Jim C. Bailey Middle School in Pensacola, Florida (FL) - Test Results, Rating, Ranking, Grades, Scores, Classes, Enrollment, Teachers, Students, and Report Card

City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 39.

4110 BAUER RD
Pensacola, FL 32506

Show street view No street view available for this location

Other nearby schools ratings:

Brown Barge Middle School (13.7 miles):	70
Wedgewood Middle School (12.6 miles):	49
A. V. Clubbs Center School (13.1 miles):	47
Jim C. Bailey Middle School:	39
Bellview Middle School (10.3 miles):	39
Brownsville Middle School (10.5 miles):	29
County Administrative Annex School (12.8 miles):	17
Pace Program School (13.6 miles):	1

Jim C. Bailey Middle School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:

Florida:	45
Escambia County:	41
Pensacola:	42
Jim C. Bailey Middle School:	39

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum

Phone: (850) 492-6136 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 17
School number: 1221
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: ESCAMBIA
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 8
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (850) 492-9860
Principal: Judy Pippen
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 1
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 2
Senate District: 4
School Web Address: www.escambia.k12.fl.us

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	59%
State average from 613 schools:	71%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	69%
State average from 612 schools:	73%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	90%
State average from 613 schools:	88%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	41%
State average from 612 schools:	51%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	60%
State average from 613 schools:	64%

Making Math Gains

Here:	60%
State average from 612 schools:	70%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	42%
State average from 613 schools:	62%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	61%
State average from 613 schools:	68%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	482
State average from 613 schools:	545

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 613 schools:	100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: C

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: B

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 119999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	82%
State average from 614 schools:	56%

Minority Rate

JIM C. BAILEY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	40%
State average from 614 schools:	49%

Region: 4

Title I: YES

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 260 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 260 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	94%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 86
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	55%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 234
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 233

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	65%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 234
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 233
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 164 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 164 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 55
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	56%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 151
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 150

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	67%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 151
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 150
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 50 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 50 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	38%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 42
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 42

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	43%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 42
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 42
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 39 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 39 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 208 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 208 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 67
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	55%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 182
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 182

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	64%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 182
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 182
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 33 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 33 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	70%
State average from 613 schools:	70%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	79%
State average from 613 schools:	71%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	83%
State average from 613 schools:	92%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	56%
State average from 613 schools:	49%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	65%
State average from 613 schools:	66%

Making Math Gains

JIM C. BAILEY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	78%
State average from 613 schools:	69%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	77%
State average from 613 schools:	68%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	83%
State average from 613 schools:	67%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	591
State average from 613 schools:	553

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 613 schools:	100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: B

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	79%
State average from 613 schools:	52%

Minority Rate

Here:	42%
State average from 613 schools:	48%

Region: 4

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 263 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 263 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 58
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

JIM C. BAILEY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	64%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 238
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 233

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	73%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 238
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 233
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 154 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 154 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	94%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 34
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	69%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 144
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 143

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	80%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 144
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 143
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 45 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 45 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	43%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 36

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

JIM C. BAILEY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	50%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 36
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 59 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 59 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	67%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 51
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	71%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 51
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 200 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 200 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 44
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	60%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 175
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 171

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	67%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 175
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 171
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 35 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27
Number of Students Tested in Math: 27
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	68%
State average from 603 schools:	69%

Meeting High Standards in Math

JIM C. BAILEY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	67%
State average from 603 schools:	70%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	95%
State average from 603 schools:	88%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	26%
State average from 602 schools:	46%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	64%
State average from 602 schools:	65%

Making Math Gains

Here:	63%
State average from 602 schools:	71%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

JIM C. BAILEY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	65%
State average from 602 schools:	64%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	65%
State average from 602 schools:	69%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	513
State average from 602 schools:	543

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 604 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: B

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	75%
State average from 605 schools:	49%

Minority Rate

Here:	42%
State average from 605 schools:	48%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 254 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 255 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 87
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	63%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 230
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 222

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	63%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 230
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 222
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 149 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 150 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 52
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	70%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 142
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 139

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	69%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 142
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 139
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 39 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 39 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 63 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 63 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	48%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 50
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 48

