Liza Jackson Preparatory School in Fort Walton Beach, Florida (FL) - Test Results, Rating, Ranking, Grades, Scores, Classes, Enrollment, Teachers, Students, and Report Card

City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 84.

546 MARY ESTHER BLVD STE 1
Fort Walton Beach, FL 32548

Show street view No street view available for this location

Other nearby schools ratings:

Destin Elementary School (9.4 miles):	90
Liza Jackson Preparatory School:	84
Florida Virtual School (0.9 miles):	79
West Navarre Intermediate School (17.0 miles):	70
C. W. Ruckel Middle School (12.3 miles):	65
Ocean City Elementary School (2.8 miles):	58
Cherokee Elementary School (7.2 miles):	49
W. E. Combs School (1.2 miles):	32

Liza Jackson Preparatory School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:

Florida:	45
Okaloosa County:	53
Fort Walton Beach:	53
Liza Jackson Preparatory School:	84

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum

Phone: (850) 833-3321 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 46
School number: 9807
School type: Combination Elementary and Secondary
District Name: OKALOOSA
Grade range: KINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 9
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (850) 833-3292
Principal: Mary H Gunter
Regular charter school.
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 1
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 4
Senate District: 4

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading: 88%

Meeting High Standards in Math: 90%

Meeting High Standards in Writing: 82%

Meeting High Standards in Science: 70%

Making Reading Gains : 72%

Making Math Gains: 72%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading : 75%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math: 77%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns): 626

Percent Tested: 99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: N

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate: 18%

Minority Rate: 21%

Region: 1

Title I: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 525 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 523 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 162
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	87%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 519
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 505

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	90%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 518
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 505
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 412 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 410 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 135
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	89%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 406
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 396

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 405
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 396
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 43 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 43 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 40
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 40
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 30 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 30 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 105 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 105 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 34
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	85%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 103
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 101

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	85%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 103
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 101
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 32 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 31 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading: 91%

Meeting High Standards in Math: 89%

Meeting High Standards in Writing: 90%

Meeting High Standards in Science: 74%

Making Reading Gains : 80%

Making Math Gains: 75%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading : 84%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math: 74%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns): 657

Percent Tested: 100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: N

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate: 16%

Minority Rate: 19%

Region: 1

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 489 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 488 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 154
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	91%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 468
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 440

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	89%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 469
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 441
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 388 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 387 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 122
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	92%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 370
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 351

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

LIZA JACKSON PREPARATORY SCHOOL:	90%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 371
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 352
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 38 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 38 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 88 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 87 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 28

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	85%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 86
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 83

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

LIZA JACKSON PREPARATORY SCHOOL:	84%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 86
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 83
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27
Number of Students Tested in Math: 27
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading: 90%

Meeting High Standards in Math: 89%

Meeting High Standards in Writing: 77%

Meeting High Standards in Science: 78%

Making Reading Gains : 69%

Making Math Gains: 78%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading : 75%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math: 78%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns): 634

Percent Tested: 100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate: 15%

Minority Rate: 17%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 490 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 490 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 169
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	89%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 481
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 460

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	89%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 481
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 459
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 401 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 401 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 136
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	90%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 396
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 380

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	90%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 396
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 379
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 34 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 34 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 33
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 33
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 82 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 82 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	81%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 81
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 81

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	90%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 81
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 81
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 35 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 33
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading: 88%

Meeting High Standards in Math: 87%

Meeting High Standards in Writing: 90%

Meeting High Standards in Science: 78%

Making Reading Gains: 72%

Making Reading Gains - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Included
Making Math Gains: 78%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading: 71%

% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math: 84%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns: 648

Percent Tested: 100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate: 13%

Minority Rate: 18%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 509 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 509 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	97%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 167
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	86%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 496
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	86%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 496
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 413 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 413 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	97%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 133
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	87%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 402
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	88%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 402
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 43 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 43 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 23
Number of Students Tested in Math: 23
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 68 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 68 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 25
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 66
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 66
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 35 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading: 83%

Meeting High Standards in Math: 80%

Meeting High Standards in Writing: 91%

Making Reading Gains: 68%

Making Math Gains: 71%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading: 60%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns: 453

Percent Tested: 100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: N

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate: 10%

Minority Rate: 17%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 470 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 471 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	97%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 149
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	81%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 461
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

LIZA JACKSON PREPARATORY SCHOOL:	78%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 462
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 389 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 390 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	97%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 125

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	81%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 381
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	79%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 382
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 37 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 37 (97%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 12

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	83%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 36

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	67%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 36
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 43 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 43 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 13

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	60%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 42

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	62%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 42
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 32 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 32 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 7

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	56%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 32

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	56%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 32
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading: 84%

Meeting High Standards in Math: 80%

Meeting High Standards in Writing: 90%

Making Reading Gains: 67%

Making Math Gains: 82%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading: 73%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns: 476

Percent Tested: 100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: N

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate: 12%

Minority Rate: 17%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1548
State average:	1402

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	341
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	1%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	8%
State average:	11%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	31%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	51%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	8%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	90%
State average:	74%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	19
State average:	17

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	5
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1730
State average:	1604

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	345
State average:	324

% in each Achievement Level 1

LIZA JACKSON PREPARATORY SCHOOL:	7%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	9%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	33%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	31%
State average:	29%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	20%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	84%
State average:	72%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	21
State average:	19

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	9
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	2
State average:	2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1871
State average:	1659

Mean Scale Score 100-500

LIZA JACKSON PREPARATORY SCHOOL:	350
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	3%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	12%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	16%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	42%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	27%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	85%
State average:	70%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	4
State average:	3

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

LIZA JACKSON PREPARATORY SCHOOL:	18
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	12
State average:	10

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	2
State average:	2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1985
State average:	1716

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	361
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	2%
State average:	19%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	5%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 3

LIZA JACKSON PREPARATORY SCHOOL:	27%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	41%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	24%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	92%
State average:	65%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

LIZA JACKSON PREPARATORY SCHOOL:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	17
State average:	14

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	9
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2029
State average:	1810

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	359
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	1%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	8%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	28%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	44%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	19%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	91%
State average:	65%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	19
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2033
State average:	1876

Mean Scale Score 100-500

LIZA JACKSON PREPARATORY SCHOOL:	341
State average:	308

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	1%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	14%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 3

LIZA JACKSON PREPARATORY SCHOOL:	49%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	29%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	6%
State average:	3%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	85%
State average:	52%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	19
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

LIZA JACKSON PREPARATORY SCHOOL:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	7
State average:	6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2087
State average:	1922

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	342
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	6%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	18%
State average:	30%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	35%
State average:	26%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	35%
State average:	12%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	6%
State average:	7%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	76%
State average:	45%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	13
State average:	11

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	8
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	349
State average:	321

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	7%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	24%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	38%
State average:	36%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	22%
State average:	11%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	8%
State average:	4%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	69%
State average:	51%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	11
State average:	9

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

LIZA JACKSON PREPARATORY SCHOOL:	9
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	10
State average:	9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	357
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	30%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	41%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	23%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	6%
State average:	2%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	70%
State average:	41%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	11
State average:	9

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	9
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	10
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	8
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1654
State average:	1481

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	376
State average:	339

% in each Achievement Level 2

LIZA JACKSON PREPARATORY SCHOOL:	1%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	31%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	36%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	32%
State average:	16%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	99%
State average:	79%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

LIZA JACKSON PREPARATORY SCHOOL:	10
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	7
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	5
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	6
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1610
State average:	1585

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	335
State average:	330

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	2%
State average:	10%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	15%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	45%
State average:	36%

% in each Achievement Level 4

LIZA JACKSON PREPARATORY SCHOOL:	31%
State average:	26%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	7%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	83%
State average:	74%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1781
State average:	1674

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	357
State average:	334

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	6%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	21%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	21%
State average:	27%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	30%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 5

LIZA JACKSON PREPARATORY SCHOOL:	22%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	73%
State average:	63%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	9
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

LIZA JACKSON PREPARATORY SCHOOL:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	8
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1963
State average:	1696

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	377
State average:	315

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	1%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	5%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	25%
State average:	29%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	30%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	38%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	93%
State average:	55%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	7
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	7
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	7
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	8
State average:	6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1982
State average:	1786

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	354
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	2%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	43%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	33%
State average:	19%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	21%
State average:	7%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	98%
State average:	57%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	7
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	7
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	5
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	7
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	7
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2019
State average:	1892

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	352
State average:	320

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	5%
State average:	21%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	39%
State average:	38%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	29%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	27%
State average:	10%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	95%
State average:	64%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	8
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	8
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

LIZA JACKSON PREPARATORY SCHOOL:	8
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	9
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	7
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1981
State average:	1925

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	319
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	19%
State average:	22%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	56%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	25%
State average:	21%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	81%
State average:	61%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	4
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	5
State average:	4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

LIZA JACKSON PREPARATORY SCHOOL:	1558
State average:	1402

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	343
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 8
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1788
State average:	1605

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	355
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 02%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 08%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 22%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 90%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1868
State average:	1656

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	349
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 2: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 96%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1934
State average:	1707

Mean Scale Score 100-500

LIZA JACKSON PREPARATORY SCHOOL:	352
State average:	310

% in each Achievement Level 2: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 96%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1976
State average:	1800

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	349
State average:	315

% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 94%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

LIZA JACKSON PREPARATORY SCHOOL:	2042
State average:	1864

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	343
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	346
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 10
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	364
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 10
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 11

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1668
State average:	1476

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	380
State average:	338

% in each Achievement Level 2: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 98%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1669
State average:	1578

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	349
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 22%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1784
State average:	1675

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	357
State average:	334

% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

LIZA JACKSON PREPARATORY SCHOOL:	1932
State average:	1679

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	370
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 22%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 95%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1952
State average:	1799

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	346
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2033
State average:	1876

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	355
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 32%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 93%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 86

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	4
State average from 27 schools:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 41%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 85%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 71

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	4
State average from 27 schools:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 35%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 6%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 94%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1605
State average:	1396

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	350
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1750
State average:	1582

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	348
State average:	320

% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 94%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 21
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

LIZA JACKSON PREPARATORY SCHOOL:	1786
State average:	1627

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	334
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 91%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1934
State average:	1696

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	351
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 92%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1971
State average:	1775

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	348
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2000
State average:	1857

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	334
State average:	304

% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	342
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 60%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	358
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 54%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 10
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 10
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 10

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

LIZA JACKSON PREPARATORY SCHOOL:	1679
State average:	1461

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	382
State average:	335

% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 38%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 96%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1668
State average:	1563

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	349
State average:	325

% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1753
State average:	1668

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	351
State average:	333

% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1894
State average:	1670

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	361
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 90%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1956
State average:	1801

Mean Scale Score 100-500

LIZA JACKSON PREPARATORY SCHOOL:	347
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 23%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2013
State average:	1882

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	350
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 22%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 94%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Number of Students

LIZA JACKSON PREPARATORY SCHOOL:	55
State average:	103

Mean Scale Score

Here:	652
State average from 3241 schools:	633

Median NPR

Here:	76
State average:	61

Literary (max 18)

LIZA JACKSON PREPARATORY SCHOOL:	14
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

LIZA JACKSON PREPARATORY SCHOOL:	10
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	16
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

LIZA JACKSON PREPARATORY SCHOOL:	7
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Number of Students

LIZA JACKSON PREPARATORY SCHOOL:	88
State average:	97

Mean Scale Score

Here:	673
State average from 3233 schools:	653

Median NPR

Here:	84
State average:	69

Literary (max 18)

LIZA JACKSON PREPARATORY SCHOOL:	15
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

LIZA JACKSON PREPARATORY SCHOOL:	11
State average:	10

Interpretation (max 20)

LIZA JACKSON PREPARATORY SCHOOL:	17
State average:	15

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	8

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	8
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	88
State average:	101

Mean Scale Score

LIZA JACKSON PREPARATORY SCHOOL:	686
State average from 3309 schools:	667

Median NPR

LIZA JACKSON PREPARATORY SCHOOL:	85
State average:	71

Literary (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	16
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Number of Students

LIZA JACKSON PREPARATORY SCHOOL:	91
State average:	190

Mean Scale Score

Here:	708
State average from 2604 schools:	671

Median NPR

Here:	89
State average:	63

Literary (max 18)

Here:	16
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	16
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	8

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	18
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	11
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	9
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	87
State average:	201

Mean Scale Score

Here:	712
State average from 2487 schools:	682

Median NPR

Here:	87
State average:	66

Literary (max 18)

Here:	16
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

LIZA JACKSON PREPARATORY SCHOOL:	14
State average:	12

Initial Understanding (max 12)

LIZA JACKSON PREPARATORY SCHOOL:	11
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	16
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	8
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	82
State average:	192

Mean Scale Score

LIZA JACKSON PREPARATORY SCHOOL:	721
State average from 2497 schools:	687

Median NPR

Here:	88
State average:	63

Literary (max 18)

LIZA JACKSON PREPARATORY SCHOOL:	15
State average:	12

Informational (max 18)

Here:	16
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

LIZA JACKSON PREPARATORY SCHOOL:	16
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	7

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	16
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	12
State average:	10

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	9
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 88

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	308
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 58%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 9
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 13

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 35%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 66%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 82

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	322
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 67%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 34%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 7%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 89%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1633
State average:	1342

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	355
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 23%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 90%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 8
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1758
State average from 1875 schools:	1542

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	350
State average:	313

% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1753
State average:	1546

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1533
State average:	1397

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 221

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

LIZA JACKSON PREPARATORY SCHOOL:	1821
State average from 1873 schools:	1629

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	341
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1816
State average:	1632

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1704
State average:	1532

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 112

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

LIZA JACKSON PREPARATORY SCHOOL:	1868
State average from 878 schools:	1661

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	340
State average:	302

% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 8
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 85%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1853
State average:	1663

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

LIZA JACKSON PREPARATORY SCHOOL:	1773
State average:	1592

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 80

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1957
State average from 808 schools:	1746

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	345
State average:	305

% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1950
State average:	1743

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

LIZA JACKSON PREPARATORY SCHOOL:	1842
State average:	1668

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 108

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	2014
State average from 819 schools:	1810

Mean Scale Score 100-500

LIZA JACKSON PREPARATORY SCHOOL:	337
State average:	294

% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 9
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1997
State average:	1807

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1950
State average:	1738

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 47

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	344
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 10
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	358
State average:	290

% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 10
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

LIZA JACKSON PREPARATORY SCHOOL:	1639
State average:	1413

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	373
State average:	324

% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 32%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 99%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

LIZA JACKSON PREPARATORY SCHOOL:	1678
State average from 1874 schools:	1525

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	351
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1671
State average:	1528

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1559
State average:	1414

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 112

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1748
State average from 1872 schools:	1647

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	350
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 94%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

LIZA JACKSON PREPARATORY SCHOOL:	1743
State average:	1649

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1663
State average:	1519

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 80

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1875
State average from 873 schools:	1641

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	357
State average:	302

% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 19%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 84%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1866
State average:	1645

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1731
State average:	1620

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 135

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1920
State average from 804 schools:	1777

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	339
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1916
State average:	1774

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1810
State average:	1645

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 105

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	2011
State average from 815 schools:	1851

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	350
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 30%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 8
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

LIZA JACKSON PREPARATORY SCHOOL:	2005
State average:	1845

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1931
State average:	1755

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 74

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 72

Mean Scale Score

Here:	659
State average from 1891 schools:	633

Median NPR: 81
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 15
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 12): 10
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 88

Mean Scale Score

Here:	663
State average from 1874 schools:	642

Median NPR: 78
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 15
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 17
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 88

Mean Scale Score

Here:	687
State average from 1870 schools:	667

Median NPR: 86
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 15
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 17
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 87

Mean Scale Score

LIZA JACKSON PREPARATORY SCHOOL:	697
State average from 874 schools:	671

Median NPR: 83
Literary (max 18): 16
Informational (max 18): 15
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 12): 10
Strategies (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 88

Mean Scale Score

Here:	702
State average from 796 schools:	675

Median NPR: 82
Literary (max 18): 16
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 84

Mean Scale Score

Here:	717
State average from 810 schools:	685

Median NPR: 86
Literary (max 18): 16
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 15
Initial Understanding (max 10): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 17
Critical Analysis (max 14): 11
Strategies (max 10): 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 72

Mean Scale Score

Here:	663
State average from 1891 schools:	632

Median NPR: 87
Number Sense (max 14): 12
Operations (max 11): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 88

Mean Scale Score

Here:	678
State average from 1874 schools:	652

Median NPR: 89
Number Sense (max 12): 11
Operations (max 12): 10
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 7
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 88

Mean Scale Score

Here:	690
State average from 1870 schools:	663

Median NPR: 88
Number Sense (max 12): 10
Operations (max 12): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 87

Mean Scale Score

Here:	705
State average from 874 schools:	669

Median NPR: 88
Number Sense (max 10): 8
Operations (max 12): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 7
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 88

Mean Scale Score

Here:	712
State average from 796 schools:	685

Median NPR: 85
Number Sense (max 9): 6
Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 7
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 7
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 84

Mean Scale Score

Here:	732
State average from 810 schools:	698

Median NPR: 90
Number Sense (max 9): 8
Operations (max 9): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 6
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 87

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	325
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 77%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 15
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

LIZA JACKSON PREPARATORY SCHOOL:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 43%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 83%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 75%

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 84

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	342
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 15%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 73%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 13
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 30%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 96%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 87%

City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

AB	BC	MB	NB	NL	NS	NT
NU	ON	PE	QC	SK	YT