Michigan International Academy School in Fort Myers, Florida (FL) - Test Results, Rating, Ranking, Grades, Scores, Classes, Enrollment, Teachers, Students, and Report Card

City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 8.

4312 MICHIGAN AVE
Fort Myers, FL 33905

Show street view No street view available for this location

Other nearby schools ratings:

New School (2.5 miles):	93
Tropic Isles Elementary School (5.8 miles):	68
Christa Mcaulliffe Elementary School (12.8 miles):	58
Gateway Elementary School (6.6 miles):	53
Edgewood Academy School (1.5 miles):	45
Skyline Elementary School (10.3 miles):	36
Veterans Park Academy For The Arts School (12.2 miles):	23
Michigan International Academy School:	8

Michigan International Academy School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:

Florida:	45
Lee County:	49
Fort Myers:	44
Michigan International Academy:	8

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum

Phone: (239) 334-8411 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 36
School number: 411
School type: Combination Elementary and Secondary
District Name: LEE
Grade range: PREKINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 8
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (239) 334-8262
Principal: James Donmoyer
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 14
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 73
Senate District: 37
School Web Address: www.leeschools.net/schools/mic

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	38%
State average from 54 schools:	75%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	67%
State average from 54 schools:	75%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	84%
State average from 54 schools:	86%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	31%
State average from 54 schools:	53%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	48%
State average from 54 schools:	66%

Making Math Gains

Here:	74%
State average from 53 schools:	68%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	46%
State average from 54 schools:	61%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	63%
State average from 54 schools:	65%

11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	461
State average from 54 schools:	539

Percent Tested

Here:	98%
State average from 53 schools:	100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: NO

Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Reading: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: Pending

Grade in 2009: C

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	51%
State average from 54 schools:	60%

Minority Rate

Here:	56%
State average from 54 schools:	57%

Region: 3

Title I: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1214 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1213 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 519
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	35%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1147
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1101

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	62%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1147
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1097
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 538 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 535 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 232
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	45%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 514
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 489

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	71%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 512
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 484
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 333 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 335 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	94%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 133
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	21%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 314
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 301

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	47%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 316
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 302
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 265 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 265 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	92%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 121
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	27%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 248
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 245

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	61%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 248
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 245
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 656 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 658 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 277
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	30%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 623
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 599

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	55%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 625
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 599
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 55 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 53 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 25
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 47
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 44
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 117 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 119 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	65%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 43
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	6%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 105
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 100

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	19%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 107
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 99
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	38%
State average from 53 schools:	78%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	68%
State average from 52 schools:	76%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	76%
State average from 53 schools:	89%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	29%
State average from 53 schools:	52%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	47%
State average from 52 schools:	69%

Making Math Gains

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	76%
State average from 53 schools:	69%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	47%
State average from 52 schools:	68%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	64%
State average from 52 schools:	67%

11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	455
State average from 52 schools:	566

Percent Tested

Here:	98%
State average from 52 schools:	100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: NO

Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Reading: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: C

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	46%
State average from 52 schools:	55%

Minority Rate

Here:	56%
State average from 53 schools:	52%

Region: 3

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1223 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1220 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	90%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 635
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	35%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1150
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1108

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	64%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1147
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1105
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 564 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 564 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	91%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 295
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	44%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 532
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 520

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	73%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 530
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 516
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 298 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 298 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	85%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 158
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	28%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 279
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 264

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	50%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 279
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 265
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 283 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 280 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	91%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 144
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	28%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 268
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 255

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	62%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 267
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 255
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 581 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 580 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	89%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 274
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	31%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 548
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 521

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	56%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 547
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 519
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 49 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 49 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 44
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 38
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 38
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 110 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 108 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	70%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 46
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 91
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 84
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 88
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 81
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	39%
State average from 52 schools:	73%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	67%
State average from 52 schools:	74%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	78%
State average from 52 schools:	84%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	25%
State average from 51 schools:	48%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	50%
State average from 51 schools:	66%

