Marion Correctional Institution School in Lowell, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 70.


Lowell, FL 32663

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Dr N H Jones Elementary School (10.5 miles):

87
Florida Correctional Institution School (0.0 miles):

79
Hammett Bowen Junior Elementary School (17.0 miles):

70
Marion Correctional Institution School:

70
Saddlewood Elementary School (12.4 miles):

68
Fessenden Elementary School (3.4 miles):

62
Oakcrest Elementary School (9.0 miles):

54
Wyomina Park Elementary School (10.4 miles):

41
Marion Correctional Institution School rating compared to average state and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Lowell:

77
Marion Correctional Institution:

70

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (352) 401-6806 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 76
School number: 3041
School type: Adult
District Name: CESA
Grade range: ADULT
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (352) 732-1249
Principal: Roger Johnson
The function/setting of the school: Adult Education
The main educational program offered at the school: Adult

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

71%
State average from 133 schools:

72%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

70%
State average from 133 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

93%
State average from 133 schools:

87%
Meeting High Standards in Science
MARION CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

36%
State average from 133 schools:

52%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

64%
State average from 133 schools:

63%
Making Math Gains
MARION CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

69%
State average from 133 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

59%
State average from 133 schools:

59%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

68%
State average from 133 schools:

65%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

530
State average from 133 schools:

541
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 133 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 119999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

53%
State average from 133 schools:

52%
Minority Rate
Here:

23%
State average from 133 schools:

43%
Region: 4

Title I: NO


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1230 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1230 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 435
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

68%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1184
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1147

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

68%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1183
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1146
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 954 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 954 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 338
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

69%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 915
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 887

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
MARION CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

69%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 914
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 885
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 57 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 57 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 117 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 117 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 38
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 116
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 114

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 116
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 114
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 40 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 40 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 37
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 37
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 653 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 653 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 223
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 621
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 602

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 620
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 600
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 139 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 139 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 51
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

40%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 129
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 118

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 128
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 117
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

73%
State average from 133 schools:

72%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

71%
State average from 133 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

95%
State average from 133 schools:

91%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

48%
State average from 133 schools:

51%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

69%
State average from 133 schools:

67%
Making Math Gains
Here:

73%
State average from 133 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

77%
State average from 133 schools:

65%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

68%
State average from 133 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

574
State average from 133 schools:

557
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 133 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

46%
State average from 132 schools:

48%
Minority Rate
Here:

25%
State average from 133 schools:

42%
Region: 4


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1148 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1148 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 386
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

68%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1120
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1078

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

67%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1119
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1077
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 861 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 861 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 300
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 844
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 811

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

69%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 843
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 810
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 66 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 66 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 60
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 57
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 60
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 57
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 114 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 114 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 32
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 112
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 107

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 112
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 107
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 44 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 44 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 43
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 43
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 524 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 524 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 174
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 508
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 492

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
MARION CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 507
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 490
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 155 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 155 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 62
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

40%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 151
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 138

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
MARION CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

40%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 151
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 138
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

70%
State average from 131 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

75%
State average from 131 schools:

72%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

97%
State average from 131 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

46%
State average from 131 schools:

48%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

66%
State average from 131 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

76%
State average from 131 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

65%
State average from 131 schools:

61%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

71%
State average from 131 schools:

69%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

566
State average from 131 schools:

540
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 131 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
MARION CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

42%
State average from 131 schools:

47%
Minority Rate
MARION CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

22%
State average from 131 schools:

44%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1147 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1144 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 352
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
MARION CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1103
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1079

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

70%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1101
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1074
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 893 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 890 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 282
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

67%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 867
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 847

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 865
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 843
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 65 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 65 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 53
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 52
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 53
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 52
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 96 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 96 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 29
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 92
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 92
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 92
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 92
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 41 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 41 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 39
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 39
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 478 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 477 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 132
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 448
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 442

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 446
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 437
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 149 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 148 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 31
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
MARION CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

31%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 131
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 123

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
MARION CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

30%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 130
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 120
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1204
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

284
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

26%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

26%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

29%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

17%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

2%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

48%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

14
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1285
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

269
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

47%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

21%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

24%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

9%
State average:

29%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

32%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

15
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1420
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MARION CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

269
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

43%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

18%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

25%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

11%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

39%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

12
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

9
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

1
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1744
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MARION CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

317
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

11%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

16%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

44%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

23%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

6%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

73%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

14
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1856
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

326
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

10%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

18%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

37%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

26%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

9%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

72%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
MARION CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

17
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1915
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

316
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

11%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

31%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

39%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

15%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

57%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

17
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

7
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

279
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

43%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

37%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

18%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
MARION CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

2%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

20%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

8
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
MARION CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

7
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

308
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

20%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

46%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

28%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

5%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
MARION CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

2%
State average:

2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

35%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

9
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
MARION CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

1307
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

301
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

17%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
MARION CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

28%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

35%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

16%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

55%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1318
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

269
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

39%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

26%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

29%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

4%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

34%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
MARION CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
MARION CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

1545
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

307
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

27%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

31%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

30%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

10%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

2%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

42%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1709
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

318
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

20%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

22%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
MARION CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

35%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

18%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

5%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

58%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
MARION CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1833
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

317
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

16%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

19%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

38%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

22%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

6%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

65%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1926
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

328
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

6%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

20%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

48%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

17%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

9%
State average:

10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

74%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1140
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

274
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1359
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

282
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 01%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 04
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 08
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 02

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
MARION CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

1434
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

272
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1742
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

317
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1834
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

322
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1917
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

317
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

277
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 25%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

309
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1254
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

290
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1414
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

290
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1533
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MARION CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

304
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1731
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

323
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1842
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

319
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1939
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

331
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 100
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Unscore - Combined: 3
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 46%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 70%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 383
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Unscore - Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 9%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 92%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1208
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

285
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1353
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

281
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1434
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

271
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1714
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

312
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1818
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MARION CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

319
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1930
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

319
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MARION CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

286
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 27%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

307
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1273
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

294
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1360
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

278
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 34%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1533
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

304
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1698
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

316
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1849
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

321
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1957
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

336
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

97
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
Here:

617
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
Here:

47
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
MARION CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
MARION CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

92
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
Here:

632
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
Here:

51
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
MARION CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

11
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

113
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
Here:

649
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
Here:

56
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
MARION CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

11
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

5
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
MARION CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

384
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
Here:

677
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
Here:

68
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
MARION CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
MARION CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

385
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
MARION CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

689
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
Here:

73
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
MARION CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

359
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
Here:

696
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
MARION CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

72
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
MARION CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

13
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
MARION CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

8
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
MARION CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

8
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 86
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

270
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 48%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 43%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 74%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 360
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

316
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 61%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
MARION CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

5
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 11%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 95%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Lowell, FL
  5. Marion Correctional Institution School in Lowell, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.