Potentials South School in Boca Raton, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 46.

701 NW 35TH ST
Boca Raton, FL 33431

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
West Boca Raton Community High Adult Education Center School (9.5 miles):

97
Coral Park Elementary School (10.5 miles):

73
Freedom Shores Elementary School (13.0 miles):

63
Margate Elementary School (11.5 miles):

51
Potentials South School:

46
Whispering Pines Elementary School (5.8 miles):

43
Crosspointe Elementary School (8.0 miles):

34
Starlight Cove Elementary School (13.8 miles):

22
Dayspring Elementary Charter School (18.4 miles):

0
Potentials South School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Palm Beach County:

45
Boca Raton:

58
Potentials South School:

46

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (561) 395-2012 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 50
School number: 641
School type: Elementary
District Name: PALM BEACH
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (561) 395-4607
Principal: Rosie Portera
Regular charter school.
The main educational program offered at the school: Special Education
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 19
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 86
Senate District: 29

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

67%
State average from 963 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

61%
State average from 963 schools:

77%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

81%
State average from 963 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

19%
State average from 962 schools:

53%
Making Reading Gains
POTENTIALS SOUTH:

63%
State average from 963 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

58%
State average from 963 schools:

66%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

57%
State average from 963 schools:

58%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

61%
State average from 963 schools:

66%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

467
State average from 963 schools:

543
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 963 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: C

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: F

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 119999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

96%
State average from 963 schools:

58%
Minority Rate
Here:

95%
State average from 963 schools:

47%
Region: 3

Title I: YES


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 107 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 107 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
POTENTIALS SOUTH:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 31
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 92
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 91

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 92
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 91
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 92 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 92 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 24

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
POTENTIALS SOUTH:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 78
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 77

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 78
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 77
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 105 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 105 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 31

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 90
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 89

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

54%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 90
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 89
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

77%
State average from 959 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

73%
State average from 959 schools:

77%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

85%
State average from 959 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

42%
State average from 959 schools:

52%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

57%
State average from 959 schools:

67%
Making Math Gains
Here:

58%
State average from 959 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

63%
State average from 959 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
POTENTIALS SOUTH:

66%
State average from 959 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

521
State average from 959 schools:

560
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 959 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: B

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
POTENTIALS SOUTH:

78%
State average from 959 schools:

54%
Minority Rate
Here:

53%
State average from 959 schools:

46%
Region: 4


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 201 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 201 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 68
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 200
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 200

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 200
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 200
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 93 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 93 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 26

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

67%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 93
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 93

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
POTENTIALS SOUTH:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 93
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 93
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 54 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 54 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

54%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 54
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 54

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 54
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 54
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 25
Number of Students Tested in Math: 25
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 165 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 165 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 56
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 164
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 164

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 164
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 164
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 30 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 30 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 37 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 37 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

16%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 37

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

30%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 37
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

73%
State average from 954 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

76%
State average from 954 schools:

76%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

77%
State average from 954 schools:

82%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

23%
State average from 954 schools:

48%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

62%
State average from 954 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
Here:

71%
State average from 954 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

74%
State average from 954 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

69%
State average from 954 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

525
State average from 954 schools:

544
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 954 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

76%
State average from 954 schools:

51%
Minority Rate
POTENTIALS SOUTH:

54%
State average from 954 schools:

45%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 211 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 211 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
POTENTIALS SOUTH:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 61
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 204
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 198

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

68%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 204
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 198
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 101 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 101 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
POTENTIALS SOUTH:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 30
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 95
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 92

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
POTENTIALS SOUTH:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 95
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 92
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 57 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 57 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 57
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 56

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
POTENTIALS SOUTH:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 57
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 56
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 22
Number of Students Tested in Math: 22
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 161 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 161 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 47
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 155
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 150

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 155
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 150
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 29
Number of Students Tested in Math: 29
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 35 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

18%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 33

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

30%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 33
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1271
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

295
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

22%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

9%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

53%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

16%
State average:

32%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

69%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

16
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1502
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

306
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

22%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

19%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

36%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

17%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

6%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
POTENTIALS SOUTH:

