Nap Ford Community Charter School in Orlando, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 64.

648 W LIVINGSTON ST
Orlando, FL 32801

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Lake Eola Charter School (0.7 miles):

98
Clarcona Elementary School (8.8 miles):

70
Nap Ford Community Charter School:

64
Wicklow Elementary School (17.1 miles):

60
Catalina Elementary School (2.7 miles):

55
Passport Charter School (4.4 miles):

46
Ucp Pine Hills Charter School (5.4 miles):

36
Kissimmee Charter Academy School (15.0 miles):

25
New Beginnings Education Complex School (17.5 miles):

0
Nap Ford Community Charter School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Orange County:

44
Orlando:

42
Nap Ford Community Charter School:

64

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (407) 245-8711 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 48
School number: 62
School type: Elementary
District Name: ORANGE
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (407) 245-8712
Principal: Jennifer Porter-Smith
Regular charter school.
School in Need of Improvement (SINI) Status: Year 4 in Need of Improvement
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 3
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 36
Senate District: 19

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

59%
State average from 963 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

52%
State average from 963 schools:

77%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
NAP FORD COMMUNITY CHARTER:

70%
State average from 963 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

20%
State average from 962 schools:

53%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

44%
State average from 963 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

48%
State average from 963 schools:

66%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
NAP FORD COMMUNITY CHARTER:

44%
State average from 963 schools:

58%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

48%
State average from 963 schools:

66%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

385
State average from 963 schools:

543
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 963 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: NO

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: A

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

89%
State average from 963 schools:

58%
Minority Rate
Here:

99%
State average from 963 schools:

47%
Region: 3

Title I: YES


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 46 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 46 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 43

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 43
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 45 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 45 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 42

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 42
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 41 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 41 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 38

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 38
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

56%
State average from 959 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

47%
State average from 959 schools:

77%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

89%
State average from 959 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

54%
State average from 959 schools:

52%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

71%
State average from 959 schools:

67%
Making Math Gains
Here:

57%
State average from 959 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
NAP FORD COMMUNITY CHARTER:

71%
State average from 959 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

57%
State average from 959 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

502
State average from 959 schools:

560
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 959 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: A

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
NAP FORD COMMUNITY CHARTER:

91%
State average from 959 schools:

54%
Minority Rate
Here:

98%
State average from 959 schools:

46%
Region: 3


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 40 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 40 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

54%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 37

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 37
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 40 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 40 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

54%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 37

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 37
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 35 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

79%
State average from 954 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

68%
State average from 954 schools:

76%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

85%
State average from 954 schools:

82%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

43%
State average from 954 schools:

48%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

74%
State average from 954 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
Here:

70%
State average from 954 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

74%
State average from 954 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

73%
State average from 954 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

566
State average from 954 schools:

544
Percent Tested
Here:

96%
State average from 954 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

59%
State average from 954 schools:

51%
Minority Rate
Here:

8%
State average from 954 schools:

45%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 43 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 43 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 42
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 41

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

40%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 42
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 41
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 42 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 42 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 40

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

41%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 40
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 38 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 38 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 36

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

35%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 36
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1300
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

300
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

15%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

10%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

45%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

30%
State average:

32%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

75%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

16
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1414
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

291
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

19%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

38%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

44%
State average:

32%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

44%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

17
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1526
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
NAP FORD COMMUNITY CHARTER:

288
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

20%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
NAP FORD COMMUNITY CHARTER:

40%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

20%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

20%
State average:

28%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
NAP FORD COMMUNITY CHARTER:

40%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

14
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
NAP FORD COMMUNITY CHARTER:

9
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
NAP FORD COMMUNITY CHARTER:

1637
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
NAP FORD COMMUNITY CHARTER:

298
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
NAP FORD COMMUNITY CHARTER:

39%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
NAP FORD COMMUNITY CHARTER:

17%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

22%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
NAP FORD COMMUNITY CHARTER:

22%
State average:

25%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

44%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

12
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1834
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

322
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

10%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

16%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

42%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

23%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

10%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

74%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

17
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1857
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

304
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

10%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
NAP FORD COMMUNITY CHARTER:

48%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

29%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

10%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

5%
State average:

3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

43%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

15
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

6
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

292
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
NAP FORD COMMUNITY CHARTER:

30%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
NAP FORD COMMUNITY CHARTER:

50%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

20%
State average:

36%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

20%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
NAP FORD COMMUNITY CHARTER:

7
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
NAP FORD COMMUNITY CHARTER:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

7
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
NAP FORD COMMUNITY CHARTER:

14%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

38%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

43%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

5%
State average:

2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

48%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

9
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
NAP FORD COMMUNITY CHARTER:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1329
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

306
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

15%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

10%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

40%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

30%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

5%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

75%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1365
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

279
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

31%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

44%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

19%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

6%
State average:

26%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

25%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1547
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

307
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

20%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

40%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

30%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

10%
State average:

28%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
NAP FORD COMMUNITY CHARTER:

40%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
NAP FORD COMMUNITY CHARTER:

5
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1619
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

297
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

39%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

28%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

11%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

17%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

6%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

33%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1830
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

316
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

19%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

29%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

26%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

23%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

52%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
NAP FORD COMMUNITY CHARTER:

1878
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

316
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

10%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

24%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

43%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

24%
State average:

17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

67%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
NAP FORD COMMUNITY CHARTER:

1154
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

276
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1597
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

322
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1618
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

305
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 43%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1626
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

296
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1762
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

308
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1926
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

319
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

302
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

333
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1175
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

273
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 54%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
NAP FORD COMMUNITY CHARTER:

1416
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

291
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 54%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
NAP FORD COMMUNITY CHARTER:

1602
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

319
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1693
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

314
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1752
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

297
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
NAP FORD COMMUNITY CHARTER:

1934
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
NAP FORD COMMUNITY CHARTER:

330
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 13
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 38%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 8%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 69%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 17
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 35%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 82%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1137
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

273
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1573
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

318
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1701
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

319
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 70%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 90%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1597
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
NAP FORD COMMUNITY CHARTER:

291
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1686
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

294
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

286
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 60%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1143
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

266
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 56%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 22%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
NAP FORD COMMUNITY CHARTER:

1511
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1612
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

321
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1645
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

303
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1716
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

288
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
NAP FORD COMMUNITY CHARTER:

18
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
NAP FORD COMMUNITY CHARTER:

607
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
Here:

37
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
NAP FORD COMMUNITY CHARTER:

8
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
NAP FORD COMMUNITY CHARTER:

5
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

15
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
Here:

654
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
Here:

70
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
NAP FORD COMMUNITY CHARTER:

10
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

8
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

10
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
NAP FORD COMMUNITY CHARTER:

674
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
Here:

78
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
NAP FORD COMMUNITY CHARTER:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
NAP FORD COMMUNITY CHARTER:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

23
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
NAP FORD COMMUNITY CHARTER:

660
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
Here:

53
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
NAP FORD COMMUNITY CHARTER:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
NAP FORD COMMUNITY CHARTER:

27
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
NAP FORD COMMUNITY CHARTER:

675
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
NAP FORD COMMUNITY CHARTER:

62
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
NAP FORD COMMUNITY CHARTER:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

8
State average:

192

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 15
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

308
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 27%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 60%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 7%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 73%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 9

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Orlando, FL
  5. Nap Ford Community Charter School in Orlando, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.