Homebound Program School in Fort Pierce, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 47.

4204 OKEECHOBEE RD
Fort Pierce, FL 34947

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Data House School (2.9 miles):

89
Bessey Creek Elementary School (18.0 miles):

68
St. Lucie Detention Center School (2.8 miles):

55
Homebound Program School:

47
Glendale Elementary School (13.9 miles):

46
Vero Beach High School (14.3 miles):

39
West Glades Elementary School (10.8 miles):

27
Weatherbee Elementary School (4.4 miles):

17
Homebound Program School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
St. Lucie County:

39
Fort Pierce:

40
Homebound Program School:

47

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (772) 429-4570 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 56
School number: 5011
School type: Combination Elementary and Secondary
District Name: ST. LUCIE
Grade range: KINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 12
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (772) 429-4589
Principal: Barbara Slaga
The function/setting of the school: Hospital/Homebound
The main educational program offered at the school: Special Education
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 23
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 80
Senate District: 26
School Web Address: http://www.cbhs.brevard.k12.fl.us/

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

81%
State average from 36 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

93%
State average from 37 schools:

76%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

95%
State average from 37 schools:

87%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

76%
State average from 37 schools:

56%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

68%
State average from 37 schools:

62%
Making Math Gains
Here:

79%
State average from 37 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

57%
State average from 37 schools:

60%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

84%
State average from 37 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

633
State average from 37 schools:

547
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 37 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: Pending

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 119999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

17%
State average from 37 schools:

41%
Minority Rate
Here:

17%
State average from 37 schools:

44%
Region: 3

Title I: NO


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 956 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 954 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 453
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 925
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 876

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 923
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 876
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 775 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 773 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 383
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 756
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 712

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 754
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 712
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 22
Number of Students Tested in Math: 22
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 62 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 62 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 57
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 55
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 57
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 55
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 46 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 46 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 44
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 41
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 44
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 41
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 172 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 172 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 73
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 156
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 147

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 156
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 148
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 72 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 72 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 36
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 70
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 66
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 70
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 66
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

82%
State average from 36 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

94%
State average from 36 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

95%
State average from 36 schools:

87%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

75%
State average from 36 schools:

52%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

67%
State average from 36 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

82%
State average from 36 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

61%
State average from 36 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

83%
State average from 36 schools:

66%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
HOMEBOUND PROGRAM:

639
State average from 36 schools:

548
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 36 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

13%
State average from 36 schools:

39%
Minority Rate
HOMEBOUND PROGRAM:

17%
State average from 36 schools:

42%
Region: 3


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1020 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1018 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 485
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
HOMEBOUND PROGRAM:

79%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 974
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 885

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
HOMEBOUND PROGRAM:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 973
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 886
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 849 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 848 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 403
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
HOMEBOUND PROGRAM:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 811
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 739

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 811
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 741
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 58 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 57 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 33
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 56
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 50
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 55
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 49
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 33 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 33 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 152 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 152 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 63
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 136
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 125

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 137
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 127
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 76 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 75 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 31
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 71
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 66
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 70
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 66
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

10%
State average from 36 schools:

67%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

29%
State average from 36 schools:

72%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

79%
State average from 36 schools:

81%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

2%
State average from 36 schools:

45%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

35%
State average from 36 schools:

63%
Making Math Gains
Here:

64%
State average from 36 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

45%
State average from 36 schools:

61%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

72%
State average from 36 schools:

69%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
HOMEBOUND PROGRAM:

336
State average from 36 schools:

528
Percent Tested
Here:

93%
State average from 36 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: F

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

60%
State average from 36 schools:

41%
Minority Rate
Here:

98%
State average from 36 schools:

45%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 239 (93%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 239 (93%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 100
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

9%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 209
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 187

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

27%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 208
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 184
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 227 (93%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 227 (93%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 95
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

8%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 198
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 178

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

27%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 197
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 175
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 150 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 150 (96%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 64

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

9%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 127
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 114

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

30%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 126
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 111
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
HOMEBOUND PROGRAM:

77%
State average from 14 schools:

53%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

92%
State average from 14 schools:

57%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

91%
State average from 14 schools:

84%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

78%
State average from 14 schools:

50%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

60%
State average from 14 schools:

52%
Making Math Gains
Here:

78%
State average from 14 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

55%
State average from 14 schools:

52%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

77%
State average from 14 schools:

65%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
Here:

608
State average from 14 schools:

475
Percent Tested
HOMEBOUND PROGRAM:

99%
State average from 14 schools:

94%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

11%
State average from 14 schools:

43%
Minority Rate
Here:

