Lake Placid Elementary School in Lake Placid, Florida (FL) - Test Results, Rating, Ranking, Grades, Scores, Classes, Enrollment, Teachers, Students, and Report Card

City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 70.

101 GREEN DRAGON DR
Lake Placid, FL 33852

Show street view No street view available for this location

Other nearby schools ratings:

The Kindergarten Learning Center School (15.7 miles):	99
Lake Placid Elementary School:	70
Cracker Trail Elementary School (9.8 miles):	59
Sun 'n Lake Elementary School (18.5 miles):	55
Fred Wild Elementary School (13.4 miles):	43
Lake Country Elementary School (6.7 miles):	42
Woodlawn Elementary School (15.4 miles):	24
Highlands County Superintendent's Office School (15.2 miles):	1

Lake Placid Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:

Florida:	45
Highlands County:	44
Lake Placid:	50
Lake Placid Elementary School:	70

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum

Phone: (863) 699-5070 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 28
School number: 211
School type: Elementary
District Name: HIGHLANDS
Grade range: KINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 5
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (863) 699-5079
Principal: Carole Disler
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 16
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 77
Senate District: 17
School Web Address: http://www.highlands.k12.fl.us/~lpe/

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	91%
State average from 734 schools:	73%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	90%
State average from 734 schools:	77%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	95%
State average from 734 schools:	85%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	80%
State average from 733 schools:	53%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	71%
State average from 734 schools:	64%

Making Math Gains

Here:	59%
State average from 733 schools:	67%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	66%
State average from 734 schools:	58%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	59%
State average from 734 schools:	66%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	611
State average from 734 schools:	543

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 733 schools:	100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: B

Grade in 119999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	34%
State average from 734 schools:	57%

Minority Rate

Here:	14%
State average from 735 schools:	46%

Region: 4

Title I: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 317 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 315 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 96
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	86%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 302
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 296

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	84%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 302
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 295
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 278 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 276 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 82
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	87%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 266
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 261

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	83%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 266
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 260
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 108 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 108 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

LAKE PLACID ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	88%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 34
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

LAKE PLACID ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	87%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 100
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 98

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	72%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 100
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 97
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 66 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 66 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	70%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 64
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 63

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	64%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 64
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 63
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

LAKE PLACID ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	95%
State average from 735 schools:	74%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	90%
State average from 734 schools:	76%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	95%
State average from 734 schools:	88%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	76%
State average from 734 schools:	51%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	68%
State average from 734 schools:	67%

Making Math Gains

Here:	57%
State average from 735 schools:	68%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	65%
State average from 735 schools:	65%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	52%
State average from 734 schools:	67%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	598
State average from 734 schools:	557

Percent Tested

Here:	99%
State average from 734 schools:	100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: B

Grade in 1999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

LAKE PLACID ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	29%
State average from 734 schools:	53%

Minority Rate

Here:	13%
State average from 734 schools:	45%

Region: 4

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 331 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 331 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	94%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 120
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	88%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 323
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 317

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	82%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 322
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 316
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 283 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 283 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	94%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 101
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	89%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 280
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 275

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	82%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 279
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 274
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 96 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 96 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 38

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	78%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 93
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 92

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	68%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 92
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 91
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 86 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 86 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	71%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 85
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 84

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	62%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 85
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 84
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	90%
State average from 711 schools:	73%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	89%
State average from 711 schools:	75%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

LAKE PLACID ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	94%
State average from 711 schools:	82%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	63%
State average from 711 schools:	47%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	73%
State average from 711 schools:	65%

Making Math Gains

Here:	72%
State average from 711 schools:	70%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	59%
State average from 711 schools:	62%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

LAKE PLACID ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	70%
State average from 711 schools:	69%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	610
State average from 711 schools:	544

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 711 schools:	100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: B

Grade in 1999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	29%
State average from 711 schools:	50%

Minority Rate

Here:	16%
State average from 711 schools:	44%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 315 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 315 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 100
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	84%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 301
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 293

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	81%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 301
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 293
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 267 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 267 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 91
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	84%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 256
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 249

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	83%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 256
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 249
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 22
Number of Students Tested in Math: 22
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 97 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 97 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 24

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	70%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 88
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 84

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	64%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 88
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 84
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 90 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 90 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 34

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	68%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 84
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 82

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	60%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 84
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 82
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	79%
State average from 652 schools:	75%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	74%
State average from 652 schools:	73%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	85%
State average from 652 schools:	83%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	50%
State average from 650 schools:	46%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	80%
State average from 652 schools:	72%