Making Math Gains

Here:	73%
State average from 51 schools:	70%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	46%
State average from 51 schools:	61%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	68%
State average from 51 schools:	69%

11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	456
State average from 51 schools:	545

Percent Tested

Here:	98%
State average from 51 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: NO

Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Reading: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	40%
State average from 52 schools:	53%

Minority Rate

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	56%
State average from 52 schools:	52%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1408 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1406 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	90%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 686
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	37%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1343
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1255

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	63%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1341
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1248
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 660 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 659 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 311
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	46%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 629
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 593

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	70%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 629
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 591
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 351 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 353 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	87%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 182
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	25%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 329
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 303

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	48%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 330
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 301
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 304 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 303 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	86%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 143
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	32%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 293
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 272

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	62%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 291
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 270
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26
Number of Students Tested in Math: 25
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 567 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 566 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	91%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 275
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	28%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 543
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 504

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	58%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 542
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 499
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 45 (90%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 45 (89%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 31
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 121 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 123 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	65%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 60
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	18%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 113
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 102

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	25%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 114
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 101
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	42%
State average from 43 schools:	70%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	33%
State average from 43 schools:	67%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	80%
State average from 43 schools:	86%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	15%
State average from 43 schools:	45%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	51%
State average from 43 schools:	65%

Making Reading Gains - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded

Making Math Gains

Here:	50%
State average from 43 schools:	66%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	70%
State average from 43 schools:	64%

% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	62%
State average from 43 schools:	68%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns

Here:	403
State average from 43 schools:	531

Percent Tested

Here:	99%
State average from 43 schools:	98%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: D

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	85%
State average from 43 schools:	50%

Minority Rate

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	84%
State average from 43 schools:	57%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 421 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 418 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	88%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 117
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	33%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 353
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	27%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 352
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 75 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 73 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 25

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	55%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 66
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	59%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 66
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 216 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 214 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	94%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 65
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	29%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 186
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	17%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 185
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 118 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 119 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	21%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 89
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	21%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 89
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 342 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 340 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	88%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 82
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	27%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 277
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	21%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 276
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 67 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 67 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 74 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 73 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 59
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	8%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 60
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	55%
State average from 44 schools:	71%

Meeting High Standards in Math

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	50%
State average from 44 schools:	67%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	74%
State average from 44 schools:	84%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	50%
State average from 44 schools:	63%

Making Math Gains

Here:	58%
State average from 44 schools:	68%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	56%
State average from 44 schools:	65%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns

Here:	343
State average from 44 schools:	418

Percent Tested

Here:	99%
State average from 44 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	83%
State average from 44 schools:	51%

Minority Rate

Here:	78%
State average from 44 schools:	56%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 400 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 400 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	85%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 119
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	47%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 346
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	44%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 347
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 105 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 105 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	89%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 38

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	70%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 94
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	68%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 94
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 189 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 189 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	79%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 47

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	41%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 164
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	26%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 165
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 93 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 93 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 29

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	28%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 76
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	47%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 76
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 315 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 315 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	81%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 88

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	40%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 272
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	36%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 273
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 52 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 52 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 38

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	26%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 38
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 71 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 71 (99%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 21

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	19%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 62
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	21%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 63
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	65%
State average from 43 schools:	66%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	62%
State average from 43 schools:	65%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	82%
State average from 43 schools:	80%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	63%
State average from 43 schools:	62%

Making Math Gains

Here:	75%
State average from 43 schools:	67%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	65%
State average from 43 schools:	61%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	412
State average from 43 schools:	400

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 43 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	77%
State average from 43 schools:	52%

Minority Rate

Here:	67%
State average from 43 schools:	55%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	1413
State average:	1402

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	319
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	8%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	13%
State average:	11%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	42%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	33%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	5%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	80%
State average:	74%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	18
State average:	17

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1523
State average:	1604

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	310
State average:	324

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	18%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	15%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	42%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	20%
State average:	29%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	5%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	67%
State average:	72%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	18
State average:	19

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	8
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	2
State average:	2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	1616
State average:	1659

