Jump to a detailed profile or search site with Google Custom Search


James Bowie Fine Arts Academy School in Midland, TX
(KG-06 • Public • Regular School)

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 64
Address
 805 ELK
Midland, TX 79701
Telephone
(432) 240-6100
(make sure to verify first before calling)
Website
http://www.midlandisd.net
City-data.com school rating
64
Students
467
Classroom Teachers (FTE)
31.5
Free lunch eligible students
111
Reduced-price lunch
eligible students
37
School district
MIDLAND ISD
Charter school
No
Title I status
Title I schoolwide school
Magnet School Indicator
Yes
Shared Time Indicator
Missing
Adult education offered
No

Ratings

This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
FANNIN EL (1.5 miles):

65
James Bowie Fine Arts Academy School:

64
MIDLAND H S (0.7 miles):

44
MIDLAND ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL (1.0 miles):

33
SAN JACINTO J H (0.9 miles):

28
DE ZAVALA EL (1.3 miles):

22
HOUSTON EL (0.9 miles):

19
MILAM EL (1.4 miles):

16
MIDLAND ALTERNATIVE PROGRAM (1.3 miles):

7
James Bowie Fine Arts Academy School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Texas:

54
Midland County:

36
Midland:

36
James Bowie Fine Arts Academy:

64

Students & Teachers


Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 467
Enrollment in 2015: 474
Enrollment in 2014: 476
Enrollment in 2013: 507
Enrollment in 2012: 490
Enrollment in 2011: 496
Enrollment in 2010: 481

James Bowie Fine Arts Academy School - Historical enrollment


Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)

GradeKGG01G02G03G04G05G06Total
All students66666566666870467
Female students34394240353539264
Male students32272326313331203
American Indian/Alaska Native students - 1 - 1 - - - 2
Hispanic students31393140393736253
Black students3 - 3665427
White students32253019202527178
Two or More Races students - 11 - 1137

Enrollment by grade:
Kindergarten enrollment: 66
1st grade enrollment: 66
2nd grade enrollment: 65
3rd grade enrollment: 66
4th grade enrollment: 66
5th grade enrollment: 68
6th grade enrollment: 70

James Bowie Fine Arts Academy School - Historical enrollment by grade


Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 9,864 schools)

Female enrollment: 264 (56.5%)
School:

56.5%
Texas:

49.0%
Male enrollment: 203 (43.5%)
Here:

43.5%
Texas:

50.1%

James Bowie Fine Arts Academy School - Historical enrollment by gender


Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 9,864 schools)

American Indian/Alaska Native enrollment: 2 (0.4%)
Here:

0.4%
Texas:

0.4%
Hispanic enrollment: 253 (54.2%)
James Bowie Fine Arts Academy School:

54.2%
State:

46.9%
Black enrollment: 27 (5.8%)
School:

5.8%
Texas:

11.6%
White enrollment: 178 (38.1%)
School:

38.1%
State:

32.3%
Two or More Races enrollment: 7 (1.5%)
Here:

1.5%
State:

2.1%

James Bowie Fine Arts Academy School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity


Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 8,545 schools)

Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 148 (31.7%)
Here:

31.7%
State:

61.6%
Free lunch eligible students: 111 (23.8%)
James Bowie Fine Arts Academy School:

23.8%
Texas:

55.4%
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 37 (7.9%)
Here:

7.9%
State:

6.2%

James Bowie Fine Arts Academy School - Lunch Program Eligibility


Teachers and support:
(State average from 9,601 schools)

Classroom Teachers (FTE): 31.5

Number of FTE teachers in their first year of teaching: 1
Number of FTE teachers in their second year of teaching: 1.5
Number of FTE school counselors: 1
Number of FTE teachers who were absent more than 10 school days during the school years: 6
Number of FTE nurses: 1

Student/Teacher Ratio
School:

14.8
State:

15.6

James Bowie Fine Arts Academy School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio


School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $1,946,113
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 31.5 (Salary Expenditures: $1,619,016)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 2 (Salary Expenditures: $25,904)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 3.5 (Salary Expenditures: $132,458)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 4 (Salary Expenditures: $168,735)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $107,040
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,: $1,958,263
  • Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $1,631,166
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 2 (Salary Expenditures: $25,904)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 2.5 (Salary Expenditures: $132,458)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 2 (Salary Expenditures: $168,735)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds: $147,331

Students with disabilities:
Show data for

Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.

Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 8 (male: 4, female: 4)
  • Hispanic: 8 (male: 4, female: 4)

Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 16 (male: 7, female: 9)
  • Hispanic: 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
  • Black: 2 (all female)
  • White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Retention:
Show data for

(State average from 3,201 schools)

A student is retained if he or she is not promoted to the next grade prior to the beginning of the following school year. Students are not considered retained if they can proceed to the next grade because they successfully completed a summer school program or for a similar reason. At the high school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as being in the next grade is considered retained
Total number of students retained in Kindergarten: 2 (all female)
  • Hispanic: 2

Percent of Kindergarten students retained
School:

3.0%
Texas:

5.2%

Total number of students retained in 1st grade: 2 (all female)
  • Hispanic: 2

Percent of 1st grade students retained
James Bowie Fine Arts Academy School:

3.0%
Texas:

6.1%

Total number of students retained in 4th grade: 2 (all male)
  • Black: 2
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2

Percent of 4th grade students retained
James Bowie Fine Arts Academy School:

3.0%
State:

3.6%

Statewide Student Assessments


State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for

(State average from 4,539 schools)

The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
3rd Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,537
  • Males1,526
  • Females1,548
  • Hispanic1,516
  • White1,570
Math Average Scale Score:

1,537
Texas:

1,453
Math students tested: 70
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 70

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.5 (81%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.7 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 5.3 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3 (75%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 19%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 31%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 39%

11%
19%
31%
39%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,526, Tested: 34, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%, Approaches: 14%, Meets: 39%, Masters: 35%)
12%
14%
39%
35%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,548, Tested: 36, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 42%)
11%
22%
25%
42%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,516, Tested: 41, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 32%)
15%
22%
31%
32%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,570, Tested: 28, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%, Approaches: 14%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 50%)
7%
14%
29%
50%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,471
  • Males1,445
  • Females1,496
  • Hispanic1,456
  • White1,491
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,471
Texas:

1,423
Reading students tested: 70
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 70

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.2 (85%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.1 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.1 (72%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 39%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 16%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 31%

14%
39%
16%
31%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,445, Tested: 34, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 24%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 9%, Masters: 29%)
24%
38%
9%
29%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,496, Tested: 36, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 33%)
6%
38%
23%
33%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,456, Tested: 41, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 42%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 29%)
17%
42%
12%
29%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,491, Tested: 28, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 32%)
11%
35%
22%
32%

4th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,554
  • Males1,568
  • Females1,546
  • Hispanic1,529
  • White1,605
Math Average Scale Score:

1,554
State:

1,546
Math students tested: 71
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 72

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.6 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 7.7 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.4 (64%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.8 (70%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 32%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 35%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 13%

20%
32%
35%
13%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,568, Tested: 26, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 19%, Meets: 35%, Masters: 23%)
23%
19%
35%
23%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,546, Tested: 45, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 35%, Masters: 7%)
18%
40%
35%
7%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,529, Tested: 42, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 31%, Approaches: 24%, Meets: 38%, Masters: 7%)
31%
24%
38%
7%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,605, Tested: 24, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 42%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 25%)
42%
33%
25%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,531
  • Males1,504
  • Females1,546
  • Hispanic1,498
  • White1,597
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,531
State:

1,496
Reading students tested: 71
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 72

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.7 (71%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.4 (69%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8.8 (68%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 34%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 23%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 23%

