Phoenix Alternative School in Yale, Michigan (MI)



315 PARK AVENUE
Yale, MI 48097

County: St. Clair
Grade span: 6 - 12

Phone: (810) 387-3231 (make sure to verify first before calling)
Show street view No street view available for this location

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Michigan forum

Enrollment in Phoenix Alternative School

2007 Student Enrollment: 26

Female Enrollment: 11
Male Enrollment: 15


6th Grade Enrollment: 1
8th Grade Enrollment: 1
9th Grade Enrollment: 1
10th Grade Enrollment: 5
11th Grade Enrollment: 6
12th Grade Enrollment: 12


9th Grade Female Enrollment: 1
10th Grade Female Enrollment: 2
11th Grade Female Enrollment: 4
12th Grade Female Enrollment: 4


6th Grade Male Enrollment: 1
8th Grade Male Enrollment: 1
10th Grade Male Enrollment: 3
11th Grade Male Enrollment: 2
12th Grade Male Enrollment: 8


White Enrollment (%): 92.3%
Here:

92.3%
State average from 3483 schools:

70.4%
Hispanic Enrollment (%): 3.9%
This school:

3.9%
State average from 3483 schools:

4.9%
Hawaiian Enrollment (%): 3.85%
Here:

3.85%
State average from 3483 schools:

0.12%


Genders in Phoenix Alternative School

Grades in Phoenix Alternative School

Races in Phoenix Alternative School



2006 Student Enrollment: 28

Female Enrollment: 12
Male Enrollment: 16


8th Grade Enrollment: 4
9th Grade Enrollment: 2
10th Grade Enrollment: 4
11th Grade Enrollment: 11
12th Grade Enrollment: 7


8th Grade Female Enrollment: 1
9th Grade Female Enrollment: 1
10th Grade Female Enrollment: 3
11th Grade Female Enrollment: 5
12th Grade Female Enrollment: 2


8th Grade Male Enrollment: 3
9th Grade Male Enrollment: 1
10th Grade Male Enrollment: 1
11th Grade Male Enrollment: 6
12th Grade Male Enrollment: 5


White Enrollment (%): 100.0%
Here:

100.0%
State average from 3572 schools:

70.3%


Genders in Phoenix Alternative School

Grades in Phoenix Alternative School



2005 Student Enrollment: 21

Female Enrollment: 8
Male Enrollment: 13


Special Education Enrollment: 21


Special Education Female Enrollment: 8


Special Education Male Enrollment: 13


White Enrollment (%): 100.0%
Here:

100.0%
State average from 3644 schools:

70.9%


Genders in Phoenix Alternative School



2004 Student Enrollment: 16

Female Enrollment: 5
Male Enrollment: 11


Special Education Enrollment: 16


Special Education Female Enrollment: 5


Special Education Male Enrollment: 11


White Enrollment (%): 100.0%
Here:

100.0%
State average from 3582 schools:

72.3%


Genders in Phoenix Alternative School



2003 Student Enrollment: 17

Female Enrollment: 4
Male Enrollment: 13


Special Education Enrollment: 17


Special Education Female Enrollment: 4


Special Education Male Enrollment: 13


White Enrollment (%): 100.0%
Here:

100.0%
State average from 3497 schools:

73.5%


Genders in Phoenix Alternative School



2002 Student Enrollment: 14

Female Enrollment: 4
Male Enrollment: 10


Special Education Enrollment: 14


Special Education Female Enrollment: 4


Special Education Male Enrollment: 10


White Enrollment (%): 92.9%
Here:

92.9%
State average from 3348 schools:

74.2%
Asian Enrollment (%): 7.1%
Here:

7.1%
State average from 3348 schools:

1.7%


Genders in Phoenix Alternative School

Races in Phoenix Alternative School



2001 Student Enrollment: 19

Female Enrollment: 5
Male Enrollment: 14


7th Grade Female Enrollment: 1
8th Grade Female Enrollment: 1
12th Grade Female Enrollment: 3