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	56%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 50
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 48
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 181 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 182 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 60
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	59%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 160
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 153

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

JIM C. BAILEY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	58%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 160
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 153
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 29
Number of Students Tested in Math: 29
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	72%
State average from 539 schools:	64%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	70%
State average from 539 schools:	64%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	94%
State average from 539 schools:	91%

Meeting High Standards in Science

JIM C. BAILEY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	59%
State average from 538 schools:	44%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	63%
State average from 539 schools:	61%

Making Math Gains

JIM C. BAILEY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	72%
State average from 539 schools:	69%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	62%
State average from 539 schools:	64%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	66%
State average from 539 schools:	67%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns

Here:	558
State average from 539 schools:	523

Percent Tested

Here:	99%
State average from 539 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	44%
State average from 541 schools:	49%

Minority Rate

JIM C. BAILEY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	34%
State average from 542 schools:	53%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1494 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1492 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	97%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 472
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	66%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1408
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	63%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1406
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 980 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 979 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	98%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 317
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	70%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 925
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	68%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 925
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 286 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 285 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	94%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 88
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	50%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 267
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	42%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 266
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 74 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 74 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 67
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 67
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 69 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 69 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 68
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 68
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 664 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 663 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	95%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 213
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	55%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 623
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	51%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 623
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 224 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 223 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	84%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 75
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

JIM C. BAILEY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	31%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 212
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	25%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 212
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

JIM C. BAILEY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	71%
State average from 526 schools:	64%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	67%
State average from 526 schools:	63%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	92%
State average from 526 schools:	89%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	69%
State average from 526 schools:	66%

Making Math Gains

Here:	75%
State average from 526 schools:	71%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	75%
State average from 526 schools:	72%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns

Here:	449
State average from 526 schools:	425

Percent Tested

Here:	99%
State average from 526 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

JIM C. BAILEY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	47%
State average from 525 schools:	50%

Minority Rate

JIM C. BAILEY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	34%
State average from 526 schools:	52%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1518 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1517 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	97%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 492
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	65%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1424
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	60%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1421
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1001 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1001 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	98%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 323

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	69%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 935
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	67%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 932
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 321 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 320 (98%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	96%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 120
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	50%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 305
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	40%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 304
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 75 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 75 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 24

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	56%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 70

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	47%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 70
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 58 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 58 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 10

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	85%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 54

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	73%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 55
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 699 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 697 (98%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	95%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 219
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

JIM C. BAILEY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	55%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 645
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	48%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 641
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 234 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 233 (98%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

JIM C. BAILEY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	86%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 77
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	31%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 222
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

JIM C. BAILEY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	24%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 221
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	62%
State average from 505 schools:	59%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	64%
State average from 505 schools:	60%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

JIM C. BAILEY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	78%
State average from 506 schools:	83%

Making Reading Gains

JIM C. BAILEY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	56%
State average from 505 schools:	61%

Making Math Gains

Here:	74%
State average from 505 schools:	69%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	61%
State average from 505 schools:	66%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns

Here:	395
State average from 506 schools:	397

Percent Tested

Here:	99%
State average from 506 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	53%
State average from 506 schools:	51%

Minority Rate

Here:	33%
State average from 506 schools:	50%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1163
State average:	1402

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	278
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	37%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	15%
State average:	11%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	32%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	13%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	3%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	48%
State average:	74%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	14
State average:	17

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	3
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	3
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1510
State average:	1604

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	307
State average:	324

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	21%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	14%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	40%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	17%
State average:	29%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	8%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	65%
State average:	72%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	18
State average:	19

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	8
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	2
State average:	2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1517
State average:	1659

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	286
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	22%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	26%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	34%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	16%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	1%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	51%
State average:	70%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	3
State average:	3

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	14
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	10
State average:	10

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	2
State average:	2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1745
State average:	1716

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	317
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	13%
State average:	19%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	17%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	34%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	28%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	8%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	70%
State average:	65%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	14
State average:	14

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

JIM C. BAILEY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	1829
State average:	1810

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	321
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	13%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	17%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	35%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	26%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	9%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

JIM C. BAILEY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	70%
State average:	65%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

JIM C. BAILEY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	17
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1899
State average:	1876

