City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is
39.
Other nearby schools ratings:
Kate M. Smith Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:Florida: | 45 |
Washington County: | 29 |
Chipley: | 29 |
Kate M. Smith Elementary School: | 39 |
Discuss this school with others on our active
Florida forum
Phone: (850) 638-6220 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 67
School number: 41
School type: Elementary
District Name: WASHINGTON
Grade range: PREKINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 4
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (850) 638-6279
Principal: Jerry V Register
School in Need of Improvement (SINI) Status:
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 1
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 5
Senate District: 2
School Web Address: http://kms.paec.org
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 88% |
State average from 6 schools: | 87% |
Meeting High Standards in MathKATE M. SMITH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 88% |
State average from 6 schools: | 87% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 74% |
State average from 6 schools: | 77% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 46% |
State average from 6 schools: | 49% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 72% |
State average from 6 schools: | 70% |
Making Math GainsKATE M. SMITH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 70% |
State average from 6 schools: | 73% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading KATE M. SMITH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 54% |
State average from 6 schools: | 57% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 58% |
State average from 6 schools: | 69% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 550 |
State average from 6 schools: | 568 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 6 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: A
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: C
Grade in 2007: B
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: B
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 119999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 67% |
State average from 6 schools: | 67% |
Minority RateHere: | 26% |
State average from 6 schools: | 24% |
Region: 1
Title I: YES
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 316 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 316 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 85% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 140
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 78% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 303
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 299
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientKATE M. SMITH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 81% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 304
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 299
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 237 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 237 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 84% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 104
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 81% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 230
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 226
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 83% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 230
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 226
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 51 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 51 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 26
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 67% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 48
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 65% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 49
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 49
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 209 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 209 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 84% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 92
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 72% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 197
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 193
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 74% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 198
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 193
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 68 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 68 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 64% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 36
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 43% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 65
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 64
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientKATE M. SMITH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 55% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 66
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 65
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 89% |
State average from 6 schools: | 86% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 91% |
State average from 6 schools: | 86% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 83% |
State average from 6 schools: | 82% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 44% |
State average from 6 schools: | 46% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 77% |
State average from 6 schools: | 75% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 79% |
State average from 6 schools: | 76% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 68% |
State average from 6 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 80% |
State average from 6 schools: | 73% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 611 |
State average from 6 schools: | 592 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 6 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: C
Grade in 2007: B
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: B
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 63% |
State average from 6 schools: | 64% |
Minority RateHere: | 27% |
State average from 6 schools: | 26% |
Region: 1
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 300 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 300 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 92% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 141
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 78% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 286
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 279
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 82% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 284
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 277
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 223 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 223 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 94% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 108
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 83% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 216
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 213
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 86% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 214
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 211
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 50 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 50 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 57% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 45
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 64% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 45
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 168 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 168 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 90% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 79
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 71% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 160
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 155
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 78% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 159
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 154
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 69 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 69 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 36
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientKATE M. SMITH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 41% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 66
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 62
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 51% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 65
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 61
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 84% |
State average from 6 schools: | 82% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 87% |
State average from 6 schools: | 81% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 58% |
State average from 6 schools: | 67% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 30% |
State average from 6 schools: | 33% |
Making Reading Gains KATE M. SMITH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 67% |
State average from 6 schools: | 67% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 58% |
State average from 6 schools: | 67% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 58% |
State average from 6 schools: | 57% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 47% |
State average from 6 schools: | 61% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 489 |
State average from 6 schools: | 513 |
Percent TestedHere: | 97% |
State average from 6 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: NO
Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Math: YES
Grade in 2008: C
Grade in 2007: B
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: B
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 61% |
State average from 6 schools: | 61% |
Minority RateKATE M. SMITH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 27% |
State average from 6 schools: | 25% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 307 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 307 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 82% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 148
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 76% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 301
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 296
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 80% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 301
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 296
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 230 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 230 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 79% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 110
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 81% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 227