7th Grade Male Enrollment: 2
8th Grade Male Enrollment: 3
9th Grade Male Enrollment: 1
10th Grade Male Enrollment: 2
12th Grade Male Enrollment: 1


White Enrollment (%): 94.7%
This school:

94.7%
State average from 3201 schools:

76.6%
Hispanic Enrollment (%): 5.3%
Here:

5.3%
State average from 3201 schools:

3.6%


Genders in Phoenix Alternative School

Races in Phoenix Alternative School





Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Statistics:

Met Overall AYP: Yes




School Safety Practices:

Warning codes used to alert faculty of a critical incident: Yes
Tactical evacuation route for students or entry routes for emergency support teams: Yes
Off-site staging area for assembly and communication at the onset of critical incident: Yes
Emergency communication tree or plan: Yes
Facility blueprints and site plan on file with emergency support team: Yes
Control access to site during school hours (doors locked or monitored): Yes
Control access to grounds during school hours (gates locked or monitored): No
Students required to pass through metal detectors each day: No
Visitors required to pass through metal detectors: No
Campus closed for most students during lunch: Yes
Integrated home-land security in school practices into school safety plans: Yes
Random sweeps for weapons: Yes
Require clear book bags or ban book bags: Yes
Require students to wear badges or picture IDs: No
Require staff to wear badges or picture IDs: Yes
Provide staff training in risk assessment: Yes
Security cameras used to monitor the school: No
Telephones provided in most classrooms: Yes
Emergency button provided in lavatories: No
In compliance with the state law that requires that a student who brings a firearm to school be expelled for one year: Yes
In compliance with Elem. and Sec. Edu. Act (ESEA), that requires referral to juvenile delinquency system of any student who brings a firearm to school: Yes
School wide training in positive behavioral support and interventions: Yes


School Safety Plans:

Safety plan exists - Shootings: Yes
Safety plan exists - Riots: Yes
Safety plan exists - Bomb scares or comparable threats (excluding fire): Yes
Safety plan exists - Disaster planning (tornadoes, floods, chemical spill, etc.): Yes
Safety plan exists - Hostages: Yes
Safety plan exists - Lock down: Yes


School Prevention Programs:

Implemented a violence prevention curriculum: No
Practiced behavior modification/intervention with students: Yes
Provided group counseling (social work) or therapeutic activity for students: Yes
Provided peer mentoring or coaching program: No
Provided peer mediation (student court) in resolving conduct problems: No
Provided conflict resolution training to staff and students: Yes
Provided programs that promote a sense of social integration among students: Yes
Established a hot line for students to report problems: Yes
Provided training and assistance in classroom management to teachers: Yes
Revised or reviewed school wide discipline policy: Yes
Made architectural or environmental modifications to reduce crime or violence: Yes
Used a paid law enforcement or security service: Yes
Implemented a drug prevention service: No
Conducted community service projects on prevention: No
Implemented teacher/staff training on violence/drug prevention: No
Conducted public/parent awareness activities on violence/drug prevention: No
Offered after-school or before-school programs: No
Provided alternative education programs: Yes
Underwent curriculum acquisition or development: Yes
Provided services for out-of-school youth (school-age): Yes
Administered special one-time events (not included in the above mentioned programs): No
Involved organizations in administering drug and violence-prevention services via joint service delivery (including referrals): Yes
Involved organizations in administering drug and violence prevention services via teacher/staff training: No
Involved organizations in administering drug and violence prevention services via public awareness activities: Yes
Involved organizations in administering drug and violence prevention services via fund raising: No
Allowed students to participate in the design, delivery or critiquing of a drug or violence prevention program: No
Balanced and restorative justice conferencing (aka transformative conferencing): No




Attendance Statistics:

Attendance Rate (2006): 82.0%
This school:

82.0%
State average from 3668 schools:

93.6%
Attendance Rate (2005): 85.0%
This school:

85.0%
State average from 3919 schools:

92.3%
Attendance Rate (2004): 83.0%
This school:

83.0%
State average from 3863 schools:

92.4%




2006 Expulsion statistics:

Expulsions - Prohibited Substances: 1


2003 Expulsion statistics:

Expulsions - Prohibited Behaviors: 1




2002 Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Math Statistics:


Students Tested: 1

Students Scoring Below Proficient: 1


Students Scoring Below Proficient (%): 100.0%
Phoenix Alternative School:

100.0%
State average from 805 schools:

25.7%


Did Not Meet Standard: 1


Did Not Meet Standard (%): 100.0%
Phoenix Alternative School:

100.0%
State average from 805 schools:

41.1%




2002 Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Reading Statistics:


Students Tested: 1

Students Scoring Below Proficient: 1


Students Scoring Below Proficient (%): 100.0%
Here:

100.0%
State average from 804 schools:

23.1%


Did Not Meet Standard: 1


Did Not Meet Standard (%): 100.0%
Here:

100.0%
State average from 804 schools:

35.6%




2002 Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Writing Statistics:


Students Tested: 1

Students Scoring Below Proficient: 1


Students Scoring Below Proficient (%): 100.0%
Phoenix Alternative School:

100.0%
State average from 802 schools:

17.6%


Did Not Meet Standard: 1


Did Not Meet Standard (%): 100.0%
Here:

100.0%
State average from 802 schools:

41.7%




2002 Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Science Statistics:


Students Tested: 1

Students Scoring Below Proficient: 1


Students Scoring Below Proficient (%): 100.0%
Here:

100.0%
State average from 802 schools:

26.8%


Did Not Meet Standard: 1


Did Not Meet Standard (%): 100.0%
This school:

100.0%
State average from 802 schools:

47.6%




2002 Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Social Studies Statistics:


Students Tested: 1

Students Scoring Below Proficient: 1


Students Scoring Below Proficient (%): 100.0%
Here:

100.0%
State average from 801 schools:

48.3%


Did Not Meet Standard: 1


Did Not Meet Standard (%): 100.0%
Here:

100.0%
State average from 801 schools:

80.6%




2001 Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Math Statistics:


Students Tested: 4

Students Scoring Proficient: 1


Students Scoring Proficient (%): 25.0%
This school:

25.0%
State average from 701 schools:

41.4%


Met Or Exceeded Standards: 1


Met Or Exceeded Standards (%): 25.0%
Here:

25.0%
State average from 701 schools:

56.5%




2001 Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Reading Statistics:


Students Tested: 4

Students Scoring Proficient: 1


Students Scoring Proficient (%): 25.0%
Phoenix Alternative School:

25.0%
State average from 703 schools:

46.2%


Met Or Exceeded Standards: 1


Met Or Exceeded Standards (%): 25.0%
This school:

25.0%
State average from 703 schools:

61.6%




2001 Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Writing Statistics:


Students Tested: 4

Students Scoring Partially Proficient: 1


Students Scoring Partially Proficient (%): 25.0%
Here:

25.0%
State average from 700 schools:

19.2%


Did Not Meet Standard: 1


Did Not Meet Standard (%): 25.0%
This school:

25.0%
State average from 700 schools:

29.0%




2001 Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Science Statistics:


Students Tested: 4

Students Scoring Partially Proficient: 1


Students Scoring Partially Proficient (%): 25.0%
Here:

25.0%
State average from 700 schools:

20.1%


Did Not Meet Standard: 1


Did Not Meet Standard (%): 25.0%
Here:

25.0%
State average from 700 schools:

37.5%




2001 Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Social Studies Statistics:


Students Tested: 4

Students Scoring Partially Proficient: 1


Students Scoring Partially Proficient (%): 25.0%
Here:

25.0%
State average from 698 schools:

26.4%


Did Not Meet Standard: 1


Did Not Meet Standard (%): 25.0%
Here:

25.0%
State average from 698 schools:

63.7%







  1. All Cities
  2. Michigan forum
  3. Michigan
  4. Yale, MI
  5. Phoenix Alternative School in Yale, Michigan (MI)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.