20%
34%
23%
23%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,504, Tested: 26, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 31%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 15%)
31%
23%
31%
15%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,546, Tested: 45, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 27%)
13%
40%
20%
27%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,498, Tested: 42, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 26%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 14%)
26%
38%
22%
14%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,597, Tested: 24, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 38%)
4%
25%
33%
38%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All3,835
  • Males3,770
  • Females3,872
  • Hispanic3,740
  • White4,001
Writing Average Scale Score:

3,835
Texas:

3,570
Writing students tested: 71
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 72

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.1 (52%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 4.8 (60%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 11 (69%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 31%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 28%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 30%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 11%

31%
28%
30%
11%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,770, Tested: 26, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 42%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 12%)
42%
23%
23%
12%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,872, Tested: 45, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 24%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 11%)
24%
32%
33%
11%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,740, Tested: 42, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 7%)
38%
26%
29%
7%
White: (Average Scale Score: 4,001, Tested: 24, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 21%)
25%
21%
33%
21%

5th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,675
  • Males1,671
  • Females1,678
  • Hispanic1,675
  • Black1,619
  • White1,696
Math Average Scale Score:

1,675
Texas:

1,603
Math students tested: 82
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 82

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.3 (71%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 13.1 (77%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.9 (76%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.8 (70%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 22%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 32%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 39%

7%
22%
32%
39%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,671, Tested: 37, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 19%, Meets: 38%, Masters: 32%)
11%
19%
38%
32%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,678, Tested: 45, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 44%)
4%
25%
27%
44%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,675, Tested: 48, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 44%)
6%
23%
27%
44%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,619, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 67%, Masters: 0%)
17%
16%
67%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,696, Tested: 26, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 19%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 42%)
8%
19%
31%
42%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,594
  • Males1,611
  • Females1,580
  • Hispanic1,585
  • Black1,496
  • White1,641
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,594
State:

1,546
Reading students tested: 82
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 82

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.9 (73%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.9 (71%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 26%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 24%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 32%

18%
26%
24%
32%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,611, Tested: 37, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 35%)
16%
25%
24%
35%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,580, Tested: 45, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 29%)
20%
27%
24%
29%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,585, Tested: 48, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 27%)
19%
31%
23%
27%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,496, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 0%)
33%
34%
33%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,641, Tested: 26, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%, Approaches: 15%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 50%)
12%
15%
23%
50%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All3,973
  • Males4,095
  • Females3,873
  • Hispanic3,942
  • Black3,622
  • White4,176
Science Average Scale Score:

3,973
Texas:

3,771
Science students tested: 82
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 82

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.4 (74%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 6 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.3 (73%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 8.9 (74%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 32%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 31%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 21%

16%
32%
31%
21%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 4,095, Tested: 37, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 35%, Masters: 27%)
8%
30%
35%
27%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,873, Tested: 45, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 22%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 16%)
22%
34%
28%
16%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,942, Tested: 49, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%, Approaches: 39%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 18%)
16%
39%
27%
18%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 3,622, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 0%)
33%
34%
33%
White: (Average Scale Score: 4,176, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 44%, Masters: 32%)
4%
20%
44%
32%

6th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (6th Grade)

  • All1,693
  • Males1,667
  • Females1,717
  • Hispanic1,674
  • Black1,717
  • White1,731
Math Average Scale Score:

1,693
Texas:

1,546
Math students tested: 76
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 76

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.5 (65%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.4 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 4.3 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 4.3 (61%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 37%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 34%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 25%

4%
37%
34%
25%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,667, Tested: 36, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 50%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 19%)
6%
50%
25%
19%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,717, Tested: 40, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 3%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 43%, Masters: 30%)
3%
25%
43%
30%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,674, Tested: 48, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 42%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 23%)
6%
42%
29%
23%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,717, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 33%)
33%
34%
33%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,731, Tested: 18, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 44%, Masters: 28%)
28%
44%
28%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (6th Grade)

  • All1,589
  • Males1,525
  • Females1,647
  • Hispanic1,576
  • Black1,604
  • White1,615
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,589
Texas:

1,457
Reading students tested: 76
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 76

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.4 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12.1 (71%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.6 (64%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 28%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 30%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 26%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 16%

28%
30%
26%
16%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,525, Tested: 36, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 47%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 6%)
47%
31%
16%
6%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,647, Tested: 40, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 35%, Masters: 25%)
10%
30%
35%
25%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,576, Tested: 48, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 31%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 15%)
31%
31%
23%
15%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,604, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 67%, Masters: 0%)
17%
16%
67%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,615, Tested: 18, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 22%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 22%)
22%
34%
22%
22%

Health & Safety


Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
Show data for

(State average from 7,777 schools)

A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.

    Chronic Student Absenteeism

  • Hispanic16
  • White10
  • Multirace2
  • IDEA2
  • 5042
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 28 (male: 10, female: 18)
  • Hispanic: 16 (male: 8, female: 8)
  • White: 10 (male: 2, female: 8)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all female)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all male)
  • Section 504: 2 (all male)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 students
School:

60.0
Texas:

147.9

Restraint and Seclusion:
Show data for

(State average from 2,148 schools)

Mechanical restraint refers to the use of any device or equipment to restrict a student's freedom of movement. The term does not include devices implemented by trained school personnel, or utilized by a student that have been prescribed by an appropriate medical or related services professional and are used for the specific and approved purposes for which such devices were designed, such as:
  • Adaptive devices or mechanical supports used to achieve proper body position, balance, or alignment to allow greater freedom of mobility than would be possible without the use of such devices or mechanical supports;
  • Vehicle safety restraints when used as intended during the transport of a student in a moving vehicle;
  • Restraints for medical immobilization; or Orthopedically prescribed devices that permit a student to participate in activities without risk of harm.
Total Number of Non-IDEA students subjected to mechanical restraint: 2 (all female)
  • Black: 2

Non-IDEA students subjected to mechanical restraint per 1,000 students
Here:

4.3
Texas:

5.4


Suspensions:
Show data for

(State average from 3,231 schools)

Out-of-school suspension
  • For students with disabilities served under IDEA : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his/her regular school for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes to another setting (e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include both removals in which no individualized family service plan(IFSP) or individualized education plan(IEP) services are provided because the removal is 10 days or less as well as removals in which the child continues to receive services according to his/her IFSP or IEP.
  • For students without disabilities and students with disabilities served solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his / her regular school for at least half a day(but less than the remainder of the school year) for disciplinary purposes to another setting(e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include removals in which no educational services are provided, and removals in which educational services are provided(e.g., school-provided at home instruction or tutoring).
In-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his or her regular classroom(s) for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes, but remains under the direct supervision of school personnel. Direct supervision means school personnel are physically in the same location as students under their supervision.

    School days missed due to out-of-school suspension

  • Hispanic9
  • Black5
  • White9
  • IDEA2
  • 50410
School days missed due to out-of-school suspension: 23 (male: 22, female: 1)
  • Hispanic: 9 (male: 8, female: 1)
  • Black: 5 (all male)
  • White: 9 (all male)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all male)
  • Section 504: 10 (all male)

Instances of out-of-school suspension (Students without disabilities): 10

Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Students without disabilities)
Here:

21.4
State:

102.7
Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 8 (male: 4, female: 4)
  • Hispanic: 2 (all female)
  • Black: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • White: 2 (all male)

Students without disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 8 (male: 6, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Black: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2 (all male)

Students without disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2

Instances of out-of-school suspension (Students with disabilities): 1

Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Students with disabilities)
James Bowie Fine Arts Academy School:

2.1
State:

27.5
Instances of out-of-school suspension (Section 504 only): 8

Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Section 504 only)
School:

17.1
State:

12.0

Students with disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Section 504: 2

Comments


Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss Midland, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Some parts © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

Table of Contents