Nellie N. Coffman Middle School in Cathedral City, CA
(06-08 • Public • Regular School)
City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in California) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 26
- Address
- 34-603 Plumley Rd.
Cathedral City, CA 92234
- Telephone
- (760) 770-8617
(make sure to verify first before calling)
- Website
- http://www.psusd.us
- City-data.com school rating
- 26
- Students
- 1,095
- Classroom Teachers (FTE)
- 45.4
- National School Lunch
Program (NSLP) Status - No
- Free lunch eligible students
- 887
- Reduced-price lunch
eligible students - 114
- School district
- Palm Springs Unified
- Charter school
- No
- Title I status
- Title I schoolwide school
- Magnet School Indicator
- No
- Shared Time Indicator
- Missing
- Adult education offered
- No
No street view available for this location
Ratings
This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
Nellie N. Coffman Middle School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:California: | 46 |
Riverside County: | 40 |
Cathedral City: | 33 |
Nellie N. Coffman Middle School: | 26 |
Students & Teachers
Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 1,095
Enrollment in 2015: 1,081
Enrollment in 2014: 1,138
Enrollment in 2013: 1,051
Enrollment in 2012: 1,108
Enrollment in 2011: 1,115
Enrollment in 2010: 1,104
Enrollment in 2009: 1,152
Enrollment in 2008: 1,175
Enrollment in 2007: 1,177
Enrollment in 2006: 1,227
Enrollment in 2005: 1,193
Enrollment in 2004: 1,188
Enrollment in 2003: 1,173
Enrollment in 2002: 1,138
Enrollment in 2001: 1,018
Enrollment in 2000: 1,017
Enrollment in 1999: 925
Nellie N. Coffman Middle School - Historical enrollment
Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)
Grade | G06 | G07 | G08 | Total |
---|
All students | 346 | 347 | 402 | 1,095 |
Female students | 181 | 163 | 213 | 557 |
Male students | 165 | 184 | 189 | 538 |
American Indian/Alaska Native students | 1 | - | - | 1 |
Asian students | 5 | 1 | 10 | 16 |
Hispanic students | 304 | 319 | 352 | 975 |
Black students | 8 | 10 | 8 | 26 |
White students | 25 | 14 | 29 | 68 |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander students | - | - | 1 | 1 |
Two or More Races students | 3 | 3 | 2 | 8 |
Enrollment by grade:
6th grade enrollment: 346
7th grade enrollment: 347
8th grade enrollment: 402
Nellie N. Coffman Middle School - Historical enrollment by grade
Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 12,430 schools)
Female enrollment: 557 (50.9%)Nellie N. Coffman Middle School: | 50.9% |
State: | 49.4% |
Male enrollment: 538 (49.1%)School: | 49.1% |
California: | 49.6% |
Nellie N. Coffman Middle School - Historical enrollment by gender
Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 12,430 schools)
American Indian/Alaska Native enrollment: 1 (0.1%)Nellie N. Coffman Middle School: | 0.1% |
California: | 1.0% |
Asian enrollment: 16 (1.5%)
Hispanic enrollment: 975 (89.0%)
Black enrollment: 26 (2.4%)
White enrollment: 68 (6.2%)Nellie N. Coffman Middle School: | 6.2% |
State: | 28.3% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander enrollment: 1 (0.1%)
Two or More Races enrollment: 8 (0.7%)
Nellie N. Coffman Middle School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity
Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 10,111 schools)
Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 1,001 (91.4%)Nellie N. Coffman Middle School: | 91.4% |
State: | 61.2% |
Free lunch eligible students: 887 (81.0%)Here: | 81.0% |
California: | 52.8% |
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 114 (10.4%)
Nellie N. Coffman Middle School - Lunch Program Eligibility
Teachers and support:
(State average from 12,394 schools)
Classroom Teachers (FTE): 45.4
Number of FTE teachers in their first year of teaching: 2
Number of FTE teachers in their second year of teaching: 0.5
Number of FTE school counselors: 2
Number of FTE teachers who were absent more than 10 school days during the school years: 8
Number of FTE security guards: 2
Number of FTE nurses: 0.6
Number of FTE psychologists: 0.6
Nellie N. Coffman Middle School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio
School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds:
$3,895,562- Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 40.4 (Salary Expenditures: $3,532,139)
- Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 0.8 (Salary Expenditures: $23,843)
- Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 8.8 (Salary Expenditures: $221,389)
- Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 3 (Salary Expenditures: $463,847)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds:
$173,377 Limited English Proficiency:
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs
- Hispanic334
- Asian4
- Native Hawaiian2
- IDEA58
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 340 (male: 181, female: 159)
- Hispanic: 334 (male: 179, female: 155)
- Asian: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 2 (all female)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 58 (male: 35, female: 23)
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs
- Hispanic322
- Asian2
- White2
- IDEA49
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 326 (male: 178, female: 148)
- Hispanic: 322 (male: 176, female: 146)
- Asian: 2 (all male)
- White: 2 (all female)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 49 (male: 35, female: 14)
Students with disabilities:
Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.
Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 96 (male: 62, female: 34)
- Hispanic: 89 (male: 55, female: 34)
- White: 7 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 59 (male: 34, female: 25)
Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 6 (male: 2, female: 4)
- Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- White: 2 (all female)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all male)
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 81 (male: 62, female: 19)
- Hispanic: 74 (male: 55, female: 19)
- White: 7 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 53 (male: 37, female: 16)
Students with disabilities served under Section 504
- Hispanic7
- Black2
- White4
- LEP2
Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 13 (male: 9, female: 4)
- Hispanic: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
- Black: 2 (all male)
- White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all male)
Gifted and Talented:
(State average from 5,551 schools)
This school has students enrolled in one or more gifted/talented programs
Gifted/talented programs are programs during regular school hours that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an enriched curriculum for students who are endowed with a high degree of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, creativity, interest, or talent.
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment
- Hispanic82
- Asian2
- Black2
- White10
- LEP2
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 96 (male: 37, female: 59)
- Hispanic: 82 (male: 35, female: 47)
- Asian: 2 (all female)
- Black: 2 (all female)
- White: 10 (male: 2, female: 8)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all female)
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 studentsNellie N. Coffman Middle School: | 87.7 |
California: | 84.3 |
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment
- Hispanic82
- Asian5
- Black4
- White16
- IDEA2
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 107 (male: 54, female: 53)
- Hispanic: 82 (male: 44, female: 38)
- Asian: 5 (all female)
- Black: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- White: 16 (male: 8, female: 8)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all male)
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 students
Statewide Student Assessments
Smarter Balanced Summative Assessments:
(State average from 10,463 schools)
Smarter Balanced Summative Assessments (SB) is one of the online summative assessments - part of California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) System.
