Parent Resource Center School in Indiantown, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 39.

15255 SW JACKSON AVE
Indiantown, FL 34956

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Clark Advanced Learning Center School (16.9 miles):

92
Adult Education-Martin Co High School (16.6 miles):

81
Ese Homebound School (18.4 miles):

67
Murray Middle School (18.3 miles):

50
Jensen Beach High School (19.5 miles):

44
Parent Resource Center School:

39
Pahokee Middle-Senior High School (18.0 miles):

37
Sandy Pines Psychiatric Center School (18.0 miles):

21
Life Skills- West School (19.0 miles):

0
Parent Resource Center School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Martin County:

58
Indiantown:

63
Parent Resource Center School:

39

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (772) 597-5054 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 43
School number: 133
School type: Combination Elementary and Secondary
District Name: MARTIN
Grade range: PREKINDERGARTEN AND GRADES 9 TO 12
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (772) 597-2865
Principal: Marshall Skinner
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 16
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 81
Senate District: 28

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Meeting High Standards in Math
PARENT RESOURCE CENTER:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

77%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

47%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

57%
Making Math Gains
Here:

69%
State average from 27 schools:

73%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

48%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

65%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
PARENT RESOURCE CENTER:

533
State average from 27 schools:

513
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 27 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: B

Grade in 2007: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
PARENT RESOURCE CENTER:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

52%
Minority Rate
Here:

37%
State average from 27 schools:

39%
Region: 4

Title I: NO


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1020 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1020 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 318
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 998
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 971

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 997
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 968
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 646 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 646 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 198
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

69%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 638
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 622

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 638
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 621
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 59 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 59 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 58
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 56
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 58
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 56
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 281 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 281 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 96
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 271
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 264

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 270
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 263
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 621 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 621 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 206
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 602
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 582

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
PARENT RESOURCE CENTER:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 601
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 579
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 64 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 64 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 59
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 57
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 59
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 57
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 173 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 173 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 49
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

31%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 169
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 165

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

27%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 169
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 164
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
PARENT RESOURCE CENTER:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

58%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

76%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

84%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

43%
Making Reading Gains
PARENT RESOURCE CENTER:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

58%
Making Math Gains
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

73%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

55%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

69%
State average from 27 schools:

66%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
PARENT RESOURCE CENTER:

570
State average from 27 schools:

518
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 27 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: B

Grade in 2007: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

48%
Minority Rate
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

39%
Region: 4


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 980 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 980 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 302
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

68%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 953
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 896

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 952
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 895
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 599 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 599 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 166
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 592
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 547

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

70%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 592
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 547
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 51 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 51 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 49
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 48
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 49
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 48
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 269 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 269 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 99
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 252
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 245

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

54%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 252
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 245
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 564 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 564 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 197
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 545
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 519

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 544
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 518
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 83 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 83 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 32
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 68
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 68
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 68
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 68
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 160 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 160 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 36

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

34%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 156
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 146

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

28%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 156
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 147
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

70%
State average from 26 schools:

60%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

64%
State average from 26 schools:

76%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

83%
State average from 26 schools:

83%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

34%
State average from 26 schools:

44%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

65%
State average from 26 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
Here:

71%
State average from 26 schools:

75%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
PARENT RESOURCE CENTER:

57%
State average from 26 schools:

53%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

68%
State average from 26 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
PARENT RESOURCE CENTER:

512
State average from 26 schools:

522
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 27 schools:

98%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: B

Grade in 2007: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

45%
Minority Rate
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

39%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 839 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 839 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 213
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
PARENT RESOURCE CENTER:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 761
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 646

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

54%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 759
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 643
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 454 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 454 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 96
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 412
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 346

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 410
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 346
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 62 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 62 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 24
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 51
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 43
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 51
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 43
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 270 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 270 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 83

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

48%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 246
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 209

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

48%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 246
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 207
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 467 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 467 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 124

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 417
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 357

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 417
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 354
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 116 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 116 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 33

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

19%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 102
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 73

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

22%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 102
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 72
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 138 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 138 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 25

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

24%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 124
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 111

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

20%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 124
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 111
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1738
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

316
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

16%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

16%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

26%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

9%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
PARENT RESOURCE CENTER:

68%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

14
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1831
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

321
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

13%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

18%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

32%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

26%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

11%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
PARENT RESOURCE CENTER:

68%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

17
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1900
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

13%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

27%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

39%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

16%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

60%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

16
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

7
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
PARENT RESOURCE CENTER:

305
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

27%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

33%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

31%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

8%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

2%
State average:

2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
PARENT RESOURCE CENTER:

40%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

9
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1724
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

322
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

21%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

20%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

30%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 4
PARENT RESOURCE CENTER:

19%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

10%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

59%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
PARENT RESOURCE CENTER:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1815
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
PARENT RESOURCE CENTER:

313
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

20%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

16%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

38%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

20%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 5
PARENT RESOURCE CENTER:

5%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

64%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
PARENT RESOURCE CENTER:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
PARENT RESOURCE CENTER:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1903
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

322
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

11%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
PARENT RESOURCE CENTER:

19%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

43%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

19%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

7%
State average:

10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

70%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
PARENT RESOURCE CENTER:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1753
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

319
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1837
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

322
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1879
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

308
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

298
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1733
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

324
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1820
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

314
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1882
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

317
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 311
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 39%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 91%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1740
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

316
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1742
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

304
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1808
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

294
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

277
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 28%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1690
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

314
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1784
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

305
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
PARENT RESOURCE CENTER:

1854
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

310
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

303
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
Here:

677
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
Here:

68
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
PARENT RESOURCE CENTER:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
PARENT RESOURCE CENTER:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

299
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
PARENT RESOURCE CENTER:

677
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
Here:

63
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

223
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
Here:

678
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
Here:

55
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
PARENT RESOURCE CENTER:

11
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
PARENT RESOURCE CENTER:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

2
State average:

273

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

5
State average:

237

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 233
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

266
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 34%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 74%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 5

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 1

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 1

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 5
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Indiantown, FL
  5. Parent Resource Center School in Indiantown, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.