15%
State average from 14 schools:

61%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 992 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 991 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

97%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 472
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 953
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 956
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 831 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 830 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

97%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 392
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 798
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 801
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 37 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 37 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 24
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 47 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 47 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 39 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 39 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 126 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 125 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
HOMEBOUND PROGRAM:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 56
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 122
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 121
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 67 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 66 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 62
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 62
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

78%
State average from 13 schools:

54%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

91%
State average from 13 schools:

62%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

90%
State average from 13 schools:

82%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

62%
State average from 13 schools:

59%
Making Math Gains
Here:

81%
State average from 13 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

63%
State average from 13 schools:

68%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
HOMEBOUND PROGRAM:

465
State average from 13 schools:

393
Percent Tested
HOMEBOUND PROGRAM:

99%
State average from 13 schools:

95%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

11%
State average from 13 schools:

42%
Minority Rate
HOMEBOUND PROGRAM:

17%
State average from 13 schools:

59%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 975 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 973 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

97%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 459
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 938
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 936
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 822 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 820 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

96%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 391

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 790
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 788
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 41 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 41 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 15

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 39

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

79%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 39
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 43 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 43 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 19

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

79%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 42

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
HOMEBOUND PROGRAM:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 42
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 34 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 34 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 17

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

79%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 33
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 33
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 124 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 123 (97%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 60

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 115
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 115
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 75 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 73 (97%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 31
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

21%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 68

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
HOMEBOUND PROGRAM:

40%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 67
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

72%
State average from 14 schools:

49%
Meeting High Standards in Math
HOMEBOUND PROGRAM:

88%
State average from 14 schools:

57%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

88%
State average from 14 schools:

78%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

63%
State average from 14 schools:

54%
Making Math Gains
Here:

83%
State average from 14 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

60%
State average from 14 schools:

58%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

454
State average from 14 schools:

365
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 14 schools:

95%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

13%
State average from 14 schools:

43%
Minority Rate
Here:

16%
State average from 14 schools:

61%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2029
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

359
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

7%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

9%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

22%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

32%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

30%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

84%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

19
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2035
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

341
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

7%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

14%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

34%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
HOMEBOUND PROGRAM:

35%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

10%
State average:

3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

79%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

19
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

8
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2134
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

351
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

5%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

21%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

25%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 4
HOMEBOUND PROGRAM:

28%
State average:

12%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

22%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

74%
State average:

45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

13
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

8
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2227
State average:

1938
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

356
State average:

302
Percent Passing
Here:

88%
State average:

56%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

8%
State average:

35%
% in each Achievement Level 2
HOMEBOUND PROGRAM:

22%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

24%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

13%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

35%
State average:

12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

71%
State average:

37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
HOMEBOUND PROGRAM:

18
State average:

15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
HOMEBOUND PROGRAM:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

9
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

359
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

6%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

23%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

42%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

18%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

13%
State average:

2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

72%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
HOMEBOUND PROGRAM:

11
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

9
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

11
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

344
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

7%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

22%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 3
HOMEBOUND PROGRAM:

48%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

20%
State average:

5%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
HOMEBOUND PROGRAM:

71%
State average:

36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
HOMEBOUND PROGRAM:

11
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

9
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

8
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1955
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

347
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

8%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

7%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

23%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

39%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

24%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
HOMEBOUND PROGRAM:

85%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

7
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

7
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

7
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2008
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

349
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

4%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

9%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

34%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

26%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

28%
State average:

10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

88%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

8
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

8
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

8
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

9
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

7
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2080
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

348
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

1%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

8%
State average:

22%
% in each Achievement Level 3
HOMEBOUND PROGRAM:

24%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

38%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

29%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

91%
State average:

61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

8
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

8
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2117
State average:

1995
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

356
State average:

326
Percent Passing
HOMEBOUND PROGRAM:

96%
State average:

80%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

2%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

4%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

20%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

49%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

24%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

94%
State average:

69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

9
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

7
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

9
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
HOMEBOUND PROGRAM:

11
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

7
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1983
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

350
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2085
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

352
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2121
State average:

1907
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

349
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2170
State average:

1921
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

345
State average:

299
Percent Passing: 85%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 27%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

359
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 10
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 10

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

341
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
HOMEBOUND PROGRAM:

1958
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

348
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 22%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
HOMEBOUND PROGRAM:

2036
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

356
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 34%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 91%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 9

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2071
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
HOMEBOUND PROGRAM:

345
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 29%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 94%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2106
State average:

1972
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

353
State average:

321
Percent Passing: 96%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 91%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 10
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 277
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

5
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 30%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 11%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 7%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 97%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 228
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 9%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 6%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 90%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2008
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

355
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 25%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2039
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

342
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 9

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
HOMEBOUND PROGRAM:

1703
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
HOMEBOUND PROGRAM:

272
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 57%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 12%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
HOMEBOUND PROGRAM:

1691
State average:

1935
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

257
State average:

302
Percent Passing: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 76%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 6%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

353
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 10
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 10

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

260
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 63%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 1%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1971
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

351
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 25%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2020
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

352
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 30%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1817
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

271
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 27%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1876
State average:

1984
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

297
State average:

323
Percent Passing: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

279
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
Here:

717
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
Here:

89
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

16
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

11
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

16
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

11
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

8
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

280
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
HOMEBOUND PROGRAM:

714
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
Here:

84
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

16
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

11
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
HOMEBOUND PROGRAM:

8
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

116
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
Here:

673
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
Here:

41
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
HOMEBOUND PROGRAM:

10
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
HOMEBOUND PROGRAM:

6
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

4
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

98
State average:

237
Mean Scale Score
Here:

691
State average from 2096 schools:

709
Median NPR
HOMEBOUND PROGRAM:

49
State average:

65
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 279
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
HOMEBOUND PROGRAM:

334
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 15%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 67%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

5
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 30%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 12%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 7%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 93%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 112
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

271
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 26%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 7
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 35%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 77%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1966
State average from 808 schools:

1746
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

347
State average:

305
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 21%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 80%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1970
State average:

1743
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1936
State average:

1668
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 34

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1990
State average from 819 schools:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

332
State average:

294
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 8
Percent Matched to 2006: 85%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

2011
State average:

1807
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1977
State average:

1738
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 34

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

2113
State average from 612 schools:

1849
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

347
State average:

298
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 9: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 79%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

2119
State average:

1837
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

2028
State average:

1779
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 90

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

2127
State average from 573 schools:

1879
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

337
State average:

291
Percent Passing: 76%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 25%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 18: 14
Percent Matched to 2006: 86%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
HOMEBOUND PROGRAM:

2142
State average:

1873
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

2108
State average:

1876
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 34

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

361
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

349
State average:

295
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 14: 10

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1944
State average from 804 schools:

1777
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

345
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 80%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1950
State average:

1774
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1924
State average:

1645
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 26

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

2015
State average from 815 schools:

1851
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

351
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 30%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 90%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 8
Percent Matched to 2006: 85%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

2039
State average:

1845
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1990
State average:

1755
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 49

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

2054
State average from 613 schools:

1884
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

340
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 24%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 10: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 8: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 79%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

2065
State average:

1869
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

2018
State average:

1821
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 47

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

2086
State average from 581 schools:

1950
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

348
State average:

315
Percent Passing: 94%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 19%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 90%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 10: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 11: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 86%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

2093
State average:

1939
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

2060
State average:

1901
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 33

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 275
Mean Scale Score
Here:

700
State average from 796 schools:

675
Median NPR: 81
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 241
Mean Scale Score
Here:

718
State average from 810 schools:

685
Median NPR: 86
Literary (max 18): 16
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 16
Initial Understanding (max 10): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 17
Critical Analysis (max 14): 11
Strategies (max 10): 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 234
Mean Scale Score
Here:

739
State average from 597 schools:

696
Median NPR: 90
Literary (max 18): 16
Informational (max 18): 15
Functional (max 18): 16
Initial Understanding (max 10): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 17
Critical Analysis (max 14): 12
Strategies (max 10): 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 243
Mean Scale Score
HOMEBOUND PROGRAM:

723
State average from 575 schools:

695
Median NPR: 78
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 10): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 14): 11
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 275
Mean Scale Score
Here:

720
State average from 796 schools:

685
Median NPR: 88
Number Sense (max 9): 6
Operations (max 9): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 7
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 7
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 240
Mean Scale Score
Here:

734
State average from 810 schools:

698
Median NPR: 90
Number Sense (max 9): 8
Operations (max 9): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 6
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 7
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 234
Mean Scale Score
Here:

746
State average from 597 schools:

708
Median NPR: 90
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 11
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 8
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 11

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 243
Mean Scale Score
Here:

741
State average from 575 schools:

710
Median NPR: 85
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 10
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 8
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 242
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

324
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 68%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 9
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 12
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 37%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 90%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 85%

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 247
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
HOMEBOUND PROGRAM:

333
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 19%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 68%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 9 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 13
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 8%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 88%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 73%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Fort Pierce, FL
  5. Homebound Program School in Fort Pierce, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.