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 223
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 86% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 227
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 223
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 53 (93%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 53 (93%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 25
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 55% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 51
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 57% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 51
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 176 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 176 (97%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 82% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 87
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 71% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 171
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 167
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 71% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 171
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 167
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 64 (90%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 64 (90%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 24
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 49% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 63
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 61
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 57% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 63
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 61
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2006-2007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 87% |
State average from 6 schools: | 77% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 86% |
State average from 6 schools: | 81% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 84% |
State average from 6 schools: | 82% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 82% |
State average from 6 schools: | 52% |
Making Reading GainsHere: | 84% |
State average from 6 schools: | 85% |
Making Reading Gains - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
Making Math GainsHere: | 79% |
State average from 6 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere: | 68% |
State average from 6 schools: | 81% |
% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 68% |
State average from 6 schools: | 62% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 ColumnsHere: | 638 |
State average from 6 schools: | 589 |
Percent TestedKATE M. SMITH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 100% |
State average from 6 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 66% |
State average from 6 schools: | 58% |
Minority RateHere: | 57% |
State average from 6 schools: | 31% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 230 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 231 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 89% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 83
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 75% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 218
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 72% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 219
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 104 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 105 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 95% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 40
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientKATE M. SMITH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 87% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 100
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 89% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 101
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 67 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 67 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 59% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 48% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 138 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 138 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 81% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 43
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 63% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 126
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 57% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 126
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 59 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 59 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 42% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 55
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 33% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 55
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2005-2006 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 83% |
State average from 6 schools: | 78% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 83% |
State average from 6 schools: | 80% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 93% |
State average from 6 schools: | 86% |
Making Reading GainsHere: | 64% |
State average from 6 schools: | 64% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 72% |
State average from 6 schools: | 72% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere: | 51% |
State average from 6 schools: | 55% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 ColumnsHere: | 446 |
State average from 6 schools: | 435 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 6 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 65% |
State average from 6 schools: | 57% |
Minority RateHere: | 56% |
State average from 6 schools: | 31% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 238 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 239 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 94% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 80
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 71% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 229
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 70% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 230
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 116 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 116 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 94% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 35
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 87% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 114
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 82% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 114
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 74 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 75 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 28
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientKATE M. SMITH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 42% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 71
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 49% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 72
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 136 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 137 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 93% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 44
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 56% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 129
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 52% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 130
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 72 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 72 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 27
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientKATE M. SMITH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 47% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 72
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientKATE M. SMITH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 42% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 72
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
2004-2005 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 79% |
State average from 6 schools: | 74% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 76% |
State average from 6 schools: | 76% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 83% |
State average from 6 schools: | 78% |
Making Reading GainsHere: | 65% |
State average from 6 schools: | 65% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 73% |
State average from 6 schools: | 71% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere: | 56% |
State average from 6 schools: | 58% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 ColumnsHere: | 432 |
State average from 6 schools: | 421 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 6 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 69% |
State average from 6 schools: | 59% |
Minority RateHere: | 57% |
State average from 6 schools: | 31% |
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1427 |
State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 321 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 11% |
State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 37% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 38% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 5KATE M. SMITH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 6% |
State average: | 8% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 80% |
State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9KATE M. SMITH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 5 |
State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1606 |
State average: | 1604 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 324 |
State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 16% |
State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2KATE M. SMITH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 11% |
State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 29% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 37% |
State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 73% |
State average: | 72% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1570 |
State average: | 1659 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 296 |
State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 23% |
State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 17% |
State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 33% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 21% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 59% |
State average: | 70% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1537 |
State average: | 1716 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 280 |
State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 32% |
State average: | 19% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 22% |
State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 39% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 46% |
State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1673 |
