Mater Academy Lakes Middle School in Hialeah, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 34.

17300 NW 87 AVE
Hialeah, FL 33015

Mater Academy Lakes Middle School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Miami-Dade County:

45
Hialeah:

48
Mater Academy Lakes Middle School:

34

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (305) 512-3917 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 13
School number: 6033
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: DADE
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 8
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (305) 512-3912
Principal: Frank Jimenez
Regular charter school.
School in Need of Improvement (SINI) Status: Title 1 school not in need of improvement
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 25
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 102
Senate District: 40

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

69%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

72%
State average from 612 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

92%
State average from 613 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

32%
State average from 612 schools:

51%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

67%
State average from 613 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

79%
State average from 612 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

70%
State average from 613 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

73%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

554
State average from 613 schools:

545
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: B

Grade in 2007: C

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

62%
State average from 614 schools:

56%
Minority Rate
Here:

92%
State average from 614 schools:

49%
Region: 5

Title I: YES


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 214 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 214 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 69
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
MATER ACADEMY LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:

68%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 211
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 203

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 211
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 203
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 181 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 181 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 55
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

70%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 178
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 175

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 178
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 175
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 132 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 132 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 40
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 132
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 127

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
MATER ACADEMY LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 132
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 127
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

57%
State average from 613 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

62%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

89%
State average from 613 schools:

92%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

29%
State average from 613 schools:

49%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

64%
State average from 613 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

74%
State average from 613 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

75%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

77%
State average from 613 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
MATER ACADEMY LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:

527
State average from 613 schools:

553
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: B

Grade in 2007: C

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

52%
State average from 613 schools:

52%
Minority Rate
Here:

94%
State average from 613 schools:

48%
Region: 5


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 223 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 223 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 112
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 217
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 205

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 217
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 205
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 195 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 195 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 100
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
MATER ACADEMY LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 190
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 180

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 190
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 180
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 117 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 117 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 54
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 113
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 106

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 113
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 106
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
MATER ACADEMY LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:

59%
State average from 603 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

64%
State average from 603 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

85%
State average from 603 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

34%
State average from 602 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

63%
State average from 602 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
Here:

73%
State average from 602 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

68%
State average from 602 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
MATER ACADEMY LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:

70%
State average from 602 schools:

69%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

516
State average from 602 schools:

543
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 604 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: B

Grade in 2007: C

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
MATER ACADEMY LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:

47%
State average from 605 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

94%
State average from 605 schools:

48%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 259 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 259 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 95
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
MATER ACADEMY LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 254
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 240

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 254
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 240
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 229 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 229 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 85
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 224
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 212

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

67%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 224
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 212
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 122 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 122 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 52
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 119
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 116

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
MATER ACADEMY LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 119
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 116
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 25
Number of Students Tested in Math: 25
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

55%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

55%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
MATER ACADEMY LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:

91%
State average from 539 schools:

91%
Meeting High Standards in Science
MATER ACADEMY LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:

21%
State average from 538 schools:

44%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

49%
State average from 539 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
Here:

60%
State average from 539 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

54%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
MATER ACADEMY LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:

65%
State average from 539 schools:

67%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
Here:

450
State average from 539 schools:

523
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 539 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: C

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

50%
State average from 541 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

94%
State average from 542 schools:

53%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 223 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 223 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

98%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 46
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 193
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

54%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 193
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 190 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 190 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

98%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 41
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 164
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 164
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 113 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 113 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 26

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 95
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 95
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 33 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 33 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1840
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

335
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

5%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

13%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

35%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

36%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

12%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

83%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

16
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1830
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MATER ACADEMY LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:

321
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

12%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

24%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

34%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

20%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 5
MATER ACADEMY LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:

10%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

64%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

17
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
MATER ACADEMY LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1899
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
MATER ACADEMY LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:

7%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

41%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

34%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

16%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

51%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

17
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

7
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

305
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

21%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

46%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

27%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

4%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

33%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
MATER ACADEMY LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:

9
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1871
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

356
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

6%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

13%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

26%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

37%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

19%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

81%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

7
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1816
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

17%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

27%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

27%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

25%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

56%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1891
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

319
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

14%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
MATER ACADEMY LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:

17%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

50%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

14%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

69%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1744
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

317
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1838
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MATER ACADEMY LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:

323
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1861
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

305
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

299
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1760
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

330
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1774
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

302
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
MATER ACADEMY LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1897
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

321
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 115
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 41%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 9%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 88%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
MATER ACADEMY LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1703
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

310
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1760
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

308
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1882
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

309
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

295
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1635
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

301
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1822
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

314
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1922
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

327
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

51
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
MATER ACADEMY LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:

667
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
Here:

60
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
MATER ACADEMY LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

112
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
Here:

679
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
Here:

65
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
MATER ACADEMY LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
MATER ACADEMY LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:

97
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
Here:

692
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
Here:

69
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

11
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
MATER ACADEMY LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:

8
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 97
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

285
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 39%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 41%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 85%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1575
State average from 878 schools:

1661
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

287
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 75%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1627
State average:

1663
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1658
State average:

1592
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: -32

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1724
State average from 808 schools:

1746
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

301
State average:

305
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 69%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1761
State average:

1743
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1729
State average:

1668
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 33

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1855
State average from 819 schools:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

303
State average:

294
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 75%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
MATER ACADEMY LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1883
State average:

1807
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1855
State average:

1738
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 28

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

288
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 20%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1625
State average from 873 schools:

1641
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

299
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 75%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1669
State average:

1645
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1700
State average:

1620
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: -31

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1783
State average from 804 schools:

1777
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

305
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 69%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1819
State average:

1774
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1678
State average:

1645
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 141

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1899
State average from 815 schools:

1851
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

321
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 75%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1904
State average:

1845
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1833
State average:

1755
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 71

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 88
Mean Scale Score
Here:

656
State average from 874 schools:

671
Median NPR: 50
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 78
Mean Scale Score
MATER ACADEMY LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:

673
State average from 796 schools:

675
Median NPR: 59
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 56
Mean Scale Score
Here:

689
State average from 810 schools:

685
Median NPR: 66
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 10): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 14): 10
Strategies (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 88
Mean Scale Score
MATER ACADEMY LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:

659
State average from 874 schools:

669
Median NPR: 55
Number Sense (max 10): 5
Operations (max 12): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 78
Mean Scale Score
MATER ACADEMY LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:

687
State average from 796 schools:

685
Median NPR: 71
Number Sense (max 9): 5
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 6
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 56
Mean Scale Score
Here:

700
State average from 810 schools:

698
Median NPR: 72
Number Sense (max 9): 6
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 55
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

278
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 24%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 9
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 44%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 85%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 76%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Hialeah, FL
  5. Mater Academy Lakes Middle School in Hialeah, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.