Lake Shore Middle School in Belle Glade, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 17.

425 W CANAL ST N
Belle Glade, FL 33430

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Sago Palm Academy School (10.6 miles):

45
Pahokee Middle-Senior High School (9.4 miles):

37
Pahokee Elementary School (9.4 miles):

36
Crossroads Academy School (0.6 miles):

31
K Cunningham/Canal Point Elementary School (12.1 miles):

26
Lake Shore Middle School:

17
Pahokee Elementary School (9.4 miles):

16
Clewiston Youth Developmental Academy School (16.4 miles):

6
Lake Shore Middle School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Palm Beach County:

45
Belle Glade:

25
Lake Shore Middle School:

17

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (561) 829-1100 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 50
School number: 1232
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: PALM BEACH
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 8
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (561) 829-1190
Principal: Floyd Henry, Jr.
School in Need of Improvement (SINI) Status:
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 23
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 84
Senate District: 27
School Web Address: www.edline.net/pages/Lake_Shore_Middle_School

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

39%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Math
LAKE SHORE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

52%
State average from 612 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

84%
State average from 613 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

24%
State average from 612 schools:

51%
Making Reading Gains
LAKE SHORE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

54%
State average from 613 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

68%
State average from 612 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

61%
State average from 613 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

69%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

451
State average from 613 schools:

545
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: C

Grade in 2009: C

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: D

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: D

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 119999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

98%
State average from 614 schools:

56%
Minority Rate
Here:

99%
State average from 614 schools:

49%
Region: 5

Title I: YES


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 745 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 746 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 216
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

35%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 686
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 670

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 686
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 669
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 510 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 510 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 148
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

31%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 483
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 471

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

40%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 484
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 470
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 214 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 215 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 62
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
LAKE SHORE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 184
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 182

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 183
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 182
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 731 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 731 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 211
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

34%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 673
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 657

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 672
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 656
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 136 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 136 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 30

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
LAKE SHORE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

17%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 108
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 108

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

34%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 108
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 108
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 145 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 146 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 48
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

20%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 137
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 130

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

25%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 137
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 130
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

36%
State average from 613 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

50%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

98%
State average from 613 schools:

92%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

23%
State average from 613 schools:

49%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

55%
State average from 613 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
LAKE SHORE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

62%
State average from 613 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

74%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

70%
State average from 613 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

468
State average from 613 schools:

553
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: C

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: D

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: D

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

97%
State average from 613 schools:

52%
Minority Rate
Here:

99%
State average from 613 schools:

48%
Region: 5


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 810 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 809 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 257
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

31%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 745
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 733

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 742
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 731
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 556 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 556 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 172
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

28%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 523
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 518

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 521
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 517
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 241 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 240 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 79
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 210
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 205

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 209
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 204
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 785 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 784 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 249
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

31%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 722
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 711

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 719
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 709
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 134 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 134 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

13%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 106
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 105

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

22%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 106
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 105
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 170 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 169 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 54
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

16%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 159
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 155

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

24%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 159
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 155
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

38%
State average from 603 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

54%
State average from 603 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

96%
State average from 603 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

16%
State average from 602 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

56%
State average from 602 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
Here:

70%
State average from 602 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
LAKE SHORE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

69%
State average from 602 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

71%
State average from 602 schools:

69%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
LAKE SHORE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

470
State average from 602 schools:

543
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 604 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: D

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: D

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

95%
State average from 605 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

99%
State average from 605 schools:

48%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 784 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 785 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 213
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
LAKE SHORE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

32%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 731
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 703

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 735
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 707
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 563 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 564 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 150
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

29%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 527
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 508

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 531
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 512
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 202 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 202 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 55
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

41%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 187
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 178

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 187
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 178
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 748 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 749 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 198
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

32%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 698
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 673

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 702
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 677
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 129 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 129 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

21%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 116
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 103

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
LAKE SHORE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 116
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 103
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 165 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 166 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 31
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

15%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 153
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 145

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

25%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 154
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 147
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
LAKE SHORE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

34%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

44%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

84%
State average from 539 schools:

91%
Meeting High Standards in Science
LAKE SHORE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

9%
State average from 538 schools:

44%
Making Reading Gains
LAKE SHORE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

57%
State average from 539 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
LAKE SHORE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

66%
State average from 539 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

69%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

66%
State average from 539 schools:

67%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
Here:

429
State average from 539 schools:

523
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 539 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: D

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: D

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

94%
State average from 541 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

98%
State average from 542 schools:

53%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 892 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 894 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 318
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
LAKE SHORE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

28%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 854
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

37%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 858
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 617 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 617 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 210
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

28%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 592
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

34%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 594
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 247 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 249 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 102
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

28%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 237
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 239
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 841 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 843 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
LAKE SHORE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 304
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

28%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 815
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

37%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 819
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 146 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 147 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 57
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

11%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 142
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

