City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is
49.
Other nearby schools ratings:
John Love Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:Florida: | 45 |
Duval County: | 44 |
Jacksonville: | 43 |
John Love Elementary School: | 49 |
Discuss this school with others on our active
Florida forum
Phone: (904) 630-6790 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 16
School number: 731
School type: Elementary
District Name: DUVAL
Grade range: KINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 5
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (904) 630-6793
Principal: Michelle Quarles
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 3
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 15
Senate District: 1
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 79% |
State average from 734 schools: | 73% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 78% |
State average from 734 schools: | 77% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 94% |
State average from 734 schools: | 85% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 59% |
State average from 733 schools: | 53% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 69% |
State average from 734 schools: | 64% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 71% |
State average from 733 schools: | 67% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 65% |
State average from 734 schools: | 58% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathJOHN LOVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 58% |
State average from 734 schools: | 66% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 573 |
State average from 734 schools: | 543 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 733 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: A
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 35% |
State average from 734 schools: | 57% |
Minority RateHere: | 43% |
State average from 735 schools: | 46% |
Region: 2
Title I: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 993 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 993 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 308
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 74% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 951
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 889
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 72% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 948
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 889
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 574 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 574 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 182
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 82% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 566
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 528
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 79% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 565
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 527
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 198 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 198 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 59
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 45% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 183
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 174
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientJOHN LOVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 43% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 182
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 174
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 127 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 127 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 40
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientJOHN LOVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 68% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 111
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 105
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 70% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 110
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 105
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 52 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 52 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 51
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 47
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 51
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 48
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 345 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 345 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 106
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 51% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 315
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 298
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientJOHN LOVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 49% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 313
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 297
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 38 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 38 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 138 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 138 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 82% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 45
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 43% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 132
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 123
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 35% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 131
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 123
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 81% |
State average from 735 schools: | 74% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 78% |
State average from 734 schools: | 76% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 96% |
State average from 734 schools: | 88% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 66% |
State average from 734 schools: | 51% |
Making Reading Gains JOHN LOVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 71% |
State average from 734 schools: | 67% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 75% |
State average from 735 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 71% |
State average from 735 schools: | 65% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 62% |
State average from 734 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 600 |
State average from 734 schools: | 557 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 734 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 32% |
State average from 734 schools: | 53% |
Minority RateHere: | 42% |
State average from 734 schools: | 45% |
Region: 3
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1063 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1063 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 334
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 76% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1002
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 925
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 72% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1003
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 924
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 622 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 622 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 203
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 83% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 602
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 549
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 80% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 602
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 547
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 212 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 212 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 55
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 55% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 187
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 178
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 44% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 188
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 180
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 124 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 124 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 32
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 67% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 114
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 107
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 63% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 114
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 107
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 58 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 58 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 49
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 49
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 331 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 331 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 81
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 55% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 295
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 277
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 47% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 297
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 278
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 35 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 148 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 148 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 92% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 49
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 44% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 140
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 132
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 37% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 141
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 133
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 79% |
State average from 711 schools: | 73% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 78% |
State average from 711 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 97% |
State average from 711 schools: | 82% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 61% |
State average from 711 schools: | 47% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 73% |
State average from 711 schools: | 65% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 76% |
State average from 711 schools: | 70% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading JOHN LOVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 67% |
State average from 711 schools: | 62% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 66% |
State average from 711 schools: | 69% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 597 |
State average from 711 schools: | 544 |
Percent TestedJOHN LOVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 100% |
State average from 711 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateJOHN LOVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 33% |
State average from 711 schools: | 50% |
Minority RateHere: | 46% |
State average from 711 schools: | 44% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 978 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 978 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 260