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	304
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	19%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	12%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	30%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	36%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	4%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	69%
State average:	70%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	3
State average:	3

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	15
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	10
State average:	10

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	2
State average:	2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1713
State average:	1716

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	312
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	19%
State average:	19%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	16%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	37%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	21%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	7%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	66%
State average:	65%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	14
State average:	14

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	3
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	1803
State average:	1810

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	316
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	15%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	19%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 3

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	36%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	24%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	5%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	66%
State average:	65%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	17
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	3
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1838
State average:	1876

Mean Scale Score 100-500

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	300
State average:	308

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	24%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 2

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	29%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	36%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	10%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	1%
State average:	3%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	47%
State average:	52%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	4
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	15
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	6
State average:	6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1896
State average:	1922

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	307
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	27%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	38%
State average:	30%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	25%
State average:	26%

% in each Achievement Level 4

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	8%
State average:	12%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	3%
State average:	7%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	36%
State average:	45%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	11
State average:	11

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	6
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1910
State average:	1938

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	297
State average:	302

Percent Passing

Here:	53%
State average:	56%

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	38%
State average:	35%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	32%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	18%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	6%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	6%
State average:	12%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	30%
State average:	37%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	14
State average:	15

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	6
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	7
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	307
State average:	321

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	24%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	32%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	34%
State average:	36%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	10%
State average:	11%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	1%
State average:	4%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	44%
State average:	51%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	9
State average:	9

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	8
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	8
State average:	9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	303
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	23%
State average:	27%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	37%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	31%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	6%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	3%
State average:	2%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	40%
State average:	41%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	8
State average:	9

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	8
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	7
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	294
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	35%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	36%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	26%
State average:	30%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	3%
State average:	5%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	29%
State average:	36%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	8
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	6
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	1456
State average:	1481

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	334
State average:	339

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	6%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	13%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	35%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	37%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	9%
State average:	16%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	81%
State average:	79%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	8
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	4
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	5
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1466
State average:	1585

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	302
State average:	330

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	15%
State average:	10%

% in each Achievement Level 2

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	29%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	41%
State average:	36%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	9%
State average:	26%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	5%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	55%
State average:	74%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	6
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	3
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1632
State average:	1674

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	325
State average:	334

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	15%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 2

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	33%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	31%
State average:	27%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	19%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	2%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	52%
State average:	63%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	7
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	6
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	6
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1649
State average:	1696

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	304
State average:	315

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	25%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	24%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	32%
State average:	29%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	15%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	3%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	51%
State average:	55%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	4
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	6
State average:	6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1768
State average:	1786

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	301
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	21%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	26%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	33%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	18%
State average:	19%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	2%
State average:	7%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	52%
State average:	57%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	4
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	5
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1875
State average:	1892

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	315
State average:	320

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	16%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	21%
State average:	21%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	43%
State average:	38%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	17%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 5

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	3%
State average:	10%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	63%
State average:	64%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	5
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1914
State average:	1925

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	299
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	14%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	28%
State average:	22%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	39%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	15%
State average:	21%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	4%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	58%
State average:	61%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	3
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	1979
State average:	1995

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	322
State average:	326

Percent Passing

Here:	78%
State average:	80%

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	12%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	23%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	32%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	29%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	4%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	65%
State average:	69%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	6
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	7
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	5
State average:	5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1354
State average:	1402

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	309
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1639
State average:	1605

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	329
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 06%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 06%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 03%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1584
State average:	1656

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	298
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	1638
State average:	1707

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	298
State average:	310

% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	1704
State average:	1800

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	297
State average:	315

% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1765
State average:	1864

Mean Scale Score 100-500

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	285
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 23%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1899
State average:	1907

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	308
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1938
State average:	1921

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	302
State average:	299

Percent Passing: 54%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	299
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 25%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	261
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 5%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	291
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 27%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1355
State average:	1476

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	312
State average:	338

% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	1529
State average:	1578

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	317
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1569
State average:	1675

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	312
State average:	334

% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1593
State average:	1679

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	291
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	1769
State average:	1799

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	301
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1795
State average:	1876

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	295
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1927
State average:	1925

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	303
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1984
State average:	1972

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	323
State average:	321

Percent Passing: 80%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 90

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	4
State average from 27 schools:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 41%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 73%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 42

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	4
State average from 27 schools:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 48%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 90%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 661

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	4
State average from 27 schools:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 32%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 73%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1345
State average:	1396

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	307
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1522
State average:	1582

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	309
State average:	320

% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1582
State average:	1627

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	298
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1566
State average:	1696

Mean Scale Score 100-500

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	285
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	1728
State average:	1775

Mean Scale Score 100-500

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	302
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	1795
State average:	1857

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	291
State average:	304

% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1925
State average:	1894

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	313
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1915
State average:	1935

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	298
State average:	302

Percent Passing: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	293
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	280
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 16%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	291
State average:	302

% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 23%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1355
State average:	1461

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	312
State average:	335

% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1418
State average:	1563

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	291
State average:	325

% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1607
State average:	1668

Mean Scale Score 100-500

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	320
State average:	333

% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1599
State average:	1670

Mean Scale Score 100-500

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	293
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1765
State average:	1801

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	300
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1844
State average:	1882

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	307
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1923
State average:	1915

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	302
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1977
State average:	1984

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	322
State average:	323

Percent Passing: 80%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Number of Students

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	101
State average:	103

Mean Scale Score

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	633
State average from 3241 schools:	633

Median NPR

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	61
State average:	61

Literary (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	14
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	6
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	98
State average:	97

Mean Scale Score

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	646
State average from 3233 schools:	653

Median NPR

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	65
State average:	69

Literary (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	12
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	10

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	14
State average:	15

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	8

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	110
State average:	101

Mean Scale Score

Here:	665
State average from 3309 schools:	667

Median NPR

Here:	70
State average:	71

Literary (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	12
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	14
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	6
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	62
State average:	190

Mean Scale Score

Here:	656
State average from 2604 schools:	671

Median NPR

Here:	50
State average:	63

Literary (max 18)

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	12
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	11
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	7
State average:	8

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	13
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	7
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	54
State average:	201

Mean Scale Score

Here:	672
State average from 2487 schools:	682

Median NPR

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	58
State average:	66

Literary (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

Here:	11
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	11
State average:	12

Initial Understanding (max 12)

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	9
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	13
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	6
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Number of Students

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	51
State average:	192

Mean Scale Score

Here:	669
State average from 2497 schools:	687

Median NPR

Here:	46
State average:	63

Literary (max 18)

Here:	11
State average:	12

Informational (max 18)

Here:	11
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	7
State average:	7

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	12
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	10

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	642
State average:	273

Mean Scale Score

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	694
State average from 2275 schools:	694

Median NPR

Here:	61
State average:	61

Literary (max 18)

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	13
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	11
State average:	11

Functional (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	11

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	7
State average:	7

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	14
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	5
State average:	5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	652
State average:	237

Mean Scale Score

Here:	705
State average from 2096 schools:	709

Median NPR

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	63
State average:	65

Literary (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	13
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	14

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	8

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	15
State average:	15

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	10

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 101

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	263
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 33%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	3
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 50%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 48

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	245
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 15%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 46%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 69%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 722

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	291
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 44%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 30%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 74%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1051
State average:	1342

Mean Scale Score 100-500

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	259
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1289
State average from 1875 schools:	1542

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	270
State average:	313

% in each Achievement Level 1: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 75%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1346
State average:	1546

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1315
State average:	1397

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 31

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1388
State average from 1873 schools:	1629

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	263
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 80%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1424
State average:	1632

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1351
State average:	1532

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 73

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1470
State average from 878 schools:	1661

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	268
State average:	302

% in each Achievement Level 1: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 77%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1493
State average:	1663

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1437
State average:	1592

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 56

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1572
State average from 808 schools:	1746

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	272
State average:	305

% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 85%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1611
State average:	1743

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1574
State average:	1668

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 37

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1681
State average from 819 schools:	1810

