Largo High School in Largo, Florida (FL) - Test Results, Rating, Ranking, Grades, Scores, Classes, Enrollment, Teachers, Students, and Report Card

City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 35.

410 MISSOURI AVE
Largo, FL 33770

Show street view No street view available for this location

Other nearby schools ratings:

St. Petersburg Collegiate High School (10.5 miles):	96
Clearwater High School (3.3 miles):	69
Seminole High School (5.2 miles):	54
Nina Harris Ese Center School (7.2 miles):	44
Largo High School:	35
Countryside High School (8.5 miles):	31
Dixie M. Hollins High School (8.2 miles):	22
Dropout Prevention School (0.6 miles):	9

Largo High School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:

Florida:	45
Pinellas County:	51
Largo:	46
Largo High School:	35

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum

Phone: (727) 588-3758 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 52
School number: 2081
School type: Senior High
District Name: PINELLAS
Grade range: GRADES 9 TO 12
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (727) 588-4037
Magnet Program.
Principal: Marjorie H Sundstrom
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 10
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 54
Senate District: 13
School Web Address: http://www.largo-hs.pinellas.k12.fl.us

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	45%
State average from 451 schools:	62%

Meeting High Standards in Math

LARGO HIGH SCHOOL:	75%
State average from 451 schools:	77%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	84%
State average from 452 schools:	86%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	33%
State average from 451 schools:	48%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	47%
State average from 452 schools:	58%

Making Math Gains

Here:	70%
State average from 449 schools:	72%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	38%
State average from 452 schools:	52%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	58%
State average from 452 schools:	67%

11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	460
State average from 452 schools:	522

Percent Tested

Here:	97%
State average from 450 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: NO

Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Reading: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: Pending

Grade in 2009: D

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: D

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: D

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 119999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	45%
State average from 454 schools:	50%

Minority Rate

Here:	31%
State average from 454 schools:	47%

Region: 4

Title I: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 905 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 896 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 439
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	43%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 869
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 822

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	72%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 857
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 813
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 633 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 626 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 321
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	49%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 610
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 574

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	80%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 600
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 568
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 129 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 129 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	91%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 56
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	19%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 123
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 118

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	39%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 123
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 118
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 72 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 69 (95%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 29
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 68
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 66
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 66
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 63
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 25
Number of Students Tested in Math: 25
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 439 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 434 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	94%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 196
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	33%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 417
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 392

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	60%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 412
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 390
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 20
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 101 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 100 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	89%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 46
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 96
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 91
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 93
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 88
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	44%
State average from 443 schools:	60%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	73%
State average from 440 schools:	75%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	77%
State average from 443 schools:	85%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	30%
State average from 443 schools:	46%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	45%
State average from 441 schools:	59%

Making Math Gains

Here:	73%
State average from 442 schools:	72%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	40%
State average from 442 schools:	56%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

LARGO HIGH SCHOOL:	66%
State average from 441 schools:	66%

11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

LARGO HIGH SCHOOL:	448
State average from 441 schools:	522

Percent Tested

Here:	95%
State average from 448 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: NO

Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Reading: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: D

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: D

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: D

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	37%
State average from 446 schools:	46%

Minority Rate

Here:	32%
State average from 451 schools:	45%

Region: 4

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 954 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 951 (96%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	91%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 462
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	42%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 897
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 853

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	69%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 899
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 856
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 651 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 647 (95%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 295
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	47%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 619
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 585

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	76%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 616
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 581
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 146 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 148 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	86%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 83
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	24%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 136
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 130

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	45%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 142
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 138
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 92 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 90 (95%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	73%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 55
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 82
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 82
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 80
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 80
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27
Number of Students Tested in Math: 27
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 377 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 375 (94%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	85%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 175
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	34%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 344
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 329

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	58%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 347
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 333
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 39 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 36 (90%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 115 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 119 (95%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	80%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 69
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	32%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 112
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 108

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

LARGO HIGH SCHOOL:	45%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 117
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 113
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	41%
State average from 425 schools:	61%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	68%
State average from 425 schools:	75%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	80%
State average from 425 schools:	82%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	33%
State average from 425 schools:	45%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	48%
State average from 425 schools:	61%

Making Math Gains

Here:	72%
State average from 425 schools:	74%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	44%
State average from 425 schools:	55%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	67%
State average from 425 schools:	71%

11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	463
State average from 425 schools:	526

Percent Tested

Here:	95%
State average from 425 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: D

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: D

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	32%
State average from 425 schools:	42%

Minority Rate

Here:	31%
State average from 425 schools:	44%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1053 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1043 (96%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	87%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 491
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	37%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 983
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 925

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	61%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 976
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 917
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 706 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 697 (96%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	90%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 340
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	45%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 665
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 624

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	71%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 652
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 609
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 175 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 176 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	84%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 75
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	14%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 157
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 153

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	34%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 165
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 161
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 114 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 113 (95%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	72%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 54
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

LARGO HIGH SCHOOL:	20%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 106
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 97

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	45%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 105
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 97
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 389 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 385 (95%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	84%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 170
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	26%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 356
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 331

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	50%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 355
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 330
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 48 (93%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 47 (91%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 33
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 33
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 165 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 160 (95%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	66%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 82
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	20%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 153
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 148

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	33%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 152
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 145
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	85%
State average from 370 schools:	45%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	84%
State average from 370 schools:	69%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	94%
State average from 370 schools:	84%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	63%
State average from 370 schools:	41%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	73%
State average from 370 schools:	52%

Making Reading Gains - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Included

Making Math Gains

Here:	76%
State average from 370 schools:	71%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	82%
State average from 370 schools:	49%

% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	74%
State average from 370 schools:	67%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns

Here:	631
State average from 370 schools:	482

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 370 schools:	97%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	65%
State average from 372 schools:	38%

Minority Rate

Here:	42%
State average from 372 schools:	48%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 318 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 316 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	100%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 64
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	77%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 278
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	73%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 278
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 184 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 182 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	100%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 41
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

LARGO HIGH SCHOOL:	82%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 165
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	79%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 164
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 72 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 72 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	57%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 58
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	54%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 59
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 34 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 34 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 202 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 202 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	100%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 41
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	76%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 178
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	70%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 178
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 87 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 87 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	59%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 80
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

LARGO HIGH SCHOOL:	46%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 80
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	85%
State average from 360 schools:	45%

Meeting High Standards in Math

LARGO HIGH SCHOOL:	82%
State average from 361 schools:	68%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	67%
State average from 361 schools:	83%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	67%
State average from 361 schools:	53%

Making Math Gains

Here:	69%
State average from 361 schools:	72%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

LARGO HIGH SCHOOL:	65%
State average from 361 schools:	53%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns

Here:	435
State average from 361 schools:	374

Percent Tested

Here:	99%
State average from 361 schools:	98%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	67%
State average from 362 schools:	38%

Minority Rate

Here:	43%
State average from 362 schools:	47%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 293 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 294 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	86%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 73
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	72%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 261
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	70%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 263
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 171 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 171 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	87%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 46

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	75%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 152
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	73%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 153
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 62 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 62 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 16

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	66%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 53
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	60%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 53
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 38 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 38 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 9

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

LARGO HIGH SCHOOL:	69%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 35

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	66%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 35
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 200 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 200 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

LARGO HIGH SCHOOL:	83%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 42

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	69%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 177
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	64%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 178
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 88 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 88 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 22

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	49%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 75
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	50%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 76
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	85%
State average from 348 schools:	42%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	77%
State average from 348 schools:	67%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	84%
State average from 348 schools:	84%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	70%
State average from 348 schools:	51%

Making Math Gains

Here:	73%
State average from 348 schools:	73%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	56%
State average from 348 schools:	53%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns

Here:	445
State average from 348 schools:	371

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 348 schools:	98%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	66%
State average from 347 schools:	38%

Minority Rate

LARGO HIGH SCHOOL:	45%
State average from 348 schools:	45%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1547
State average:	1402

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	341
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	7%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	4%
State average:	11%

% in each Achievement Level 3

LARGO HIGH SCHOOL:	31%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	46%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	12%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	89%
State average:	74%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	19
State average:	17

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1682
State average:	1604

Mean Scale Score 100-500

LARGO HIGH SCHOOL:	337
State average:	324

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	11%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	3%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	32%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	42%
State average:	29%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	12%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

LARGO HIGH SCHOOL:	86%
State average:	72%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	21
State average:	19

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	9
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

LARGO HIGH SCHOOL:	2
State average:	2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1768
State average:	1659

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	331
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	7%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	10%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	35%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	34%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	14%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	82%
State average:	70%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	4
State average:	3

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	17
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	11
State average:	10

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	2
State average:	2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

LARGO HIGH SCHOOL:	1815
State average:	1716

Mean Scale Score 100-500

LARGO HIGH SCHOOL:	330
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	11%
State average:	19%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	11%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	29%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	36%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	14%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	78%
State average:	65%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	15
State average:	14

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1927
State average:	1922

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	313
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	23%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	30%
State average:	30%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	30%
State average:	26%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	12%
State average:	12%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	5%
State average:	7%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	47%
State average:	45%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	11
State average:	11

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	7
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1948
State average:	1938

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	304
State average:	302

Percent Passing

Here:	57%
State average:	56%

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	33%
State average:	35%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	31%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	19%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 4

LARGO HIGH SCHOOL:	7%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	10%
State average:	12%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	36%
State average:	37%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	15
State average:	15

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	7
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	337
State average:	321

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	6%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 2

LARGO HIGH SCHOOL:	29%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 3

LARGO HIGH SCHOOL:	44%
State average:	36%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	18%
State average:	11%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	3%
State average:	4%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	65%
State average:	51%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	10
State average:	9

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	9
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	10
State average:	9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	291
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	40%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 2

LARGO HIGH SCHOOL:	30%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	27%
State average:	30%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	3%
State average:	5%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	30%
State average:	36%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	7
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

LARGO HIGH SCHOOL:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

LARGO HIGH SCHOOL:	6
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1529
State average:	1481

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	349
State average:	339

% in each Achievement Level 1

LARGO HIGH SCHOOL:	4%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	7%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	36%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	39%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	15%
State average:	16%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	90%
State average:	79%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	9
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

LARGO HIGH SCHOOL:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	5
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	6
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1634
State average:	1585

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	341
State average:	330

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	5%
State average:	10%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	9%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	42%
State average:	36%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	32%
State average:	26%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	12%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

LARGO HIGH SCHOOL:	86%
State average:	74%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1755
State average:	1674

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	351
State average:	334

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	5%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	21%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	23%
State average:	27%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	38%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	14%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	74%
State average:	63%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	9
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	8
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1816
State average:	1696

Mean Scale Score 100-500

LARGO HIGH SCHOOL:	343
State average:	315

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	11%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 2

LARGO HIGH SCHOOL:	16%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	27%
State average:	29%

% in each Achievement Level 4

LARGO HIGH SCHOOL:	26%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	19%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

LARGO HIGH SCHOOL:	73%
State average:	55%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	5
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

LARGO HIGH SCHOOL:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	7
State average:	6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1945
State average:	1925

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	308
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	12%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	21%
State average:	22%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	38%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

LARGO HIGH SCHOOL:	22%
State average:	21%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	7%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	67%
State average:	61%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	4
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	5
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2001
State average:	1995

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	327
State average:	326

Percent Passing

Here:	84%
State average:	80%

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	10%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	17%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	33%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 4

LARGO HIGH SCHOOL:	34%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	6%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	73%
State average:	69%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

LARGO HIGH SCHOOL:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

LARGO HIGH SCHOOL:	8
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	5
State average:	5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1483
State average:	1402

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	330
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1731
State average:	1605

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	345
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 05%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 08%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1713
State average:	1656

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	321
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1738
State average:	1707

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	316
State average:	310

% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1944
State average:	1907

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	316
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1904
State average:	1921

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	296
State average:	299

Percent Passing: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	320
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	281
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 27%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1554
State average:	1476

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	355
State average:	338

% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 24%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1650
State average:	1578

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	345
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1743
State average:	1675

Mean Scale Score 100-500

LARGO HIGH SCHOOL:	349
State average:	334

% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1761
State average:	1679

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	330
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1964
State average:	1925

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	314
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1967
State average:	1972

Mean Scale Score 100-500

LARGO HIGH SCHOOL:	319
State average:	321

Percent Passing: 79%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 126

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	4
State average from 27 schools:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 56%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 7%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 91%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 465

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	4
State average from 27 schools:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 73%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

LARGO HIGH SCHOOL:	1472
State average:	1396

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	328
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1669
State average:	1582

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	335
State average:	320

% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 20
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1673
State average:	1627

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	314
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1791
State average:	1696

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	326
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1908
State average:	1894

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	309
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

LARGO HIGH SCHOOL:	1915
State average:	1935

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	298
State average:	302

Percent Passing: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

LARGO HIGH SCHOOL:	314
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	293
State average:	302

% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 28%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1492
State average:	1461

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	341
State average:	335

% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1595
State average:	1563

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	332
State average:	325

% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1672
State average:	1668

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	334
State average:	333

% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1809
State average:	1670

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	341
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1921
State average:	1915

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	301
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1974
State average:	1984

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	321
State average:	323

Percent Passing: 79%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	131
State average:	103

Mean Scale Score

Here:	641
State average from 3241 schools:	633

Median NPR

Here:	68
State average:	61

Literary (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

LARGO HIGH SCHOOL:	14
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	15
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	121
State average:	97

Mean Scale Score

Here:	661
State average from 3233 schools:	653

Median NPR

Here:	77
State average:	69

Literary (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

LARGO HIGH SCHOOL:	13
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	10

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	16
State average:	15

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	8

Strategies (max 10)

LARGO HIGH SCHOOL:	8
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	124
State average:	101

Mean Scale Score

Here:	679
State average from 3309 schools:	667

Median NPR

LARGO HIGH SCHOOL:	81
State average:	71

Literary (max 18)

LARGO HIGH SCHOOL:	14
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

LARGO HIGH SCHOOL:	15
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	15
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	6
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	77
State average:	190

Mean Scale Score

Here:	682
State average from 2604 schools:	671

Median NPR

LARGO HIGH SCHOOL:	73
State average:	63

Literary (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	8

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	16
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

LARGO HIGH SCHOOL:	10
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

LARGO HIGH SCHOOL:	8
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	454
State average:	273

Mean Scale Score

Here:	692
State average from 2275 schools:	694

Median NPR

LARGO HIGH SCHOOL:	60
State average:	61

Literary (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	11
State average:	11

Functional (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	11

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	7
State average:	7

Interpretation (max 20)

LARGO HIGH SCHOOL:	14
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

LARGO HIGH SCHOOL:	5
State average:	5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	425
State average:	237

Mean Scale Score

LARGO HIGH SCHOOL:	703
State average from 2096 schools:	709

Median NPR

Here:	61
State average:	65

Literary (max 18)

LARGO HIGH SCHOOL:	14
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	14

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	8

Interpretation (max 20)

LARGO HIGH SCHOOL:	14
State average:	15

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	10

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 120

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	313
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 68%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 47%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 80%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 510

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	284
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 41%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

LARGO HIGH SCHOOL:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 71%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

LARGO HIGH SCHOOL:	1404
State average:	1342

Mean Scale Score 100-500

LARGO HIGH SCHOOL:	317
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1636
State average from 1875 schools:	1542

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	329
State average:	313

% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1646
State average:	1546

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1419
State average:	1397

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 226

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

LARGO HIGH SCHOOL:	1633
State average from 1873 schools:	1629

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	307
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1644
State average:	1632

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1535
State average:	1532

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 109

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1662
State average from 878 schools:	1661

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	303
State average:	302

% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 85%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1673
State average:	1663

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1584
State average:	1592

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 89

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	314
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1447
State average:	1413

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	332
State average:	324

% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1617
State average from 1874 schools:	1525

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	337
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1637
State average:	1528

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1509
State average:	1414

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 128

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1681
State average from 1872 schools:	1647

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	336
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1700
State average:	1649

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1548
State average:	1519

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 152

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1707
State average from 873 schools:	1641

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	318
State average:	302

% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 85%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1718
State average:	1645

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1613
State average:	1620

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 105

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 82

Mean Scale Score

LARGO HIGH SCHOOL:	643
State average from 1891 schools:	633

Median NPR: 69
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 70

Mean Scale Score

Here:	655
State average from 1874 schools:	642

Median NPR: 71
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 83

Mean Scale Score

Here:	669
State average from 1870 schools:	667

Median NPR: 74
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 72

Mean Scale Score

Here:	677
State average from 874 schools:	671

Median NPR: 69
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 83

Mean Scale Score

LARGO HIGH SCHOOL:	637
State average from 1891 schools:	632

Median NPR: 72
Number Sense (max 14): 11
Operations (max 11): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 70

Mean Scale Score

LARGO HIGH SCHOOL:	666
State average from 1874 schools:	652

Median NPR: 84
Number Sense (max 12): 10
Operations (max 12): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 83

Mean Scale Score

Here:	669
State average from 1870 schools:	663

Median NPR: 78
Number Sense (max 12): 9
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 72

Mean Scale Score

Here:	680
State average from 874 schools:	669

Median NPR: 74
Number Sense (max 10): 6
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 72

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	318
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 56%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 74%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 14
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 42%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 13%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 88%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 72%

City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DC	DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID
IL	IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	MD
ME	MI	MN	MO	MS	MT	NC
ND	NE	NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY
OH	OK	OR	PA	RI	SC	SD
TN	TX	UT	VA	VT	WA	WI
WV	WY

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID	IL
IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	ME	MI
MN	MO	MS	MT	NC	ND	NE
NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	SD	TN	TX
VA	VT	WA	WI	WV	WY

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID	IL
IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	ME	MI
MN	MO	MS	MT	NC	ND	NE
NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	SD	TN	TX
VA	VT	WA	WI	WV	WY

AL	AZ	CA	CO	CT	DE	FL
GA	HI	IA	ID	IL	IN	KS
LA	MA	MD	MI	MN	MO	NC
NE	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	TN	TX	UT
VA	WA	WI	WV

AL	CA	CO	DC	DE	FL	GA
IA	ID	IL	IN	KS	KY	LA
MD	ME	MI	MN	NC	NE	NH
NJ	NV	NY	OH	OK	OR	PA
SC	TN	TX	UT	VA	WA	WI