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	313
State average:	308

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	16%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	28%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	35%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

JIM C. BAILEY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	19%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	2%
State average:	3%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	57%
State average:	52%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	4
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	16
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	7
State average:	6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

JIM C. BAILEY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	292
State average:	321

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	30%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 2

JIM C. BAILEY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	36%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	28%
State average:	36%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	6%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

JIM C. BAILEY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	33%
State average:	51%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	8
State average:	9

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	6
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	7
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	8
State average:	9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	316
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1

JIM C. BAILEY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	21%
State average:	27%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	32%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 3

JIM C. BAILEY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	33%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	10%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	4%
State average:	2%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	47%
State average:	41%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

JIM C. BAILEY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	9
State average:	9

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	9
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	7
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1330
State average:	1481

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	306
State average:	339

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	17%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	13%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	45%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	22%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	3%
State average:	16%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

JIM C. BAILEY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	70%
State average:	79%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	7
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	4
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

JIM C. BAILEY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	5
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1546
State average:	1585

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	321
State average:	330

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	8%
State average:	10%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	22%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	41%
State average:	36%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	23%
State average:	26%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	6%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	70%
State average:	74%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1614
State average:	1674

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	321
State average:	334

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	15%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	31%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 3

JIM C. BAILEY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	32%
State average:	27%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	21%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	1%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	54%
State average:	63%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

JIM C. BAILEY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	7
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

JIM C. BAILEY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	6
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1680
State average:	1696

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	312
State average:	315

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	22%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	21%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	33%
State average:	29%

% in each Achievement Level 4

JIM C. BAILEY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	18%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	5%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	56%
State average:	55%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	4
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	6
State average:	6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1804
State average:	1786

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	310
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	19%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	23%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	32%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	20%
State average:	19%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	7%
State average:	7%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

JIM C. BAILEY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	58%
State average:	57%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

JIM C. BAILEY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	4
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	6
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1911
State average:	1892

Mean Scale Score 100-500

JIM C. BAILEY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	324
State average:	320

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	12%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	15%
State average:	21%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	42%
State average:	38%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	21%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 5

JIM C. BAILEY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	10%
State average:	10%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	72%
State average:	64%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

JIM C. BAILEY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	5
State average:	5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

JIM C. BAILEY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	1276
State average:	1402

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	296
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1475
State average:	1605

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	301
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 04
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 09
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1594
State average:	1656

Mean Scale Score 100-500

JIM C. BAILEY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	300
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1739
State average:	1707

Mean Scale Score 100-500

JIM C. BAILEY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	316
State average:	310

% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1825
State average:	1800

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	320
State average:	315

% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1884
State average:	1864

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	310
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	310
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	310
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1386
State average:	1476

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	319
State average:	338

% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1483
State average:	1578

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	306
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1674
State average:	1675

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	334
State average:	334

% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1689
State average:	1679

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	313
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1813
State average:	1799

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	312
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1893
State average:	1876

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	320
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 69

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	4
State average from 27 schools:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 39%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 78%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 473

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	4
State average from 27 schools:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 37%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 84%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1233
State average:	1396

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	289
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1546
State average:	1582

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	314
State average:	320

% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

JIM C. BAILEY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	1517
State average:	1627

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	286
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1741
State average:	1696

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	317
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1800
State average:	1775

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	315
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1905
State average:	1857

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	314
State average:	304

% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	290
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 23%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	317
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1326
State average:	1461

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	306
State average:	335

% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1536
State average:	1563

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	318
State average:	325

% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1590
State average:	1668

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	316
State average:	333

% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1687
State average:	1670

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	313
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1819
State average:	1801

Mean Scale Score 100-500

JIM C. BAILEY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	313
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1918
State average:	1882

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	326
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	92
State average:	103

Mean Scale Score

Here:	612
State average from 3241 schools:	633

Median NPR

Here:	43
State average:	61

Literary (max 18)

JIM C. BAILEY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	11
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	11
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

JIM C. BAILEY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	8
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	12
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	7
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	5
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Number of Students

JIM C. BAILEY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	93
State average:	97