State average: | 1810 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 291 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 24% |
State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 31% |
State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 36% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 45% |
State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1824 |
State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 297 |
State average: | 308 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 28% |
State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 35% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 25% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 10% |
State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 37% |
State average: | 52% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 2035 |
State average: | 1922 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 333 |
State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 31% |
State average: | 30% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 41% |
State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 14% |
State average: | 12% |
% in each Achievement Level 5KATE M. SMITH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 9% |
State average: | 7% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 64% |
State average: | 45% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1973 |
State average: | 1938 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 309 |
State average: | 302 |
Percent PassingHere: | 59% |
State average: | 56% |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 28% |
State average: | 35% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 35% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 23% |
State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 36% |
State average: | 37% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2KATE M. SMITH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 7 |
State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 298 |
State average: | 321 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 30% |
State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 2KATE M. SMITH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 35% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 30% |
State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 35% |
State average: | 51% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 290 |
State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 34% |
State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 2KATE M. SMITH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 44% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 17% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 22% |
State average: | 41% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 276 |
State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 60% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 20% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 3KATE M. SMITH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 20% |
State average: | 30% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 20% |
State average: | 36% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1523 |
State average: | 1481 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 348 |
State average: | 339 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 32% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 35% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 5Here: | 17% |
State average: | 16% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 84% |
State average: | 79% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1613 |
State average: | 1585 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 336 |
State average: | 330 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 17% |
State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 28% |
State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 33% |
State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 5Here: | 14% |
State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 75% |
State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1617 |
State average: | 1674 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500KATE M. SMITH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 322 |
State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 20% |
State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 31% |
State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 27% |
State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 18% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 49% |
State average: | 63% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1515 |
State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500KATE M. SMITH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 273 |
State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 47% |
State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 27% |
State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 24% |
State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 26% |
State average: | 55% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1667 |
State average: | 1786 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 276 |
State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 43% |
State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 2KATE M. SMITH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 24% |
State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 28% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 32% |
State average: | 57% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1852 |
State average: | 1892 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 309 |
State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 19% |
State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 25% |
State average: | 21% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 43% |
State average: | 38% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 10% |
State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 5KATE M. SMITH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 3% |
State average: | 10% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 56% |
State average: | 64% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12KATE M. SMITH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 5 |
State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1981 |
State average: | 1925 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 319 |
State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 14% |
State average: | 22% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 55% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 24% |
State average: | 21% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 83% |
State average: | 61% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6KATE M. SMITH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 6 |
State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 2033 |
State average: | 1995 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 335 |
State average: | 326 |
Percent PassingHere: | 93% |
State average: | 80% |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 18% |
State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 29% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 46% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 80% |
State average: | 69% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1397 |
State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 316 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1653 |
State average: | 1605 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 332 |
State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 03%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreKATE M. SMITH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 1590 |
State average: | 1656 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 299 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreKATE M. SMITH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 1582 |
State average: | 1707 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 288 |
State average: | 310 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1726 |
State average: | 1800 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 301 |
State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1783 |
State average: | 1864 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 288 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1975 |
State average: | 1907 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 322 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 301 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 28%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 276 |
State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 23%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 267 |
State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 63%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1475 |
State average: | 1476 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 338 |
State average: | 338 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1669 |
State average: | 1578 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 349 |
State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1671 |
State average: | 1675 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 334 |
State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1499 |
State average: | 1679 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 269 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 57%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 20%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1702 |
State average: | 1799 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 284 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1795 |
State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 295 |
State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreKATE M. SMITH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 1980 |
State average: | 1925 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 319 |
State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 144
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 4 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Unscore - Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 46%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 78%
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 162
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 4 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 45%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 82%
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreKATE M. SMITH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 1419 |
State average: | 1396 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 320 |
State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1592 |
State average: | 1582 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 321 |
State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreKATE M. SMITH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 1594 |
State average: | 1627 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 300 |
State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1597 |