58%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

18
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1491
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

282
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

25%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

29%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

43%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
POTENTIALS SOUTH:

4%
State average:

28%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

46%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

2
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
POTENTIALS SOUTH:

13
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

9
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2061
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
POTENTIALS SOUTH:

338
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

8%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

25%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

36%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

18%
State average:

12%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

13%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
POTENTIALS SOUTH:

67%
State average:

45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

13
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

8
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2053
State average:

1938
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

323
State average:

302
Percent Passing
Here:

71%
State average:

56%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

20%
State average:

35%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

36%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
POTENTIALS SOUTH:

19%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

13%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

13%
State average:

12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

45%
State average:

37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

16
State average:

15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

8
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

297
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

32%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

50%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

11%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

7%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
POTENTIALS SOUTH:

18%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

9
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
POTENTIALS SOUTH:

7
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

329
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

11%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 2
POTENTIALS SOUTH:

36%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

42%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

10%
State average:

5%
% in each Achievement Level 5
POTENTIALS SOUTH:

1%
State average:

1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

53%
State average:

36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

10
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
POTENTIALS SOUTH:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

8
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1358
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

9%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

29%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

36%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

22%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
POTENTIALS SOUTH:

62%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1415
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
POTENTIALS SOUTH:

291
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

22%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

33%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
POTENTIALS SOUTH:

11%
State average:

26%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

44%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1560
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

310
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

32%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

29%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

21%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

18%
State average:

28%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
POTENTIALS SOUTH:

39%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
POTENTIALS SOUTH:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
POTENTIALS SOUTH:

2030
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

333
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

3%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
POTENTIALS SOUTH:

11%
State average:

22%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

38%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

29%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

18%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

85%
State average:

61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

8
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2055
State average:

1995
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

340
State average:

326
Percent Passing
Here:

91%
State average:

80%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

5%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

12%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

26%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

43%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 5
POTENTIALS SOUTH:

12%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

82%
State average:

69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
POTENTIALS SOUTH:

6
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
POTENTIALS SOUTH:

1351
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

308
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1519
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

309
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 03%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1546
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

291
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2051
State average:

1907
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

336
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2097
State average:

1921
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

332
State average:

299
Percent Passing: 77%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

297
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

325
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
POTENTIALS SOUTH:

1408
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

323
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1570
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

326
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1608
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

320
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2019
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

330
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2078
State average:

1972
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

346
State average:

321
Percent Passing: 92%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 9
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 68
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 44%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 84%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 482
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 8%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 85%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
POTENTIALS SOUTH:

1324
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

304
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1500
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

306
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1558
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

294
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2063
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

338
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2074
State average:

1935
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

327
State average:

302
Percent Passing: 71%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 9

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

292
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 22%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

331
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1443
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

331
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1552
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

322
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1638
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

327
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2032
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

334
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
POTENTIALS SOUTH:

2069
State average:

1984
Mean Scale Score 100-500
POTENTIALS SOUTH:

344
State average:

323
Percent Passing: 91%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

77
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
Here:

625
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
Here:

54
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
POTENTIALS SOUTH:

12
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

68
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
POTENTIALS SOUTH:

638
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
Here:

58
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

67
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
Here:

658
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
Here:

64
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
POTENTIALS SOUTH:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

524
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
POTENTIALS SOUTH:

722
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
Here:

84
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
POTENTIALS SOUTH:

15
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
POTENTIALS SOUTH:

14
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

17
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

11
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
POTENTIALS SOUTH:

7
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
POTENTIALS SOUTH:

421
State average:

237
Mean Scale Score
Here:

731
State average from 2096 schools:

709
Median NPR
POTENTIALS SOUTH:

84
State average:

65
Literary (max 18)
POTENTIALS SOUTH:

15
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
POTENTIALS SOUTH:

15
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

17
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

12
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

9
State average:

8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 64
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

281
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 11%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 48%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 42%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 73%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 447
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

325
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 67%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 6%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 84%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Boca Raton, FL
  5. Potentials South School in Boca Raton, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.