The summative assessments are comprehensive, end-of-year assessments of grade-level learning that measure progress toward college and career readiness. Each test in English language arts/literacy (ELA) and mathematics is comprised of two parts: (1) a computer-adaptive test and (2) a performance task, administered within a selected testing window available at 66 percent of the instructional year for grades three through eight, and grade eleven.
The summative assessments are aligned with the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) for ELA and mathematics. The tests capitalize on the strengths of computer adaptive testing efficient and precise measurement across the full range of achievement and timely turnaround of results.
ELA Standard Met and Above
- All36%
- Males32%
- Females40%
- Black35%
- Hispanic34%
- White43%
ELA students tested: 1,019
ELA students with scores: 1,019
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 36% |
State: | 49% |
Standard Not Met:
34.7%Standard Nearly Met:
29.1%Standard Met:
29.1%Standard Exceeded:
7.0%All Grades:
6th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2488.9, Students tested: 345, Standard Not Met: 34.8%, Nearly Met: 28.1%, Met: 29.6%, Exceeded: 7.5%)7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2519.9, Students tested: 341, Standard Not Met: 34.3%, Nearly Met: 27.3%, Met: 30.2%, Exceeded: 8.2%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2520.7, Students tested: 333, Standard Not Met: 35.1%, Nearly Met: 32.1%, Met: 27.6%, Exceeded: 5.1%)Nellie N. Coffman Middle School - ELA Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
Math Standard Met and Above
- All19%
- Males18%
- Females20%
- Black6%
- Hispanic18%
- White24%
Math students tested: 1,021
Math students with scores: 1,019
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 19% |
California: | 38% |
Standard Not Met:
54.8%Standard Nearly Met:
26.2%Standard Met:
11.9%Standard Exceeded:
7.2%All Grades:
6th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2473.5, Students tested: 353, Standard Not Met: 44.9%, Nearly Met: 33.2%, Met: 13.9%, Exceeded: 8.0%)7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2475.8, Students tested: 339, Standard Not Met: 52.2%, Nearly Met: 28.0%, Met: 12.4%, Exceeded: 7.4%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2465.8, Students tested: 329, Standard Not Met: 68.0%, Nearly Met: 16.8%, Met: 9.2%, Exceeded: 6.1%)Nellie N. Coffman Middle School - Math Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
ELA Standard Met and Above
- All35%
- Males29%
- Females40%
- Black35%
- Hispanic32%
- White42%
ELA students tested: 1,068
ELA students with scores: 1,064
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 35% |
California: | 48% |
Standard Not Met:
34.0%Standard Nearly Met:
31.0%Standard Met:
29.0%Standard Exceeded:
5.0%All Grades:
6th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2494.6, Students tested: 341, Standard Not Met: 33.0%, Nearly Met: 30.0%, Met: 31.0%, Exceeded: 6.0%)7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2510.6, Students tested: 338, Standard Not Met: 37.0%, Nearly Met: 33.0%, Met: 22.0%, Exceeded: 8.0%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2524.7, Students tested: 389, Standard Not Met: 34.0%, Nearly Met: 30.0%, Met: 34.0%, Exceeded: 2.0%)Nellie N. Coffman Middle School - ELA Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
Math Standard Met and Above
- All19%
- Males17%
- Females21%
- Black10%
- Hispanic17%
- White27%
Math students tested: 1,081
Math students with scores: 1,079
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 19% |
State: | 37% |
Standard Not Met:
53.0%Standard Nearly Met:
29.0%Standard Met:
13.0%Standard Exceeded:
6.0%All Grades:
6th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2469.2, Students tested: 344, Standard Not Met: 48.0%, Nearly Met: 31.0%, Met: 13.0%, Exceeded: 8.0%)7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2478.4, Students tested: 342, Standard Not Met: 51.0%, Nearly Met: 30.0%, Met: 14.0%, Exceeded: 5.0%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2486.0, Students tested: 395, Standard Not Met: 58.0%, Nearly Met: 25.0%, Met: 11.0%, Exceeded: 6.0%)Nellie N. Coffman Middle School - Math Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
ELA Standard Met and Above
- All30%
- Males25%
- Females36%
- Black52%
- Hispanic28%
- White38%
ELA students tested: 1,073
ELA students with scores: 1,065
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 30% |
California: | 44% |
Standard Not Met:
37.0%Standard Nearly Met:
33.0%Standard Met:
26.0%Standard Exceeded:
4.0%All Grades:
6th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2480.7, Students tested: 338, Standard Not Met: 39.0%, Nearly Met: 32.0%, Met: 23.0%, Exceeded: 6.0%)7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2500.2, Students tested: 389, Standard Not Met: 40.0%, Nearly Met: 33.0%, Met: 26.0%, Exceeded: 2.0%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2530.6, Students tested: 346, Standard Not Met: 32.0%, Nearly Met: 33.0%, Met: 29.0%, Exceeded: 6.0%)Nellie N. Coffman Middle School - ELA Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
Math Standard Met and Above
- All17%
- Males16%
- Females18%
- Black5%
- Hispanic16%
- White21%
Math students tested: 1,086
Math students with scores: 1,083
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 17% |
California: | 34% |
Standard Not Met:
57.0%Standard Nearly Met:
27.0%Standard Met:
12.0%Standard Exceeded:
5.0%All Grades:
6th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2454.1, Students tested: 346, Standard Not Met: 55.0%, Nearly Met: 29.0%, Met: 11.0%, Exceeded: 5.0%)7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2470.5, Students tested: 392, Standard Not Met: 53.0%, Nearly Met: 29.0%, Met: 15.0%, Exceeded: 3.0%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2472.9, Students tested: 348, Standard Not Met: 63.0%, Nearly Met: 22.0%, Met: 10.0%, Exceeded: 6.0%)Nellie N. Coffman Middle School - Math Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
Paper-based CAASPP:
(State average from 9,784 schools)
California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) System includes paper-based tests:
California Standards Tests (CSTs) - The CSTs for science in grades five, eight, and ten are administered only to students in California public schools. All questions are multiple-choice. These tests were developed specifically to assess students' knowledge of the California content standards in science.
California Modified Assessment (CMA) - The CMA for science was administered to eligible students in grades five, eight, and ten. The CMA is a standards-based test for students with an individualized education program who meet the eligibility criteria adopted by the State Board of Education. The Elementary and Secondary Education Act called for a range of assessments appropriate to students' abilities. The CMA provides an appropriate assessment for a small percentage of students allowing them to demonstrate their knowledge of skills in the California academic content standards for science.
