Madison County Excel Alternative School in Madison, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 46.

372 NW MARION ST.
Madison, FL 32340

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Madison County Excel Alternative School (0.7 miles):

80
Madison County High School (0.1 miles):

63
Madison County Excel Alternative School:

46
Madison County Central School (7.8 miles):

16
Madison County Excel Alternative School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Madison County:

43
Madison:

50
Madison County Excel Alternative:

46

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (850) 973-5054 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 40
School number: 950
School type: Senior High
District Name: MADISON
Grade range: GRADES 5 TO 12
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (850) 973-5047
Principal: Maceo Howell
The function/setting of the school: Alternative to Expulsion
The main educational program offered at the school: Alternative Education
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 4
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 10
Senate District: 6

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

92%
State average from 13 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

85%
State average from 13 schools:

78%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

87%
State average from 13 schools:

82%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

67%
State average from 13 schools:

53%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

75%
State average from 13 schools:

63%
Making Math Gains
Here:

69%
State average from 13 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

75%
State average from 13 schools:

57%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

70%
State average from 13 schools:

65%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

620
State average from 13 schools:

542
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 13 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: B

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

14%
State average from 13 schools:

51%
Minority Rate
Here:

40%
State average from 13 schools:

35%
Region: 5

Title I: NO


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 23 (80%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24 (83%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

7%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 22
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 23
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

93%
State average from 13 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

87%
State average from 13 schools:

79%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

92%
State average from 13 schools:

84%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

73%
State average from 13 schools:

54%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

80%
State average from 13 schools:

69%
Making Math Gains
Here:

78%
State average from 13 schools:

73%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
MADISON COUNTY EXCEL ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL:

85%
State average from 13 schools:

67%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

74%
State average from 13 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
MADISON COUNTY EXCEL ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL:

662
State average from 13 schools:

567
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 13 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: B

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

9%
State average from 13 schools:

41%
Minority Rate
Here:

39%
State average from 13 schools:

36%
Region: 5


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 29 (88%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 29 (88%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

14%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 23
Number of Students Tested in Math: 23
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26 (89%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26 (89%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

88%
State average from 12 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

88%
State average from 12 schools:

80%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
MADISON COUNTY EXCEL ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL:

89%
State average from 12 schools:

83%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

69%
State average from 12 schools:

52%
Making Reading Gains
MADISON COUNTY EXCEL ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL:

73%
State average from 12 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
MADISON COUNTY EXCEL ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL:

82%
State average from 12 schools:

75%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

70%
State average from 12 schools:

58%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

71%
State average from 12 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

630
State average from 12 schools:

559
Percent Tested
MADISON COUNTY EXCEL ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL:

100%
State average from 12 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: B

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

11%
State average from 12 schools:

37%
Minority Rate
Here:

41%
State average from 12 schools:

37%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 38 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 38 (96%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
MADISON COUNTY EXCEL ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL:

12%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

9%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 32 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 32 (96%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 36 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 36 (96%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 53 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 53 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
MADISON COUNTY EXCEL ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL:

7%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 47 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 46 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 46 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 46 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

11%
State average from 4 schools:

40%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

3%
State average from 4 schools:

35%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

74%
State average from 4 schools:

73%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

30%
State average from 4 schools:

50%
Making Math Gains
Here:

33%
State average from 4 schools:

52%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

30%
State average from 4 schools:

55%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

181
State average from 4 schools:

304
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 4 schools:

96%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: NO

Grade in 2006: P

Grade in 2005: F

Grade in 2004: F

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

94%
State average from 4 schools:

70%
Minority Rate
Here:

92%
State average from 4 schools:

66%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 58 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 58 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 23
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

9%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 46
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 45
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 53 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 53 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 22

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

7%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 43
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 42
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 54 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 54 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 23

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

9%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 44
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 43
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
MADISON COUNTY EXCEL ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL:

4%
State average from 4 schools:

39%
Meeting High Standards in Math
MADISON COUNTY EXCEL ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL:

4%
State average from 4 schools:

38%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

64%
State average from 4 schools:

68%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

33%
State average from 4 schools:

47%
Making Math Gains
Here:

45%
State average from 4 schools:

57%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
MADISON COUNTY EXCEL ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL:

27%
State average from 4 schools:

49%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

177
State average from 4 schools:

298
Percent Tested
Here:

92%
State average from 4 schools:

94%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: No%

Grade in 2005: F

Grade in 2004: F

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

84%
State average from 4 schools:

67%
Minority Rate
Here:

87%
State average from 4 schools:

62%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1592
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

348
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

3%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

5%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

29%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

52%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

12%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

93%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

20
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

5
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1802
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

357
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

5%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

29%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

47%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 5
MADISON COUNTY EXCEL ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL:

19%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

95%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

22
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

10
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1814
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

339
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

2%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

7%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

42%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

16%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

91%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
MADISON COUNTY EXCEL ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL:

4
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

18
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

12
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

341
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

3%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
MADISON COUNTY EXCEL ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL:

29%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
MADISON COUNTY EXCEL ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL:

52%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
MADISON COUNTY EXCEL ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL:

10%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

6%
State average:

4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

68%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

10
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

10
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1553
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

355
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

4%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

5%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

29%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

44%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
MADISON COUNTY EXCEL ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL:

18%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

91%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1663
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

347
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

2%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
MADISON COUNTY EXCEL ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL:

16%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

28%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

38%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

16%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

82%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
MADISON COUNTY EXCEL ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1754
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

351
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

3%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

22%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

26%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

40%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

9%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

75%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
MADISON COUNTY EXCEL ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL:

8
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1592
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

348
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 95%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1728
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

345
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 03%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 06%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 91%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1478
State average:

1907
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

230
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 92%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
MADISON COUNTY EXCEL ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL:

1575
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

359
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 95%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1667
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

348
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1704
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

237
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 62%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 1
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 103
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 41%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 85%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1519
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

336
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 92%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1708
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

341
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 21
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1779
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

333
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1561
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

245
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 85%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

346
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1541
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

352
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 94%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1688
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

353
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 22%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1801
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

361
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1755
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

252
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

98
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
MADISON COUNTY EXCEL ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL:

654
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
Here:

78
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

17
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
MADISON COUNTY EXCEL ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

102
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
Here:

671
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
MADISON COUNTY EXCEL ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL:

82
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
MADISON COUNTY EXCEL ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL:

15
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
MADISON COUNTY EXCEL ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL:

14
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
MADISON COUNTY EXCEL ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL:

15
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

11
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

16
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

8
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
MADISON COUNTY EXCEL ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL:

100
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
Here:

693
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
Here:

89
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

16
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

11
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

17
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
MADISON COUNTY EXCEL ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

3
State average:

190

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

9
State average:

201

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

9
State average:

192

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
MADISON COUNTY EXCEL ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL:

11
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
MADISON COUNTY EXCEL ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL:

646
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
Here:

18
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

7
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

7
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
Here:

8
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

5
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

9
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
MADISON COUNTY EXCEL ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL:

5
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

3
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

8
State average:

237

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 102
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

328
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 75%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 13
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 44%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 84%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 7

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1545
State average from 819 schools:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

238
State average:

294
% in each Achievement Level 1: 73%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 73%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1500
State average:

1807
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1349
State average:

1738
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 152

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1502
State average from 612 schools:

1849
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MADISON COUNTY EXCEL ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL:

235
State average:

298
% in each Achievement Level 1: 81%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 6%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 6
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 9: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 81%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1438
State average:

1837
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1526
State average:

1779
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: -88

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1417
State average from 573 schools:

1879
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

206
State average:

291
Percent Passing: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 93%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 7%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 5
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 18: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 64%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1567
State average:

1873
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1672
State average:

1876
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: -104

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

177
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 90%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 3
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 3

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1490
State average from 815 schools:

1851
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

218
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 82%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 9%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 73%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1477
State average:

1845
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1330
State average:

1755
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 147

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1652
State average from 613 schools:

1884
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

222
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 61%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 11%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 11%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 11: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 10: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 8: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 83%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1664
State average:

1869
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1599
State average:

1821
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 66

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
MADISON COUNTY EXCEL ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL:

1700
State average from 581 schools:

1950
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

254
State average:

315
Percent Passing: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 71%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 14%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 10: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 14: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 14: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 11: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 64%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1757
State average:

1939
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1767
State average:

1901
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: -11

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 10
Median NPR: 17
Literary (max 18): 9
Informational (max 18): 7
Functional (max 18): 8
Initial Understanding (max 10): 6
Interpretation (max 20): 8
Critical Analysis (max 14): 5
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 17
Mean Scale Score
Here:

641
State average from 597 schools:

696
Median NPR: 15
Literary (max 18): 8
Informational (max 18): 6
Functional (max 18): 9
Initial Understanding (max 10): 5
Interpretation (max 20): 8
Critical Analysis (max 14): 6
Strategies (max 10): 3

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 17
Mean Scale Score
Here:

652
State average from 575 schools:

695
Median NPR: 16
Literary (max 18): 9
Informational (max 18): 7
Functional (max 18): 9
Initial Understanding (max 10): 5
Interpretation (max 20): 9
Critical Analysis (max 14): 6
Strategies (max 10): 3

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 17
Mean Scale Score
Here:

672
State average from 597 schools:

708
Median NPR: 34
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 3
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 6
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 17
Mean Scale Score
Here:

680
State average from 575 schools:

710
Median NPR: 24
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 3
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 3

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 11
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 17
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

205
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 71%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 12%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 12%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 9 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 7
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
MADISON COUNTY EXCEL ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL:

2
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 47%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 18%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Madison, FL
  5. Madison County Excel Alternative School in Madison, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.