Kissimmee Charter Academy School in Kissimmee, Florida (FL) - Test Results, Rating, Ranking, Grades, Scores, Classes, Enrollment, Teachers, Students, and Report Card

City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 9.

2850 BILL BECK BLVD
Kissimmee, FL 34744

Show street view No street view available for this location

Other nearby schools ratings:

Lake Eola Charter School (14.8 miles):	98
Freedom Middle School (6.5 miles):	65
Durrance Elementary School (8.5 miles):	55
Passport Charter School (13.9 miles):	46
Boggy Creek Elementary School (0.8 miles):	36
P. M. Wells Charter Academy School (4.4 miles):	27
Orlando Tech Ace School (18.0 miles):	16
Kissimmee Charter Academy School:	9

Kissimmee Charter Academy School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:

Florida:	45
Osceola County:	33
Kissimmee:	33
Kissimmee Charter Academy School:	9

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum

Phone: (407) 847-1400 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 49
School number: 866
School type: Combination Elementary and Secondary
District Name: OSCEOLA
Grade range: PREKINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 8
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (407) 847-1401
Principal: Lori Mccarley
Regular charter school.
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 15
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 79
Senate District: 19
School Web Address: www.osceola.k12.fl.us

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	75%
State average from 54 schools:	75%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	66%
State average from 54 schools:	75%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

KISSIMMEE CHARTER ACADEMY:	82%
State average from 54 schools:	86%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	56%
State average from 54 schools:	53%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	65%
State average from 54 schools:	66%

Making Math Gains

KISSIMMEE CHARTER ACADEMY:	57%
State average from 53 schools:	68%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

KISSIMMEE CHARTER ACADEMY:	54%
State average from 54 schools:	61%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	55%
State average from 54 schools:	65%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	510
State average from 54 schools:	539

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 53 schools:	100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: B

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: N

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	59%
State average from 54 schools:	60%

Minority Rate

Here:	80%
State average from 54 schools:	57%

Region: 3

Title I: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 518 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 518 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 164
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	71%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 503
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 496

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	63%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 502
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 496
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 109 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 109 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 32
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	79%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 108
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 107

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	74%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 108
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 107
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 41 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 41 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 39
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 39
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 300 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 300 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 98
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

KISSIMMEE CHARTER ACADEMY:	70%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 288
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 287

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	61%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 287
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 287
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 311 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 311 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 97
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	67%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 301
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 297

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	55%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 300
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 297
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 87 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 87 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 29

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	46%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 81
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 81

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	35%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 81
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 81
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 39 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 39 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 37
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 37
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	75%
State average from 53 schools:	78%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	70%
State average from 52 schools:	76%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	82%
State average from 53 schools:	89%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	54%
State average from 53 schools:	52%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	73%
State average from 52 schools:	69%

Making Math Gains

Here:	71%
State average from 53 schools:	69%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	73%
State average from 52 schools:	68%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	72%
State average from 52 schools:	67%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	570
State average from 52 schools:	566

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 52 schools:	100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: N

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

KISSIMMEE CHARTER ACADEMY:	56%
State average from 52 schools:	55%

Minority Rate

Here:	76%
State average from 53 schools:	52%

Region: 3

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 471 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 472 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 122
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	71%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 459
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 449

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	66%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 459
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 449
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 122 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 122 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	85%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 33
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	78%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 120
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 115

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	76%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 120
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 115
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 36 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 36 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 268 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 269 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 67
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	68%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 259
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 255

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	63%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 259
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 255
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 274 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 274 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 68
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	66%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 264
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 259

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	61%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 264
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 259
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 84 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 85 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	45%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 77
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 76

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	40%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 77
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 76
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 36 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 36 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 36
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 36
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	70%
State average from 52 schools:	73%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	65%
State average from 52 schools:	74%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	80%
State average from 52 schools:	84%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	34%
State average from 51 schools:	48%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	61%
State average from 51 schools:	66%

Making Math Gains

Here:	58%
State average from 51 schools:	70%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	51%
State average from 51 schools:	61%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	64%
State average from 51 schools:	69%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	483
State average from 51 schools:	545

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 51 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: C

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	55%
State average from 52 schools:	53%

Minority Rate

Here:	74%
State average from 52 schools:	52%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 471 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 471 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 152
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	64%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 465
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 456

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	60%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 464
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 455
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 122 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 122 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 38
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	75%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 120
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 119

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	71%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 120
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 119
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 40 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 40 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 39
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 39
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 262 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 262 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 85
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	59%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 258
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 252

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

KISSIMMEE CHARTER ACADEMY:	54%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 257
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 251
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 278 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 278 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	91%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 99
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	57%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 274
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 268

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

KISSIMMEE CHARTER ACADEMY:	54%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 273
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 267
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 86 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 86 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 32

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	37%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 84
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 80

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	37%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 84
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 80
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 46 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 46 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 46
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 46
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 25 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 25 (94%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	7%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	20%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	27%
State average from 44 schools:	71%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	31%
State average from 44 schools:	67%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	89%
State average from 44 schools:	84%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	44%
State average from 44 schools:	63%

Making Math Gains

Here:	47%
State average from 44 schools:	68%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	40%
State average from 44 schools:	65%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns

Here:	278
State average from 44 schools:	418

Percent Tested

KISSIMMEE CHARTER ACADEMY:	97%
State average from 44 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: NO

Grade in 2006: P

Grade in 2005: F

Grade in 2004: P

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

KISSIMMEE CHARTER ACADEMY:	65%
State average from 44 schools:	51%

Minority Rate

KISSIMMEE CHARTER ACADEMY:	59%
State average from 44 schools:	56%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 117 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 118 (95%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	94%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 33
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	25%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 48
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	28%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 50
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 47 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 48 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 22
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 62 (93%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 63 (93%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 25
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 79 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 79 (95%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 24

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	24%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 33
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	21%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 34
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	13%
State average from 43 schools:	66%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	21%
State average from 43 schools:	65%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	92%
State average from 43 schools:	80%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	21%
State average from 43 schools:	62%

Making Math Gains

Here:	38%
State average from 43 schools:	67%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	16%
State average from 43 schools:	61%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns

Here:	201
State average from 43 schools:	400

Percent Tested

Here:	84%
State average from 43 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: No%

Grade in 2005: F

Grade in 2004: P

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	75%
State average from 43 schools:	52%

Minority Rate

Here:	66%
State average from 43 schools:	55%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1495
State average:	1402

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	332
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1

KISSIMMEE CHARTER ACADEMY:	3%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	17%
State average:	11%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	28%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	46%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	6%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	80%
State average:	74%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	19
State average:	17

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1614
State average:	1604

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	325
State average:	324

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	16%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	13%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	28%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	33%
State average:	29%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	9%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	71%
State average:	72%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	19
State average:	19

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	8
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	2
State average:	2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1728
State average:	1659

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	324
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	8%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	16%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 3

KISSIMMEE CHARTER ACADEMY:	29%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	38%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	9%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	76%
State average:	70%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	3
State average:	3

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	16
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	11
State average:	10

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

KISSIMMEE CHARTER ACADEMY:	2
State average:	2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1702
State average:	1716

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	310
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

KISSIMMEE CHARTER ACADEMY:	20%
State average:	19%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	17%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	32%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	26%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 5

KISSIMMEE CHARTER ACADEMY:	6%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	63%
State average:	65%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	14
State average:	14

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

KISSIMMEE CHARTER ACADEMY:	6
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	3
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1850
State average:	1810

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	325
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	16%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	14%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 3

KISSIMMEE CHARTER ACADEMY:	34%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	23%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	13%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	70%
State average:	65%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	17
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

KISSIMMEE CHARTER ACADEMY:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1936
State average:	1876

Mean Scale Score 100-500

KISSIMMEE CHARTER ACADEMY:	321
State average:	308

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	12%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	23%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	39%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	23%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	3%
State average:	3%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	65%
State average:	52%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	4
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	17
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	7
State average:	6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1860
State average:	1922

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	301
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	22%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 2

KISSIMMEE CHARTER ACADEMY:	61%
State average:	30%

% in each Achievement Level 3

KISSIMMEE CHARTER ACADEMY:	11%
State average:	26%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	6%
State average:	12%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	17%
State average:	45%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

KISSIMMEE CHARTER ACADEMY:	10
State average:	11

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	6
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1782
State average:	1938

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	273
State average:	302

Percent Passing

Here:	40%
State average:	56%

% in each Achievement Level 1

KISSIMMEE CHARTER ACADEMY:	53%
State average:	35%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	33%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 3

KISSIMMEE CHARTER ACADEMY:	7%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	7%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	13%
State average:	37%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	13
State average:	15

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	6
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	5
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	326
State average:	321

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	12%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	29%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	47%
State average:	36%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	9%
State average:	11%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	3%
State average:	4%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	59%
State average:	51%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	9
State average:	9

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	9
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	9
State average:	9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	320
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	12%
State average:	27%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	39%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	42%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

KISSIMMEE CHARTER ACADEMY:	7%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	49%
State average:	41%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	9
State average:	9

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	9
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

KISSIMMEE CHARTER ACADEMY:	7
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	280
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1

KISSIMMEE CHARTER ACADEMY:	53%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	35%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	12%
State average:	30%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	12%
State average:	36%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	7
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	6
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	6
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1474
State average:	1481

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	338
State average:	339

% in each Achievement Level 1

KISSIMMEE CHARTER ACADEMY:	4%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 2

KISSIMMEE CHARTER ACADEMY:	14%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	39%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	26%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	17%
State average:	16%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	82%
State average:	79%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	8
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	5
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	5
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1507
State average:	1585

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	312
State average:	330

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	14%
State average:	10%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	21%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	43%
State average:	36%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	17%
State average:	26%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	4%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	64%
State average:	74%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

KISSIMMEE CHARTER ACADEMY:	3
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1682
State average:	1674

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	336
State average:	334

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	13%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	25%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	27%
State average:	27%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	28%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 5

KISSIMMEE CHARTER ACADEMY:	8%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	62%
State average:	63%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	8
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

KISSIMMEE CHARTER ACADEMY:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	7
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1653
State average:	1696

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	305
State average:	315

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	27%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	27%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	31%
State average:	29%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	14%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	1%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

KISSIMMEE CHARTER ACADEMY:	47%
State average:	55%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	4
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	6
State average:	6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1791
State average:	1786

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	307
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	23%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	23%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	30%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	23%
State average:	19%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	53%
State average:	57%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

KISSIMMEE CHARTER ACADEMY:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	3
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	5
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1913
State average:	1892

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	325
State average:	320

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	7%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	28%
State average:	21%

% in each Achievement Level 3

KISSIMMEE CHARTER ACADEMY:	35%
State average:	38%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	26%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	4%
State average:	10%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	65%
State average:	64%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

KISSIMMEE CHARTER ACADEMY:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	5
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1851
State average:	1925

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	281
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1

KISSIMMEE CHARTER ACADEMY:	26%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	42%
State average:	22%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	21%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	11%
State average:	21%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	32%
State average:	61%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

KISSIMMEE CHARTER ACADEMY:	3
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	4
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	4
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	3
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1860
State average:	1995

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	293
State average:	326

Percent Passing

KISSIMMEE CHARTER ACADEMY:	67%
State average:	80%

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	33%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	13%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	47%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	7%
State average:	33%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

KISSIMMEE CHARTER ACADEMY:	53%
State average:	69%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	5
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	3
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	4
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	5
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	3
State average:	5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

KISSIMMEE CHARTER ACADEMY:	1442
State average:	1402

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	323
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1637
State average:	1605

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	329
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 05%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1650
State average:	1656

Mean Scale Score 100-500

KISSIMMEE CHARTER ACADEMY:	310
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1725
State average:	1707

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	314
State average:	310

% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1840
State average:	1800

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	323
State average:	315

% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1898
State average:	1864

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	313
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1881
State average:	1907

Mean Scale Score 100-500

KISSIMMEE CHARTER ACADEMY:	304
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1839
State average:	1921

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	284
State average:	299

Percent Passing: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 62%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 15%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	315
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	317
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	328
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1401
State average:	1476

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	322
State average:	338

% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1590
State average:	1578

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	331
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1661
State average:	1675

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	331
State average:	334

% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1677
State average:	1679

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	311
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1836
State average:	1799

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	318
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1910
State average:	1876

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	324
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1903
State average:	1925

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	296
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1881
State average:	1972

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	298
State average:	321

Percent Passing: 62%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 79

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	4
State average from 27 schools:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 43%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 73%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 48

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	4
State average from 27 schools:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 35%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 13%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 90%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 11

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	3
State average from 27 schools:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 45%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 36%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1429
State average:	1396

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	321
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1501
State average:	1582

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	306
State average:	320

% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1595
State average:	1627

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	300
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1682
State average:	1696

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	306
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1788
State average:	1775

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	313
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1887
State average:	1857

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	310
State average:	304

% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1909
State average:	1894

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	310
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1899
State average:	1935

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	295
State average:	302

Percent Passing: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	297
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	304
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1456
State average:	1461

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	334
State average:	335

% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

KISSIMMEE CHARTER ACADEMY:	1507
State average:	1563

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	312
State average:	325

% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1643
State average:	1668

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	328
State average:	333

% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1670
State average:	1670

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	309
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1762
State average:	1801

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	299
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1894
State average:	1882

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	320
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

KISSIMMEE CHARTER ACADEMY:	1913
State average:	1915

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	299
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1933
State average:	1984

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	311
State average:	323

Percent Passing: 81%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 63%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	86
State average:	103

Mean Scale Score

KISSIMMEE CHARTER ACADEMY:	640
State average from 3241 schools:	633

Median NPR

Here:	67
State average:	61

Literary (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	15
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	95
State average:	97

Mean Scale Score

Here:	650
State average from 3233 schools:	653

Median NPR

Here:	68
State average:	69

Literary (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

KISSIMMEE CHARTER ACADEMY:	12
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	10

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	14
State average:	15

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	8

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Number of Students

KISSIMMEE CHARTER ACADEMY:	96
State average:	101

Mean Scale Score

KISSIMMEE CHARTER ACADEMY:	666
State average from 3309 schools:	667

Median NPR

Here:	72
State average:	71

Literary (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	15
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	6
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	69
State average:	190

Mean Scale Score

Here:	669
State average from 2604 schools:	671

Median NPR

Here:	61
State average:	63

Literary (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	8

Interpretation (max 20)

KISSIMMEE CHARTER ACADEMY:	14
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Number of Students

KISSIMMEE CHARTER ACADEMY:	64
State average:	201

Mean Scale Score

KISSIMMEE CHARTER ACADEMY:	686
State average from 2487 schools:	682

Median NPR

Here:	70
State average:	66

Literary (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

KISSIMMEE CHARTER ACADEMY:	13
State average:	12

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	14
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Number of Students

KISSIMMEE CHARTER ACADEMY:	56
State average:	192

Mean Scale Score

Here:	691
State average from 2497 schools:	687

Median NPR

Here:	68
State average:	63

Literary (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	12

Informational (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	7

Interpretation (max 20)

KISSIMMEE CHARTER ACADEMY:	14
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	10

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	8
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	20
State average:	273

Mean Scale Score

Here:	690
State average from 2275 schools:	694

Median NPR

Here:	58
State average:	61

Literary (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	11
State average:	11

Functional (max 18)

Here:	11
State average:	11

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	7
State average:	7

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	14
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	5
State average:	5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Number of Students

KISSIMMEE CHARTER ACADEMY:	16
State average:	237

Mean Scale Score

KISSIMMEE CHARTER ACADEMY:	707
State average from 2096 schools:	709

Median NPR

KISSIMMEE CHARTER ACADEMY:	65
State average:	65

Literary (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	14

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	8

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	16
State average:	15

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	10

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	8
State average:	8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 97

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	277
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 44%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 41%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 64%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 57

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	308
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 51%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 39%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 98%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 17

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	269
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 41%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

KISSIMMEE CHARTER ACADEMY:	3
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 35%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 41%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 6%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 53%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1789
State average from 612 schools:	1849

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	287
State average:	298

% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 9: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 70%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1763
State average:	1837

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1753
State average:	1779

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 10

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1749
State average from 573 schools:	1879

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	267
State average:	291

Percent Passing: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 65%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 18: 10
Percent Matched to 2006: 95%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

KISSIMMEE CHARTER ACADEMY:	1728
State average:	1873

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1854
State average:	1876

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: -126

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	282
State average:	295

% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 13%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 13: 3
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 14: 6

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1832
State average from 613 schools:	1884

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	275
State average:	290

% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 10: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 8: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 70%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1817
State average:	1869

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1810
State average:	1821

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 7

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1888
State average from 581 schools:	1950

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	300
State average:	315

Percent Passing: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 10: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 14: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 11: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 95%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1889
State average:	1939

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1869
State average:	1901

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 20

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 10

Mean Scale Score

Here:	696
State average from 597 schools:	696

Median NPR: 64
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 10): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 14): 10
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 21

Mean Scale Score

Here:	685
State average from 575 schools:	695

Median NPR: 43
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 9
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 14): 9
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 10

Mean Scale Score

Here:	697
State average from 597 schools:	708

Median NPR: 61
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 8
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 21

Mean Scale Score

Here:	701
State average from 575 schools:	710

Median NPR: 51
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 6
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 20

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	250
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 10%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 9 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

KISSIMMEE CHARTER ACADEMY:	3
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 30%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 30%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 55%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 25%

City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DC	DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID
IL	IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	MD
ME	MI	MN	MO	MS	MT	NC
ND	NE	NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY
OH	OK	OR	PA	RI	SC	SD
TN	TX	UT	VA	VT	WA	WI
WV	WY

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID	IL
IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	ME	MI
MN	MO	MS	MT	NC	ND	NE
NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	SD	TN	TX
VA	VT	WA	WI	WV	WY

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID	IL
IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	ME	MI
MN	MO	MS	MT	NC	ND	NE
NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	SD	TN	TX
VA	VT	WA	WI	WV	WY

AL	AZ	CA	CO	CT	DE	FL
GA	HI	IA	ID	IL	IN	KS
LA	MA	MD	MI	MN	MO	NC
NE	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	TN	TX	UT
VA	WA	WI	WV

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DC	DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID
IL	IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	MD
ME	MI	MN	MO	MS	MT	NC
ND	NE	NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY
OH	OK	OR	PA	RI	SC	SD
TN	TX	UT	VA	VT	WA	WI
WV	WY