Oak Grove Academy School in Riviera Beach, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 0.

3661 N INTERSTATE PARK RD
Riviera Beach, FL 33404

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Alexander W Dreyfoos Junior Of The Arts School (5.2 miles):

98
Jupiter High School (7.5 miles):

65
Seminole Ridge Community High School (13.5 miles):

57
Palm Beach Maritime Academy School (9.3 miles):

47
Watson B. Duncan Middle School (5.0 miles):

36
Royal Palm Beach High School (8.7 miles):

25
Santaluces Community High School (13.6 miles):

16
Oak Grove Academy School:

0
Palm Beach Juvenile Correctional Facility School (9.0 miles):

0
Oak Grove Academy School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Palm Beach County:

45
Riviera Beach:

32
Oak Grove Academy School:

0

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (561) 832-1353 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 50
School number: 842
School type: Senior High
District Name: PALM BEACH
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 12
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (561) 832-4797
Principal: Dick Reed
The function/setting of the school: Alternative to Expulsion
The main educational program offered at the school: Alternative Education

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

28%
State average from 133 schools:

66%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

59%
State average from 133 schools:

72%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

80%
State average from 133 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

20%
State average from 133 schools:

47%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

44%
State average from 133 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
Here:

72%
State average from 132 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

47%
State average from 133 schools:

57%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

68%
State average from 133 schools:

66%
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

428
State average from 133 schools:

522
Percent Tested
Here:

97%
State average from 132 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: NO

Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Reading: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: Pending

Grade in 2009: D

Grade in 2008: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

72%
State average from 137 schools:

57%
Minority Rate
Here:

88%
State average from 137 schools:

53%
Region: 3

Title I: NO


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 100 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 97 (94%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 25
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
OAK GROVE ACADEMY:

13%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

24%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 81 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 78 (94%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 24

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

12%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

25%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 89 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 86 (94%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 24

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

9%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

21%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

28%
State average from 141 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

60%
State average from 133 schools:

72%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

74%
State average from 139 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

26%
State average from 133 schools:

47%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

45%
State average from 133 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
Here:

71%
State average from 136 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

45%
State average from 133 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

62%
State average from 133 schools:

67%
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

411
State average from 133 schools:

540
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 134 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: NO

Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Reading: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: D

Grade in 2008: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

68%
State average from 132 schools:

53%
Minority Rate
Here:

88%
State average from 139 schools:

52%
Region: 3


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 102 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 100 (93%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

82%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 28
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

19%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 54
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 47

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
OAK GROVE ACADEMY:

25%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 53
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 44
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 67 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 64 (94%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

15%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

13%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 22
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 82 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 81 (94%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 24

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

17%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 43

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

21%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 40
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
Percent Tested
Here:

76%
State average from 124 schools:

99%
Grade in 2008: I

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
OAK GROVE ACADEMY:

75%
State average from 126 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

89%
State average from 125 schools:

52%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 145 (74%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 150 (76%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 42

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
OAK GROVE ACADEMY:

8%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 84
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 81

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

10%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 89
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 85
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: I
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: I
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 96 (76%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 99 (78%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 33

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

9%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 64
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 61

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

10%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 70
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 66
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: I
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 31 (70%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 31 (70%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: I
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: I
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: I
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 114 (75%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 116 (77%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 35

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

7%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 69
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 66

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

8%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 73
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 70
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: I
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: I
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 32 (73%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 32 (73%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: I
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16 (91%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15 (90%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

13%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

7%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1425
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

244
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

65%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

16%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
OAK GROVE ACADEMY:

11%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

8%
State average:

23%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

19%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
OAK GROVE ACADEMY:

11
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
OAK GROVE ACADEMY:

1580
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

246
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

71%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

19%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

10%
State average:

33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

10%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

2
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

10
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1546
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

243
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

84%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

8%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

8%
State average:

26%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

8%
State average:

45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
OAK GROVE ACADEMY:

7
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
OAK GROVE ACADEMY:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1788
State average:

1938
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

274
State average:

302
Percent Passing
Here:

31%
State average:

56%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

69%
State average:

35%
% in each Achievement Level 2
OAK GROVE ACADEMY:

8%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

8%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

15%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

23%
State average:

37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

13
State average:

15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

5
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

204
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

91%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

9%
State average:

31%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

4
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

3
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

4
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

3
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
OAK GROVE ACADEMY:

254
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

60%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

40%
State average:

33%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

5
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

4
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

5
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1563
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

250
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

56%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

28%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

17%
State average:

31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

17%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
OAK GROVE ACADEMY:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1694
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

269
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

55%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

36%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

10%
State average:

38%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

10%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
OAK GROVE ACADEMY:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
OAK GROVE ACADEMY:

3
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1771
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

257
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

56%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

17%
State average:

22%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

28%
State average:

31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

28%
State average:

61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

2
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

2
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1920
State average:

1995
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

308
State average:

326
Percent Passing
Here:

75%
State average:

80%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

8%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

50%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

42%
State average:

28%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

42%
State average:

69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1338
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

244
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 77%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1553
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

268
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 17%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1662
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

263
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 23%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1721
State average:

1907
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

275
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 62%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 19%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
OAK GROVE ACADEMY:

1695
State average:

1921
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

257
State average:

299
Percent Passing: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 71%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 14%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

231
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 74%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 11%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
OAK GROVE ACADEMY:

1389
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
OAK GROVE ACADEMY:

244
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 85%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1612
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

262
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 14%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1742
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

281
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 26%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1829
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
OAK GROVE ACADEMY:

274
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1872
State average:

1972
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

296
State average:

321
Percent Passing: 54%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 29
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 41%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 7%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 69%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 16
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

3
State average from 27 schools:

59
Unscore - Combined: 6
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 38%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1364
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

249
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 65%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1523
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

263
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1604
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

251
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 2%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1635
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
OAK GROVE ACADEMY:

259
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 82%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 4%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1580
State average:

1935
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

236
State average:

302
Percent Passing: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 78%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 4%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

210
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 87%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 2%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1378
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

241
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 65%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1639
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

269
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 19%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1698
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

270
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 58%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 12%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1795
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

264
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 17%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1799
State average:

1984
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

278
State average:

323
Percent Passing: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 26%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
OAK GROVE ACADEMY:

16
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
Here:

625
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
Here:

22
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

8
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

9
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

5
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

27
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
Here:

643
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
Here:

32
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
OAK GROVE ACADEMY:

6
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
OAK GROVE ACADEMY:

11
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
OAK GROVE ACADEMY:

7
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

5
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
OAK GROVE ACADEMY:

47
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
Here:

641
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
Here:

22
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

8
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
OAK GROVE ACADEMY:

8
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

5
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

9
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

5
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

29
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
Here:

647
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
Here:

19
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

8
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

6
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
Here:

8
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

4
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

9
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

5
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

3
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

21
State average:

237
Mean Scale Score
Here:

675
State average from 2096 schools:

709
Median NPR
Here:

33
State average:

65
Literary (max 18)
OAK GROVE ACADEMY:

12
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

12
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 47
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

225
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 66%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 4%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 7
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 30%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 64%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 22
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

246
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 18%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 18%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 6
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
OAK GROVE ACADEMY:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 36%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 41%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 77%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 3

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 3

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 3

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 3

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 2
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Riviera Beach, FL
  5. Oak Grove Academy School in Riviera Beach, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.