James M. Marlowe Elementary School in New Port Richey, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 56.

5642 CECILIA DR
New Port Richey, FL 34652

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Tarpon Springs Fundamental Ele School (8.0 miles):

97
Maniscalco Elementary School (18.4 miles):

81
Pine View Elementary School (17.5 miles):

70
Lake St. George Elementary School (13.4 miles):

60
James M. Marlowe Elementary School:

56
Oldsmar Elementary School (15.0 miles):

50
Skycrest Elementary School (19.8 miles):

39
Imagine At Land O' Lakes School (12.6 miles):

28
Pasco County Superintendent's Office School (14.0 miles):

1
James M. Marlowe Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Pasco County:

43
New Port Richey:

44
James M. Marlowe Elementary:

56

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (727) 774-8600 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 51
School number: 65
School type: Elementary
District Name: PASCO
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (727) 774-8691
Principal: Terri L Mutell
School in Need of Improvement (SINI) Status:
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 9
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 45
Senate District: 11
School Web Address: WWW.PASCO.K12.FL.US

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

71%
State average from 963 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

65%
State average from 963 schools:

77%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

67%
State average from 963 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

42%
State average from 962 schools:

53%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

62%
State average from 963 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
JAMES M. MARLOWE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

65%
State average from 963 schools:

66%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

49%
State average from 963 schools:

58%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

76%
State average from 963 schools:

66%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
JAMES M. MARLOWE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

497
State average from 963 schools:

543
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 963 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: B

Grade in 2009: C

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: N

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

81%
State average from 963 schools:

58%
Minority Rate
Here:

38%
State average from 963 schools:

47%
Region: 4

Title I: YES


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 248 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 248 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 75
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
JAMES M. MARLOWE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 236
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 228

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
JAMES M. MARLOWE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 236
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 228
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 165 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 165 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 52
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 156
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 150

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 156
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 150
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 45 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 45 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 44
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 43

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 44
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 43
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 195 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 195 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 63
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 185
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 177

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 185
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 177
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27
Number of Students Tested in Math: 27
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 44 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 44 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

34%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 39

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
JAMES M. MARLOWE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

32%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 39
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

74%
State average from 959 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

71%
State average from 959 schools:

77%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

56%
State average from 959 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

40%
State average from 959 schools:

52%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

61%
State average from 959 schools:

67%
Making Math Gains
Here:

66%
State average from 959 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

54%
State average from 959 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

66%
State average from 959 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
JAMES M. MARLOWE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

488
State average from 959 schools:

560
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 959 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: C

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: N

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

77%
State average from 959 schools:

54%
Minority Rate
Here:

34%
State average from 959 schools:

46%
Region: 4


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 266 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 266 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 79
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 249
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 243

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
JAMES M. MARLOWE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 249
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 243
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 190 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 190 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 57
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

69%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 179
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 174

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
JAMES M. MARLOWE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

70%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 179
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 174
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 38 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 38 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 36
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 36
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 201 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 201 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 58
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 186
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 182

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 186
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 182
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 29
Number of Students Tested in Math: 29
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 47 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 47 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
JAMES M. MARLOWE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

38%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 45

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 45
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

75%
State average from 954 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

74%
State average from 954 schools:

76%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

67%
State average from 954 schools:

82%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

57%
State average from 954 schools:

48%
Making Reading Gains
JAMES M. MARLOWE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

65%
State average from 954 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
Here:

78%
State average from 954 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
JAMES M. MARLOWE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

61%
State average from 954 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

88%
State average from 954 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

565
State average from 954 schools:

544
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 954 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

72%
State average from 954 schools:

51%
Minority Rate
Here:

29%
State average from 954 schools:

45%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 251 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 251 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 75
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

67%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 238
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 236

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 238
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 236
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 193 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 193 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 64
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
JAMES M. MARLOWE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

70%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 187
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 186

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 187
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 186
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 29
Number of Students Tested in Math: 29
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 179 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 179 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 50
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
JAMES M. MARLOWE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 167
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 166

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 167
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 166
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 52 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 52 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

40%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 50
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 49

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

38%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 50
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 49
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1337
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
JAMES M. MARLOWE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

306
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

17%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

13%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

35%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

34%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
JAMES M. MARLOWE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

70%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

17
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1533
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

311
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

23%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

20%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

31%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

18%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

9%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

58%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

18
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1576
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

297
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

23%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

13%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

37%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

19%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

7%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

64%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

14
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

10
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
JAMES M. MARLOWE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

304
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

28%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

35%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

32%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
JAMES M. MARLOWE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

5%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
JAMES M. MARLOWE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

37%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
JAMES M. MARLOWE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

9
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
JAMES M. MARLOWE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

8
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1345
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

310
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

13%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
JAMES M. MARLOWE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

24%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

35%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

22%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

6%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

63%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
JAMES M. MARLOWE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1480
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
JAMES M. MARLOWE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

306
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
JAMES M. MARLOWE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

23%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

18%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
JAMES M. MARLOWE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

36%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

19%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

5%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

60%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1641
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

327
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

12%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

33%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

25%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

23%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

7%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

55%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
JAMES M. MARLOWE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1281
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
JAMES M. MARLOWE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

297
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1535
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

312
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 02%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1622
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

305
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

302
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1347
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
JAMES M. MARLOWE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

310
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
JAMES M. MARLOWE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1492
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

308
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1667
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

333
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 86
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
JAMES M. MARLOWE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

3
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 55%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1355
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

309
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1543
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1642
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

309
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
JAMES M. MARLOWE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1412
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

324
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1539
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

319
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1640
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

327
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

85
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
Here:

630
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
Here:

59
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
JAMES M. MARLOWE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

79
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
JAMES M. MARLOWE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

652
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
Here:

69
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

93
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
Here:

669
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
Here:

74
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
JAMES M. MARLOWE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

13
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
JAMES M. MARLOWE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

13
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 78
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

286
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 44%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
JAMES M. MARLOWE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 60%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. New Port Richey, FL
  5. James M. Marlowe Elementary School in New Port Richey, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.