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 73% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 921
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 843
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 73% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 919
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 840
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 538 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 538 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 138
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 81% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 514
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 466
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 83% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 511
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 462
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 221 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 221 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 94% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 62
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 51% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 206
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 199
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 49% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 207
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 200
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 126 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 126 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 33
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 60% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 113
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 99
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 58% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 113
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 99
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 54 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 54 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 51
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 47
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 51
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 47
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 307 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 307 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 74
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 49% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 281
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 264
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 45% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 280
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 263
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 38 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 38 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 141 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 141 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 90% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 30
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 44% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 133
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 129
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientJOHN LOVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 41% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 133
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 128
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2006-2007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingJOHN LOVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 51% |
State average from 652 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 63% |
State average from 652 schools: | 73% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 100% |
State average from 652 schools: | 83% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 41% |
State average from 650 schools: | 46% |
Making Reading GainsHere: | 54% |
State average from 652 schools: | 72% |
Making Reading Gains - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
Making Math GainsHere: | 75% |
State average from 652 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere: | 56% |
State average from 652 schools: | 67% |
% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathJOHN LOVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 77% |
State average from 652 schools: | 69% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 ColumnsHere: | 517 |
State average from 652 schools: | 553 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 652 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
Grade in 2007: B
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: D
Grade in 1999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 93% |
State average from 655 schools: | 53% |
Minority RateHere: | 88% |
State average from 655 schools: | 55% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 122 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 122 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 97% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 36
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 42% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 100
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 53% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 100
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 104 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 104 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 28
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 39% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 83
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 53% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 83
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 108 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 108 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 28
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 39% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 87
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 51% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 87
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 29
Number of Students Tested in Math: 29
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2005-2006 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 55% |
State average from 643 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 48% |
State average from 643 schools: | 71% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 76% |
State average from 643 schools: | 81% |
Making Reading GainsHere: | 55% |
State average from 643 schools: | 63% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 73% |
State average from 643 schools: | 69% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere: | 47% |
State average from 643 schools: | 61% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 ColumnsHere: | 354 |
State average from 643 schools: | 420 |
Percent TestedHere: | 97% |
State average from 643 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: NO
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: D
Grade in 1999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 92% |
State average from 644 schools: | 54% |
Minority RateHere: | 90% |
State average from 644 schools: | 54% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 97 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 97 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 91% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 22
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 43% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 88
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 34% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 88
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 82 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 82 (99%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 20
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 42% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 73
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 33% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 73
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 80 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 80 (99%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 37% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 71
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 31% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 71
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 34 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 34 (96%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 18% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 33
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 9% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 33
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2004-2005 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 48% |
State average from 631 schools: | 74% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 46% |
State average from 631 schools: | 69% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 81% |
State average from 631 schools: | 80% |
Making Reading GainsHere: | 58% |
State average from 631 schools: | 66% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 72% |
State average from 631 schools: | 69% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere: | 60% |
State average from 631 schools: | 60% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 ColumnsHere: | 365 |
State average from 631 schools: | 417 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 631 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: D
Grade in 1999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 100% |
State average from 631 schools: | 54% |
Minority RateHere: | 92% |
State average from 631 schools: | 52% |
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1481 |
State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 330 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 12% |
State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 27% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 47% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 80% |
State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1592 |
State average: | 1604 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 321 |
State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 13% |
State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 17% |
State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 32% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4JOHN LOVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 31% |
State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 71% |
State average: | 72% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1637 |
State average: | 1659 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 308 |
State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1JOHN LOVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 12% |
State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 24% |
State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 38% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 18% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 64% |
State average: | 70% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1794 |
State average: | 1716 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 326 |
State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 13% |
State average: | 19% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 17% |
State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 30% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 29% |
State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveJOHN LOVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 71% |
State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1927 |
State average: | 1810 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 340 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 12% |
State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 33% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 31% |
State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 79% |
State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1930 |
State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500JOHN LOVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 319 |
State average: | 308 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 12% |
State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 23% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 42% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 20% |
State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 65% |
State average: | 52% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1690 |
State average: | 1922 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 269 |
State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 58% |
State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 23% |
State average: | 30% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 13% |
State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5JOHN LOVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 2% |
State average: | 7% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 19% |
State average: | 45% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1673 |
State average: | 1938 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 253 |
State average: | 302 |
Percent PassingHere: | 22% |
State average: | 56% |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 72% |
State average: | 35% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 17% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
% in each Achievement Level 4JOHN LOVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 1% |
State average: | 8% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 10% |
State average: | 37% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 318 |
State average: | 321 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 17% |
State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 31% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3JOHN LOVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 41% |
State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 52% |
State average: | 51% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12JOHN LOVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 9 |
State average: | 9 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 322 |
State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 18% |
State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 31% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 39% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 52% |
State average: | 41% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 264 |
State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 64% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 29% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveJOHN LOVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 8% |
State average: | 36% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1543 |
State average: | 1481 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 352 |
State average: | 339 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 37% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 33% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 5Here: | 17% |
State average: | 16% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 87% |
State average: | 79% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6JOHN LOVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 5 |
State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1548 |
State average: | 1585 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500JOHN LOVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 321 |
State average: | 330 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 19% |
State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 45% |
State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 25% |
State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 72% |
State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1663 |
State average: | 1674 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 332 |
State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 14% |
State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 2JOHN LOVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 31% |
State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 26% |
State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 20% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 54% |
State average: | 63% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12JOHN LOVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 7 |
State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1785 |
State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 336 |
State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 20% |
State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 15% |
State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 23% |
State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 26% |
State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 65% |
State average: | 55% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1860 |
State average: | 1786 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 324 |
State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 15% |
State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 16% |
State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 33% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 23% |
State average: | 19% |
% in each Achievement Level 5JOHN LOVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 14% |
State average: | 7% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 69% |
State average: | 57% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8JOHN LOVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 6 |
State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1944 |
State average: | 1892 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 333 |
State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 15% |
State average: | 21% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 38% |
State average: | 38% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 20% |
State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 5JOHN LOVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 18% |
State average: | 10% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveJOHN LOVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 76% |
State average: | 64% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6JOHN LOVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 8 |
State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreJOHN LOVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 1752 |
State average: | 1925 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 251 |
State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 52% |
State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 30% |
State average: | 22% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 14% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 17% |
State average: | 61% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7JOHN LOVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 2 |
State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1842 |
State average: | 1995 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 289 |
State average: | 326 |
Percent PassingHere: | 50% |
State average: | 80% |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 37% |
State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 36% |
State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 19% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 27% |
State average: | 69% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7JOHN LOVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 3 |
State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1444 |
State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 324 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1667 |
State average: | 1605 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 334 |
State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 03%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 08%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1668 |
State average: | 1656 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 313 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1819 |
State average: | 1707 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 331 |
State average: | 310 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1860 |
State average: | 1800 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 327 |
State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1978 |
State average: | 1864 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 329 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1724 |
State average: | 1907 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 275 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 57%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 14%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1715 |
State average: | 1921 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 261 |
State average: | 299 |
Percent Passing: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 75%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 4%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 315 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 331 |
State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 268 |
State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 60%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 7%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1453 |
State average: | 1476 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 333 |
State average: | 338 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1593 |
State average: | 1578 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 331 |
State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1676 |
State average: | 1675 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 335 |
State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1804 |
State average: | 1679 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 340 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1846 |
State average: | 1799 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 320 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreJOHN LOVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 1958 |
State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 336 |
State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 22%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1811 |
State average: | 1925 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 269 |
State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 22%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1867 |
State average: | 1972 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500JOHN LOVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 295 |
State average: | 321 |
Percent Passing: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 27%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 120
