Merrick Special Education Center School in Miami, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 17.


Miami, FL 33132

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Hallandale Elementary School (13.5 miles):

96
James W. Johnson Elementary School (7.8 miles):

78
William H. Lehman Elementary School (14.3 miles):

67
Bethune Mary M Elementary School (18.2 miles):

54
Rockway Elementary School (10.2 miles):

45
Eneida M. Hartner Elementary School (1.6 miles):

36
Miami Park Elementary School (6.6 miles):

25
Merrick Special Education Center School:

17
Sunshine Academy School (8.7 miles):

0
Merrick Special Education Center School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Miami-Dade County:

45
Miami:

44
Merrick Special Education Center:

17

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (305) 995-3613 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 13
School number: 3221
School type: Other
District Name: DADE
Grade range: UNASSIGNED

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

47%
State average from 89 schools:

72%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

54%
State average from 89 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

88%
State average from 89 schools:

86%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

36%
State average from 89 schools:

53%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

55%
State average from 89 schools:

63%
Making Math Gains
Here:

61%
State average from 89 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

60%
State average from 89 schools:

57%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

57%
State average from 89 schools:

65%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

458
State average from 89 schools:

540
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 89 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: C

Grade in 2009: C

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: D

Grade in 2002: D

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 119999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

94%
State average from 89 schools:

54%
Minority Rate
Here:

97%
State average from 89 schools:

43%
Region: 5

Title I: YES


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 304 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 303 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 108
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 281
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 277

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 280
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 277
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 224 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 224 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 85
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 210
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 209

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
MERRICK SPECIAL EDUCATION CENTER:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 210
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 209
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 72 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 71 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 65
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 63

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 64
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 63
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 288 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 287 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 104
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 266
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 263

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 265
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 263
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 55 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 54 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

38%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 47

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
MERRICK SPECIAL EDUCATION CENTER:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 46
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 32 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 32 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

54%
State average from 89 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

58%
State average from 89 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

94%
State average from 89 schools:

89%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

28%
State average from 89 schools:

51%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

66%
State average from 89 schools:

67%
Making Math Gains
Here:

69%
State average from 89 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

58%
State average from 89 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
MERRICK SPECIAL EDUCATION CENTER:

62%
State average from 89 schools:

66%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

489
State average from 89 schools:

555
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 89 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: C

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: D

Grade in 2002: D

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

90%
State average from 89 schools:

51%
Minority Rate
Here:

98%
State average from 89 schools:

41%
Region: 3


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 272 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 272 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 76
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 250
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 246

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 252
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 248
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 204 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 204 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 55
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

48%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 189
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 188

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

54%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 190
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 189
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 55 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 55 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

67%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 48

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 49
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 49
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 252 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 252 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 68
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

48%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 231
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 229

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

54%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 233
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 231
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 46 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 46 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

41%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 38

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 38
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

52%
State average from 87 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

52%
State average from 87 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

92%
State average from 87 schools:

84%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

15%
State average from 87 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

58%
State average from 87 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

53%
State average from 87 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

63%
State average from 87 schools:

61%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

59%
State average from 87 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

444
State average from 87 schools:

538
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 87 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: D

Grade in 2002: D

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

89%
State average from 87 schools:

48%
Minority Rate
MERRICK SPECIAL EDUCATION CENTER:

97%
State average from 87 schools:

41%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 247 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 247 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 71
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

48%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 234
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 230

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 234
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 230
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 191 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 191 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 55
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 181
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 179

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
MERRICK SPECIAL EDUCATION CENTER:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 181
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 179
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 45 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 45 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 44
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 42

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 44
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 42
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 218 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 218 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 65
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
MERRICK SPECIAL EDUCATION CENTER:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 206
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 203

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 206
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 203
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 30 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 30 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
MERRICK SPECIAL EDUCATION CENTER:

1147
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

275
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

41%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

16%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

23%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

18%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

2%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
MERRICK SPECIAL EDUCATION CENTER:

43%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

13
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1396
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

288
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

39%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

23%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

20%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

14%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

38%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

16
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
MERRICK SPECIAL EDUCATION CENTER:

1500
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

283
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
MERRICK SPECIAL EDUCATION CENTER:

29%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

19%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

27%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

23%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

52%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

14
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

9
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
MERRICK SPECIAL EDUCATION CENTER:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

298
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
MERRICK SPECIAL EDUCATION CENTER:

33%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

33%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

20%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
MERRICK SPECIAL EDUCATION CENTER:

13%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

34%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

9
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

7
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1299
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

300
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

23%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

16%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

21%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

7%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

60%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1414
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

291
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

32%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

29%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

22%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

11%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

6%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

39%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1633
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

326
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

20%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

29%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

19%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

20%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

11%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

51%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
MERRICK SPECIAL EDUCATION CENTER:

1127
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

271
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1466
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

300
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 02%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 04
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 09
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1476
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

279
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

286
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 25%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1288
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

297
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1471
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

303
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1584
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

315
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 79
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 46%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 6%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 91%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1112
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MERRICK SPECIAL EDUCATION CENTER:

269
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1438
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

295
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1446
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

274
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

270
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 13%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1237
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

286
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1468
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

303
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1546
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

307
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

93
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
Here:

603
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
Here:

34
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
MERRICK SPECIAL EDUCATION CENTER:

11
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
MERRICK SPECIAL EDUCATION CENTER:

7
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

11
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

5
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

76
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
Here:

636
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
Here:

56
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

78
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
Here:

647
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
MERRICK SPECIAL EDUCATION CENTER:

54
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
MERRICK SPECIAL EDUCATION CENTER:

11
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

5
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 75
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
MERRICK SPECIAL EDUCATION CENTER:

303
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 15%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 63%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 41%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 92%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Miami, FL
  5. Merrick Special Education Center School in Miami, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.