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	267
State average:	294

% in each Achievement Level 1: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 24%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 85%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1729
State average:	1807

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1659
State average:	1738

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 70

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	237
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1: 66%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	254
State average:	290

% in each Achievement Level 1: 56%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 13%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1044
State average:	1413

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	245
State average:	324

% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 22%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1304
State average from 1874 schools:	1525

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	265
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 73%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	1331
State average:	1528

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1317
State average:	1414

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 14

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1338
State average from 1872 schools:	1647

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	263
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 60%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 13%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 75%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1438
State average:	1649

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1362
State average:	1519

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 76

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1493
State average from 873 schools:	1641

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	268
State average:	302

% in each Achievement Level 1: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 79%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1521
State average:	1645

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1501
State average:	1620

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 20

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1669
State average from 804 schools:	1777

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	276
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 85%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	1673
State average:	1774

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1572
State average:	1645

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 102

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1795
State average from 815 schools:	1851

Mean Scale Score 100-500

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	295
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 37%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1804
State average:	1845

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1733
State average:	1755

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 71

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 79

Mean Scale Score

Here:	599
State average from 1891 schools:	633

Median NPR: 32
Literary (max 18): 9
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 12): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 11
Critical Analysis (max 12): 6
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 64

Mean Scale Score

Here:	623
State average from 1874 schools:	642

Median NPR: 44
Literary (max 18): 9
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 12): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 12): 6
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 55

Mean Scale Score

Here:	635
State average from 1870 schools:	667

Median NPR: 42
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 12): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 74

Mean Scale Score

Here:	647
State average from 874 schools:	671

Median NPR: 40
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 12): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 65

Mean Scale Score

Here:	658
State average from 796 schools:	675

Median NPR: 45
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 9
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 12): 6
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 78

Mean Scale Score

Here:	669
State average from 810 schools:	685

Median NPR: 46
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 14): 8
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 78

Mean Scale Score

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	594
State average from 1891 schools:	632

Median NPR: 36
Number Sense (max 14): 8
Operations (max 11): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 3
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 64

Mean Scale Score

Here:	623
State average from 1874 schools:	652

Median NPR: 52
Number Sense (max 12): 8
Operations (max 12): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 52

Mean Scale Score

Here:	633
State average from 1870 schools:	663

Median NPR: 46
Number Sense (max 12): 7
Operations (max 12): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 74

Mean Scale Score

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	651
State average from 874 schools:	669

Median NPR: 44
Number Sense (max 10): 5
Operations (max 12): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 65

Mean Scale Score

Here:	673
State average from 796 schools:	685

Median NPR: 59
Number Sense (max 9): 4
Operations (max 9): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 78

Mean Scale Score

Here:	691
State average from 810 schools:	698

Median NPR: 64
Number Sense (max 9): 6
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 65

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	249
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 28%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	3
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 32%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 63%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 38%

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 74

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	252
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 20%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 9
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	3
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 34%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 8%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 73%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 58%

City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DC	DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID
IL	IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	MD
ME	MI	MN	MO	MS	MT	NC
ND	NE	NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY
OH	OK	OR	PA	RI	SC	SD
TN	TX	UT	VA	VT	WA	WI
WV	WY

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID	IL
IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	ME	MI
MN	MO	MS	MT	NC	ND	NE
NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	SD	TN	TX
VA	VT	WA	WI	WV	WY

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID	IL
IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	ME	MI
MN	MO	MS	MT	NC	ND	NE
NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	SD	TN	TX
VA	VT	WA	WI	WV	WY

AL	AZ	CA	CO	CT	DE	FL
GA	HI	IA	ID	IL	IN	KS
LA	MA	MD	MI	MN	MO	NC
NE	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	TN	TX	UT
VA	WA	WI	WV

AL	CA	CO	DC	DE	FL	GA
IA	ID	IL	IN	KS	KY	LA
MD	ME	MI	MN	NC	NE	NH
NJ	NV	NY	OH	OK	OR	PA
SC	TN	TX	UT	VA	WA	WI