27%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 143
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 164 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 165 (96%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 58
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

9%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 158
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

15%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 161
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

29%
State average from 526 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

35%
State average from 526 schools:

63%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
LAKE SHORE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

82%
State average from 526 schools:

89%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

58%
State average from 526 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

69%
State average from 526 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

73%
State average from 526 schools:

72%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

346
State average from 526 schools:

425
Percent Tested
LAKE SHORE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

99%
State average from 526 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: D

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

96%
State average from 525 schools:

50%
Minority Rate
Here:

98%
State average from 526 schools:

52%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 989 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 988 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
LAKE SHORE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 318
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

24%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 956
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

29%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 950
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 672 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 672 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 208
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

21%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 656
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

24%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 654
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 290 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 289 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 102
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

30%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 273
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

41%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 269
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 950 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 949 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 310
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

23%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 919
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

29%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 914
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 152 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 152 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
LAKE SHORE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 30

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

10%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 143
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

23%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 142
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 179 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 180 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 53
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 177
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

8%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 175
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

27%
State average from 505 schools:

59%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

31%
State average from 505 schools:

60%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

79%
State average from 506 schools:

83%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

52%
State average from 505 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
Here:

63%
State average from 505 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

65%
State average from 505 schools:

66%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

317
State average from 506 schools:

397
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 506 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: D

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

93%
State average from 506 schools:

51%
Minority Rate
Here:

98%
State average from 506 schools:

50%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1386
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LAKE SHORE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

253
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

52%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

24%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

17%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

7%
State average:

25%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

25%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

10
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1637
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

284
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

35%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

26%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

28%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

8%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

39%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

14
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1737
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

279
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

44%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

27%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

23%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

6%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

29%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

13
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

6
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

265
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

55%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

27%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

15%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

3%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

17%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

7
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

6
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

5
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1558
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

283
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

42%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

29%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
LAKE SHORE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

22%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

5%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

29%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
LAKE SHORE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
LAKE SHORE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

5
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1742
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

294
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

30%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

21%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

30%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

14%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

5%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

49%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1844
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LAKE SHORE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

307
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

20%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
LAKE SHORE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

29%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

32%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
LAKE SHORE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

14%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
LAKE SHORE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

50%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1460
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

266
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 27%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
LAKE SHORE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1598
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

277
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 34%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1721
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

275
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 22%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

255
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 54%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1551
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

281
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
LAKE SHORE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1741
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LAKE SHORE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

294
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1810
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

299
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 265
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Unscore - Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 10%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 89%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1469
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

268
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1612
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

280
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1752
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

282
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 24%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

266
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 14%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1536
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

278
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1762
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LAKE SHORE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

299
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1841
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

307
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
LAKE SHORE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

239
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
Here:

646
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
Here:

40
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
LAKE SHORE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

10
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
LAKE SHORE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

297
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
Here:

660
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
Here:

48
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
LAKE SHORE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

8
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
LAKE SHORE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

7
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

5
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

228
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
Here:

667
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
Here:

45
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
LAKE SHORE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

9
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 223
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

285
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 12%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 45%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 8
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 9%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 91%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1464
State average from 878 schools:

1661
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

267
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 28%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1473
State average:

1663
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1431
State average:

1592
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 42

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1621
State average from 808 schools:

1746
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

281
State average:

305
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
LAKE SHORE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1619
State average:

1743
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
LAKE SHORE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1489
State average:

1668
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 130

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1693
State average from 819 schools:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

270
State average:

294
% in each Achievement Level 1: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 20%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1705
State average:

1807
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1575
State average:

1738
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 130

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

238
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 66%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1557
State average from 873 schools:

1641
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

283
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1565
State average:

1645
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1547
State average:

1620
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 18

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1715
State average from 804 schools:

1777
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

288
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1720
State average:

1774
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1573
State average:

1645
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 147

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1764
State average from 815 schools:

1851
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

287
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1778
State average:

1845
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1685
State average:

1755
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 93

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 281
Mean Scale Score
Here:

650
State average from 874 schools:

671
Median NPR: 44
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 262
Mean Scale Score
Here:

658
State average from 796 schools:

675
Median NPR: 45
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 9
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 12): 6
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 330
Mean Scale Score
Here:

662
State average from 810 schools:

685
Median NPR: 40
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 9
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 10): 6
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 14): 8
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 281
Mean Scale Score
Here:

651
State average from 874 schools:

669
Median NPR: 47
Number Sense (max 10): 4
Operations (max 12): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 262
Mean Scale Score
LAKE SHORE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

673
State average from 796 schools:

685
Median NPR: 59
Number Sense (max 9): 4
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 330
Mean Scale Score
Here:

682
State average from 810 schools:

698
Median NPR: 54
Number Sense (max 9): 5
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 325
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

243
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 20%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 8
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 37%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 75%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 58%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Belle Glade, FL
  5. Lake Shore Middle School in Belle Glade, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.