State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 291 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreKATE M. SMITH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 1699 |
State average: | 1775 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 296 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1793 |
State average: | 1857 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500KATE M. SMITH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 290 |
State average: | 304 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 2047 |
State average: | 1894 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 335 |
State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 2047 |
State average: | 1935 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 322 |
State average: | 302 |
Percent Passing: 68%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 293 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 26%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 282 |
State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 27%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500KATE M. SMITH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 251 |
State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 71%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 5%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1467 |
State average: | 1461 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 336 |
State average: | 335 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1563 |
State average: | 1563 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500KATE M. SMITH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 324 |
State average: | 325 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1648 |
State average: | 1668 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 329 |
State average: | 333 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1587 |
State average: | 1670 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 290 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 37%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1708 |
State average: | 1801 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 286 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1829 |
State average: | 1882 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500KATE M. SMITH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 304 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 2005 |
State average: | 1915 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 326 |
State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 2049 |
State average: | 1984 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 339 |
State average: | 323 |
Percent Passing: 95%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of StudentsKATE M. SMITH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 154 |
State average: | 103 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 632 |
State average from 3241 schools: | 633 |
Literary (max 18)KATE M. SMITH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 13 |
State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 655 |
State average from 3233 schools: | 653 |
Informational (max 18)KATE M. SMITH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 13 |
State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)KATE M. SMITH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 9 |
State average: | 8 |
Strategies (max 10)KATE M. SMITH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 7 |
State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere: | 222 |
State average: | 101 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 661 |
State average from 3309 schools: | 667 |
Literary (max 18)KATE M. SMITH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 12 |
State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)KATE M. SMITH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 12 |
State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)KATE M. SMITH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 9 |
State average: | 9 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Strategies (max 10)KATE M. SMITH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 6 |
State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of StudentsKATE M. SMITH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 168 |
State average: | 190 |
Mean Scale ScoreKATE M. SMITH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 656 |
State average from 2604 schools: | 671 |
Informational (max 18)KATE M. SMITH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 11 |
State average: | 12 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere: | 154 |
State average: | 201 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 667 |
State average from 2487 schools: | 682 |
Median NPRKATE M. SMITH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 54 |
State average: | 66 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)KATE M. SMITH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 9 |
State average: | 9 |
Interpretation (max 20)KATE M. SMITH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 13 |
State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere: | 161 |
State average: | 192 |
Mean Scale ScoreKATE M. SMITH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 675 |
State average from 2497 schools: | 687 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)KATE M. SMITH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 9 |
State average: | 10 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere: | 108 |
State average: | 273 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 715 |
State average from 2275 schools: | 694 |
Informational (max 18)KATE M. SMITH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 13 |
State average: | 11 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Strategies (max 10)KATE M. SMITH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 6 |
State average: | 5 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 726 |
State average from 2096 schools: | 709 |
Functional (max 18)KATE M. SMITH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 15 |
State average: | 14 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)KATE M. SMITH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 9 |
State average: | 8 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 151
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 280 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 44%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 54%
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 159
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 262 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 31%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - CombinedKATE M. SMITH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 4 |
State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 72%
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 88
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedKATE M. SMITH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 313 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 61%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 34%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 92%
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1300 |
State average: | 1342 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 300 |
State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1622 |
State average from 1875 schools: | 1542 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 327 |
State average: | 313 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 98%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1636 |
State average: | 1546 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1466 |
State average: | 1397 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 169
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1764 |
State average from 1873 schools: | 1629 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 330 |
State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 95%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1763 |
State average: | 1632 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1595 |
State average: | 1532 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 168
2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 338 |
State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 10
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1356 |
State average: | 1413 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 312 |
State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1610 |
State average from 1874 schools: | 1525 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 335 |
State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 99%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1614 |
State average: | 1528 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1483 |
State average: | 1414 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 131
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1774 |
State average from 1872 schools: | 1647 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 355 |
State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 24%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 95%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1772 |
State average: | 1649 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1645 |
State average: | 1519 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 127
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 64
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 627 |
State average from 1891 schools: | 633 |
Median NPR: 54
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 83
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 653 |
State average from 1874 schools: | 642 |
Median NPR: 71
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 82
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 684 |
State average from 1870 schools: | 667 |
Median NPR: 84
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 63
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 625 |
State average from 1891 schools: | 632 |
Median NPR: 63
Number Sense (max 14): 10
Operations (max 11): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 83
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 670 |
State average from 1874 schools: | 652 |
Median NPR: 85
Number Sense (max 12): 10
Operations (max 12): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 82
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 690 |
State average from 1870 schools: | 663 |
Median NPR: 88
Number Sense (max 12): 10
Operations (max 12): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8
2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 85
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 303 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 59%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 13
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 45%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 75%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 65%
- All Cities
- Florida forum
- Florida
- Chipley, FL
- Kate M. Smith Elementary School in Chipley, Florida (FL)
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: