1396

Mean Scale Score 100-500

HOBBS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	337
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1645
State average:	1582

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	330
State average:	320

% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 20
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1727
State average:	1627

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	324
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

HOBBS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	1798
State average:	1696

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	327
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 8
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1842
State average:	1775

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	324
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1944
State average:	1857

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	322
State average:	304

% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1947
State average:	1894

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	316
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2015
State average:	1935

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	316
State average:	302

Percent Passing: 64%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	336
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	322
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	302
State average:	302

% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1622
State average:	1461

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	370
State average:	335

% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 30%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 91%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1639
State average:	1563

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	342
State average:	325

% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

HOBBS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	1763
State average:	1668

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	353
State average:	333

% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1674
State average:	1670

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	310
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1830
State average:	1801

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	316
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1922
State average:	1882

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	327
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1932
State average:	1915

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	304
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2003
State average:	1984

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	328
State average:	323

Percent Passing: 84%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	164
State average:	103

Mean Scale Score

Here:	649
State average from 3241 schools:	633

Median NPR

Here:	74
State average:	61

Literary (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

HOBBS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	15
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

HOBBS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	10
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	16
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	119
State average:	97

Mean Scale Score

Here:	662
State average from 3233 schools:	653

Median NPR

Here:	77
State average:	69

Literary (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	10

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	16
State average:	15

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	8

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	8
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Number of Students

HOBBS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	146
State average:	101

Mean Scale Score

Here:	682
State average from 3309 schools:	667

Median NPR

Here:	83
State average:	71

Literary (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	16
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	248
State average:	190

Mean Scale Score

Here:	686
State average from 2604 schools:	671

Median NPR

HOBBS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	75
State average:	63

Literary (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	8

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	16
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

HOBBS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	8
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	226
State average:	201

Mean Scale Score

HOBBS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	697
State average from 2487 schools:	682

Median NPR

Here:	79
State average:	66

Literary (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	12

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

HOBBS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	15
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

HOBBS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	10
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	217
State average:	192

Mean Scale Score

Here:	704
State average from 2497 schools:	687

Median NPR

Here:	78
State average:	63

Literary (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	12

Informational (max 18)

HOBBS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	14
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

HOBBS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	8
State average:	7

Interpretation (max 20)

HOBBS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	15
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

HOBBS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	11
State average:	10

Strategies (max 10)

HOBBS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	8
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	256
State average:	273

Mean Scale Score

Here:	699
State average from 2275 schools:	694

Median NPR

Here:	66
State average:	61

Literary (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	11

Functional (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	11

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	7
State average:	7

Interpretation (max 20)

HOBBS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	15
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	6
State average:	5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	185
State average:	237

Mean Scale Score

Here:	719
State average from 2096 schools:	709

Median NPR

HOBBS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	76
State average:	65

Literary (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	14

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	8

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	16
State average:	15

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	11
State average:	10

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	8
State average:	8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 123

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	309
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 61%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 73%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 214

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	317
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 65%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 6%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 91%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 232

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	291
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 41%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 69%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1723
State average from 878 schools:	1661

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	313
State average:	302

% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1735
State average:	1663

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1668
State average:	1592

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 67

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1842
State average from 808 schools:	1746

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	324
State average:	305

% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 87%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1835
State average:	1743

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1759
State average:	1668

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 76

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1900
State average from 819 schools:	1810

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	313
State average:	294

% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1907
State average:	1807

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1829
State average:	1738

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 78

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	306
State average:	290

% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

HOBBS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	1653
State average from 873 schools:	1641

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	305
State average:	302

% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1665
State average:	1645

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1667
State average:	1620

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: -2

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1827
State average from 804 schools:	1777

Mean Scale Score 100-500

HOBBS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	316
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 87%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1826
State average:	1774

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1737
State average:	1645

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 89

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1908
State average from 815 schools:	1851

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	324
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1917
State average:	1845

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1834
State average:	1755

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 83

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 236

Mean Scale Score

Here:	680
State average from 874 schools:	671

Median NPR: 72
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 222

Mean Scale Score

Here:	685
State average from 796 schools:	675

Median NPR: 71
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 230

Mean Scale Score

HOBBS MIDDLE SCHOOL:	698
State average from 810 schools:	685

Median NPR: 74
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 10): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 14): 10
Strategies (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 235

Mean Scale Score

Here:	674
State average from 874 schools:	669

Median NPR: 68
Number Sense (max 10): 6
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 222

Mean Scale Score

Here:	697
State average from 796 schools:	685

Median NPR: 78
Number Sense (max 9): 6
Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 6
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 229

Mean Scale Score

Here:	711
State average from 810 schools:	698

Median NPR: 79
Number Sense (max 9): 7
Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 229

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	303
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 55%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 11
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 86%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 77%

City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DC	DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID
IL	IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	MD
ME	MI	MN	MO	MS	MT	NC
ND	NE	NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY
OH	OK	OR	PA	RI	SC	SD
TN	TX	UT	VA	VT	WA	WI
WV	WY

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID	IL
IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	ME	MI
MN	MO	MS	MT	NC	ND	NE
NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	SD	TN	TX
VA	VT	WA	WI	WV	WY

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID	IL
IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	ME	MI
MN	MO	MS	MT	NC	ND	NE
NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	SD	TN	TX
VA	VT	WA	WI	WV	WY

AL	AZ	CA	CO	CT	DE	FL
GA	HI	IA	ID	IL	IN	KS
LA	MA	MD	MI	MN	MO	NC
NE	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	TN	TX	UT
VA	WA	WI	WV

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DC	DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID
IL	IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	MD
ME	MI	MN	MO	MS	MT	NC
ND	NE	NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY
OH	OK	OR	PA	RI	SC	SD
TN	TX	UT	VA	VT	WA	WI
WV	WY