Mt. Herman Ese Center School in Jacksonville, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 46.

1741 FRANCIS ST
Jacksonville, FL 32209

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Global Leaf School (14.4 miles):

95
Lavilla Of The Arts School (1.0 miles):

68
Abess Park Elementary School (11.5 miles):

59
Annie R. Morgan Elementary School (2.9 miles):

49
Mt. Herman Ese Center School:

46
Chimney Lakes Elementary School (13.2 miles):

44
Duncan U. Fletcher Middle School (16.6 miles):

35
Lake Lucina Elementary School (4.9 miles):

23
Mt. Herman Ese Center School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Duval County:

44
Jacksonville:

43
Mt. Herman Ese Center School:

46

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (904) 630-6740 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 16
School number: 1641
School type: Combination Elementary and Secondary
District Name: DUVAL
Grade range: KINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 12
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (904) 630-6738
Principal: Mark Cashen
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 3
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 15
Senate District: 1

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

78%
State average from 36 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

84%
State average from 37 schools:

76%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

94%
State average from 37 schools:

87%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

67%
State average from 37 schools:

56%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

76%
State average from 37 schools:

62%
Making Math Gains
Here:

64%
State average from 37 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

80%
State average from 37 schools:

60%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

67%
State average from 37 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

610
State average from 37 schools:

547
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 37 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: B

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 119999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

73%
State average from 37 schools:

41%
Minority Rate
Here:

96%
State average from 37 schools:

44%
Region: 5

Title I: YES


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 135 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 135 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
MT. HERMAN ESE CENTER:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 49
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

13%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 92
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 88

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

19%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 93
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 89
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 90 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 90 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 36

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

10%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 58

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

16%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 62
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 59
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 33 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 33 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 119 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 119 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 44
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

13%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 85
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 81

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

20%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 86
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 82
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

79%
State average from 36 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

70%
State average from 36 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

78%
State average from 36 schools:

87%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

40%
State average from 36 schools:

52%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

65%
State average from 36 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
MT. HERMAN ESE CENTER:

56%
State average from 36 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

57%
State average from 36 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

55%
State average from 36 schools:

66%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

500
State average from 36 schools:

548
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 36 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: B

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

55%
State average from 36 schools:

39%
Minority Rate
Here:

37%
State average from 36 schools:

42%
Region: 4


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 152 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 152 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 40
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

70%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 152
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 141

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 152
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 141
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 94 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 94 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

79%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 94
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 85

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 94
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 85
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 48 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 48 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

48%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 47

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

25%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 47
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 83 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 83 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 83
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 80

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 83
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 80
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27
Number of Students Tested in Math: 27
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

72%
State average from 36 schools:

67%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

65%
State average from 36 schools:

72%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

78%
State average from 36 schools:

81%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

25%
State average from 36 schools:

45%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

64%
State average from 36 schools:

63%
Making Math Gains
Here:

65%
State average from 36 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

77%
State average from 36 schools:

61%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

83%
State average from 36 schools:

69%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

529
State average from 36 schools:

528
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 36 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

60%
State average from 36 schools:

41%
Minority Rate
Here:

47%
State average from 36 schools:

45%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 186 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 186 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 58
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
MT. HERMAN ESE CENTER:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 169
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 158

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
MT. HERMAN ESE CENTER:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 169
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 158
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 102 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 102 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 34
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 94
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 85

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 94
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 85
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 72 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 72 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 67
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 66

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

30%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 67
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 66
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 108 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 108 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 30
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 101
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 98

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 101
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 98
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 35 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

29%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 71 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 71 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

100%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 23
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 67
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 67
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27
Number of Students Tested in Math: 27
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 24
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 38 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 38 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 38
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 38
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 48 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 48 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 44
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 44
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 71 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 71 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 23
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 67
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 67
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1291
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

298
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

18%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

17%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

42%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

21%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

2%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

65%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
MT. HERMAN ESE CENTER:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

16
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1669
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

335
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

15%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

9%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

28%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
MT. HERMAN ESE CENTER:

31%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

17%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

76%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

21
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1625
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

306
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

13%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

20%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

28%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
MT. HERMAN ESE CENTER:

