Lakewood High School in St Petersburg, Florida (FL) - Test Results, Rating, Ranking, Grades, Scores, Classes, Enrollment, Teachers, Students, and Report Card

City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 31.

1400 54TH AVE S
St Petersburg, FL 33705

Show street view No street view available for this location

Other nearby schools ratings:

St. Petersburg Collegiate High School (6.2 miles):	96
Clearwater High School (17.9 miles):	69
Seminole High School (13.6 miles):	54
Tampa Marine Institute School (20.0 miles):	40
Community High School (19.4 miles):	32
Lakewood High School:	31
Dixie M. Hollins High School (8.0 miles):	22
Ewes - E-Kel-Etu Camp School (18.1 miles):	3

Lakewood High School rating compared to average state and city schools ratings:

Florida:	45
St Petersburg:	45
Lakewood High School:	31

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum

Phone: (727) 893-2916 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 52
School number: 2031
School type: Senior High
District Name: PINELLAS
Grade range: GRADES 9 TO 12
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (727) 893-1387
Magnet Program.
Principal: Dennis M Duda
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 11
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 55
Senate District: 18
School Web Address: http://www.lakewood-hs.pinellas.k12.fl.us

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	45%
State average from 451 schools:	62%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	63%
State average from 451 schools:	77%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	85%
State average from 452 schools:	86%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	48%
State average from 451 schools:	48%

Making Reading Gains

LAKEWOOD HIGH SCHOOL:	48%
State average from 452 schools:	58%

Making Math Gains

Here:	69%
State average from 449 schools:	72%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	35%
State average from 452 schools:	52%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	54%
State average from 452 schools:	67%

11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	447
State average from 452 schools:	522

Percent Tested

Here:	97%
State average from 450 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: NO

Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Reading: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: Pending

Grade in 2009: D

Grade in 2008: D

Grade in 2007: D

Grade in 2006: D

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 119999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	44%
State average from 454 schools:	50%

Minority Rate

Here:	68%
State average from 454 schools:	47%

Region: 4

Title I: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 708 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 710 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 311
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	42%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 687
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 635

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	59%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 691
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 634
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 210 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 210 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 95
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	78%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 208
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 180

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	89%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 209
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 183
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 422 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 424 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 180
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	20%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 405
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 382

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	39%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 408
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 380
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 335 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 338 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	94%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 140
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	28%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 318
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 299

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	46%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 322
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 300
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 62 (91%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 62 (92%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 29
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 59
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 56
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 59
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 56
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	45%
State average from 443 schools:	60%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	67%
State average from 440 schools:	75%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	83%
State average from 443 schools:	85%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	40%
State average from 443 schools:	46%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	46%
State average from 441 schools:	59%

Making Math Gains

LAKEWOOD HIGH SCHOOL:	68%
State average from 442 schools:	72%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	39%
State average from 442 schools:	56%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	63%
State average from 441 schools:	66%

11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	451
State average from 441 schools:	522

Percent Tested

LAKEWOOD HIGH SCHOOL:	97%
State average from 448 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: NO

Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Reading: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: D

Grade in 2008: D

Grade in 2007: D

Grade in 2006: D

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

LAKEWOOD HIGH SCHOOL:	39%
State average from 446 schools:	46%

Minority Rate

Here:	66%
State average from 451 schools:	45%

Region: 4

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 720 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 722 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	85%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 374
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	41%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 695
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 664

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	60%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 700
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 669
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 236 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 234 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 129
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	73%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 232
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 224

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	89%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 231
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 221
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 379 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 383 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

LAKEWOOD HIGH SCHOOL:	73%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 182
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	15%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 360
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 340

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	40%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 366
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 348
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 38 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 38 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 24
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 37
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 37
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 295 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 299 (96%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

LAKEWOOD HIGH SCHOOL:	78%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 148
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	22%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 280
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 269

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	41%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 284
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 274
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 87 (93%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 88 (95%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	33%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 39
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 83
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 79
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 85
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 81
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	52%
State average from 425 schools:	61%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	70%
State average from 425 schools:	75%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	76%
State average from 425 schools:	82%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	47%
State average from 425 schools:	45%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	58%
State average from 425 schools:	61%

Making Math Gains

LAKEWOOD HIGH SCHOOL:	72%
State average from 425 schools:	74%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	45%
State average from 425 schools:	55%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	68%
State average from 425 schools:	71%

11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	488
State average from 425 schools:	526

Percent Tested

Here:	97%
State average from 425 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: NO

Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Reading: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: D

Grade in 2007: D

Grade in 2006: D

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	34%
State average from 425 schools:	42%

Minority Rate

Here:	63%
State average from 425 schools:	44%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 772 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 771 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	87%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 330
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	47%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 727
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 671

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	64%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 709
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 655
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 272 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 269 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	92%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 122
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	75%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 268
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 245

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	90%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 261
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 239
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 381 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 383 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	84%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 159
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	22%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 343
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 326

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	39%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 336
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 319
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 40 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 40 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 38 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 38 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 31
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 304 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 306 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	84%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 114
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	29%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 276
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 253

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	48%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 268
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 246
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 89 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 91 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

LAKEWOOD HIGH SCHOOL:	57%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 35
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 75
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 69
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 70
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 64
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	49%
State average from 370 schools:	45%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	67%
State average from 370 schools:	69%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	84%
State average from 370 schools:	84%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	43%
State average from 370 schools:	41%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	58%
State average from 370 schools:	52%

Making Math Gains

Here:	69%
State average from 370 schools:	71%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	48%
State average from 370 schools:	49%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	60%
State average from 370 schools:	67%

11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0

Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns

Here:	478
State average from 370 schools:	482

Percent Tested

Here:	95%
State average from 370 schools:	97%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: D

Grade in 2006: D

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	27%
State average from 372 schools:	38%

Minority Rate

Here:	57%
State average from 372 schools:	48%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 741 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 734 (95%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	91%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 381
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	43%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 728
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	60%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 721
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 295 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 291 (94%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	96%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 158
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	74%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 291
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	84%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 287
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 348 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 347 (95%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	87%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 176
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	15%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 342
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

LAKEWOOD HIGH SCHOOL:	37%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 341
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 29 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 29 (95%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 25
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 235 (92%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 234 (92%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	92%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 109
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

LAKEWOOD HIGH SCHOOL:	24%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 232
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	42%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 230
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27
Number of Students Tested in Math: 27
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 104 (90%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 102 (88%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	60%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 45
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	12%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 100
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 99
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	44%
State average from 360 schools:	45%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	66%
State average from 361 schools:	68%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	79%
State average from 361 schools:	83%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	53%
State average from 361 schools:	53%

Making Math Gains

LAKEWOOD HIGH SCHOOL:	71%
State average from 361 schools:	72%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	48%
State average from 361 schools:	53%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns

Here:	361
State average from 361 schools:	374

Percent Tested

Here:	95%
State average from 361 schools:	98%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: NO

Grade in 2006: D

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	27%
State average from 362 schools:	38%

Minority Rate

Here:	54%
State average from 362 schools:	47%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 926 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 915 (96%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	85%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 392
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	39%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 888
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	59%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 874
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 376 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 373 (96%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 165

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	67%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 367
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	84%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 362
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 415 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 408 (96%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	81%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 167

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	14%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 397
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	37%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 390
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 60 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 59 (96%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 28

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	25%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 53

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	44%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 52
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 39 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 39 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 18

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

LAKEWOOD HIGH SCHOOL:	49%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 37

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	72%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 36
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 306 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 301 (93%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	78%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 98

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

LAKEWOOD HIGH SCHOOL:	17%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 288
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	36%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 284
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 54 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 53 (95%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 26

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	8%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 53

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	27%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 52
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 140 (91%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 136 (89%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	67%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 43

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	18%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 124
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	19%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 118
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

LAKEWOOD HIGH SCHOOL:	48%
State average from 348 schools:	42%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	65%
State average from 348 schools:	67%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	86%
State average from 348 schools:	84%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	55%
State average from 348 schools:	51%

Making Math Gains

Here:	69%
State average from 348 schools:	73%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	49%
State average from 348 schools:	53%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns

Here:	372
State average from 348 schools:	371

Percent Tested

Here:	97%
State average from 348 schools:	98%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: No%

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	29%
State average from 347 schools:	38%

Minority Rate

Here:	54%
State average from 348 schools:	45%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1500
State average:	1402

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	333
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	12%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

LAKEWOOD HIGH SCHOOL:	5%
State average:	11%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	31%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	39%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	13%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	83%
State average:	74%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	18
State average:	17

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1728
State average:	1604

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	345
State average:	324

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	7%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	7%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	27%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 4

LAKEWOOD HIGH SCHOOL:	42%
State average:	29%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	17%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	86%
State average:	72%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

LAKEWOOD HIGH SCHOOL:	22
State average:	19

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	9
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	2
State average:	2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1750
State average:	1659

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	328
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	9%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	13%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	25%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	35%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	18%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	78%
State average:	70%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	4
State average:	3

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	17
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	11
State average:	10

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	2
State average:	2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1883
State average:	1716

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	342
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	9%
State average:	19%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	9%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	30%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	30%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	23%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

LAKEWOOD HIGH SCHOOL:	83%
State average:	65%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	16
State average:	14

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1943
State average:	1922

Mean Scale Score 100-500

LAKEWOOD HIGH SCHOOL:	316
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	27%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	28%
State average:	30%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	23%
State average:	26%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	13%
State average:	12%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	9%
State average:	7%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	45%
State average:	45%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	11
State average:	11

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	7
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1947
State average:	1938

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	304
State average:	302

Percent Passing

LAKEWOOD HIGH SCHOOL:	54%
State average:	56%

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	39%
State average:	35%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	24%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 3

LAKEWOOD HIGH SCHOOL:	13%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	5%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	19%
State average:	12%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	37%
State average:	37%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	15
State average:	15

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	6
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	7
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	349
State average:	321

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	8%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	22%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	38%
State average:	36%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	22%
State average:	11%

% in each Achievement Level 5

LAKEWOOD HIGH SCHOOL:	10%
State average:	4%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	70%
State average:	51%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

LAKEWOOD HIGH SCHOOL:	11
State average:	9

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	9
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	10
State average:	9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	310
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	27%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	29%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	33%
State average:	30%

% in each Achievement Level 4

LAKEWOOD HIGH SCHOOL:	10%
State average:	5%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	1%
State average:	1%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	44%
State average:	36%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

LAKEWOOD HIGH SCHOOL:	9
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	7
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1493
State average:	1481

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	342
State average:	339

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	9%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	11%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	33%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	27%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	19%
State average:	16%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	80%
State average:	79%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	8
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	5
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	6
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1721
State average:	1585

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	361
State average:	330

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	3%
State average:	10%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	7%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	29%
State average:	36%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	40%
State average:	26%

% in each Achievement Level 5

LAKEWOOD HIGH SCHOOL:	21%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	90%
State average:	74%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	5
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1735
State average:	1674

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	347
State average:	334

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	11%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	16%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	23%
State average:	27%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	34%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 5

LAKEWOOD HIGH SCHOOL:	15%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	72%
State average:	63%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

LAKEWOOD HIGH SCHOOL:	9
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	7
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1836
State average:	1696

Mean Scale Score 100-500

LAKEWOOD HIGH SCHOOL:	348
State average:	315

% in each Achievement Level 1

LAKEWOOD HIGH SCHOOL:	11%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	9%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 3

LAKEWOOD HIGH SCHOOL:	30%
State average:	29%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	29%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	21%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	80%
State average:	55%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	6
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

LAKEWOOD HIGH SCHOOL:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

LAKEWOOD HIGH SCHOOL:	7
State average:	6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1931
State average:	1925

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	304
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	20%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	23%
State average:	22%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	26%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	19%
State average:	21%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	12%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	57%
State average:	61%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

LAKEWOOD HIGH SCHOOL:	4
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

LAKEWOOD HIGH SCHOOL:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1980
State average:	1995

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	322
State average:	326

Percent Passing

Here:	71%
State average:	80%

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	19%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 2

LAKEWOOD HIGH SCHOOL:	22%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	19%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	24%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	16%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	59%
State average:	69%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	6
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	8
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	5
State average:	5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1486
State average:	1402

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	331
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1754
State average:	1605

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	349
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 08%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 27%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1806
State average:	1656

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	338
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1878
State average:	1707

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	341
State average:	310

% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1929
State average:	1907

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	313
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1934
State average:	1921

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	301
State average:	299

Percent Passing: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	346
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 10
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	292
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1598
State average:	1476

Mean Scale Score 100-500

LAKEWOOD HIGH SCHOOL:	364
State average:	338

% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 28%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 91%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

LAKEWOOD HIGH SCHOOL:	1708
State average:	1578

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	358
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 24%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1804
State average:	1675

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	362
State average:	334

% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1850
State average:	1679

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	351
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1938
State average:	1925

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	306
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1974
State average:	1972

Mean Scale Score 100-500

LAKEWOOD HIGH SCHOOL:	321
State average:	321

Percent Passing: 70%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 135

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	4
State average from 27 schools:	59

Unscore - Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 45%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 7%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 87%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 377

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	4
State average from 27 schools:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 6%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 76%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1539
State average:	1396

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	339
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

LAKEWOOD HIGH SCHOOL:	1767
State average:	1582

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	351
State average:	320

% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 22
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1744
State average:	1627

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	327
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

LAKEWOOD HIGH SCHOOL:	1897
State average:	1696

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	345
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 8
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1922
State average:	1894

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	312
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1975
State average:	1935

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	309
State average:	302

Percent Passing: 54%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 22%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	344
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	304
State average:	302

% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1590
State average:	1461

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	363
State average:	335

% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 29%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1748
State average:	1563

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	367
State average:	325

% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 24%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 91%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1784
State average:	1668

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	357
State average:	333

% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1866
State average:	1670

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	355
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 22%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1939
State average:	1915

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	307
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1989
State average:	1984

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	325
State average:	323

Percent Passing: 75%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	137
State average:	103

Mean Scale Score

Here:	647
State average from 3241 schools:	633

Median NPR

Here:	72
State average:	61

Literary (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	16
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

LAKEWOOD HIGH SCHOOL:	7
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Number of Students

LAKEWOOD HIGH SCHOOL:	143
State average:	97

Mean Scale Score

Here:	673
State average from 3233 schools:	653

Median NPR

LAKEWOOD HIGH SCHOOL:	84
State average:	69

Literary (max 18)

Here:	16
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	11
State average:	10

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	16
State average:	15

Critical Analysis (max 12)

LAKEWOOD HIGH SCHOOL:	10
State average:	8

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	8
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	175
State average:	101

Mean Scale Score

Here:	681
State average from 3309 schools:	667

Median NPR

Here:	82
State average:	71

Literary (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

LAKEWOOD HIGH SCHOOL:	15
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	16
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	175
State average:	190

Mean Scale Score

Here:	699
State average from 2604 schools:	671

Median NPR

Here:	84
State average:	63

Literary (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	8

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	17
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	8
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	373
State average:	273

Mean Scale Score

Here:	702
State average from 2275 schools:	694

Median NPR

LAKEWOOD HIGH SCHOOL:	69
State average:	61

Literary (max 18)

LAKEWOOD HIGH SCHOOL:	13
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	11

Functional (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	11

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	7
State average:	7

Interpretation (max 20)

LAKEWOOD HIGH SCHOOL:	15
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	6
State average:	5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Number of Students

LAKEWOOD HIGH SCHOOL:	318
State average:	237

Mean Scale Score

Here:	710
State average from 2096 schools:	709

Median NPR

Here:	68
State average:	65

Literary (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	14

Initial Understanding (max 12)

LAKEWOOD HIGH SCHOOL:	8
State average:	8

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	15
State average:	15

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	10

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	8
State average:	8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 143

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	350
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 90%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 9
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 13

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 45%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 94%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 346

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	298
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 47%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 69%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1913
State average from 612 schools:	1849

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	310
State average:	298

% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 87%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1920
State average:	1837

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1849
State average:	1779

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 72

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

LAKEWOOD HIGH SCHOOL:	1950
State average from 573 schools:	1879

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	304
State average:	291

Percent Passing: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 18: 12
Percent Matched to 2006: 84%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	2010
State average:	1873

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1966
State average:	1876

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 44

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	302
State average:	295

% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 14: 7

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1929
State average from 613 schools:	1884

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	304
State average:	290

% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 10: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 8: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 87%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1933
State average:	1869

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1889
State average:	1821

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 45

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1986
State average from 581 schools:	1950

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	324
State average:	315

Percent Passing: 75%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 10: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 11: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 81%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	2025
State average:	1939

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1986
State average:	1901

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 39

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 325

Mean Scale Score

LAKEWOOD HIGH SCHOOL:	712
State average from 597 schools:	696

Median NPR: 76
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 15
Initial Understanding (max 10): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 14): 10
Strategies (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 317

Mean Scale Score

Here:	708
State average from 575 schools:	695

Median NPR: 66
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 10): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 14): 10
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 324

Mean Scale Score

Here:	720
State average from 597 schools:	708

Median NPR: 77
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 9
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 7
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 318

Mean Scale Score

Here:	721
State average from 575 schools:	710

Median NPR: 69
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 8
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 385

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	302
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 12%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 50%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 9 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 79%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 66%

City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DC	DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID
IL	IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	MD
ME	MI	MN	MO	MS	MT	NC
ND	NE	NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY
OH	OK	OR	PA	RI	SC	SD
TN	TX	UT	VA	VT	WA	WI
WV	WY

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID	IL
IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	ME	MI
MN	MO	MS	MT	NC	ND	NE
NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	SD	TN	TX
VA	VT	WA	WI	WV	WY

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID	IL
IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	ME	MI
MN	MO	MS	MT	NC	ND	NE
NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	SD	TN	TX
VA	VT	WA	WI	WV	WY

AL	AZ	CA	CO	CT	DE	FL
GA	HI	IA	ID	IL	IN	KS
LA	MA	MD	MI	MN	MO	NC
NE	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	TN	TX	UT
VA	WA	WI	WV

AL	CA	CO	DC	DE	FL	GA
IA	ID	IL	IN	KS	KY	LA
MD	ME	MI	MN	NC	NE	NH
NJ	NV	NY	OH	OK	OR	PA
SC	TN	TX	UT	VA	WA	WI