Osceola Middle School in Seminole, Florida (FL) - Test Results, Rating, Ranking, Grades, Scores, Classes, Enrollment, Teachers, Students, and Report Card

City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 66.

9301 98TH ST N
Seminole, FL 33777

Show street view No street view available for this location

Other nearby schools ratings:

Hospital/Homebound School (7.1 miles):	90
Coachman Fundamental Middle School (8.3 miles):	74
Osceola Middle School:	66
Davidsen Middle School (17.4 miles):	59
Largo Middle School (3.6 miles):	48
Ese Countywide School (3.0 miles):	40
Hamilton Disston School (8.0 miles):	29
Riviera Middle School (9.1 miles):	15
Pace Center For Girls School (4.1 miles):	0

Osceola Middle School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:

Florida:	45
Pinellas County:	51
Seminole:	58
Osceola Middle School:	66

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum

Phone: (727) 547-7689 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 52
School number: 3041
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: PINELLAS
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 8
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (727) 547-7667
Principal: Susan A Arsenault
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 10
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 51
Senate District: 13
School Web Address: http://www.osceola-ms.pinellas.k12.fl.us

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	71%
State average from 613 schools:	71%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	70%
State average from 612 schools:	73%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	93%
State average from 613 schools:	88%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	36%
State average from 612 schools:	51%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	64%
State average from 613 schools:	64%

Making Math Gains

Here:	69%
State average from 612 schools:	70%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	59%
State average from 613 schools:	62%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	68%
State average from 613 schools:	68%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	530
State average from 613 schools:	545

Percent Tested

Here:	99%
State average from 613 schools:	100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 119999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	53%
State average from 614 schools:	56%

Minority Rate

Here:	23%
State average from 614 schools:	49%

Region: 4

Title I: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1230 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1230 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 435
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	68%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1184
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1147

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	68%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1183
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1146
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 954 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 954 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 338
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	69%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 915
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 887

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	69%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 914
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 885
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 57 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 57 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 117 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 117 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 38
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	64%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 116
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 114

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	56%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 116
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 114
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 40 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 40 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 37
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 37
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 653 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 653 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 223
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	62%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 621
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 602

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	60%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 620
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 600
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 139 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 139 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	88%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 51
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	40%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 129
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 118

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	43%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 128
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 117
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	73%
State average from 613 schools:	70%

Meeting High Standards in Math

OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	71%
State average from 613 schools:	71%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	95%
State average from 613 schools:	92%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	48%
State average from 613 schools:	49%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	69%
State average from 613 schools:	66%

Making Math Gains

Here:	73%
State average from 613 schools:	69%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	77%
State average from 613 schools:	68%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	68%
State average from 613 schools:	67%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	574
State average from 613 schools:	553

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 613 schools:	100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	46%
State average from 613 schools:	52%

Minority Rate

Here:	25%
State average from 613 schools:	48%

Region: 4

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1148 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1148 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 386
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	68%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1120
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1078

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	67%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1119
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1077
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 861 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 861 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 300
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	71%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 844
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 811

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	69%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 843
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 810
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 66 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 66 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 60
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 57
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 60
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 57
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 114 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 114 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 32
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	63%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 112
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 107

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	59%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 112
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 107
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 44 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 44 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 43
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 43
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 524 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 524 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 174
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	62%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 508
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 492

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	60%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 507
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 490
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 155 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 155 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	92%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 62
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	40%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 151
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 138

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	40%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 151
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 138
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	70%
State average from 603 schools:	69%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	75%
State average from 603 schools:	70%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	97%
State average from 603 schools:	88%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	46%
State average from 602 schools:	46%

Making Reading Gains

OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	66%
State average from 602 schools:	65%

Making Math Gains

Here:	76%
State average from 602 schools:	71%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	65%
State average from 602 schools:	64%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	71%
State average from 602 schools:	69%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	566
State average from 602 schools:	543

Percent Tested

Here:	99%
State average from 604 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	42%
State average from 605 schools:	49%

Minority Rate

Here:	22%
State average from 605 schools:	48%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1147 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1144 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 352
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	66%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1103
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1079

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	70%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1101
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1074
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 893 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 890 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 282
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	67%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 867
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 847

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	71%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 865
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 843
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 65 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 65 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 53
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 52
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 53
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 52
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 96 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 96 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 29
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 92
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 92
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 92
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 92
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 41 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 41 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 39
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 39
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 478 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 477 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 132
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	60%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 448
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 442

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	61%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 446
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 437
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 149 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 148 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 31
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	31%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 131
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 123

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	30%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 130
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 120
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	89%
State average from 539 schools:	64%

Meeting High Standards in Math

OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	80%
State average from 539 schools:	64%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	93%
State average from 539 schools:	91%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	68%
State average from 538 schools:	44%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	78%
State average from 539 schools:	61%

Making Reading Gains - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Included

Making Math Gains

Here:	71%
State average from 539 schools:	69%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	69%
State average from 539 schools:	64%

% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Included

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	71%
State average from 539 schools:	67%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns

Here:	619
State average from 539 schools:	523

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 539 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	36%
State average from 541 schools:	49%

Minority Rate

Here:	19%
State average from 542 schools:	53%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 357 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 356 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	99%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 75
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	82%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 346
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	73%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 344
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 294 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 294 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	98%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 61
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	86%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 285
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	75%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 284
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 22
Number of Students Tested in Math: 22
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 130 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 129 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 24

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	75%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 123
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	65%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 122
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 75 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 75 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	65%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 75
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	53%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 74
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	90%
State average from 526 schools:	64%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	79%
State average from 526 schools:	63%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	97%
State average from 526 schools:	89%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	70%
State average from 526 schools:	66%

Making Math Gains

OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	72%
State average from 526 schools:	71%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	75%
State average from 526 schools:	72%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns

Here:	483
State average from 526 schools:	425

Percent Tested

OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	100%
State average from 526 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	40%
State average from 525 schools:	50%

Minority Rate

Here:	19%
State average from 526 schools:	52%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 382 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 382 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	98%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 84
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	82%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 364
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	72%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 364
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 320 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 320 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	97%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 71

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	84%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 306
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	74%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 306
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 146 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 146 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	94%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 35

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	76%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 136
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	64%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 136
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 83 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 83 (99%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 12

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	54%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 76
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	46%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 76
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	87%
State average from 505 schools:	59%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	81%
State average from 505 schools:	60%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	90%
State average from 506 schools:	83%

Making Reading Gains

OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	73%
State average from 505 schools:	61%

Making Math Gains

Here:	73%
State average from 505 schools:	69%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	60%
State average from 505 schools:	66%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns

Here:	464
State average from 506 schools:	397

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 506 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	41%
State average from 506 schools:	51%

Minority Rate

Here:	18%
State average from 506 schools:	50%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1204
State average:	1402

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	284
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	26%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	26%
State average:	11%

% in each Achievement Level 3

OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	29%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	17%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 5

OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	2%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	48%
State average:	74%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	14
State average:	17

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	3
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1285
State average:	1604

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	269
State average:	324

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	47%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	21%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	24%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 4

OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	9%
State average:	29%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	32%
State average:	72%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	15
State average:	19

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	6
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	2
State average:	2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1420
State average:	1659

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	269
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	43%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	18%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	25%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	11%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	3%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	39%
State average:	70%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	3
State average:	3

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	12
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	9
State average:	10

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	1
State average:	2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1744
State average:	1716

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	317
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	11%
State average:	19%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	16%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	44%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	23%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 5

OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	6%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	73%
State average:	65%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	14
State average:	14

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1856
State average:	1810

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	326
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	10%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	18%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	37%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	26%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	9%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	72%
State average:	65%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	17
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	1915
State average:	1876

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	316
State average:	308

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	11%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	31%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	39%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	15%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	3%
State average:	3%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	57%
State average:	52%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	4
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	17
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	7
State average:	6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	279
State average:	321

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	43%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	37%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	18%
State average:	36%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	2%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	20%
State average:	51%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	8
State average:	9

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	6
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	7
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	7
State average:	9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	308
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	20%
State average:	27%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	46%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	28%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	5%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	2%
State average:	2%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	35%
State average:	41%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	9
State average:	9

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	8
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	7
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1307
State average:	1481

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	301
State average:	339

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	17%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	28%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	35%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 4

OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	16%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	4%
State average:	16%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	55%
State average:	79%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	6
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	4
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	4
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1318
State average:	1585

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	269
State average:	330

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	39%
State average:	10%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	26%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	29%
State average:	36%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	4%
State average:	26%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	1%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	34%
State average:	74%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	5
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	3
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	3
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	3
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1545
State average:	1674

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	307
State average:	334

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	27%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 2

OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	31%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	30%
State average:	27%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	10%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	2%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	42%
State average:	63%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	6
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	6
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	5
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1709
State average:	1696

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	318
State average:	315

% in each Achievement Level 1

OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	20%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	22%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	35%
State average:	29%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	18%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	5%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	58%
State average:	55%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	4
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	6
State average:	6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1833
State average:	1786

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	317
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	16%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	19%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	38%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	22%
State average:	19%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	6%
State average:	7%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	65%
State average:	57%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	4
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	6
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1926
State average:	1892

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	328
State average:	320

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	6%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	20%
State average:	21%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	48%
State average:	38%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	17%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	9%
State average:	10%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	74%
State average:	64%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	6
State average:	5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1140
State average:	1402

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	274
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1359
State average:	1605

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	282
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 01%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 04
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 08
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 02

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1434
State average:	1656

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	272
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1742
State average:	1707

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	317
State average:	310

% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1834
State average:	1800

Mean Scale Score 100-500

OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	322
State average:	315

% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1917
State average:	1864

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	317
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	277
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 25%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	309
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1254
State average:	1476

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	290
State average:	338

% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1414
State average:	1578

Mean Scale Score 100-500

OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	290
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1533
State average:	1675

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	304
State average:	334

% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1731
State average:	1679

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	323
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	1842
State average:	1799

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	319
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	1939
State average:	1876

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	331
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 100

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	4
State average from 27 schools:	59

Unscore - Combined: 3
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 46%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 70%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 383

