Key West Detention Center School in Key West, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 10.

5501 COLLEGE RD
Key West, FL 33040

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Pace-Lower Keys School (1.3 miles):

82
Sugarloaf School (15.0 miles):

43
Key West High School (2.2 miles):

39
Horace O'Bryant Middle School (2.5 miles):

33
Key West Detention Center School:

10
Key West Detention Center School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Monroe County:

50
Key West:

46
Key West Detention Center School:

10

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:



Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (305) 293-7300 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 44
School number: 294
School type: Senior High
District Name: MONROE
Grade range: GRADES 8 TO 12
School's status regarding neglected and delinquent criteria: Neglected, Residential
Principal: Raiette Avael
The function/setting of the school: Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ)
The main educational program offered at the school: Alternative Education
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 18
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 120
Senate District: 39

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 45 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 44 (96%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
KEY WEST DETENTION CENTER:

32%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26
Number of Students Tested in Math: 25
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 36 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 35 (95%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 50 (91%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 49 (89%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

25%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28 (93%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28 (93%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 30 (88%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 29 (86%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 60 (87%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 60 (88%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

23%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

18%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 39 (85%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 39 (85%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 33 (85%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 33 (87%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1887
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

310
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

8%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

31%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

46%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

15%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

62%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

16
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

6
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1898
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

307
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

18%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

36%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

36%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

9%
State average:

12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

45%
State average:

45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

11
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
KEY WEST DETENTION CENTER:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1899
State average:

1938
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

295
State average:

302
Percent Passing
Here:

38%
State average:

56%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

38%
State average:

35%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

25%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

19%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

13%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

6%
State average:

12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

38%
State average:

37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

14
State average:

15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
KEY WEST DETENTION CENTER:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
KEY WEST DETENTION CENTER:

302
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

38%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

23%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

31%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

8%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

38%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

8
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
KEY WEST DETENTION CENTER:

316
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

27%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

18%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

36%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

18%
State average:

5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

55%
State average:

36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1856
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

310
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

15%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

38%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

31%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

15%
State average:

17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

46%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1891
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

292
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

14%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

27%
State average:

22%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

41%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

18%
State average:

21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

59%
State average:

61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2011
State average:

1995
Mean Scale Score 100-500
KEY WEST DETENTION CENTER:

330
State average:

326
Percent Passing
Here:

88%
State average:

80%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

6%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
KEY WEST DETENTION CENTER:

25%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
KEY WEST DETENTION CENTER:

38%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

25%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

6%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

69%
State average:

69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1945
State average:

1907
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

316
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1779
State average:

1921
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

273
State average:

299
Percent Passing: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 56%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 13%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
KEY WEST DETENTION CENTER:

1937
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

306
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1901
State average:

1972
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

303
State average:

321
Percent Passing: 63%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 19
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

3
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 37%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 53%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1584
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

274
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1704
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

272
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 55%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1738
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

278
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 56%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 22%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1735
State average:

1935
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

265
State average:

302
Percent Passing: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 56%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 12%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

260
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 58%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 42%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1593
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

257
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 54%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 23%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1768
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

288
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 25%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1843
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

278
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1879
State average:

1984
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

298
State average:

323
Percent Passing: 58%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
KEY WEST DETENTION CENTER:

3
State average:

103

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

3
State average:

97

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

6
State average:

101

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
KEY WEST DETENTION CENTER:

1
State average:

190

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

14
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
KEY WEST DETENTION CENTER:

639
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
Here:

29
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
KEY WEST DETENTION CENTER:

9
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

8
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

10
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

5
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

11
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
Here:

657
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
KEY WEST DETENTION CENTER:

34
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
KEY WEST DETENTION CENTER:

11
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

11
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

31
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
Here:

667
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
Here:

36
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

8
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

5
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

4
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

35
State average:

237
Mean Scale Score
Here:

677
State average from 2096 schools:

709
Median NPR
Here:

36
State average:

65
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

14
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

12
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 2

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 34
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

237
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 56%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 21%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 8
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 6%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 44%


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.