Mainland High School in Daytona Beach, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 22.

1255 W INTERNATIONAL SPEEDWAY BLVD
Daytona Beach, FL 32114

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Spruce Creek High School (6.4 miles):

72
Boston Avenue School (18.4 miles):

47
New Smyrna Beach High School (15.5 miles):

41
Community Learning Center East School (5.0 miles):

36
Mainland High School:

22
Heritage High School (0.6 miles):

14
Three Springs Of Daytona School (6.9 miles):

1
Riverview Learning Center School (3.5 miles):

0
Mainland High School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Volusia County:

42
Daytona Beach:

35
Mainland High School:

22

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (386) 226-0300 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 64
School number: 3436
School type: Senior High
District Name: VOLUSIA
Grade range: GRADES 9 TO 12
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (386) 226-0332
Principal: Cheryl Salerno
School in Need of Improvement (SINI) Status: Title 1 school not in need of improvement
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 7
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 27
Senate District: 1

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
MAINLAND HIGH SCHOOL:

41%
State average from 451 schools:

62%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

69%
State average from 451 schools:

77%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
MAINLAND HIGH SCHOOL:

83%
State average from 452 schools:

86%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

41%
State average from 451 schools:

48%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

45%
State average from 452 schools:

58%
Making Math Gains
Here:

72%
State average from 449 schools:

72%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

37%
State average from 452 schools:

52%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

61%
State average from 452 schools:

67%
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

449
State average from 452 schools:

522
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 450 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: NO

Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Reading: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: Pending

Grade in 2009: D

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: D

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 119999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

56%
State average from 454 schools:

50%
Minority Rate
Here:

50%
State average from 454 schools:

47%
Region: 2

Title I: YES


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 919 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 915 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 422
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

37%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 857
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 802

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 853
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 803
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 477 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 475 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 211
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 447
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 418

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 446
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 421
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 323 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 322 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 162
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

17%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 305
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 290

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 303
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 289
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 70 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 69 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 31
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 58
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 60
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 57
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 543 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 541 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
MAINLAND HIGH SCHOOL:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 238
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

27%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 505
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 471

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 501
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 469
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20
Number of Students Tested in Math: 20
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 168 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 166 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 61
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

20%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 157
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 143

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 154
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 143
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

40%
State average from 443 schools:

60%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

66%
State average from 440 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

77%
State average from 443 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

33%
State average from 443 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

46%
State average from 441 schools:

59%
Making Math Gains
Here:

68%
State average from 442 schools:

72%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

41%
State average from 442 schools:

56%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

58%
State average from 441 schools:

66%
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

429
State average from 441 schools:

522
Percent Tested
Here:

97%
State average from 448 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: D

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: D

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

49%
State average from 446 schools:

46%
Minority Rate
Here:

49%
State average from 451 schools:

45%
Region: 3


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 908 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 904 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 400
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 840
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 803

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 841
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 798
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 463 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 462 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 197
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 428
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 412

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
MAINLAND HIGH SCHOOL:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 428
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 411
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 346 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 344 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 157
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

23%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 317
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 301

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 318
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 299
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 57 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 57 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 29
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 54
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 50
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 54
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 48
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 470 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 467 (95%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 191
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

26%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 431
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 408

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 430
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 403
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 22
Number of Students Tested in Math: 22
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 163 (92%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 163 (92%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 74
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

18%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 146
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 131

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

38%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 143
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 126
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

42%
State average from 425 schools:

61%
Meeting High Standards in Math
MAINLAND HIGH SCHOOL:

67%
State average from 425 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

76%
State average from 425 schools:

82%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

35%
State average from 425 schools:

45%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

55%
State average from 425 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
Here:

76%
State average from 425 schools:

74%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

57%
State average from 425 schools:

55%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

74%
State average from 425 schools:

71%
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

492
State average from 425 schools:

526
Percent Tested
Here:

97%
State average from 425 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: D

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

42%
State average from 425 schools:

42%
Minority Rate
MAINLAND HIGH SCHOOL:

50%
State average from 425 schools:

44%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 966 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 959 (96%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 453
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

38%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 901
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 849

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 893
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 843
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 487 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 487 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 232
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

48%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 457
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 435

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 457
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 436
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 374 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 369 (95%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 180
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

24%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 354
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 336

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 349
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 332
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 64 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 62 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 25
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 56
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 50
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 53
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 47
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 455 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 448 (94%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 205
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

29%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 428
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 400

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 421
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 394
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 22
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 166 (90%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 164 (90%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 65
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

19%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 146
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 136

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

27%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 142
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 132
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

34%
State average from 370 schools:

45%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

56%
State average from 370 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

78%
State average from 370 schools:

84%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

38%
State average from 370 schools:

41%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

44%
State average from 370 schools:

52%
Making Math Gains
Here:

65%
State average from 370 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

44%
State average from 370 schools:

49%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

66%
State average from 370 schools:

67%
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0

Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
Here:

425
State average from 370 schools:

482
Percent Tested
Here:

96%
State average from 370 schools:

97%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: D

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
MAINLAND HIGH SCHOOL:

41%
State average from 372 schools:

38%
Minority Rate
Here:

50%
State average from 372 schools:

48%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1017 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1010 (96%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 411
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

30%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 944
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 940
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 507 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 502 (96%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 195
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 474
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 469
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 418 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 416 (96%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 171
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

19%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 384
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 385
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 57 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 57 (94%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 29
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 478 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 477 (95%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 154
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

24%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 436
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

41%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 437
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 179 (93%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 177 (93%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 64
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
MAINLAND HIGH SCHOOL:

10%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 154
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

19%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 154
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

34%
State average from 360 schools:

45%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

62%
State average from 361 schools:

68%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

78%
State average from 361 schools:

83%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

45%
State average from 361 schools:

53%
Making Math Gains
Here:

70%
State average from 361 schools:

72%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

49%
State average from 361 schools:

53%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

338
State average from 361 schools:

374
Percent Tested
Here:

95%
State average from 361 schools:

98%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: NO

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

39%
State average from 362 schools:

38%
Minority Rate
Here:

51%
State average from 362 schools:

47%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 954 (93%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 939 (93%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 392
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
MAINLAND HIGH SCHOOL:

30%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 878
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 863
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 493 (93%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 485 (92%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
MAINLAND HIGH SCHOOL:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 213

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

37%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 461
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 454
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 371 (93%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 365 (92%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 145

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
MAINLAND HIGH SCHOOL:

21%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 333
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 327
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 51 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 50 (94%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 16

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

27%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 48

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 47
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20
Number of Students Tested in Math: 20
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 402 (90%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 397 (90%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 158

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

21%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 361
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 357
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 164 (77%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 163 (77%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 66

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
MAINLAND HIGH SCHOOL:

11%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 145
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

21%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 142
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
MAINLAND HIGH SCHOOL:

31%
State average from 348 schools:

42%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

66%
State average from 348 schools:

67%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

84%
State average from 348 schools:

84%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

46%
State average from 348 schools:

51%
Making Math Gains
Here:

71%
State average from 348 schools:

73%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
MAINLAND HIGH SCHOOL:

56%
State average from 348 schools:

53%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
MAINLAND HIGH SCHOOL:

354
State average from 348 schools:

371
Percent Tested
Here:

94%
State average from 348 schools:

98%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

31%
State average from 347 schools:

38%
Minority Rate
Here:

48%
State average from 348 schools:

45%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1882
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MAINLAND HIGH SCHOOL:

305
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

27%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

33%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

26%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

10%
State average:

12%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

40%
State average:

45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

10
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
MAINLAND HIGH SCHOOL:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1898
State average:

1938
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

295
State average:

302
Percent Passing
Here:

46%
State average:

56%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

41%
State average:

35%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

29%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

15%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

5%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

9%
State average:

12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

30%
State average:

37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

14
State average:

15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MAINLAND HIGH SCHOOL:

302
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

31%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

33%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

31%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

3%
State average:

5%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

35%
State average:

36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1920
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MAINLAND HIGH SCHOOL:

301
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

19%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

22%
State average:

22%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

34%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

20%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

6%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

60%
State average:

61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
MAINLAND HIGH SCHOOL:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
MAINLAND HIGH SCHOOL:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1969
State average:

1995
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

320
State average:

326
Percent Passing
MAINLAND HIGH SCHOOL:

80%
State average:

80%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

14%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

24%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 4
MAINLAND HIGH SCHOOL:

24%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

62%
State average:

69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
MAINLAND HIGH SCHOOL:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
MAINLAND HIGH SCHOOL:

5
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1895
State average:

1907
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

307
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1916
State average:

1921
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

298
State average:

299
Percent Passing: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

297
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1913
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

299
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1975
State average:

1972
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

321
State average:

321
Percent Passing: 76%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 421
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
MAINLAND HIGH SCHOOL:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 32%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 70%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1913
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

310
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1906
State average:

1935
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

296
State average:

302
Percent Passing: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

306
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 34%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1924
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

302
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1967
State average:

1984
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

319
State average:

323
Percent Passing: 75%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
MAINLAND HIGH SCHOOL:

455
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
MAINLAND HIGH SCHOOL:

695
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
Here:

63
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
MAINLAND HIGH SCHOOL:

12
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
MAINLAND HIGH SCHOOL:

7
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
MAINLAND HIGH SCHOOL:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

5
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

393
State average:

237
Mean Scale Score
Here:

709
State average from 2096 schools:

709
Median NPR
Here:

67
State average:

65
Literary (max 18)
MAINLAND HIGH SCHOOL:

15
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Initial Understanding (max 12)
MAINLAND HIGH SCHOOL:

8
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

8
State average:

8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 471
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
MAINLAND HIGH SCHOOL:

284
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 39%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 70%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1858
State average from 612 schools:

1849
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

300
State average:

298
% in each Achievement Level 1: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 34%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 9: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1857
State average:

1837
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1816
State average:

1779
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 41

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1860
State average from 573 schools:

1879
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

288
State average:

291
Percent Passing: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 23%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 18: 11
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1866
State average:

1873
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1875
State average:

1876
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: -9

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

300
State average:

295
% in each Achievement Level 1: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 34%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 14: 7

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1875
State average from 613 schools:

1884
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

288
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 10: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 8: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1881
State average:

1869
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1841
State average:

1821
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 40

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1941
State average from 581 schools:

1950
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

315
Percent Passing: 69%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 10: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 11: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1943
State average:

1939
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1919
State average:

1901
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 24

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 514
Mean Scale Score
Here:

698
State average from 597 schools:

696
Median NPR: 65
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 14): 10
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 358
Mean Scale Score
Here:

696
State average from 575 schools:

695
Median NPR: 55
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 14): 10
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 515
Mean Scale Score
Here:

708
State average from 597 schools:

708
Median NPR: 69
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 8
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 358
Mean Scale Score
Here:

708
State average from 575 schools:

710
Median NPR: 59
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 7
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 430
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

281
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 36%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 9 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 74%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 56%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Daytona Beach, FL
  5. Mainland High School in Daytona Beach, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.