Mean Scale Score

Here:	646
State average from 3233 schools:	653

Median NPR

Here:	65
State average:	69

Literary (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	10

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	14
State average:	15

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	8

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	75
State average:	101

Mean Scale Score

Here:	652
State average from 3309 schools:	667

Median NPR

JIM C. BAILEY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	59
State average:	71

Literary (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	11
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

JIM C. BAILEY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	12
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	13
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	5
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	480
State average:	190

Mean Scale Score

JIM C. BAILEY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	677
State average from 2604 schools:	671

Median NPR

Here:	69
State average:	63

Literary (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	8

Interpretation (max 20)

JIM C. BAILEY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	15
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

JIM C. BAILEY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	9
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

JIM C. BAILEY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	7
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	493
State average:	201

Mean Scale Score

JIM C. BAILEY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	688
State average from 2487 schools:	682

Median NPR

Here:	72
State average:	66

Literary (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	12

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	14
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	482
State average:	192

Mean Scale Score

Here:	699
State average from 2497 schools:	687

Median NPR

Here:	74
State average:	63

Literary (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	12

Informational (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

JIM C. BAILEY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	14
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	7

Interpretation (max 20)

JIM C. BAILEY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	15
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

JIM C. BAILEY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	11
State average:	10

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	8
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 93

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	320
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 73%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 42%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 91%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 481

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	298
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 48%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 37%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 87%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1689
State average from 878 schools:	1661

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	307
State average:	302

% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1684
State average:	1663

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1619
State average:	1592

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 66

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1829
State average from 808 schools:	1746

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	321
State average:	305

% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1835
State average:	1743

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1751
State average:	1668

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 84

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1904
State average from 819 schools:	1810

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	314
State average:	294

% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1903
State average:	1807

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1830
State average:	1738

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 73

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	318
State average:	290

% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1650
State average from 873 schools:	1641

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	304
State average:	302

% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1649
State average:	1645

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1627
State average:	1620

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 21

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1842
State average from 804 schools:	1777

Mean Scale Score 100-500

JIM C. BAILEY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	319
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1851
State average:	1774

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

JIM C. BAILEY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	1701
State average:	1645

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 150

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

JIM C. BAILEY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	1916
State average from 815 schools:	1851

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	326
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1918
State average:	1845

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1827
State average:	1755

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 91

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 532

Mean Scale Score

Here:	677
State average from 874 schools:	671

Median NPR: 69
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 481

Mean Scale Score

Here:	685
State average from 796 schools:	675

Median NPR: 70
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 490

Mean Scale Score

Here:	704
State average from 810 schools:	685

Median NPR: 78
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 15
Initial Understanding (max 10): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 14): 10
Strategies (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 529

Mean Scale Score

Here:	672
State average from 874 schools:	669

Median NPR: 67
Number Sense (max 10): 6
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 479

Mean Scale Score

Here:	695
State average from 796 schools:	685

Median NPR: 76
Number Sense (max 9): 5
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 6
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 488

Mean Scale Score

Here:	713
State average from 810 schools:	698

Median NPR: 80
Number Sense (max 9): 7
Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 487

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	307
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 56%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 11
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 34%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 89%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 77%

City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DC	DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID
IL	IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	MD
ME	MI	MN	MO	MS	MT	NC
ND	NE	NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY
OH	OK	OR	PA	RI	SC	SD
TN	TX	UT	VA	VT	WA	WI
WV	WY

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID	IL
IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	ME	MI
MN	MO	MS	MT	NC	ND	NE
NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	SD	TN	TX
VA	VT	WA	WI	WV	WY

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID	IL
IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	ME	MI
MN	MO	MS	MT	NC	ND	NE
NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	SD	TN	TX
VA	VT	WA	WI	WV	WY

AL	AZ	CA	CO	CT	DE	FL
GA	HI	IA	ID	IL	IN	KS
LA	MA	MD	MI	MN	MO	NC
NE	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	TN	TX	UT
VA	WA	WI	WV

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DC	DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID
IL	IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	MD
ME	MI	MN	MO	MS	MT	NC
ND	NE	NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY
OH	OK	OR	PA	RI	SC	SD
TN	TX	UT	VA	VT	WA	WI
WV	WY