Jefferson Correctional Institution School in Monticello, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 8.

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Roberts Elementary School (18.6 miles):

71
Chaires Elementary School (16.0 miles):

62
Buck Lake Elementary School (19.3 miles):

58
Jefferson County Elementary School (1.1 miles):

34
Greenville Elementary School (14.8 miles):

17
Jefferson Correctional Institution School:

8
Jefferson County Superintendent's Office School (0.9 miles):

1
Jefferson County Adult School (0.2 miles):

0
Jefferson Correctional Institution School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Jefferson County:

16
Monticello:

16
This School:

8

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:



Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (850) 997-1987 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 76
School number: 1031
School type: Adult
District Name: CESA
Grade range: ADULT
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (850) 997-1987
Principal: Janet Renfroe
The function/setting of the school: Adult Education
The main educational program offered at the school: Adult

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

28%
State average from 133 schools:

72%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

55%
State average from 133 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

86%
State average from 133 schools:

87%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

30%
State average from 133 schools:

52%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

42%
State average from 133 schools:

63%
Making Math Gains
Here:

61%
State average from 133 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

45%
State average from 133 schools:

59%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

55%
State average from 133 schools:

65%
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
JEFFERSON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

402
State average from 133 schools:

541
Percent Tested
JEFFERSON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

99%
State average from 133 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: NO

Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Reading: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: Pending

Grade in 2009: D

Grade in 2008: D

Grade in 2007: D

Grade in 2006: D

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: D

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 119999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
JEFFERSON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

55%
State average from 133 schools:

52%
Minority Rate
Here:

34%
State average from 133 schools:

43%
Region: 4

Title I: NO


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 865 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 862 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 398
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

27%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 809
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 752

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 798
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 737
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 577 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 574 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 262
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

30%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 540
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 494

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 532
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 485
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 71 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 71 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 33
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 65
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 59
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 64
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 58
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 114 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 114 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 53
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

22%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 107
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 105

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 105
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 101
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 65 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 65 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 37
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 62
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 61
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 62
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 61
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 521 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 520 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 223
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

25%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 482
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 455

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 473
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 442
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 45 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 45 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 36
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 114 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 114 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 45
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

20%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 103
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 98

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

35%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 100
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 94
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

28%
State average from 133 schools:

72%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

60%
State average from 133 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

76%
State average from 133 schools:

91%
Meeting High Standards in Science
JEFFERSON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

23%
State average from 133 schools:

51%
Making Reading Gains
JEFFERSON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

40%
State average from 133 schools:

67%
Making Math Gains
Here:

67%
State average from 133 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

38%
State average from 133 schools:

65%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

65%
State average from 133 schools:

68%
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
JEFFERSON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

397
State average from 133 schools:

557
Percent Tested
Here:

97%
State average from 133 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: D

Grade in 2008: D

Grade in 2007: D

Grade in 2006: D

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: D

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
JEFFERSON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

45%
State average from 132 schools:

48%
Minority Rate
Here:

36%
State average from 133 schools:

42%
Region: 4


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 871 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 871 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 423
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

26%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 790
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 751

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
JEFFERSON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 783
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 743
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 558 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 558 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 278
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

30%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 522
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 497

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 514
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 490
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 88 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 89 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

81%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 42
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 78
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 73
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 79
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 73
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 110 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 109 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 44
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 92
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 89
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 90
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 87
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 82 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 82 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 43
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 68
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 67
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 70
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 69
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 405 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 405 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 179
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

24%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 356
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 341

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 351
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 334
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 65 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 63 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 44
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 45
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 129 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 131 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 60
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

17%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 115
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 109

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

30%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 115
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 108
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

31%
State average from 131 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

59%
State average from 131 schools:

72%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

79%
State average from 131 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

21%
State average from 131 schools:

48%
Making Reading Gains
JEFFERSON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

48%
State average from 131 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

72%
State average from 131 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

52%
State average from 131 schools:

61%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

69%
State average from 131 schools:

69%
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

431
State average from 131 schools:

540
Percent Tested
Here:

98%
State average from 131 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: D

Grade in 2007: D

Grade in 2006: D

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: D

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

41%
State average from 131 schools:

47%
Minority Rate
Here:

36%
State average from 131 schools:

44%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 860 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 861 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 380
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
JEFFERSON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

29%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 799
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 723

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 796
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 720
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 561 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 562 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 242
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

31%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 520
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 480

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
JEFFERSON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 518
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 479
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 129 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 130 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 78
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

18%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 121
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 112

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

31%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 122
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 113
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 85 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 85 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 32
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 76
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 64
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 75
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 62
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 54 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 53 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 53
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 43
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 42
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 385 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 385 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 173
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

23%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 357
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 329

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 355
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 327
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 40 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 39 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 133 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 135 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 61
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

20%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 122
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 111

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
JEFFERSON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 123
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 111
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1777
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

323
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
JEFFERSON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

14%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

13%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
JEFFERSON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

33%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

28%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 5
JEFFERSON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

12%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

73%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

15
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1916
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

338
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

10%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

15%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

29%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

27%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

20%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

75%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

18
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1967
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

327
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

10%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
JEFFERSON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

23%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

36%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
JEFFERSON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

25%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

7%
State average:

3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

68%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

18
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

7
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1838
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

296
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

36%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

36%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

20%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

5%
State average:

12%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

28%
State average:

45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

10
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1853
State average:

1938
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

286
State average:

302
Percent Passing
Here:

43%
State average:

56%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

47%
State average:

35%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

31%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

12%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 4
JEFFERSON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

5%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

5%
State average:

12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

22%
State average:

37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

13
State average:

15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

320
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

21%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

29%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

12%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

49%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

9
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

288
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

40%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

34%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

23%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

2%
State average:

5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

26%
State average:

36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1774
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

333
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

18%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

18%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

26%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

21%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

16%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

63%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
JEFFERSON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

7
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
JEFFERSON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

1873
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

327
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

13%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
JEFFERSON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

17%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

21%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

15%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

70%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1950
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

334
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

7%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

15%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

40%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

20%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

19%
State average:

10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
JEFFERSON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

78%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
JEFFERSON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1885
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

291
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
JEFFERSON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

21%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

33%
State average:

22%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

32%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

12%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 5
JEFFERSON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

2%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

47%
State average:

61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
JEFFERSON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1942
State average:

1995
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

326
Percent Passing
Here:

75%
State average:

80%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

18%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

23%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

23%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

58%
State average:

69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
JEFFERSON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1807
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

329
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1854
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

326
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1982
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

330
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1831
State average:

1907
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

295
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1831
State average:

1921
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

282
State average:

299
Percent Passing: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 22%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

328
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

282
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 20%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1799
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

339
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1882
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

329
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
JEFFERSON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

1966
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

338
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 24%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1903
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

296
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1937
State average:

1972
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

312
State average:

321
Percent Passing: 68%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 419
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 35%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 7%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 93%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 449
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 32%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 69%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1795
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
JEFFERSON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

326
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 8
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1914
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

337
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1977
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

329
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1841
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

297
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
JEFFERSON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

1848
State average:

1935
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

285
State average:

302
Percent Passing: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 21%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

328
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

275
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1755
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

329
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1902
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

334
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1977
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

341
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 23%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1891
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

292
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1948
State average:

1984
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

314
State average:

323
Percent Passing: 71%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
JEFFERSON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

390
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
JEFFERSON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

686
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
Here:

76
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
JEFFERSON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

16
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
JEFFERSON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

8
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

412
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
Here:

700
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
JEFFERSON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

80
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

403
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
Here:

702
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
Here:

76
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
JEFFERSON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

11
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

8
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

403
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
JEFFERSON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

687
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
JEFFERSON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

55
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
JEFFERSON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

7
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

5
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
JEFFERSON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

322
State average:

237
Mean Scale Score
Here:

696
State average from 2096 schools:

709
Median NPR
Here:

54
State average:

65
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Initial Understanding (max 12)
JEFFERSON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

8
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 404
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

321
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 11%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 60%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 10%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 7%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 91%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 390
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

283
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 40%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 34%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 74%


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.