Polk Modular -West School in Bartow, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 22.

1915 S FLORAL AVE
Bartow, FL 33830

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Bartow Elementary Academy School (1.1 miles):

93
Elbert Elementary School (13.5 miles):

63
Lincoln Elementary Magnet School (18.9 miles):

54
East Area Adult School (13.5 miles):

45
Elementary D School (0.0 miles):

38
James E. Stephens Elementary School (2.6 miles):

30
Crystal Lake Elementary School (11.8 miles):

24
Polk Modular -West School:

22
Polk Modular -West School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Polk County:

41
Bartow:

48
Polk Modular -West School:

22

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (863) 534-0521 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 53
School number: 1911
School type: Elementary
District Name: POLK

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

89%
State average from 963 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

88%
State average from 963 schools:

77%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

92%
State average from 963 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

80%
State average from 962 schools:

53%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

69%
State average from 963 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

67%
State average from 963 schools:

66%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

71%
State average from 963 schools:

58%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

63%
State average from 963 schools:

66%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

619
State average from 963 schools:

543
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 963 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 119999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

26%
State average from 963 schools:

58%
Minority Rate
Here:

34%
State average from 963 schools:

47%
Region: 5

Title I: NO


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 417 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 417 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 117
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

82%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 393
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 370

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

81%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 393
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 370
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 271 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 271 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 77
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 258
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 241

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 258
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 241
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 39 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 39 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 85 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 85 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 24

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

81%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 79
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 76

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 79
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 76
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 108 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 108 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 33
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 99
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 96

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 99
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 96
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 36 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 36 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 31
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 31
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 73 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 73 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 68
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 64

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 68
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 64
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

57%
State average from 959 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

63%
State average from 959 schools:

77%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

75%
State average from 959 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

16%
State average from 959 schools:

52%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

54%
State average from 959 schools:

67%
Making Math Gains
POLK MODULAR SCHOOL-WEST:

68%
State average from 959 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

43%
State average from 959 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

87%
State average from 959 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

463
State average from 959 schools:

560
Percent Tested
POLK MODULAR SCHOOL-WEST:

100%
State average from 959 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: C

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

91%
State average from 959 schools:

54%
Minority Rate
Here:

85%
State average from 959 schools:

46%
Region: 4


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 198 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 198 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 52
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 179
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 178

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 178
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 177
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 37 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 37 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 86 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 86 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 26

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 81
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 81

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 81
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 81
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 52 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 52 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

67%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 42

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 42
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 41
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 184 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 184 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 47
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 165
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 164

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

54%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 164
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 163
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 42 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 42 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

67%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 36

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 44 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 44 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

38%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 39

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

38%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 39
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

58%
State average from 954 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

57%
State average from 954 schools:

76%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

91%
State average from 954 schools:

82%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

21%
State average from 954 schools:

48%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

57%
State average from 954 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
Here:

63%
State average from 954 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

68%
State average from 954 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

78%
State average from 954 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

493
State average from 954 schools:

544
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 954 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

87%
State average from 954 schools:

51%
Minority Rate
Here:

85%
State average from 954 schools:

45%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 216 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 216 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 58
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 193
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 185

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 193
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 185
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 40 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 40 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 98 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 98 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 28

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 88
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 86

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 88
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 86
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 49 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 49 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 41

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 41
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 183 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 183 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 56
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
POLK MODULAR SCHOOL-WEST:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 166
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 161

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 166
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 161
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 43 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 43 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 36

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 36
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 44 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 44 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

31%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 42
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 40

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

31%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 42
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 40
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1431
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

322
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

11%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
POLK MODULAR SCHOOL-WEST:

11%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

37%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
POLK MODULAR SCHOOL-WEST:

34%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 5
POLK MODULAR SCHOOL-WEST:

7%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

78%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
POLK MODULAR SCHOOL-WEST:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

18
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1727
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

344
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

7%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

10%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

25%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

35%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

22%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

83%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

21
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

10
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
POLK MODULAR SCHOOL-WEST:

1688
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
POLK MODULAR SCHOOL-WEST:

317
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

11%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

11%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

40%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

26%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

13%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

79%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

16
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

11
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

338
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

15%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
POLK MODULAR SCHOOL-WEST:

17%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

47%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

13%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

8%
State average:

4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

68%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
POLK MODULAR SCHOOL-WEST:

10
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

10
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1500
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
POLK MODULAR SCHOOL-WEST:

343
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

8%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

11%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

32%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

30%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

19%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

81%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
POLK MODULAR SCHOOL-WEST:

1652
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

345
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

6%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

11%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

34%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

35%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
POLK MODULAR SCHOOL-WEST:

14%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

83%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
POLK MODULAR SCHOOL-WEST:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1750
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

350
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

9%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

17%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

24%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
POLK MODULAR SCHOOL-WEST:

35%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

16%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

75%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
POLK MODULAR SCHOOL-WEST:

8
State average:

7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1185
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

281
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1423
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

293
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 04
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 08
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 02

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1452
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

275
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

277
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 19%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
POLK MODULAR SCHOOL-WEST:

1352
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

311
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1460
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

301
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1521
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

302
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 57
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Unscore - Combined: 4
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 37%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 70%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
POLK MODULAR SCHOOL-WEST:

1215
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

286
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1391
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

287
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1459
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

276
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

273
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 17%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1326
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

306
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1411
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

290
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1553
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

309
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
POLK MODULAR SCHOOL-WEST:

74
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
POLK MODULAR SCHOOL-WEST:

616
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
Here:

46
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
POLK MODULAR SCHOOL-WEST:

12
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
POLK MODULAR SCHOOL-WEST:

8
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

66
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
Here:

636
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
Here:

55
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
POLK MODULAR SCHOOL-WEST:

12
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
POLK MODULAR SCHOOL-WEST:

9
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
POLK MODULAR SCHOOL-WEST:

13
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
POLK MODULAR SCHOOL-WEST:

7
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

74
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
Here:

650
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
Here:

57
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
POLK MODULAR SCHOOL-WEST:

11
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
POLK MODULAR SCHOOL-WEST:

12
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
POLK MODULAR SCHOOL-WEST:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

5
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 65
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

293
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 55%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 40%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 85%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Bartow, FL
  5. Polk Modular -West School in Bartow, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.