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	4
State average from 27 schools:	59

Unscore - Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 9%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 92%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1208
State average:	1396

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	285
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1353
State average:	1582

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	281
State average:	320

% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1434
State average:	1627

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	271
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1714
State average:	1696

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	312
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1818
State average:	1775

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	319
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1930
State average:	1857

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	319
State average:	304

% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	286
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 27%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	307
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1273
State average:	1461

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	294
State average:	335

% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1360
State average:	1563

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	278
State average:	325

% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 34%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1533
State average:	1668

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	304
State average:	333

% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1698
State average:	1670

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	316
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1849
State average:	1801

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	321
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	1957
State average:	1882

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	336
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	97
State average:	103

Mean Scale Score

Here:	617
State average from 3241 schools:	633

Median NPR

OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	47
State average:	61

Literary (max 18)

Here:	11
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	11
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	13
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	8
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	6
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	92
State average:	97

Mean Scale Score

Here:	632
State average from 3233 schools:	653

Median NPR

Here:	51
State average:	69

Literary (max 18)

OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	12
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

Here:	11
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	10

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	13
State average:	15

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	7
State average:	8

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	6
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Number of Students

OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	113
State average:	101

Mean Scale Score

Here:	649
State average from 3309 schools:	667

Median NPR

Here:	56
State average:	71

Literary (max 18)

Here:	11
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	11
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	13
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	5
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	384
State average:	190

Mean Scale Score

OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	677
State average from 2604 schools:	671

Median NPR

OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	68
State average:	63

Literary (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	8

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	15
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	385
State average:	201

Mean Scale Score

Here:	689
State average from 2487 schools:	682

Median NPR

OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	73
State average:	66

Literary (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	12

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	15
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	359
State average:	192

Mean Scale Score

Here:	696
State average from 2497 schools:	687

Median NPR

Here:	72
State average:	63

Literary (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	12

Informational (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	7

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	15
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	10
State average:	10

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	8
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 86

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	270
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 48%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 43%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 74%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 360

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	316
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 61%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	5
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 11%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 95%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	1402
State average:	1342

Mean Scale Score 100-500

OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	317
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	1722
State average from 1875 schools:	1542

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	344
State average:	313

% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1724
State average:	1546

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1475
State average:	1397

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 250

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1679
State average from 1873 schools:	1629

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	315
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1717
State average:	1632

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1663
State average:	1532

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 55

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1806
State average from 878 schools:	1661

Mean Scale Score 100-500

OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	328
State average:	302

% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1819
State average:	1663

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1670
State average:	1592

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 149

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	332
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1462
State average:	1413

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	335
State average:	324

% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1651
State average from 1874 schools:	1525

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	345
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1644
State average:	1528

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1526
State average:	1414

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 118

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1668
State average from 1872 schools:	1647

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	333
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1675
State average:	1649

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1568
State average:	1519

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 107

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1766
State average from 873 schools:	1641

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	331
State average:	302

% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1780
State average:	1645

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1673
State average:	1620

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 107

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 73

Mean Scale Score

OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	641
State average from 1891 schools:	633

Median NPR: 67
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 77

Mean Scale Score

Here:	661
State average from 1874 schools:	642

Median NPR: 76
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 96

Mean Scale Score

Here:	674
State average from 1870 schools:	667

Median NPR: 78
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 109

Mean Scale Score

Here:	684
State average from 874 schools:	671

Median NPR: 75
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 72

Mean Scale Score

OSCEOLA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	631
State average from 1891 schools:	632

Median NPR: 68
Number Sense (max 14): 11
Operations (max 11): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 77

Mean Scale Score

Here:	671
State average from 1874 schools:	652

Median NPR: 86
Number Sense (max 12): 10
Operations (max 12): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 96

Mean Scale Score

Here:	667
State average from 1870 schools:	663

Median NPR: 76
Number Sense (max 12): 9
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 109

Mean Scale Score

Here:	686
State average from 874 schools:	669

Median NPR: 76
Number Sense (max 10): 7
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 76

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	336
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 78%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 14
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 39%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 92%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 79%

City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DC	DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID
IL	IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	MD
ME	MI	MN	MO	MS	MT	NC
ND	NE	NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY
OH	OK	OR	PA	RI	SC	SD
TN	TX	UT	VA	VT	WA	WI
WV	WY

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID	IL
IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	ME	MI
MN	MO	MS	MT	NC	ND	NE
NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	SD	TN	TX
VA	VT	WA	WI	WV	WY

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID	IL
IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	ME	MI
MN	MO	MS	MT	NC	ND	NE
NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	SD	TN	TX
VA	VT	WA	WI	WV	WY

AL	AZ	CA	CO	CT	DE	FL
GA	HI	IA	ID	IL	IN	KS
LA	MA	MD	MI	MN	MO	NC
NE	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	TN	TX	UT
VA	WA	WI	WV

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DC	DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID
IL	IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	MD
ME	MI	MN	MO	MS	MT	NC
ND	NE	NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY
OH	OK	OR	PA	RI	SC	SD
TN	TX	UT	VA	VT	WA	WI
WV	WY