Jump to a detailed profile or search site with Google Custom Search


Irma Dru Hutchison Elementary School in Richmond, TX
(PK-05 • Public • Regular School)

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 82
Address
 3602 RANSOM RD
Richmond, TX 77469
Telephone
(832) 223-1700
(make sure to verify first before calling)
Website
http://www.lcisd.org
City-data.com school rating
82
Students
709
Classroom Teachers (FTE)
43.0
Free lunch eligible students
193
Reduced-price lunch
eligible students
29
School district
LAMAR CISD
Charter school
No
Title I status
Not a Title I school
Magnet School Indicator
No
Shared Time Indicator
Missing
Adult education offered
No

Ratings

This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
SUSANNA DICKINSON EL (2.4 miles):

99
BRAZOS BEND EL (2.7 miles):

95
MANFORD WILLIAMS EL (1.6 miles):

90
Irma Dru Hutchison Elementary School:

82
SMITH EL (2.7 miles):

81
WILLIAM VELASQUEZ (2.9 miles):

69
JANE LONG EL (2.7 miles):

68
JOHN ARREDONDO EL (2.8 miles):

55
JUVENILE DETENT CTR (1.7 miles):

5
Irma Dru Hutchison Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Texas:

54
Fort Bend County:

70
Richmond:

75
Irma Dru Hutchison Elementary:

82

Students & Teachers


Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 709
Enrollment in 2015: 793
Enrollment in 2014: 778
Enrollment in 2013: 773
Enrollment in 2012: 760
Enrollment in 2011: 786
Enrollment in 2010: 787
Enrollment in 2009: 722
Enrollment in 2008: 656
Enrollment in 2007: 588
Enrollment in 2006: 537

Irma Dru Hutchison Elementary School - Historical enrollment


Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)

GradePKKGG01G02G03G04G05Total
All students3794105113107129124709
Female students22375647556947333
Male students15574966526077376
American Indian/Alaska Native students - - 1 - 1114
Asian students11301923222429158
Hispanic students8202229253024158
Black students12243332414446232
White students3152623162424131
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander students11 - 2 - - - 4
Two or More Races students244426 - 22

Enrollment by grade:
Pre-Kindergarten enrollment: 37
Kindergarten enrollment: 94
1st grade enrollment: 105
2nd grade enrollment: 113
3rd grade enrollment: 107
4th grade enrollment: 129
5th grade enrollment: 124

Irma Dru Hutchison Elementary School - Historical enrollment by grade


Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 9,864 schools)

Female enrollment: 333 (47.0%)
Irma Dru Hutchison Elementary School:

47.0%
Texas:

49.0%
Male enrollment: 376 (53.0%)
School:

53.0%
Texas:

50.1%

Irma Dru Hutchison Elementary School - Historical enrollment by gender


Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 9,864 schools)

American Indian/Alaska Native enrollment: 4 (0.6%)
School:

0.6%
State:

0.4%
Asian enrollment: 158 (22.3%)
Irma Dru Hutchison Elementary School:

22.3%
Texas:

3.1%
Hispanic enrollment: 158 (22.3%)
Here:

22.3%
State:

46.9%
Black enrollment: 232 (32.7%)
Here:

32.7%
Texas:

11.6%
White enrollment: 131 (18.5%)
School:

18.5%
State:

32.3%
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander enrollment: 4 (0.6%)
Irma Dru Hutchison Elementary School:

0.6%
State:

0.1%
Two or More Races enrollment: 22 (3.1%)
School:

3.1%
State:

2.1%

Irma Dru Hutchison Elementary School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity


Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 8,545 schools)

Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 222 (31.3%)
Here:

31.3%
Texas:

61.6%
Free lunch eligible students: 193 (27.2%)
Here:

27.2%
State:

55.4%
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 29 (4.1%)
School:

4.1%
State:

6.2%

Irma Dru Hutchison Elementary School - Lunch Program Eligibility


Teachers and support:
(State average from 9,601 schools)

Classroom Teachers (FTE): 43


Student/Teacher Ratio
Irma Dru Hutchison Elementary School:

16.5
Texas:

15.6

Irma Dru Hutchison Elementary School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio


School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $3,222,405
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 44 (Salary Expenditures: $2,436,832)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $89,122
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,: $0
  • Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $3,072,985
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds: $0

Limited English Proficiency:
Show data for

    Students Enrolled in LEP Programs

  • Hispanic25
  • Asian61
  • Black19
  • White19
  • Multirace2
  • IDEA7
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 126 (male: 74, female: 52)
  • Hispanic: 25 (male: 14, female: 11)
  • Asian: 61 (male: 38, female: 23)
  • Black: 19 (male: 14, female: 5)
  • White: 19 (male: 8, female: 11)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all female)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 7 (male: 5, female: 2)

Students with disabilities:
Show data for

Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.

Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.

    Students with disabilities served under IDEA

  • Hispanic16
  • Asian7
  • Black11
  • White13
  • LEP7
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 47 (male: 43, female: 4)
  • Hispanic: 16 (all male)
  • Asian: 7 (all male)
  • Black: 11 (male: 7, female: 4)
  • White: 13 (all male)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 7 (all male)

    Students with disabilities served under Section 504

  • Asian2
  • Black4
  • White4
  • Multirace2
Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 12 (male: 6, female: 6)
  • Asian: 2 (all male)
  • Black: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all female)

Retention:
Show data for

(State average from 3,201 schools)

A student is retained if he or she is not promoted to the next grade prior to the beginning of the following school year. Students are not considered retained if they can proceed to the next grade because they successfully completed a summer school program or for a similar reason. At the high school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as being in the next grade is considered retained
Total number of students retained in 3rd grade: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2

Percent of 3rd grade students retained
Here:

1.9%
State:

4.1%


Gifted and Talented:
Show data for

(State average from 7,254 schools)

This school has students enrolled in one or more gifted/talented programs
Gifted/talented programs are programs during regular school hours that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an enriched curriculum for students who are endowed with a high degree of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, creativity, interest, or talent.

    Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment

  • Hispanic10
  • Asian13
  • Black10
  • White10
  • LEP4
  • IDEA2
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 43 (male: 23, female: 20)
  • Hispanic: 10 (male: 8, female: 2)
  • Asian: 13 (male: 5, female: 8)
  • Black: 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
  • White: 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all male)

Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 students
Here:

60.6
Texas:

79.4

Statewide Student Assessments


State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for

(State average from 4,539 schools)

The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
3rd Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,487
  • Males1,489
  • Females1,484
  • Hispanic1,428
  • Asian1,587
  • Black1,474
  • White1,500
  • Multirace1,463
Math Average Scale Score:

1,487
State:

1,453
Math students tested: 114
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 114

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.8 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.9 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 4.5 (64%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.8 (70%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 22%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 28%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 20%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 30%

22%
28%
20%
30%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,489, Tested: 60, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 27%)
20%
30%
23%
27%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,484, Tested: 54, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 24%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 33%)
24%
26%
17%
33%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,428, Tested: 29, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 17%)
38%
31%
14%
17%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,587, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 14%, Meets: 9%, Masters: 67%)
10%
14%
9%
67%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,474, Tested: 35, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 26%)
23%
26%
25%
26%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,500, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 29%)
14%
34%
23%
29%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,463, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 43%, Masters: 0%)
14%
43%
43%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,446
  • Males1,429
  • Females1,465
  • Hispanic1,377
  • Asian1,506
  • Black1,439
  • White1,489
  • Multirace1,467
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,446
Texas:

1,423
Reading students tested: 114
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 114

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.9 (78%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.8 (65%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.1 (65%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 26%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 32%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 14%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 28%

26%
32%
14%
28%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,429, Tested: 60, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 30%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 20%)
30%
32%
18%
20%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,465, Tested: 54, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 22%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 9%, Masters: 37%)
22%
32%
9%
37%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,377, Tested: 29, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 48%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 17%)
48%
21%
14%
17%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,506, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 43%)
10%
33%
14%
43%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,439, Tested: 35, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 37%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 23%)
23%
37%
17%
23%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,489, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 5%, Masters: 38%)
19%
38%
5%
38%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,467, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 14%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 29%)
29%
14%
28%
29%

4th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,621
  • Males1,620
  • Females1,622
  • Hispanic1,600
  • Asian1,712
  • Black1,552
  • White1,603
  • Multirace1,676
Math Average Scale Score:

1,621
State:

1,546
Math students tested: 100
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 100

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.6 (73%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.1 (74%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.5 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.1 (78%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 23%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 26%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 38%