CST Science students tested: 385
CST Science students with scores: 383
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 33% |
California: | 54% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
17.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
21.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
29.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
25.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
8.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 318.2, Students tested: 385, Far Below Basic: 17.0%, Below Basic: 21.0%, Basic: 29.0%, Proficient: 25.0%, Advanced: 8.0%) CST Science students tested: 345
CST Science students with scores: 343
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 26% |
State: | 56% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
25.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
22.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
27.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
20.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
6.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 303.9, Students tested: 345, Far Below Basic: 25.0%, Below Basic: 22.0%, Basic: 27.0%, Proficient: 20.0%, Advanced: 6.0%) CST Science students tested: 369
CST Science students with scores: 356
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 53% |
State: | 60% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
7.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
17.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
23.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
24.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
29.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 357.4, Students tested: 369, Far Below Basic: 7.0%, Below Basic: 17.0%, Basic: 23.0%, Proficient: 24.0%, Advanced: 29.0%)
CMA Science students tested: 12
CMA Science students with scores: 7
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 29% |
State: | 39% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
28.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
14.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
29.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
29.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
0.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 305.9, Students tested: 12, Far Below Basic: 28.0%, Below Basic: 14.0%, Basic: 29.0%, Proficient: 29.0%, Advanced: 0.0%) The Physical Fitness Test:
The Physical Fitness Test (PFT) for students in California schools is the FITNESSGRAM. The main goal of the test is to help students in starting life-long habits of regular physical activity.
Aerobic Capacity:7th grade:
(Students tested: 331, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 48.9%, Needs Improvement: 39.9%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 11.2%)
Body Composition:7th grade:
(Students tested: 331, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 58.6%, Needs Improvement: 20.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 20.6%)
Abdominal Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 331, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 94.9%, Needs Improvement: 5.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 331, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 96.1%, Needs Improvement: 3.9%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 331, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 90.3%, Needs Improvement: 9.7%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:7th grade:
(Students tested: 331, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 96.7%, Needs Improvement: 3.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:7th grade:
(Students tested: 326, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 35.9%, Needs Improvement: 56.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 8.0%)
Body Composition:7th grade:
(Students tested: 326, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 52.8%, Needs Improvement: 22.7%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 24.5%)
Abdominal Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 326, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 87.7%, Needs Improvement: 12.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 326, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 99.4%, Needs Improvement: 0.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 326, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 82.8%, Needs Improvement: 17.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:7th grade:
(Students tested: 326, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 86.2%, Needs Improvement: 13.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:7th grade:
(Students tested: 384, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 46.1%, Needs Improvement: 41.7%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 12.2%)
Body Composition:7th grade:
(Students tested: 384, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 54.9%, Needs Improvement: 22.7%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 22.4%)
Abdominal Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 384, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 93.2%, Needs Improvement: 6.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 384, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 96.4%, Needs Improvement: 3.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 384, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 82.8%, Needs Improvement: 17.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:7th grade:
(Students tested: 384, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 82.8%, Needs Improvement: 17.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:7th grade:
(Students tested: 323, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 44.6%, Needs Improvement: 44.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 11.1%)
Body Composition:7th grade:
(Students tested: 323, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 60.1%, Needs Improvement: 17.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 22.9%)
Abdominal Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 323, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 96.6%, Needs Improvement: 3.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 323, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 96.6%, Needs Improvement: 3.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 323, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 94.4%, Needs Improvement: 5.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:7th grade:
(Students tested: 323, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 99.4%, Needs Improvement: 0.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:7th grade:
(Students tested: 365, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 54.8%, Needs Improvement: 30.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 15.1%)
Body Composition:7th grade:
(Students tested: 365, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 54.0%, Needs Improvement: 8.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 37.8%)
Abdominal Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 365, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 96.2%, Needs Improvement: 3.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 365, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 99.2%, Needs Improvement: 0.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 365, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 91.2%, Needs Improvement: 8.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:7th grade:
(Students tested: 365, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 98.1%, Needs Improvement: 1.9%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:7th grade:
(Students tested: 339, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 45.1%, Needs Improvement: 37.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 17.4%)
Body Composition:7th grade:
(Students tested: 339, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 48.4%, Needs Improvement: 14.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 37.4%)
Abdominal Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 339, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 93.8%, Needs Improvement: 6.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 339, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 92.0%, Needs Improvement: 8.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 339, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 81.7%, Needs Improvement: 18.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:7th grade:
(Students tested: 339, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 99.1%, Needs Improvement: 0.9%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
California English Language Development Test:
(State average from 9,932 schools)
Students in kindergarten through grade twelve whose home language is not English are required by law to take an English skills test. In California, the test is called the California English Language Development Test (CELDT).
Nellie N. Coffman Middle School - students who met CELDT criterion (all grades)
All Grades:Student Count: 342
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 153
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 45.0% |
State: | 34.0% |
Grade 6:Student Count: 148
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 47
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 32.0% |
State: | 39.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 528.9 |
California: | 532.4 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 502.0 |
California: | 518.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 540.9 |
California: | 518.5 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 518.1 |
California: | 522.0 |
Grade 7:Student Count: 104
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 51
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 49.0% |
State: | 48.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 550.3 |
California: | 547.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 524.5 |
California: | 534.4 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 563.5 |
California: | 529.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 519.3 |
California: | 530.2 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 90
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 55
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 61.0% |
State: | 47.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 569.9 |
California: | 556.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 549.6 |
State: | 547.2 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 587.5 |
State: | 536.1 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 546.3 |
State: | 537.0 |
All Grades:Student Count: 342
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 161
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 47.0% |
California: | 34.0% |
Grade 6:Student Count: 121
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 51
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 42.0% |
California: | 41.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 538.6 |
California: | 536.1 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 521.5 |