Making Reading Gains - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded

Making Math Gains

Here:	74%
State average from 652 schools:	68%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	75%
State average from 652 schools:	67%

% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	94%
State average from 652 schools:	69%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns

Here:	611
State average from 652 schools:	553

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 652 schools:	100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	62%
State average from 655 schools:	53%

Minority Rate

Here:	49%
State average from 655 schools:	55%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 362 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 362 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	92%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 114
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	74%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 340
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	69%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 340
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 186 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 186 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 58
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	80%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 180
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	76%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 180
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 50 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 50 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 117 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 117 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	94%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 36
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	69%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 105
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	65%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 105
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 227 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 227 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

LAKE PLACID ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	91%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 68
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	64%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 208
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	63%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 208
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 54 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 54 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

LAKE PLACID ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	44%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 54
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

LAKE PLACID ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	48%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 54
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	75%
State average from 643 schools:	75%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	66%
State average from 643 schools:	71%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	77%
State average from 643 schools:	81%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	61%
State average from 643 schools:	63%

Making Math Gains

LAKE PLACID ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	70%
State average from 643 schools:	69%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	45%
State average from 643 schools:	61%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns

Here:	394
State average from 643 schools:	420

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 643 schools:	100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: NO

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	64%
State average from 644 schools:	54%

Minority Rate

Here:	48%
State average from 644 schools:	54%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 350 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 351 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	88%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 90
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	69%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 315
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	61%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 315
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 191 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 191 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	85%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 46

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	76%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 180
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	69%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 180
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 42 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 42 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 12

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	61%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 41

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	34%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 41
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 104 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 105 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 29

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	60%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 84
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	57%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 84
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 218 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 218 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	85%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 65
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	59%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 188
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	47%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 188
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 54 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 54 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 15

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	44%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 50
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	38%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 50
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	72%
State average from 631 schools:	74%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	64%
State average from 631 schools:	69%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	63%
State average from 631 schools:	80%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	67%
State average from 631 schools:	66%

Making Math Gains

Here:	75%
State average from 631 schools:	69%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	65%
State average from 631 schools:	60%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns

Here:	406
State average from 631 schools:	417

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 631 schools:	100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	55%
State average from 631 schools:	54%

Minority Rate

Here:	46%
State average from 631 schools:	52%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1545
State average:	1402

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	340
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	4%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	12%
State average:	11%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	33%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	34%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 5

LAKE PLACID ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	18%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	84%
State average:	74%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	19
State average:	17

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1677
State average:	1604

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	336
State average:	324

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	8%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	11%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	34%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	37%
State average:	29%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	11%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	81%
State average:	72%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

LAKE PLACID ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	20
State average:	19

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	9
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	2
State average:	2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1851
State average:	1659

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	346
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	3%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

LAKE PLACID ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	5%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	28%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	46%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	18%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	92%
State average:	70%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	4
State average:	3

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	18
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	12
State average:	10

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	2
State average:	2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1465
State average:	1716

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	267
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	42%
State average:	19%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	21%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	25%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	10%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	1%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	37%
State average:	65%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	10
State average:	14

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	6
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	3
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

LAKE PLACID ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	1647
State average:	1810

Mean Scale Score 100-500

LAKE PLACID ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	286
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	33%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	24%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	31%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	7%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	4%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	43%
State average:	65%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	14
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

LAKE PLACID ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	3
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1766
State average:	1876

Mean Scale Score 100-500

LAKE PLACID ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	285
State average:	308

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	32%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	29%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 3

LAKE PLACID ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	29%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	9%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	1%
State average:	3%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	39%
State average:	52%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	4
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	14
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	6
State average:	6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2130
State average:	1922

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	350
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	5%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	15%
State average:	30%

% in each Achievement Level 3

LAKE PLACID ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	35%
State average:	26%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	28%
State average:	12%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	18%
State average:	7%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	81%
State average:	45%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	14
State average:	11

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

LAKE PLACID ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	8
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

LAKE PLACID ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	2172
State average:	1938

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	345
State average:	302

Percent Passing

Here:	85%
State average:	56%

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	10%
State average:	35%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	28%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	22%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	14%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	27%
State average:	12%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	63%
State average:	37%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	17
State average:	15

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	8
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

LAKE PLACID ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	354
State average:	321

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	4%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	21%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	45%
State average:	36%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	22%
State average:	11%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	8%
State average:	4%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	75%
State average:	51%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	11
State average:	9

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	10
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	11
State average:	9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	273
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	49%
State average:	27%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	30%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	19%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	2%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	21%
State average:	41%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	7
State average:	9

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	6
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	7
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	6
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	331
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	11%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	32%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	44%
State average:	30%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	12%
State average:	5%

% in each Achievement Level 5

LAKE PLACID ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	1%
State average:	1%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	57%
State average:	36%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	10
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	8
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	8
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1587
State average:	1481

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	362
State average:	339

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	4%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	7%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	29%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	36%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	24%
State average:	16%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	90%
State average:	79%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	9
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	5
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	6
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1627
State average:	1585

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	339
State average:	330

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	4%
State average:	10%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	16%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 3

LAKE PLACID ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	34%
State average:	36%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	34%
State average:	26%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	13%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	80%
State average:	74%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1755
State average:	1674

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	351
State average:	334

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	7%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 2

LAKE PLACID ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	16%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	32%
State average:	27%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	32%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	13%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	77%
State average:	63%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	9
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

LAKE PLACID ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	8
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1476
State average:	1696

Mean Scale Score 100-500

LAKE PLACID ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	264
State average:	315

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	55%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	21%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	18%
State average:	29%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	6%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	1%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	25%
State average:	55%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	3
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	4
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	3
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

LAKE PLACID ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	5
State average:	6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

LAKE PLACID ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	1692
State average:	1786

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	282
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	36%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	26%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	27%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	10%
State average:	19%

% in each Achievement Level 5

LAKE PLACID ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	1%
State average:	7%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	38%
State average:	57%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	3
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	5
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1810
State average:	1892

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	299
State average:	320

% in each Achievement Level 1

LAKE PLACID ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	28%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	25%
State average:	21%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	32%
State average:	38%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	9%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	6%
State average:	10%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	47%
State average:	64%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	6
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	4
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2066
State average:	1925

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	344
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	1%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	6%
State average:	22%

% in each Achievement Level 3

LAKE PLACID ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	30%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	41%
State average:	21%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	21%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	93%
State average:	61%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	5
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

LAKE PLACID ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	8
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

LAKE PLACID ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	8
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	6
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

LAKE PLACID ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	2099
State average:	1995

Mean Scale Score 100-500

LAKE PLACID ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	351
State average:	326

Percent Passing

Here:	98%
State average:	80%

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	1%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	8%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 3

LAKE PLACID ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	27%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	45%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	20%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	92%
State average:	69%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	9
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	8
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	10
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	7
State average:	5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1580
State average:	1402

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	346
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 91%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 8
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1735
State average:	1605

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	346
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 06%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 07%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1781
State average:	1656

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	334
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1554
State average:	1707

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	283
State average:	310

% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1661
State average:	1800

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	289
State average:	315

% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1788
State average:	1864

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	290
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2088
State average:	1907

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	343
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2091
State average:	1921

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	331
State average:	299

Percent Passing: 77%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	344
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	270
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 19%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

LAKE PLACID ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	331
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1602
State average:	1476

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	365
State average:	338

% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 27%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 92%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

LAKE PLACID ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	1660
State average:	1578

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	347
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1729
State average:	1675

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	346
State average:	334

% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1543
State average:	1679

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	280
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1718
State average:	1799

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	289
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1803
State average:	1876

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	297
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

LAKE PLACID ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	2055
State average:	1925

Mean Scale Score 100-500

LAKE PLACID ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	341
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 26%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2082
State average:	1972

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	347
State average:	321

Percent Passing: 95%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 9
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 118

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	5
State average from 27 schools:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 12%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 11%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 88%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 225

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	4
State average from 27 schools:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 37%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 77%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 511

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	4
State average from 27 schools:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 6%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 87%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1558
State average:	1396

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	342
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 90%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1698
State average:	1582

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	340
State average:	320

% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 20
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1736
State average:	1627

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	326
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1580
State average:	1696

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	288
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1645
State average:	1775

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	286
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1781
State average:	1857

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	288
State average:	304

% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2104
State average:	1894

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	345
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2135
State average:	1935

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	338
State average:	302

Percent Passing: 81%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 24%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 9

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	329
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	273
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	336
State average:	302

% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1553
State average:	1461

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	355
State average:	335

% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1668
State average:	1563

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	349
State average:	325

% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1704
State average:	1668

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	340
State average:	333

% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1562
State average:	1670

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	284
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1728
State average:	1801

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	291
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1831
State average:	1882

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	304
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2050
State average:	1915

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	339
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 22%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2091
State average:	1984

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	349
State average:	323

Percent Passing: 96%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 91%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 9
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	120
State average:	103

Mean Scale Score

LAKE PLACID ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	654
State average from 3241 schools:	633

Median NPR

Here:	78
State average:	61

Literary (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

LAKE PLACID ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	10
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	16
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	103
State average:	97

Mean Scale Score

LAKE PLACID ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	670
State average from 3233 schools:	653

Median NPR

Here:	82
State average:	69

Literary (max 18)

LAKE PLACID ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	15
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	10

Interpretation (max 20)

LAKE PLACID ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	16
State average:	15

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	8

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	8
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Number of Students

LAKE PLACID ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	86
State average:	101

Mean Scale Score

Here:	675
State average from 3309 schools:	667

Median NPR

Here:	79
State average:	71

Literary (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	15
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Number of Students

LAKE PLACID ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	201
State average:	190

Mean Scale Score

Here:	656
State average from 2604 schools:	671

Median NPR

Here:	49
State average:	63

Literary (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	11
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

LAKE PLACID ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	7
State average:	8

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	13
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

LAKE PLACID ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	6
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	217
State average:	201

Mean Scale Score

Here:	664
State average from 2487 schools:	682

Median NPR

LAKE PLACID ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	51
State average:	66

Literary (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

Here:	11
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	10
State average:	12

Initial Understanding (max 12)

LAKE PLACID ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	9
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	13
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

LAKE PLACID ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	8
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	5
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	181
State average:	192

Mean Scale Score

Here:	673
State average from 2497 schools:	687

Median NPR

Here:	50
State average:	63

Literary (max 18)

LAKE PLACID ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	11
State average:	12

Informational (max 18)

Here:	11
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	7
State average:	7

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	12
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	10

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	512
State average:	273

Mean Scale Score

Here:	726
State average from 2275 schools:	694

Median NPR

Here:	86
State average:	61

Literary (max 18)

Here:	16
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	11

Functional (max 18)

LAKE PLACID ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	14
State average:	11

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	7

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	17
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	12
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

LAKE PLACID ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	7
State average:	5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	537
State average:	237

Mean Scale Score

Here:	735
State average from 2096 schools:	709

Median NPR

Here:	87
State average:	65

Literary (max 18)

LAKE PLACID ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	16
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	16
State average:	14

Initial Understanding (max 12)

LAKE PLACID ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	9
State average:	8

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	17
State average:	15

Critical Analysis (max 12)

LAKE PLACID ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	12
State average:	10

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	9
State average:	8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 100

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	348
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 17%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 77%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 13

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 34%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 9%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 87%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 179

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	266
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 28%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 40%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 83%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 545

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	338
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 13%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 76%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 30%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 10%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 91%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1374
State average:	1342

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	312
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1576
State average from 1875 schools:	1542

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	319
State average:	313

% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

LAKE PLACID ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	1572
State average:	1546

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1389
State average:	1397

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 183

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1637
State average from 1873 schools:	1629

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	308
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1638
State average:	1632

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1508
State average:	1532

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 130

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	313
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1436
State average:	1413

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	329
State average:	324

% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1529
State average from 1874 schools:	1525

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	317
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1527
State average:	1528

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1402
State average:	1414

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 125

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1659
State average from 1872 schools:	1647

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	331
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1657
State average:	1649

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1459
State average:	1519

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 198

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 129

Mean Scale Score

Here:	639
State average from 1891 schools:	633

Median NPR: 66
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 116

Mean Scale Score

LAKE PLACID ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	645
State average from 1874 schools:	642

Median NPR: 64
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 111

Mean Scale Score

Here:	669
State average from 1870 schools:	667

Median NPR: 74
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 129

Mean Scale Score

Here:	628
State average from 1891 schools:	632

Median NPR: 66
Number Sense (max 14): 11
Operations (max 11): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 116

Mean Scale Score

Here:	655
State average from 1874 schools:	652

Median NPR: 78
Number Sense (max 12): 9
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 111

Mean Scale Score

Here:	663
State average from 1870 schools:	663

Median NPR: 74
Number Sense (max 12): 9
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 117

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	306
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 63%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	3
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 32%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 82%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 65%

City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DC	DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID
IL	IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	MD
ME	MI	MN	MO	MS	MT	NC
ND	NE	NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY
OH	OK	OR	PA	RI	SC	SD
TN	TX	UT	VA	VT	WA	WI
WV	WY

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DC	DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID
IL	IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	MD
ME	MI	MN	MO	MS	MT	NC
ND	NE	NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY
OH	OK	OR	PA	RI	SC	SD
TN	TX	UT	VA	VT	WA	WI
WV	WY

AB	BC	MB	NB	NL	NS	NT
NU	ON	PE	QC	SK	YT