37%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

2%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

67%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

15
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

10
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
MT. HERMAN ESE CENTER:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1630
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

283
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

39%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

17%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

44%
State average:

33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

44%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

14
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1686
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

268
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
MT. HERMAN ESE CENTER:

43%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

45%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

13%
State average:

33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

13%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

12
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

5
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1654
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

263
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

73%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

22%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

3%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

3%
State average:

12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

5%
State average:

45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
MT. HERMAN ESE CENTER:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

7
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

324
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

17%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
MT. HERMAN ESE CENTER:

27%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

42%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

8%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

7%
State average:

4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

57%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

9
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
MT. HERMAN ESE CENTER:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

9
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

248
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

64%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

31%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

5%
State average:

31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

5%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

6
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

5
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
MT. HERMAN ESE CENTER:

4
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1499
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

343
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

5%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

14%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

35%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

32%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

15%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

82%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1572
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

327
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

15%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

11%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
MT. HERMAN ESE CENTER:

33%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

28%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

13%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

74%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
MT. HERMAN ESE CENTER:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1727
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

345
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

10%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

20%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

22%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

40%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

8%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

70%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1682
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

279
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

50%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

28%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

22%
State average:

31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

22%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
MT. HERMAN ESE CENTER:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
MT. HERMAN ESE CENTER:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
MT. HERMAN ESE CENTER:

1740
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

281
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

42%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
MT. HERMAN ESE CENTER:

36%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

21%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
MT. HERMAN ESE CENTER:

22%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
MT. HERMAN ESE CENTER:

3
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1795
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

264
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

30%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

49%
State average:

22%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

22%
State average:

31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
MT. HERMAN ESE CENTER:

22%
State average:

61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
MT. HERMAN ESE CENTER:

2
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1293
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MT. HERMAN ESE CENTER:

299
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1628
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

328
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 08%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1585
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

298
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1481
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

255
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 62%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 24%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
MT. HERMAN ESE CENTER:

1676
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

266
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 7%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1729
State average:

1907
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

276
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 63%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 12%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MT. HERMAN ESE CENTER:

288
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

247
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 69%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 7%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1274
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

294
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1590
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MT. HERMAN ESE CENTER:

331
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1659
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MT. HERMAN ESE CENTER:

331
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1473
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

228
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 76%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 19%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1755
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

285
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 25%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
MT. HERMAN ESE CENTER:

1855
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

282
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 40
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 35%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 75%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 71
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 38%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 90%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1311
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

302
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1470
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

301
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1556
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MT. HERMAN ESE CENTER:

293
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1358
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

248
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 60%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1499
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

258
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 23%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
MT. HERMAN ESE CENTER:

1657
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

262
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 61%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 7%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1728
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

276
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 60%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 5%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

287
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 22%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

223
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 73%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 3%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1439
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

330
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1520
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

315
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1586
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

315
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1392
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MT. HERMAN ESE CENTER:

245
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 70%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1566
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

251
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 12%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1721
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

276
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 21%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1815
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

270
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 20%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

58
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
Here:

627
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
Here:

56
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
MT. HERMAN ESE CENTER:

12
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
MT. HERMAN ESE CENTER:

8
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

64
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
Here:

643
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
Here:

61
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
MT. HERMAN ESE CENTER:

9
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
MT. HERMAN ESE CENTER:

65
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
Here:

655
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
MT. HERMAN ESE CENTER:

62
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
MT. HERMAN ESE CENTER:

12
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
MT. HERMAN ESE CENTER:

12
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

10
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
Here:

629
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
Here:

25
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
MT. HERMAN ESE CENTER:

10
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

5
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

33
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
MT. HERMAN ESE CENTER:

643
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
MT. HERMAN ESE CENTER:

33
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

11
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

5
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

58
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
Here:

645
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
Here:

25
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

8
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

5
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

9
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

5
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

33
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
Here:

663
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
Here:

32
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
MT. HERMAN ESE CENTER:

8
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

5
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
MT. HERMAN ESE CENTER:

11
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

4
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 64
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

290
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 47%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 73%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 65
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

232
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 63%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 12%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 7
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 34%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 74%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Jacksonville, FL
  5. Mt. Herman Ese Center School in Jacksonville, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.