California: | 523.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 548.7 |
State: | 520.8 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 527.8 |
California: | 524.6 |
Grade 7:Student Count: 108
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 57
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 53.0% |
State: | 48.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 567.4 |
California: | 550.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 535.9 |
California: | 536.7 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 553.8 |
California: | 530.6 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 538.7 |
State: | 532.1 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 113
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 53
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 47.0% |
State: | 49.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 568.0 |
State: | 562.4 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 555.0 |
State: | 552.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 552.9 |
State: | 539.5 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 544.8 |
State: | 541.2 |
All Grades:Student Count: 364
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 160
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 44.0% |
California: | 34.0% |
Grade 6:Student Count: 140
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 57
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 41.0% |
State: | 38.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 546.3 |
State: | 535.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 514.9 |
California: | 521.6 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 534.4 |
California: | 519.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 517.4 |
California: | 522.6 |
Grade 7:Student Count: 122
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 56
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 46.0% |
State: | 47.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 570.6 |
State: | 551.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 530.9 |
State: | 538.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 545.2 |
California: | 532.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 538.5 |
State: | 532.1 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 102
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 47
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 46.0% |
State: | 48.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 560.9 |
California: | 562.8 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 554.2 |
State: | 552.6 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 553.9 |
State: | 543.1 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 539.9 |
California: | 541.5 |
All Grades:Student Count: 340
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 163
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 48.0% |
California: | 34.0% |
Grade 6:Student Count: 152
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 66
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 43.0% |
State: | 40.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 549.7 |
State: | 538.0 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 516.2 |
California: | 525.9 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 518.4 |
California: | 522.1 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 519.0 |
California: | 526.2 |
Grade 7:Student Count: 98
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 43
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 44.0% |
State: | 47.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 559.0 |
State: | 549.7 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 530.3 |
State: | 538.6 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 533.8 |
State: | 533.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 541.5 |
California: | 535.2 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 90
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 54
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 60.0% |
California: | 49.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 582.0 |
State: | 564.3 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 558.4 |
State: | 554.9 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 555.1 |
California: | 545.4 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 551.6 |
State: | 545.9 |
All Grades:Student Count: 295
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 157
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 53.0% |
State: | 34.0% |
Grade 6:Student Count: 116
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 61
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 53.0% |
State: | 39.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 560.5 |
State: | 538.5 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 535.4 |
State: | 525.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 551.2 |
California: | 530.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 528.7 |
California: | 530.3 |
Grade 7:Student Count: 87
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 49
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 56.0% |
California: | 47.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 600.2 |
California: | 557.3 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 538.6 |
State: | 539.4 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 566.0 |
California: | 543.2 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 536.0 |
State: | 540.4 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 92
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 47
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 51.0% |
California: | 47.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 618.0 |
State: | 570.1 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 551.8 |
State: | 552.2 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 592.1 |
State: | 551.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 554.5 |
California: | 548.6 |
All Grades:Student Count: 319
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 174
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 55.0% |
California: | 35.0% |
Grade 6:Student Count: 117
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 70
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 60.0% |
California: | 44.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 619.8 |
State: | 551.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 535.3 |
State: | 532.4 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 582.0 |
California: | 532.5 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 534.0 |
State: | 534.7 |
Grade 7:Student Count: 105
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 47
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 45.0% |
California: | 50.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 604.6 |
California: | 566.1 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 528.5 |
California: | 544.7 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 586.3 |
State: | 543.8 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 541.0 |
State: | 545.1 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 97
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 57
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 59.0% |
State: | 50.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 632.7 |
California: | 579.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 549.1 |
State: | 558.4 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 585.1 |
State: | 553.4 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 566.5 |
California: | 555.6 |
All Grades:Student Count: 307
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 127
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 41.0% |
State: | 31.0% |
Grade 6:Student Count: 110
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 30
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 27.0% |
State: | 40.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 545.8 |
State: | 546.8 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 488.3 |
California: | 529.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 592.7 |
State: | 533.3 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 507.7 |
California: | 525.3 |
Grade 7:Student Count: 102
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 48
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 47.0% |
State: | 48.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 566.8 |
State: | 559.8 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 517.1 |
State: | 542.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 588.6 |
State: | 548.8 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 513.2 |
California: | 534.4 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 95
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 49
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 52.0% |
California: | 48.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 573.1 |
California: | 570.7 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 547.3 |
California: | 557.2 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 606.5 |
State: | 562.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 533.7 |
California: | 544.1 |
Accountability
Adequate Yearly Progress:
(State average from 9,846 schools)
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) - Accountability system mandated by federal No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Statistics are based on test results of the Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) Program, the California High School Exit Examination (CAHSEE), and the California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA).
Nellie N. Coffman Middle School - Adequate Yearly Progress status
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic99
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Black96
- White95
- Multirace100
- SED98
- LEP99
- With Disabilities96
- Hispanic: 99% (tested 957 out of 970 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 12 out of 12 enrolled)
- Black: 96% (tested 23 out of 24 enrolled)
- White: 95% (tested 63 out of 67 enrolled)
- Two or More Races: 100% (tested 6 out of 6 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 98% (tested 1,000 out of 1,016 enrolled)
- English Learners: 99% (tested 628 out of 634 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 96% (tested 111 out of 116 enrolled)
Math Participation RateNellie N. Coffman Middle School: | 99.0% |
California: | 96.1% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic99
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black96
- White95
- Multirace100
- SED99
- LEP99
- With Disabilities97
- Hispanic: 99% (tested 970 out of 978 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 12 out of 12 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Black: 96% (tested 23 out of 24 enrolled)
- White: 95% (tested 64 out of 68 enrolled)
- Two or More Races: 100% (tested 6 out of 6 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 99% (tested 1,010 out of 1,022 enrolled)
- English Learners: 99% (tested 639 out of 643 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 97% (tested 115 out of 118 enrolled)
Met all AYP Criteria: Yes
Number of AYP criteria met: 9
Number of AYP criteria possible: 9
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)Attendance rate (calculated by using number of days attended and enrolled) : 95
Met Attendance rate Target: Yes
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
ELA Participation RateHere: | 99.0% |
California: | 95.2% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic99
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Black100
- White97
- Multirace91
- SED99
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 99% (tested 951 out of 962 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 7 out of 7 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 9 out of 9 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 24 out of 24 enrolled)
- White: 97% (tested 62 out of 64 enrolled)
- Two or More Races: 91% (tested 10 out of 11 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 99% (tested 1,012 out of 1,025 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 568 out of 569 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 111 out of 111 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveNellie N. Coffman Middle School: | 30.7% |
State: | 42.6% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic29
- Black54
- White43
- SED30
- LEP17
- With Disabilities9
- Hispanic: 29% (267 out of 916 valid scores)
- Black: 54% (13 out of 24 valid scores)
- White: 43% (24 out of 56 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 30% (288 out of 977 valid scores)
- English Learners: 17% (94 out of 548 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 9% (10 out of 109 valid scores)
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Math Participation RateSchool: | 99.0% |
California: | 94.9% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic99
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Black100
- White97
- Multirace91
- SED99
- LEP100
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 99% (tested 969 out of 979 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 7 out of 7 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 9 out of 9 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 24 out of 24 enrolled)
- White: 97% (tested 62 out of 64 enrolled)
- Two or More Races: 91% (tested 10 out of 11 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 99% (tested 1,028 out of 1,041 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 584 out of 585 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 111 out of 112 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveHere: | 17.5% |
California: | 33.3% |
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic17
- Black4
- White23
- SED16
- LEP12
- With Disabilities5
- Hispanic: 17% (158 out of 916 valid scores)
- Black: 4% (1 out of 24 valid scores)
- White: 23% (13 out of 56 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 16% (160 out of 977 valid scores)
- English Learners: 12% (64 out of 548 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 5% (5 out of 109 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 8
Number of AYP criteria possible: 17
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: No
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 89.2%
ELA Participation RateSchool: | 99.0% |
California: | 98.2% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic99
- American Indian100
- Asian88
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- Multirace100
- SED99
- LEP99
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 99% (tested 911 out of 918 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Asian: 88% (tested 7 out of 8 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 6 out of 6 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 29 out of 29 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 82 out of 82 enrolled)
- Two or More Races: 100% (tested 4 out of 4 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 99% (tested 987 out of 993 enrolled)
- English Learners: 99% (tested 526 out of 529 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 93 out of 94 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveSchool: | 39.6% |
California: | 55.7% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic37
- Black65
- White54
- SED39
- LEP21
- With Disabilities21
- Hispanic: 37% (324 out of 868 valid scores)
- Black: 65% (17 out of 26 valid scores)
- White: 54% (39 out of 72 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 39% (364 out of 944 valid scores)
- English Learners: 21% (104 out of 507 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 21% (18 out of 84 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: No
Math Percent Proficient Target: 89.5%
Math Participation RateHere: | 99.0% |
California: | 98.2% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic99
- American Indian100
- Asian88
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- Multirace100
- SED99
- LEP99
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 99% (tested 909 out of 918 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Asian: 88% (tested 7 out of 8 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 6 out of 6 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 29 out of 29 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 82 out of 82 enrolled)
- Two or More Races: 100% (tested 4 out of 4 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 99% (tested 985 out of 993 enrolled)
- English Learners: 99% (tested 524 out of 529 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 93 out of 94 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or Above
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic40
- Black50
- White51
- SED41
- LEP29
- With Disabilities17
- Hispanic: 40% (349 out of 866 valid scores)
- Black: 50% (13 out of 26 valid scores)
- White: 51% (37 out of 72 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 41% (386 out of 942 valid scores)
- English Learners: 29% (147 out of 505 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 17% (14 out of 84 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 9
Number of AYP criteria possible: 17
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: No
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 78.4%
ELA Participation RateSchool: | 100.0% |
California: | 98.3% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White98
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 972 out of 975 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 5 out of 5 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 4 out of 4 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 12 out of 12 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 32 out of 32 enrolled)
- White: 98% (tested 84 out of 86 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,036 out of 1,041 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 583 out of 585 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 101 out of 102 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or Above
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic39
- Filipino64
- Black50
- White65
- SED40
- LEP25
- With Disabilities26
- Hispanic: 39% (359 out of 924 valid scores)
- Filipino: 64% (7 out of 11 valid scores)
- Black: 50% (15 out of 30 valid scores)
- White: 65% (51 out of 78 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 40% (393 out of 982 valid scores)
- English Learners: 25% (141 out of 565 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 26% (25 out of 96 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: No
Math Percent Proficient Target: 79%
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White98
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 971 out of 974 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 5 out of 5 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 4 out of 4 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 12 out of 12 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 32 out of 32 enrolled)
- White: 98% (tested 84 out of 86 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,035 out of 1,040 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 583 out of 584 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 101 out of 102 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveSchool: | 37.6% |
California: | 59.9% |
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic37
- Filipino46
- Black50
- White44
- SED37
- LEP29
- With Disabilities26
- Hispanic: 37% (339 out of 923 valid scores)
- Filipino: 46% (5 out of 11 valid scores)
- Black: 50% (15 out of 30 valid scores)
- White: 44% (34 out of 78 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 37% (361 out of 981 valid scores)
- English Learners: 29% (161 out of 565 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 26% (25 out of 96 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 12
Number of AYP criteria possible: 21
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: No
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 67.6%
ELA Participation RateNellie N. Coffman Middle School: | 100.0% |
California: | 98.2% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 967 out of 968 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 6 out of 6 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 12 out of 12 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 33 out of 33 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 91 out of 91 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,014 out of 1,015 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 627 out of 628 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 126 out of 126 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or Above
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic37
- Filipino73
- Black43
- White61
- SED38
- LEP25
- With Disabilities33
- Hispanic: 37% (342 out of 916 valid scores)
- Filipino: 73% (8 out of 11 valid scores)
- Black: 43% (12 out of 28 valid scores)
- White: 61% (49 out of 81 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 38% (363 out of 953 valid scores)
- English Learners: 25% (151 out of 594 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 33% (39 out of 117 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: No
Math Percent Proficient Target: 68.5%
Math Participation RateSchool: | 100.0% |
California: | 98.0% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 968 out of 968 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 6 out of 6 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 12 out of 12 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 33 out of 33 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 91 out of 91 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,015 out of 1,015 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 628 out of 628 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 126 out of 126 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or Above
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic36
- Filipino64
- Black43
- White51
- SED37
- LEP29
- With Disabilities33
- Hispanic: 36% (334 out of 917 valid scores)
- Filipino: 64% (7 out of 11 valid scores)
- Black: 43% (12 out of 28 valid scores)
- White: 51% (41 out of 81 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 37% (354 out of 954 valid scores)
- English Learners: 29% (175 out of 595 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 33% (38 out of 117 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 15
Number of AYP criteria possible: 23
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: No
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 56.8%
ELA Participation RateNellie N. Coffman Middle School: | 100.0% |
California: | 98.2% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White96
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 960 out of 960 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 5 out of 5 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 9 out of 9 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 13 out of 13 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 36 out of 36 enrolled)
- White: 96% (tested 101 out of 105 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,001 out of 1,002 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 670 out of 670 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 156 out of 157 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveSchool: | 40.6% |
California: | 53.7% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic38
- Filipino39
- Black48
- White63
- SED37
- LEP26
- With Disabilities33
- Hispanic: 38% (334 out of 890 valid scores)
- Filipino: 39% (5 out of 13 valid scores)
- Black: 48% (15 out of 31 valid scores)
- White: 63% (61 out of 97 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 37% (347 out of 930 valid scores)
- English Learners: 26% (165 out of 631 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 33% (46 out of 140 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: No
Math Percent Proficient Target: 58%
Math Participation RateSchool: | 100.0% |
California: | 98.1% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black98
- White97
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 960 out of 960 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 5 out of 5 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 9 out of 9 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 13 out of 13 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Black: 98% (tested 35 out of 36 enrolled)
- White: 97% (tested 102 out of 105 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,000 out of 1,002 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 670 out of 670 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 155 out of 157 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveNellie N. Coffman Middle School: | 41.4% |
California: | 57.1% |
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic40
- Filipino54
- Black43
- White47
- SED39
- LEP34
- With Disabilities22
- Hispanic: 40% (359 out of 890 valid scores)
- Filipino: 54% (7 out of 13 valid scores)
- Black: 43% (13 out of 30 valid scores)
- White: 47% (46 out of 97 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 39% (366 out of 929 valid scores)
- English Learners: 34% (213 out of 631 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 22% (31 out of 139 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 18
Number of AYP criteria possible: 24
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 46%
ELA Participation RateHere: | 100.0% |
California: | 98.3% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 961 out of 964 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 7 out of 7 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 9 out of 9 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 39 out of 39 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 114 out of 114 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 969 out of 971 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 684 out of 687 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 132 out of 132 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveNellie N. Coffman Middle School: | 38.8% |
California: | 52.4% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic36
- Black29
- White66
- SED36
- LEP25
- With Disabilities20
- Hispanic: 36% (319 out of 890 valid scores)
- Black: 29% (11 out of 38 valid scores)
- White: 66% (66 out of 100 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 36% (322 out of 899 valid scores)
- English Learners: 25% (159 out of 650 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 20% (24 out of 120 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: No
Math Percent Proficient Target: 47.5%
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White99
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 961 out of 964 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 7 out of 7 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 9 out of 9 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 39 out of 39 enrolled)
- White: 99% (tested 113 out of 114 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 968 out of 971 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 684 out of 687 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 131 out of 132 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveNellie N. Coffman Middle School: | 37.5% |
State: | 55.6% |
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic36
- Black32
- White53
- SED36
- LEP30
- With Disabilities17
- Hispanic: 36% (317 out of 890 valid scores)
- Black: 32% (12 out of 38 valid scores)
- White: 53% (52 out of 99 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 36% (327 out of 898 valid scores)
- English Learners: 30% (197 out of 650 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 17% (20 out of 119 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 21
Number of AYP criteria possible: 25
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 35.2%
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian80
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black98
- White97
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities98
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 984 out of 985 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 80% (tested 4 out of 5 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 5 out of 5 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 13 out of 13 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Black: 98% (tested 41 out of 42 enrolled)
- White: 97% (tested 114 out of 117 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 972 out of 974 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 735 out of 735 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 98% (tested 130 out of 132 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveNellie N. Coffman Middle School: | 32.4% |
State: | 48.6% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic30
- Filipino27
- Black41
- White54
- SED29
- LEP22
- With Disabilities13
- Hispanic: 30% (261 out of 883 valid scores)
- Filipino: 27% (3 out of 11 valid scores)
- Black: 41% (13 out of 32 valid scores)
- White: 54% (54 out of 100 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 29% (247 out of 866 valid scores)
- English Learners: 22% (149 out of 679 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 13% (16 out of 120 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
Math Percent Proficient Target: 37%
Math Participation RateNellie N. Coffman Middle School: | 99.0% |
State: | 98.0% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian80
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black98
- White97
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities98
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 983 out of 986 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 80% (tested 4 out of 5 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 5 out of 5 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 13 out of 13 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Black: 98% (tested 41 out of 42 enrolled)
- White: 97% (tested 114 out of 117 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 971 out of 975 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 734 out of 736 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 98% (tested 130 out of 132 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveNellie N. Coffman Middle School: | 36.7% |
California: | 52.3% |
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic36
- Filipino36
- Black25
- White44
- SED36
- LEP31
- With Disabilities16
- Hispanic: 36% (319 out of 882 valid scores)
- Filipino: 36% (4 out of 11 valid scores)
- Black: 25% (8 out of 32 valid scores)
- White: 44% (44 out of 100 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 36% (311 out of 865 valid scores)
- English Learners: 31% (213 out of 678 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 16% (19 out of 120 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 19
Number of AYP criteria possible: 25
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 24.4%
ELA Participation RateNellie N. Coffman Middle School: | 100.0% |
State: | 97.8% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 982 out of 982 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 10 out of 10 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 34 out of 34 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 115 out of 115 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 929 out of 929 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 737 out of 737 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 153 out of 153 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveHere: | 24.9% |
California: | 46.4% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic23
- Black30
- White42
- SED22
- LEP16
- With Disabilities12
- Hispanic: 23% (212 out of 931 valid scores)
- Black: 30% (10 out of 33 valid scores)
- White: 42% (45 out of 108 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 22% (195 out of 880 valid scores)
- English Learners: 16% (115 out of 719 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 12% (18 out of 147 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
Math Percent Proficient Target: 26.5%
Math Participation RateNellie N. Coffman Middle School: | 100.0% |
State: | 97.9% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 982 out of 982 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 10 out of 10 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 34 out of 34 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 115 out of 115 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 929 out of 929 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 737 out of 737 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 153 out of 153 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or Above
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic27
- Black24
- White37
- SED27
- LEP23
- With Disabilities16
- Hispanic: 27% (255 out of 931 valid scores)
- Black: 24% (8 out of 33 valid scores)
- White: 37% (40 out of 108 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 27% (235 out of 880 valid scores)
- English Learners: 23% (164 out of 719 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 16% (23 out of 147 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 21
Number of AYP criteria possible: 25
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 24.4%
ELA Participation RateNellie N. Coffman Middle School: | 100.0% |
California: | 97.3% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 982 out of 982 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 8 out of 8 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 35 out of 35 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 159 out of 159 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 896 out of 896 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 738 out of 738 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 127 out of 127 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveHere: | 25.7% |
California: | 45.9% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic23
- Black34
- White43
- SED22
- LEP16
- With Disabilities12
- Hispanic: 23% (209 out of 919 valid scores)
- Black: 34% (11 out of 32 valid scores)
- White: 43% (64 out of 149 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 22% (183 out of 837 valid scores)
- English Learners: 16% (113 out of 717 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 12% (14 out of 120 valid scores)
Math met overall: Yes
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
Math Percent Proficient Target: 26.5%
Math Participation RateNellie N. Coffman Middle School: | 100.0% |
State: | 97.5% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White99
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 981 out of 982 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 8 out of 8 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 35 out of 35 enrolled)
- White: 99% (tested 158 out of 159 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 894 out of 896 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 737 out of 738 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 127 out of 127 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveNellie N. Coffman Middle School: | 25.0% |
State: | 49.9% |
Math Proficient or Above
- Black28
- White32
- SED24
- LEP19
- With Disabilities16
- Black: 28% (9 out of 32 valid scores)
- White: 32% (48 out of 148 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 24% (198 out of 835 valid scores)
- English Learners: 19% (139 out of 716 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 16% (19 out of 120 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 17
Number of AYP criteria possible: 25
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 24.4%
ELA Participation RateNellie N. Coffman Middle School: | 100.0% |
California: | 99.3% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic99
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 99% (tested 950 out of 955 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 7 out of 7 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 10 out of 10 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 40 out of 40 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 169 out of 169 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 875 out of 879 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 702 out of 704 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 120 out of 121 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveNellie N. Coffman Middle School: | 24.7% |
State: | 44.5% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic21
- Black29
- White43
- SED19
- LEP16
- With Disabilities6
- Hispanic: 21% (182 out of 860 valid scores)
- Black: 29% (10 out of 34 valid scores)
- White: 43% (68 out of 159 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 19% (155 out of 803 valid scores)
- English Learners: 16% (108 out of 666 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 6% (7 out of 109 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: No
Math Percent Proficient Target: 26.5%
Math Participation RateNellie N. Coffman Middle School: | 100.0% |
State: | 99.2% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 955 out of 956 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 7 out of 7 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 10 out of 10 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 40 out of 40 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 169 out of 169 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 880 out of 880 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 704 out of 704 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 121 out of 121 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveNellie N. Coffman Middle School: | 17.6% |
California: | 49.3% |
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic15
- Black15
- White30
- SED15
- LEP12
- With Disabilities5
- Hispanic: 15% (132 out of 864 valid scores)
- Black: 15% (5 out of 34 valid scores)
- White: 30% (48 out of 159 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 15% (120 out of 807 valid scores)
- English Learners: 12% (78 out of 667 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 5% (5 out of 110 valid scores)
Health & Safety
Offenses:
(State average from 5,445 schools)
An incident refers to a specific criminal act involving one or more victims and offenders. For example, if two students are robbed without a weapon, at the same time and place, this is classified as two robbery victimizations but only one robbery without a weapon incident
A weapon is any instrument or object used with the intent to threaten, injure, or kill. This includes look-alikes if they are used to threaten others.
Physical attack or fight refers to an actual and intentional touching or striking of another person against his/her will, or the intentional causing of bodily harm to an individual. Physical attack or fight does not include rape.
A threat refers to an act where there was no physical contact between the offender and victim but the victim felt that physical harm could have occurred based on verbal or nonverbal communication by the offender. This includes nonverbal threats (e.g., brandishing a weapon), and verbal threats of physical harm which are made in person. Threats made over the telephone or threatening letters are excluded.
At least one incident at this school that involved a shooting: No
Any of this school's students, faculty, or staff died as a result of a homicide committed at this school: No
Incidents of physical attack or fight without a weapon: 3
Incidents of threats of physical attack without a weapon: 62
Total incidents per 1,000 studentsSchool: | 59.4 |
California: | 60.8 |
Harassment & Bullying:
(State average from 2,337 schools)
An allegation is a claim or assertion that someone has done something wrong or illegal, typically made without proof.
Harassment or bullying on the basis of sex includes sexual harassment or bullying and gender-based harassment or bullying. Sexual harassment or bullying is unwelcome conduct of a sexual nature, such as unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal, nonverbal, or physical conduct of a sexual nature. Gender-based harassment or bullying is nonsexual intimidation or abusive behavior toward a student based on the student's actual or perceived sex, including harassment based on gender identity, gender expression, and nonconformity with gender stereotypes. Harassing conduct may take many forms, including verbal acts and name-calling, as well as non-verbal behavior, such as graphic and written statements, or conduct that is physically threatening, harmful or humiliating. The conduct can be carried out by school employees, other students, and non-employee third parties. Both male and female students can be victims of harassment or bullying on the basis of sex, and the harasser or bully and the victim can be of the same sex. Bullying on the basis of sex constitutes sexual harassment.
Allegations of harassment or bullying on the basis of sex: 7
Allegations of harassment or bullying on the basis of sex per 1,000 studentsNellie N. Coffman Middle School: | 6.4 |
California: | 6.8 |
Students reported as harassed or bullied on the basis of sex: 2 (all male)
Students disciplined for bullying or harassment on the basis of sex
- Hispanic5
- Multirace2
- LEP2
- IDEA2
Students disciplined for bullying or harassment on the basis of sex: 7 (all male)
- Hispanic: 5
- Two or More Races: 2
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2
Allegations of harassment or bullying on the basis of sex: 3
Allegations of harassment or bullying on the basis of sex per 1,000 studentsNellie N. Coffman Middle School: | 2.7 |
California: | 7.8 |
Students disciplined for bullying or harassment on the basis of sex: 4 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2
Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
(State average from 8,737 schools)
A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.
Chronic Student Absenteeism
- Hispanic184
- American Indian2
- Asian2
- Black4
- White22
- LEP67
- IDEA28
- 5044
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 214 (male: 110, female: 104)
- Hispanic: 184 (male: 95, female: 89)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 2 (all female)
- Asian: 2 (all male)
- Black: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- White: 22 (male: 11, female: 11)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 67 (male: 35, female: 32)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 28 (male: 20, female: 8)
- Section 504: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 studentsNellie N. Coffman Middle School: | 195.4 |
State: | 172.7 |
Chronic Student Absenteeism
- Hispanic187
- Asian4
- Black10
- White25
- Multirace4
- LEP70
- IDEA31
- 5044
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 230 (male: 124, female: 106)
- Hispanic: 187 (male: 101, female: 86)
- Asian: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Black: 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
- White: 25 (male: 14, female: 11)
- Two or More Races: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 70 (male: 38, female: 32)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 31 (male: 23, female: 8)
- Section 504: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 studentsNellie N. Coffman Middle School: | 210.0 |
California: | 178.2 |
Suspensions:
(State average from 1,406 schools)
Out-of-school suspension - For students with disabilities served under IDEA : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his/her regular school for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes to another setting (e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include both removals in which no individualized family service plan(IFSP) or individualized education plan(IEP) services are provided because the removal is 10 days or less as well as removals in which the child continues to receive services according to his/her IFSP or IEP.
- For students without disabilities and students with disabilities served solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his / her regular school for at least half a day(but less than the remainder of the school year) for disciplinary purposes to another setting(e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include removals in which no educational services are provided, and removals in which educational services are provided(e.g., school-provided at home instruction or tutoring).
In-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his or her regular classroom(s) for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes, but remains under the direct supervision of school personnel. Direct supervision means school personnel are physically in the same location as students under their supervision. School days missed due to out-of-school suspension
- Hispanic585
- Black28
- White49
- Multirace4
- LEP244
- IDEA136
- 5044
School days missed due to out-of-school suspension: 666 (male: 389, female: 277)
- Hispanic: 585 (male: 343, female: 242)
- Black: 28 (all male)
- White: 49 (male: 14, female: 35)
- Two or More Races: 4 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 244 (male: 141, female: 103)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 136 (male: 113, female: 23)
- Section 504: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
Instances of out-of-school suspension (Students without disabilities): 185
Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Students without disabilities)Here: | 168.9 |
California: | 84.8 |
Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension
- Hispanic124
- Asian2
- Black8
- White10
- Multirace4
- LEP46
Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 148 (male: 103, female: 45)
- Hispanic: 124 (male: 86, female: 38)
- Asian: 2 (all male)
- Black: 8 (all male)
- White: 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
- Two or More Races: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 46 (male: 32, female: 14)
Students without disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension
- Hispanic58
- Black2
- White4
- LEP16
Students without disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 64 (male: 30, female: 34)
- Hispanic: 58 (male: 26, female: 32)
- Black: 2 (all male)
- White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 16 (male: 5, female: 11)
Students without disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension
- Hispanic40
- Black2
- White4
- Multirace2
- LEP19
Students without disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension: 48 (male: 29, female: 19)
- Hispanic: 40 (male: 23, female: 17)
- Black: 2 (all male)
- White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Two or More Races: 2 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 19 (male: 11, female: 8)
Instances of out-of-school suspension (Students with disabilities): 62
Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Students with disabilities)
Instances of out-of-school suspension (Section 504 only): 3
Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Section 504 only)Nellie N. Coffman Middle School: | 2.7 |
State: | 3.4 |
Students with disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension
- Hispanic5
- Black2
- LEP2
- 5042
Students with disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 7 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2
- Section 504: 2
Students with disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension
- Hispanic10
- White2
- LEP7
- 5044
Students with disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 12 (male: 10, female: 2)
- Hispanic: 10 (male: 8, female: 2)
- White: 2 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
- Section 504: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
Students with disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension
- Hispanic10
- Black2
- White2
- LEP7
Students with disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension: 14 (male: 12, female: 2)
- Hispanic: 10 (male: 8, female: 2)
- Black: 2 (all male)
- White: 2 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension
- Hispanic103
- Asian2
- Black2
- White7
- LEP34
Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 114 (male: 80, female: 34)
- Hispanic: 103 (male: 71, female: 32)
- Asian: 2 (all male)
- Black: 2 (all male)
- White: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 34 (male: 23, female: 11)
Students without disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension
- Hispanic73
- Native Hawaiian2
- Black4
- White10
- LEP25
Students without disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 89 (male: 59, female: 30)
- Hispanic: 73 (male: 50, female: 23)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 2 (all male)
- Black: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- White: 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 25 (male: 14, female: 11)
Students without disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension
- Hispanic40
- Asian2
- Black2
- White7
- LEP16
Students without disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension: 51 (male: 30, female: 21)
- Hispanic: 40 (male: 23, female: 17)
- Asian: 2 (all female)
- Black: 2 (all male)
- White: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 16 (male: 8, female: 8)
Students with disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension
- Hispanic16
- Black2
- White2
- LEP13
- 5042
Students with disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 20 (male: 18, female: 2)
- Hispanic: 16 (male: 14, female: 2)
- Black: 2 (all male)
- White: 2 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 13 (male: 11, female: 2)
- Section 504: 2 (all male)
Students with disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
- Hispanic: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all female)
Students with disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension
- Hispanic14
- Black4
- White2
- LEP11
- 5042
Students with disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension: 20 (male: 18, female: 2)
- Hispanic: 14 (all male)
- Black: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- White: 2 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 11 (all male)
- Section 504: 2 (all male)
Expulsions:
(State average from 1,805 schools)
Expulsion with educational services refers to an action taken by the local educational agency of removing a child from his/her regular school for disciplinary purposes, and providing educational services to the child (e.g., school-provided at home instruction or tutoring; transfer to an alternative school) for the remainder of the school year (or longer) in accordance with local educational agency policy. Expulsion with educational services also includes removals resulting from violations of the Gun Free Schools Act that are modified to less than 365 days.
Expulsion without educational services refers to an action taken by the local educational agency of removing a child from his/her regular school for disciplinary purposes, and not providing educational services to the child for the remainder of the school year or longer in accordance with local educational agency policy. Expulsion without services also includes removals resulting from violations of the Gun Free Schools Act that are modified to less than 365 days.
Students without Disabilities who received an expulsion with educational services
- Hispanic13
- Black2
- White2
- LEP4
Students without Disabilities who received an expulsion with educational services: 17 (male: 10, female: 7)
- Hispanic: 13 (male: 8, female: 5)
- Black: 2 (all male)
- White: 2 (all female)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
Students without Disabilities who received an expulsion with educational services per 1,000 students
Students with Disabilities who received an expulsion with educational services: 2 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2
Students with Disabilities who received an expulsion with educational services per 1,000 studentsNellie N. Coffman Middle School: | 1.8 |
California: | 4.5 |
Students without Disabilities who received an expulsion without educational services: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
- Hispanic: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
Students without Disabilities who received an expulsion without educational services per 1,000 studentsNellie N. Coffman Middle School: | 6.4 |
State: | 6.0 |
Classes & Courses
Algebra I:
(State average from 1,382 schools)
Algebra I is a (college-preparatory) course that includes the study of properties and operations of the real number system; evaluating rational algebraic expressions; solving and graphing first degree equations and inequalities; translating word problems into equations; operations with and factoring of polynomials; and solving simple quadratic equations. Algebra I is a foundation course leading to higher-level mathematics courses, including Geometry and Algebra II.
8th grade student enrollment in Algebra I: 6 (male: 2, female: 4)
- Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- White: 2 (all female)
Percent of 8th grade students who passed
Number of Algebra I classes: 3
7-8th grade student enrollment in Algebra I
- Hispanic94
- Asian4
- Black4
- White7
- LEP2
- IDEA2
7-8th grade student enrollment in Algebra I: 109 (male: 53, female: 56)
- Hispanic: 94 (male: 47, female: 47)
- Asian: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Black: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- White: 7 (male: 2, female: 5)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all male)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all male)
7-8th grade studenst who passed Algebra I: 105 (male: 49, female: 56)
- Hispanic: 98 (male: 49, female: 49)
- White: 7 (all female)
Percent of 7-8th grade students who passedNellie N. Coffman Middle School: | 96.3% |
State: | 83.6% |
Number of Algebra I classes: 3
Comments
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: