Hospital/Homebound/Homebased Programs School in Tampa, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 16.

3993 E 21ST AVE
Tampa, FL 33605

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Westchase Elementary School (12.0 miles):

95
Maniscalco Elementary School (11.1 miles):

74
Davidsen Middle School (12.6 miles):

59
Seven Oaks Elementary School (16.9 miles):

48
Robinson Elementary School (15.0 miles):

38
Grady Elementary School (6.3 miles):

27
Hospital/Homebound/Homebased Programs School:

16
Mount Pleasant Standard Base Middle School (3.9 miles):

15
Mendez Exceptional Center School (2.3 miles):

0
Hospital/Homebound/Homebased Programs School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Hillsborough County:

42
Tampa:

41
This School:

16

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:



Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (813) 273-3933 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 29
School number: 5371
School type: Combination Elementary and Secondary
District Name: HILLSBOROUGH
Grade range: KINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 12
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (813) 740-3940
Principal: Victoria Littlejohn
The function/setting of the school: Hospital/Homebound
The main educational program offered at the school: Special Education
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 11
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 59
Senate District: 18

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

63%
State average from 36 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

65%
State average from 37 schools:

76%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

89%
State average from 37 schools:

87%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

55%
State average from 37 schools:

56%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

62%
State average from 37 schools:

62%
Making Math Gains
Here:

74%
State average from 37 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

65%
State average from 37 schools:

60%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

74%
State average from 37 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

547
State average from 37 schools:

547
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 37 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: B

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: A

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

56%
State average from 37 schools:

41%
Minority Rate
HOSPITAL/HOMEBOUND/HOMEBASED PROGRAMS:

91%
State average from 37 schools:

44%
Region: 5

Title I: NO


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 83 (91%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 84 (91%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
HOSPITAL/HOMEBOUND/HOMEBASED PROGRAMS:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

28%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 38

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 42
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 36
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 36 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 36 (94%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 23
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28 (88%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 29 (91%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 83 (91%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 84 (91%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

28%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 38

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 42
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 36
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

67%
State average from 36 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

60%
State average from 36 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

99%
State average from 36 schools:

87%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

33%
State average from 36 schools:

52%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

69%
State average from 36 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

71%
State average from 36 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

69%
State average from 36 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

60%
State average from 36 schools:

66%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

528
State average from 36 schools:

548
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 36 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: B

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: A

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

90%
State average from 36 schools:

39%
Minority Rate
Here:

89%
State average from 36 schools:

42%
Region: 3


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 86 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 84 (92%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
HOSPITAL/HOMEBOUND/HOMEBASED PROGRAMS:

40%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

24%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 33
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 44 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 43 (96%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 86 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 84 (92%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

40%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

24%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 33
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

71%
State average from 36 schools:

67%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

58%
State average from 36 schools:

72%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

86%
State average from 36 schools:

81%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

31%
State average from 36 schools:

45%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

70%
State average from 36 schools:

63%
Making Math Gains
Here:

64%
State average from 36 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
HOSPITAL/HOMEBOUND/HOMEBASED PROGRAMS:

70%
State average from 36 schools:

61%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

53%
State average from 36 schools:

69%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

503
State average from 36 schools:

528
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 36 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: B

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: A

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

47%
State average from 36 schools:

41%
Minority Rate
HOSPITAL/HOMEBOUND/HOMEBASED PROGRAMS:

86%
State average from 36 schools:

45%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 87 (92%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 87 (93%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

32%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 45 (92%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 45 (94%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20
Number of Students Tested in Math: 20
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 87 (92%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 87 (93%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

32%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 82 (86%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 82 (86%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

25%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

25%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 39 (86%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 40 (87%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 22
Number of Students Tested in Math: 22
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 34 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 34 (94%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 82 (86%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 82 (86%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 103 (88%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 102 (88%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 24
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
HOSPITAL/HOMEBOUND/HOMEBASED PROGRAMS:

27%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 48
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
HOSPITAL/HOMEBOUND/HOMEBASED PROGRAMS:

31%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 48
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 50 (89%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 50 (89%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 22
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 29 (91%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28 (90%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20
Number of Students Tested in Math: 20
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 37 (88%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 36 (88%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 103 (88%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 102 (88%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 24

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

27%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 48
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

31%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 48
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1626
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
HOSPITAL/HOMEBOUND/HOMEBASED PROGRAMS:

296
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

36%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

18%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

27%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

9%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

9%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

45%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

13
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1916
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

316
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

9%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

45%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

27%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

18%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

45%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
HOSPITAL/HOMEBOUND/HOMEBASED PROGRAMS:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

17
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

6
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1734
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

277
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

47%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

32%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 3
HOSPITAL/HOMEBOUND/HOMEBASED PROGRAMS:

16%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

5%
State average:

12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

21%
State average:

45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

8
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1675
State average:

1938
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

254
State average:

302
Percent Passing
Here:

31%
State average:

56%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

62%
State average:

35%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

31%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

8%
State average:

12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

8%
State average:

37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

10
State average:

15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

5
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

308
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

27%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

27%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

45%
State average:

30%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

45%
State average:

36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1508
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

271
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

55%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

9%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

27%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

9%
State average:

18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

36%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
HOSPITAL/HOMEBOUND/HOMEBASED PROGRAMS:

4
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
HOSPITAL/HOMEBOUND/HOMEBASED PROGRAMS:

1855
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

310
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

17%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

25%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
HOSPITAL/HOMEBOUND/HOMEBASED PROGRAMS:

50%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

8%
State average:

10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

58%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1768
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

256
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

44%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

28%
State average:

22%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

11%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

11%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

6%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

28%
State average:

61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

2
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1700
State average:

1995
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

254
State average:

326
Percent Passing
Here:

42%
State average:

80%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

50%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

17%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

28%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
HOSPITAL/HOMEBOUND/HOMEBASED PROGRAMS:

33%
State average:

69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
HOSPITAL/HOMEBOUND/HOMEBASED PROGRAMS:

4
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

2
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
HOSPITAL/HOMEBOUND/HOMEBASED PROGRAMS:

5
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

2
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1149
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

275
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
HOSPITAL/HOMEBOUND/HOMEBASED PROGRAMS:

1725
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

301
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1771
State average:

1907
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

284
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 57%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 21%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1790
State average:

1921
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

275
State average:

299
Percent Passing: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 16%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

289
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 54%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 23%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1122
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

261
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 27%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1762
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
HOSPITAL/HOMEBOUND/HOMEBASED PROGRAMS:

299
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1806
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

267
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1937
State average:

1972
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

312
State average:

321
Percent Passing: 74%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 9

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 19
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
HOSPITAL/HOMEBOUND/HOMEBASED PROGRAMS:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 74%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
HOSPITAL/HOMEBOUND/HOMEBASED PROGRAMS:

1670
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

291
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1657
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

262
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 20%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1852
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

299
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 34%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1911
State average:

1935
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

297
State average:

302
Percent Passing: 57%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

304
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1747
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
HOSPITAL/HOMEBOUND/HOMEBASED PROGRAMS:

283
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 20%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
HOSPITAL/HOMEBOUND/HOMEBASED PROGRAMS:

1807
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

267
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 25%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1884
State average:

1984
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

299
State average:

323
Percent Passing: 64%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

2
State average:

103

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

6
State average:

97

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
HOSPITAL/HOMEBOUND/HOMEBASED PROGRAMS:

9
State average:

101

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

5
State average:

190

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

5
State average:

201

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

9
State average:

192

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

27
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
Here:

687
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
HOSPITAL/HOMEBOUND/HOMEBASED PROGRAMS:

55
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
HOSPITAL/HOMEBOUND/HOMEBASED PROGRAMS:

12
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
HOSPITAL/HOMEBOUND/HOMEBASED PROGRAMS:

5
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

18
State average:

237
Mean Scale Score
Here:

709
State average from 2096 schools:

709
Median NPR
Here:

66
State average:

65
Literary (max 18)
HOSPITAL/HOMEBOUND/HOMEBASED PROGRAMS:

14
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Initial Understanding (max 12)
HOSPITAL/HOMEBOUND/HOMEBASED PROGRAMS:

8
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

8
State average:

8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 3

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 10
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

255
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 20%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 40%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 80%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 18
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

288
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 17%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 44%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 33%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 83%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1544
State average from 808 schools:

1746
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

267
State average:

305
% in each Achievement Level 1: 58%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 42%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1756
State average:

1743
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1690
State average:

1668
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 66

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1504
State average from 819 schools:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

230
State average:

294
% in each Achievement Level 1: 78%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 6%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 67%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1511
State average:

1807
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1349
State average:

1738
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 162

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1750
State average from 612 schools:

1849
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

280
State average:

298
% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 23%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 9: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 59%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1779
State average:

1837
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
HOSPITAL/HOMEBOUND/HOMEBASED PROGRAMS:

1765
State average:

1779
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 14

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
HOSPITAL/HOMEBOUND/HOMEBASED PROGRAMS:

1923
State average from 573 schools:

1879
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

299
State average:

291
Percent Passing: 56%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 22%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 18: 12
Percent Matched to 2006: 78%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1901
State average:

1873
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

2014
State average:

1876
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: -113

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

218
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 81%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 13%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 3
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

295
State average:

295
% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 14: 7

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1468
State average from 804 schools:

1777
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

227
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 45%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1745
State average:

1774
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1718
State average:

1645
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 27

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1589
State average from 815 schools:

1851
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

243
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 78%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 11%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 50%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1615
State average:

1845
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1545
State average:

1755
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 70

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1832
State average from 613 schools:

1884
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

275
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 10: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 8: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 55%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1891
State average:

1869
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1799
State average:

1821
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 92

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
HOSPITAL/HOMEBOUND/HOMEBASED PROGRAMS:

1841
State average from 581 schools:

1950
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

288
State average:

315
Percent Passing: 71%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 10: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 14: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 11: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 94%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1826
State average:

1939
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1882
State average:

1901
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: -55

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 3

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 15
Mean Scale Score
Here:

645
State average from 810 schools:

685
Median NPR: 25
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 7
Functional (max 18): 9
Initial Understanding (max 10): 5
Interpretation (max 20): 9
Critical Analysis (max 14): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 18
Mean Scale Score
HOSPITAL/HOMEBOUND/HOMEBASED PROGRAMS:

685
State average from 597 schools:

696
Median NPR: 51
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 10): 6
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 14): 9
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 12
Mean Scale Score
Here:

710
State average from 575 schools:

695
Median NPR: 68
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 15
Initial Understanding (max 10): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 14): 11
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 3

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 3

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 15
Mean Scale Score
Here:

659
State average from 810 schools:

698
Median NPR: 29
Number Sense (max 9): 4
Operations (max 9): 3
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 3
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 17
Mean Scale Score
Here:

690
State average from 597 schools:

708
Median NPR: 50
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 7
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 12
Mean Scale Score
Here:

707
State average from 575 schools:

710
Median NPR: 59
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 7
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 5
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 13
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

214
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 62%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 23%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 23%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 8
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 23%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 46%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 38%

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 15
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

290
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 20%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 40%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 9 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 67%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 60%


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.