Martin Correctional Institution School in Indiantown, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 85.


Indiantown, FL 34956

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Prekindergarten Programs School (18.4 miles):

89
Martin Correctional Institution School:

85
Sea Wind Elementary School (17.2 miles):

79
St. Lucie West K-8 School (18.9 miles):

70
Pierce Hammock Elementary School (15.4 miles):

59
Fau/Slcsd Palm Pointe Research School (17.1 miles):

46
Windmill Point Elementary School (16.1 miles):

39
Oak Hammock K-8 School (17.7 miles):

25
Martin Correctional Institution School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Martin County:

58
Indiantown:

63
Martin Correctional Institution:

85

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (561) 597-3705 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 76
School number: 4301
School type: Adult
District Name: CESA
Grade range: ADULT
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (561) 597-3742
Principal: Michael Boyd
The function/setting of the school: Adult Education
The main educational program offered at the school: Adult

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

85%
State average from 133 schools:

72%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

88%
State average from 133 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

91%
State average from 133 schools:

87%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

71%
State average from 133 schools:

52%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

74%
State average from 133 schools:

63%
Making Math Gains
Here:

77%
State average from 133 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

83%
State average from 133 schools:

59%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

81%
State average from 133 schools:

65%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

650
State average from 133 schools:

541
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 133 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: N

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

37%
State average from 133 schools:

52%
Minority Rate
Here:

21%
State average from 133 schools:

43%
Region: 4

Title I: NO


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 297 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 297 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 91
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 294
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 283

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 294
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 282
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 237 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 237 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 73
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 235
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 224

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 235
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 224
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 112 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 112 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 33
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

79%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 111
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 111

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 111
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 111
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 22
Number of Students Tested in Math: 22
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

82%
State average from 133 schools:

72%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

81%
State average from 133 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

93%
State average from 133 schools:

91%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

50%
State average from 133 schools:

51%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

68%
State average from 133 schools:

67%
Making Math Gains
Here:

78%
State average from 133 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

64%
State average from 133 schools:

65%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

84%
State average from 133 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

600
State average from 133 schools:

557
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 133 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: N

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

27%
State average from 132 schools:

48%
Minority Rate
Here:

16%
State average from 133 schools:

42%
Region: 4


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 293 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 293 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 88
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

79%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 284
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 271

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

79%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 283
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 271
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 251 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 251 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 76
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 245
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 234

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 245
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 235
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 93 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 93 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 24

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 89
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 84

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 89
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 84
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

81%
State average from 131 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

81%
State average from 131 schools:

72%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

89%
State average from 131 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

55%
State average from 131 schools:

48%
Making Reading Gains
MARTIN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

73%
State average from 131 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

79%
State average from 131 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

75%
State average from 131 schools:

61%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

70%
State average from 131 schools:

69%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

603
State average from 131 schools:

540
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 131 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

23%
State average from 131 schools:

47%
Minority Rate
Here:

10%
State average from 131 schools:

44%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 285 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 285 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 78
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 278
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 274

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 279
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 276
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 259 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 259 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 74
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 252
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 248

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 253
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 250
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 80 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 80 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 78
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 77

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 78
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 78
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1602
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

350
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

2%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
MARTIN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

7%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

26%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

50%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

15%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

91%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

20
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
MARTIN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

5
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1708
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MARTIN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

341
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

4%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

11%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

35%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

17%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

85%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

21
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1794
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

336
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

4%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

7%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

30%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

48%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

11%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

89%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

18
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

12
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1861
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

338
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

20%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

37%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

28%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

15%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

80%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

16
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1938
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

342
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

2%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

8%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

43%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

38%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 5
MARTIN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

9%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

91%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

19
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
MARTIN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1962
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MARTIN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

326
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

2%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
MARTIN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

26%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

54%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

13%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

72%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

18
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
MARTIN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

7
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

341
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

4%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

15%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

72%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

7%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

2%
State average:

4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

80%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

10
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
MARTIN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
MARTIN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

10
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

335
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

2%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

37%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

50%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
MARTIN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

9%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

2%
State average:

2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

61%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

10
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

10
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
MARTIN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

1615
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

368
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

7%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

33%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
MARTIN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

28%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
MARTIN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

93%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1664
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

348
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

4%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
MARTIN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

7%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

39%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

41%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
MARTIN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

9%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

89%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1805
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

362
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

9%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

43%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

33%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

15%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
MARTIN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

91%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

10
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

8
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

8
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1821
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

344
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

10%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

12%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

42%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

23%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

13%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

78%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

7
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1902
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

334
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

8%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

13%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

32%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

38%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

9%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

79%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

7
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1965
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

338
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

4%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

7%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

59%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

13%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

17%
State average:

10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

89%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
MARTIN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

1579
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

346
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 54%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 95%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1628
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

328
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 09%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 07%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1673
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

314
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1786
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

325
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1889
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

332
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1998
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

334
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MARTIN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

323
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

319
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1599
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

365
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 22%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 93%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1618
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

337
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1701
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

340
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1778
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

334
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1866
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

325
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
MARTIN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

2002
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

347
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 94%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 42
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 48%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 12%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 83%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 48
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

5
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 44%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 100%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1525
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

337
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1658
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

333
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1713
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MARTIN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

321
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1800
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MARTIN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

327
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 8
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1933
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

341
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1935
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

320
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

326
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1552
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MARTIN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

355
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 96%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1554
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MARTIN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

323
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1745
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

349
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1753
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

328
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1923
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

339
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1980
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

342
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
MARTIN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

45
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
Here:

643
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
Here:

70
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
MARTIN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

14
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

16
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

42
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
Here:

660
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
Here:

76
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
MARTIN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

13
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

16
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

8
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

46
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
MARTIN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

675
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
MARTIN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

79
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
MARTIN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

58
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
Here:

685
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
Here:

75
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
MARTIN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

14
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
MARTIN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

14
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
MARTIN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

9
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

16
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
MARTIN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

8
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

56
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
MARTIN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

707
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
Here:

85
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

16
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
MARTIN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

14
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

11
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

16
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
MARTIN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

37
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
Here:

709
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
Here:

80
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
MARTIN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

15
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

11
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
MARTIN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

8
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 41
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

331
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 71%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 13
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 34%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 83%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 37
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

305
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 46%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
MARTIN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 49%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 92%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Indiantown, FL
  5. Martin Correctional Institution School in Indiantown, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.