13%
23%
26%
38%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,620, Tested: 57, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 33%)
12%
28%
27%
33%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,622, Tested: 43, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 44%)
14%
16%
26%
44%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,600, Tested: 28, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 43%, Masters: 21%)
18%
18%
43%
21%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,712, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 9%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 73%)
5%
9%
13%
73%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,552, Tested: 26, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 19%)
19%
43%
19%
19%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,603, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 36%)
14%
29%
21%
36%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,676, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 11%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 56%)
11%
33%
56%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,561
  • Males1,554
  • Females1,570
  • Hispanic1,550
  • Asian1,615
  • Black1,528
  • White1,514
  • Multirace1,615
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,561
Texas:

1,496
Reading students tested: 100
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 100

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.2 (77%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.7 (71%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.3 (71%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 23%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 26%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 31%

20%
23%
26%
31%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,554, Tested: 57, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 35%, Masters: 21%)
21%
23%
35%
21%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,570, Tested: 43, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 44%)
19%
23%
14%
44%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,550, Tested: 28, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 29%)
25%
21%
25%
29%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,615, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 9%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 50%)
14%
9%
27%
50%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,528, Tested: 26, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 15%)
23%
31%
31%
15%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,514, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 42%, Meets: 15%, Masters: 14%)
29%
42%
15%
14%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,615, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 11%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 56%)
11%
33%
56%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All3,843
  • Males3,780
  • Females3,926
  • Hispanic3,799
  • Asian4,133
  • Black3,683
  • White3,667
  • Multirace3,989
Writing Average Scale Score:

3,843
Texas:

3,570
Writing students tested: 100
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 100

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.1 (51%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 4.5 (56%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 11.3 (71%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 32%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 19%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 33%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 16%

32%
19%
33%
16%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,780, Tested: 57, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 37%, Approaches: 14%, Meets: 35%, Masters: 14%)
37%
14%
35%
14%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,926, Tested: 43, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 26%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 19%)
26%
25%
30%
19%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,799, Tested: 28, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 36%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 21%)
36%
18%
25%
21%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 4,133, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 13%, Meets: 37%, Masters: 27%)
23%
13%
37%
27%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 3,683, Tested: 26, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 8%)
38%
27%
27%
8%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,667, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 36%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 36%, Masters: 7%)
36%
21%
36%
7%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 3,989, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 22%, Approaches: 11%, Meets: 56%, Masters: 11%)
22%
11%
56%
11%

5th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,655
  • Males1,632
  • Females1,676
  • Hispanic1,635
  • Asian1,673
  • Black1,666
  • White1,621
  • Multirace1,686
Math Average Scale Score:

1,655
Texas:

1,603
Math students tested: 109
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 110

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12.3 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.8 (76%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3 (75%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 26%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 38%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 30%

6%
26%
38%
30%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,632, Tested: 52, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 39%, Masters: 23%)
10%
28%
39%
23%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,676, Tested: 57, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 37%, Masters: 37%)
4%
22%
37%
37%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,635, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 36%, Masters: 23%)
9%
32%
36%
23%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,673, Tested: 20, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 35%)
5%
20%
40%
35%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,666, Tested: 45, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 36%)
7%
17%
40%
36%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,621, Tested: 17, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 41%, Meets: 35%, Masters: 18%)
6%
41%
35%
18%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,686, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 40%)
40%
20%
40%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,606
  • Males1,593
  • Females1,619
  • Hispanic1,588
  • Asian1,576
  • Black1,632
  • White1,584
  • Multirace1,650
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,606
State:

1,546
Reading students tested: 109
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 110

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.2 (78%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12.2 (76%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.8 (70%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 26%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 33%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 28%

13%
26%
33%
28%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,593, Tested: 52, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 25%)
13%
31%
31%
25%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,619, Tested: 57, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 35%, Masters: 32%)
12%
21%
35%
32%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,588, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 27%)
18%
32%
23%
27%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,576, Tested: 20, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 25%)
10%
40%
25%
25%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,632, Tested: 45, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 31%)
9%
20%
40%
31%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,584, Tested: 17, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 24%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 35%, Masters: 24%)
24%
17%
35%
24%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,650, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 40%)
20%
40%
40%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All3,932
  • Males3,919
  • Females3,943
  • Hispanic3,871
  • Asian4,000
  • Black4,004
  • White3,749
  • Multirace3,992
Science Average Scale Score:

3,932
State:

3,771
Science students tested: 110
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 110

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.4 (73%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5.7 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.3 (73%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 8.7 (73%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 40%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 26%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 19%

15%
40%
26%
19%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,919, Tested: 52, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%, Approaches: 37%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 21%)
19%
37%
23%
21%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,943, Tested: 58, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 17%)
10%
43%
30%
17%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,871, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 46%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 14%)
18%
46%
22%
14%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 4,000, Tested: 20, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 20%)
10%
40%
30%
20%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 4,004, Tested: 44, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 41%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 25%)
9%
41%
25%
25%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,749, Tested: 19, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 32%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 11%)
32%
31%
26%
11%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 3,992, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 20%)
40%
40%
20%

Health & Safety


Harassment & Bullying:
Show data for

(State average from 919 schools)

An allegation is a claim or assertion that someone has done something wrong or illegal, typically made without proof.

Harassment or bullying on the basis of disability refers to intimidation or abusive behavior toward a student based on actual or perceived disability. Harassing conduct may take many forms, including verbal acts and name-calling, as well as non-verbal behavior, such as graphic and written statements, or conduct that is physically threatening, harmful or humiliating. The conduct can be carried out by school employees, other students, and non-employee third parties. Bullying on the basis of disability constitutes disability harassment.
Allegations of harassment or bullying on the basis of disability: 1
Allegations of harassment or bullying on the basis of disability per 1,000 students
School:

1.4
Texas:

1.0

Students disciplined for bullying or harassment on the basis of disability: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2



Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
Show data for

(State average from 7,777 schools)

A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.

    Chronic Student Absenteeism

  • Hispanic7
  • Asian10
  • Black4
  • White4
  • LEP4
  • IDEA4
  • 5042
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 25 (male: 14, female: 11)
  • Hispanic: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • Asian: 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
  • Black: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Section 504: 2 (all male)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 students
Here:

35.3
Texas:

147.9

Restraint and Seclusion:
Show data for

(State average from 2,148 schools)

Physical restraint refers to a personal restriction that immobilizes or reduces the ability of a student to move his or her torso, arms, legs, or head freely. The term physical restraint does not include a physical escort. Physical escort means a temporary touching or holding of the hand, wrist, arm, shoulder or back for the purpose of inducing a student who is acting out to walk to a safe location.
Total Number of students with disabilities (IDEA) subjected to physical restraint: 4 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Black: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2

Students with disabilities (IDEA) subjected to physical restraint per 1,000 students
Here:

5.6
Texas:

6.8


Suspensions:
Show data for

(State average from 3,231 schools)

Out-of-school suspension
  • For students with disabilities served under IDEA : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his/her regular school for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes to another setting (e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include both removals in which no individualized family service plan(IFSP) or individualized education plan(IEP) services are provided because the removal is 10 days or less as well as removals in which the child continues to receive services according to his/her IFSP or IEP.
  • For students without disabilities and students with disabilities served solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his / her regular school for at least half a day(but less than the remainder of the school year) for disciplinary purposes to another setting(e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include removals in which no educational services are provided, and removals in which educational services are provided(e.g., school-provided at home instruction or tutoring).
In-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his or her regular classroom(s) for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes, but remains under the direct supervision of school personnel. Direct supervision means school personnel are physically in the same location as students under their supervision.
School days missed due to out-of-school suspension: 12 (male: 8, female: 4)
  • Asian: 2 (all male)
  • Black: 10 (male: 6, female: 4)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 1 (all male)

Instances of out-of-school suspension (Students without disabilities): 11

Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Students without disabilities)
School:

15.5
State:

102.7

    Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension

  • Hispanic2
  • Asian4
  • Black19
  • White4
  • LEP2
Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 29 (male: 20, female: 9)
  • Hispanic: 2 (all male)
  • Asian: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Black: 19 (male: 14, female: 5)
  • White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all male)

Students without disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 4 (all male)
  • Asian: 2
  • Black: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2

Students without disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Black: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

    Students with disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension

  • Asian2
  • Black2
  • Multirace2
  • LEP2
  • 5042
Students with disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 6 (all male)
  • Asian: 2
  • Black: 2
  • Two or More Races: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2
  • Section 504: 2

Comments


Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss Richmond, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Some parts © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

Table of Contents