Just For Girls School in Palmetto, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 1.

1500 - 10TH ST W
Palmetto, FL 34221

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Coastal Behavioral Healthcare Residential Treatment Center School (13.1 miles):

92
Carlos E. Haile Middle School (8.7 miles):

69
Suncoast For Innovative Studies School (14.4 miles):

52
Oasis Middle School (2.6 miles):

43
Electa Lee Magnet Middle School (5.2 miles):

33
Thurgood Marshall Middle School (17.0 miles):

26
Just For Girls School (0.0 miles):

6
Just For Girls School:

1
Just For Girls School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Manatee County:

42
Palmetto:

29
Just For Girls School:

1

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (941) 722-1475 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 41
School number: 2007
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: MANATEE
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 8
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (941) 722-0985
Principal: Diane Saunders
The function/setting of the school: Alternative to Expulsion
The main educational program offered at the school: Alternative Education
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 13
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 68
Senate District: 21

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

91%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

91%
State average from 612 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

93%
State average from 613 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
JUST FOR GIRLS:

79%
State average from 612 schools:

51%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

60%
State average from 613 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

60%
State average from 612 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
JUST FOR GIRLS:

60%
State average from 613 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

60%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

594
State average from 613 schools:

545
Percent Tested
JUST FOR GIRLS:

100%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

12%
State average from 614 schools:

56%
Minority Rate
Here:

81%
State average from 614 schools:

49%
Region: 5

Title I: NO


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 47 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 45 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

32%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 37

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

6%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 40 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 38 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

32%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 33

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

6%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 31
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 41 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 41 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
JUST FOR GIRLS:

34%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 31

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
JUST FOR GIRLS:

17%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 31
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 33 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 33 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 38 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 38 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

10%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
JUST FOR GIRLS:

10%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 32 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 32 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 42 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 42 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

17%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 33 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 33 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 41 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 41 (97%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 10

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
JUST FOR GIRLS:

20%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 35
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

11%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 35
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 29 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 29 (97%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 25
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1535
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

339
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

2%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

8%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

31%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

52%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

6%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

90%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

19
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1820
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

360
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
JUST FOR GIRLS:

6%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

26%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

43%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

26%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

94%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

22
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

10
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1790
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

335
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

5%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
JUST FOR GIRLS:

8%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

40%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
JUST FOR GIRLS:

30%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

18%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

88%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

17
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

11
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1475
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

269
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

50%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

33%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

17%
State average:

31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

17%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

10
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
JUST FOR GIRLS:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1642
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

285
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

26%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

37%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

16%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

21%
State average:

23%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

37%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

14
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1748
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

281
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

44%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

19%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

38%
State average:

33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
JUST FOR GIRLS:

38%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

13
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

5
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

343
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

5%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

15%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

68%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
JUST FOR GIRLS:

10%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 5
JUST FOR GIRLS:

3%
State average:

4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

80%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

11
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

10
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

230
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

56%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

44%
State average:

31%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

6
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

4
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

4
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

5
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1537
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

351
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

2%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

6%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

42%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

40%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

10%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

92%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1674
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

350
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

3%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

3%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

51%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

29%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

14%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

94%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
JUST FOR GIRLS:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
JUST FOR GIRLS:

1767
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
JUST FOR GIRLS:

354
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

8%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

8%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

45%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

8%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
JUST FOR GIRLS:

85%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

8
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1393
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

245
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

83%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

17%
State average:

20%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

2
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1591
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

257
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

68%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

26%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

5%
State average:

31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

5%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
JUST FOR GIRLS:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
JUST FOR GIRLS:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

2
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1738
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
JUST FOR GIRLS:

281
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

36%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

50%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
JUST FOR GIRLS:

7%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
JUST FOR GIRLS:

7%
State average:

17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

14%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
JUST FOR GIRLS:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1499
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

273
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1636
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

284
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1783
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

288
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

234
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 71%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 7%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1423
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
JUST FOR GIRLS:

252
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 87%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 7%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1541
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

245
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 62%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 15%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1692
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

269
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 21%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 15
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

3
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 40%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 47%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1334
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

243
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 58%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 42%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1596
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

277
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 57%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 21%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1586
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

247
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 69%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1366
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

238
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 75%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1597
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

258
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 71%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 7%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1676
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

265
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 81%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 13%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

12
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
Here:

639
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
Here:

33
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
JUST FOR GIRLS:

11
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
JUST FOR GIRLS:

7
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

14
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
Here:

666
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
Here:

53
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
JUST FOR GIRLS:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
JUST FOR GIRLS:

16
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
Here:

632
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
Here:

16
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

8
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
Here:

6
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
JUST FOR GIRLS:

4
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

8
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
JUST FOR GIRLS:

5
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 16
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
JUST FOR GIRLS:

221
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 75%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 6%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 8
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 6%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 56%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1424
State average from 878 schools:

1661
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

260
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 64%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 21%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 86%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1456
State average:

1663
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
JUST FOR GIRLS:

1361
State average:

1592
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 94

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1545
State average from 808 schools:

1746
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

267
State average:

305
% in each Achievement Level 1: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 17%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 78%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1498
State average:

1743
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1383
State average:

1668
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 115

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1568
State average from 819 schools:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

243
State average:

294
% in each Achievement Level 1: 90%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 80%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1536
State average:

1807
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1525
State average:

1738
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 11

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

209
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 90%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 3
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 3

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1294
State average from 873 schools:

1641
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

222
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 93%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 1
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 86%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1284
State average:

1645
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1412
State average:

1620
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: -129

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1552
State average from 804 schools:

1777
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

247
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 72%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 83%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1545
State average:

1774
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1346
State average:

1645
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 200

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
JUST FOR GIRLS:

1431
State average from 815 schools:

1851
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

203
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 90%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 1
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 1
Percent Matched to 2006: 70%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1312
State average:

1845
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1373
State average:

1755
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: -61

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 14
Mean Scale Score
Here:

639
State average from 874 schools:

671
Median NPR: 33
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 9
Functional (max 18): 9
Initial Understanding (max 12): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 12): 6
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 17
Mean Scale Score
Here:

653
State average from 796 schools:

675
Median NPR: 41
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 8
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 12): 6
Strategies (max 10): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 10
Mean Scale Score
Here:

647
State average from 810 schools:

685
Median NPR: 26
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 7
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 10): 5
Interpretation (max 20): 10
Critical Analysis (max 14): 7
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 14
Mean Scale Score
Here:

627
State average from 874 schools:

669
Median NPR: 24
Number Sense (max 10): 4
Operations (max 12): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 2
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 3
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 17
Mean Scale Score
Here:

644
State average from 796 schools:

685
Median NPR: 32
Number Sense (max 9): 2
Operations (max 9): 3
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 10
Mean Scale Score
Here:

657
State average from 810 schools:

698
Median NPR: 30
Number Sense (max 9): 3
Operations (max 9): 3
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 3
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 9
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Palmetto, FL
  5. Just For Girls School in Palmetto, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.