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 4 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 49%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 81%
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 346
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 4 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 34%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 7%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 95%
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 83
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 3 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Unscore - Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 34%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 34%
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1537 |
State average: | 1396 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 339 |
State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 93%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1643 |
State average: | 1582 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 330 |
State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1700 |
State average: | 1627 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 319 |
State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1741 |
State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 317 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1883 |
State average: | 1775 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 331 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1965 |
State average: | 1857 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 327 |
State average: | 304 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1755 |
State average: | 1894 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500JOHN LOVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 281 |
State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 24%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreJOHN LOVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 1609 |
State average: | 1935 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 241 |
State average: | 302 |
Percent Passing: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 76%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 6%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 316 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 329 |
State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 252 |
State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 64%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1493 |
State average: | 1461 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 342 |
State average: | 335 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1603 |
State average: | 1563 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500JOHN LOVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 334 |
State average: | 325 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1740 |
State average: | 1668 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 348 |
State average: | 333 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1763 |
State average: | 1670 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 331 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1898 |
State average: | 1801 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 333 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1967 |
State average: | 1882 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 339 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1773 |
State average: | 1915 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 258 |
State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 28%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1843 |
State average: | 1984 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 289 |
State average: | 323 |
Percent Passing: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 27%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere: | 125 |
State average: | 103 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 646 |
State average from 3241 schools: | 633 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Strategies (max 10)JOHN LOVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 7 |
State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 661 |
State average from 3233 schools: | 653 |
Functional (max 18)JOHN LOVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 14 |
State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)JOHN LOVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 10 |
State average: | 10 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)JOHN LOVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 9 |
State average: | 8 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere: | 109 |
State average: | 101 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 682 |
State average from 3309 schools: | 667 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of StudentsJOHN LOVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 361 |
State average: | 190 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 679 |
State average from 2604 schools: | 671 |
Functional (max 18)JOHN LOVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 13 |
State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)JOHN LOVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 9 |
State average: | 9 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of StudentsJOHN LOVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 339 |
State average: | 201 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 697 |
State average from 2487 schools: | 682 |
Functional (max 18)JOHN LOVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 13 |
State average: | 12 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Strategies (max 10)JOHN LOVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 7 |
State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere: | 271 |
State average: | 192 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 700 |
State average from 2497 schools: | 687 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)JOHN LOVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 11 |
State average: | 10 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 667 |
State average from 2275 schools: | 694 |
Literary (max 18)JOHN LOVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 10 |
State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)JOHN LOVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 7 |
State average: | 9 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 679 |
State average from 2096 schools: | 709 |
Median NPRJOHN LOVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 38 |
State average: | 65 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 114
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedJOHN LOVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 286 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 44%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 56%
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 272
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 325 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 66%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 12%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 6%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 93%
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 78
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 233 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 59%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 15%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 8
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 46%
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1205 |
State average: | 1342 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 284 |
State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1401 |
State average from 1875 schools: | 1542 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 289 |
State average: | 313 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1396 |
State average: | 1546 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1303 |
State average: | 1397 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 94
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1332 |
State average from 1873 schools: | 1629 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 253 |
State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 86%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1322 |
State average: | 1632 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1293 |
State average: | 1532 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 29
2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 236 |
State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 69%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 3%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreJOHN LOVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 1348 |
State average: | 1413 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 310 |
State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1463 |
State average from 1874 schools: | 1525 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 302 |
State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1458 |
State average: | 1528 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1254 |
State average: | 1414 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 204
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1463 |
State average from 1872 schools: | 1647 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 290 |
State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 83%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1464 |
State average: | 1649 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1231 |
State average: | 1519 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 232
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 44
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 622 |
State average from 1891 schools: | 633 |
Median NPR: 51
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 41
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 632 |
State average from 1874 schools: | 642 |
Median NPR: 52
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 12): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 36
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 639 |
State average from 1870 schools: | 667 |
Median NPR: 46
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 9
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 12): 6
Strategies (max 10): 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 44
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 622 |
State average from 1891 schools: | 632 |
Median NPR: 61
Number Sense (max 14): 10
Operations (max 11): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 41
Mean Scale ScoreJOHN LOVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 629 |
State average from 1874 schools: | 652 |
Median NPR: 59
Number Sense (max 12): 8
Operations (max 12): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 36
Mean Scale ScoreJOHN LOVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 635 |
State average from 1870 schools: | 663 |
Median NPR: 49
Number Sense (max 12): 7
Operations (max 12): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 40
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 307 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 68%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 40%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 100%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 85%
- All Cities
- Florida forum
- Florida
- Jacksonville, FL
- John Love Elementary School in Jacksonville, Florida (FL)
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: